Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Politics

Sources

Reason Staff | From the March 1997 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

"Ever wonder whether Members of Congress are sensitive to the dangers of disclosing individuals' Social Security numbers? Check out Page S2546 of the Congressional Record (March 20, 1996). On that page begins a list of more than 600 persons nominated for military promotions, along with their Social Security numbers, for anyone to use and abuse."

—Privacy Journal, December 1996. Privacy Journal is a monthly newsletter featuring often ahead-of-the-curve reporting on privacy issues ranging from use of Social Security numbers to computer encryption to credit reports, including updates on the latest privacy action in Congress and the courts. Privacy Journal, P.O. Box 28577, Providence RI 02908. A year's subscription is $118.

"The Environmental Protection Agency claims that implementation of proposed revisions to its guidelines for conducting cancer risk assessments would result in risk estimates based on the best available scientific knowledge and encourage development of new, relevant science. In fact, the proposed guidelines represent a setback for public health, science, and the EPA cancer risk assessment process."

—Find out why in "EPA's Cancer Risk Guidelines: Guidance to Nowhere," by Michael Gough and Steven Milloy, Cato Institute Policy Analysis No. 263, available on the Web or from the Cato Institute, 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001, (202) 842-0200.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Soundbite: Revelations and Recovery

Reason Staff
PoliticsPolicyNanny StateCongressPrivacySocial Security
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (1)

Latest

Montana's Anti-Deepfakes Law Just Hit a First Amendment Roadblock

Reem Ibrahim | 9.18.2026 5:36 PM

The Shaky Evidence That Flock Cameras Reduce Crime Rates

Autumn Billings | 9.18.2026 4:35 PM

Lindsay Clancy's Holdout Juror Did What Jurors Are Supposed To Do

Billy Binion | 9.18.2026 4:18 PM

Court Upholds Suspicionless Cellphone Searches at the Border

Tosin Akintola | 9.18.2026 3:05 PM

In the Name of Tax Fairness, Politicians Propose Special Tax Penalties on Data Centers

Christian Britschgi | 9.18.2026 2:48 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason