24/7 Newsfeed

Put Reason 24/7 on Your Site

RSS

Follow Reason 24/7 on Twitter and via RSS

Judge Slaps Feds Over Secret Evidence for No-Fly List

A federal judge in San Francisco has indignantly rejected an attempt by the Obama administration to use secret evidence to derail a former Stanford student's challenge to her apparent inclusion on the government's no-fly list.

The government must halt its "persistent and stubborn refusal" to follow the applicable laws, said U.S. District Judge William Alsup.

Rahinah Ibrahim's name on the confidential no-fly list has barred her and one of her four children from returning to the United States for nearly eight years. She was a Stanford graduate student in January 2005 when she was first stopped at San Francisco International Airport and prevented from boarding a flight to her native Malaysia.

(H/T Sevo)

Source: San Francisco Chronicle. Read full article. (link)

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • ||

    A citizen has a right to confront his or her accuser, which includes that accuser's evidence.

    A failure to allow for such a confrontation, constitutionally at least, can result only in an acquittal. In the case of a challenge to a punishment without trial, this would necessarily result in a court order to remove the unlawful punishment.

    Violation of constitutional and statutory rights is a federal crime, which can, depending on the particulars of the crime, result in a maximum penalty of execution.

    In a very real sense, introducing secret evidence that the accused is not allowed to confront that leads to a conviction or decision against the accused is not terribly different from murdering a public official -- both are illegal, with similar maximum potential penalties.

advertisement