The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
My Thoughts On Typos In Blog Posts
Earlier today, I wrote a post about whether a minor typo in a clerkship application should disqualify the candidate. Fittingly, my post had typos. I think I've fixed them, but maybe there are others.
I thought it might be useful to give my own thoughts on proofreading. Blogging is for me a form of release. I have lots of thoughts in my head, and writing them down helps me to make sense of things. My primary audience when I write is not you (sorry) but is me. Longtime readers may recall that while clerking for Judge Boggs, I was not allowed to blog. So I made my blog private, and continued writing blog posts that no one would see. (Well, a few friends had the password, but the site was not for public consumption.) When my clerkship finished, all of the posts were made public. To be sure, some posts I write are intended to influence public discourse, but most of my blogging is introspective.
To that end, typos don't bother me. I want to make sure my writing is clear and understandable, but my goal is not perfection. Each subsequent round of review takes time that I could be using to do something else. If I were to ensure that each post was flawless, I would end up writing far less. That is not a tradeoff I find worthwhile.
There is another aspect of my writing process that may not be obvious. I often have very discrete blocks of time to write, and I do not wish the project to extend beyond that block. Maybe I have 30 minutes before class starts to pump something out. Or it is late at night, I'm getting tired, and I need to wrap up a post before I call it a night. Today, for example, I had about 30 minutes on the elliptical, in which I conceived, wrote, and published the clerkship post. (I keep my laptop on a music stand adjacent to the elliptical so I can type while working out.)
You might ask, why don't I just pause the project when the time block finishes, and resume later. I'm sure I could fix errors after some sleep. But that wait is agonizing for me. My goal is to sort through my thoughts as quickly as possible, and move onto the next topic. To leave a post unpublished would make me keep coming back to it over and over again. I doubt I would be able to fall asleep if a project was still not fully developed. Once I hit the "Publish" button I can sign off and move on to the next project.
There are a few regular readers who email me typos. I will usually fix these promptly. I promise, I will respond pleasantly. Comments about typos will not be read.
For those curious, I wrote this post in a single five-minute block, after having thought about it for the past hour or so. I proof-read it once.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
"If I were to ensure that each post was flawless, I would end up writing far less. That is not a tradeoff I find worthwhile."
If it's up for a vote...
"It's not about you, it's about me."
Okay. I thought it was to get hits from people who like to hate comment. There is a serious post, and people are like, "What's the deal, dude?"
Anyway, I have an editing app. It's helpful for glaring errors like typos. Sometimes, it flags phrasing "errors" and the like, and that is less important to me. Some I just don't think are errors, especially if I'm just being colloquial. (Yes, the apps sometimes can be regulated to match your intended tone.)
But blatant typos can be picked up easily.
Still, it isn't that important. It can be a bit embarrassing. But readers here find your ideas more so. But now that we know it is a "form of release" ... well, we will still think so.
Plus, hey, I can relate, you post a lot. Quantity over quality!
"Quantity has a quality of its own"
Every Russian general - - -
I understand. This has long been my view as well.
"My primary audience when I write is not you (sorry) but is me".
Given how incoherent and nonsensical some of your posts are this isn't the least bit surprising.
Given that the topic of 95% of his posts (including, of course, this one) is himself, it's even less surprising.
Comments about typos will not be read.
What is wrong with this sentence?
What is wrong: It is one of those sentences that convince grammar weenies to give overly broad advice about avoiding the passive voice.
Occasionally, the passive voice does what a writer wants. But in sentences like that, it only draws attention to the omitted identity of the actor. Unless this was a back-handed admission that Blackman does, in fact, occasionally read the comments on his posts.
Actually, what I had in mind was the question of how he knows what the comment is about without reading it?
I think he reads the comments. He's an extremely vain individual. I don't think he could resist, unless maybe he can't stand to read all the criticism.
He has repeatedly said that he never reads the comments, and he never reads any replies to, or quote tweets of, anything he posts on Twitter. He says if you want him to read something, you have to email him. Whether he actually doesn’t read any of the comments, well, who knows? But I think it’s likely, as all the derision would get depressing
Almost all occupations that involve writing, also involve editors who proofread and make corrections. Why should the legal profession be different? I have found that having anything I write be looked at by a knowledgeable person, usually ends up being better for it.
I suspect it's more used to involve editors who proofread. I think they use autocorrect now. Lately I see typos, and characteristic auto correct errors, even in NYT and WAPO (until I dropped my WAPO subscription). Typos, auto correct errors, and voice dictation errors are common in blog posts and comments. And who cares? These aren't doctoral feces.
I see what you did there! 🙂
>Comments about typos will not be read.
How would you know the comment is about a typo without reading it;)
I tink peple wit erors in blog pots shud be sumatily exicuted. Hanging is to good for tem.