The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
My Resignation From The Heritage Foundation
I sent this letter this evening to Dr. Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation.
12/21/2025
Dear Dr. Roberts,
It is with deep regret that I must resign my position as Senior Editor of the Heritage Guide to the Constitution. Indeed, I could not have even conceived of such an action only a few months ago when we launched the third edition of the guide. On Constitution Day, I proudly stood at the Heritage Foundation as we released this book to the world. But your actions have made my continued affiliation with Heritage untenable. First, your comments were a huge unforced blunder, and gave aid and comfort to the rising tide of antisemitism on the right. Second, in the wake of your remarks, jurists, scholars, and advocates have made clear to me they can no longer associate with the Heritage Guide they contributed to. Third, and perhaps most tragically, your actions have weakened the ability of the storied Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies to promote the rule of law. My resignation is effective immediately.
For the past decade, I have cherished my close ties with The Heritage Foundation. I received several awards from Heritage, including the inaugural Edwin Meese Originalism Award. Every year, I lecture at the Heritage Clerkship Academy. I published a Heritage whitepaper on fighting antisemitism. And the crowning achievement of my professional career has been my service as the senior editor of the Heritage Guide to the Constitution, which was published only three months ago. I devoted four years of my life to this definitive treatment of the Constitution. More importantly, John and I recruited more than 150 jurists, scholars, and advocates to participate in this generational project. As a testament to the value of this enterprise, Justice Samuel Alito graciously wrote the preface. All of this work was possible thanks to the sterling reputation of the Meese Center. Attorney General Edwin Meese is the cornerstone of the conservative legal movement. My co-editor John Malcolm is a brilliant scholar and bold leader who has guided the Meese Center to great heights. And the staff of the Meese Center provided the careful attention and insightful edits to make the Guide possible.
Yet, Heritage came to a crashing halt after your infamous video. Your initial remarks were indefensible. Your apology was underwhelming. And the lack of any meaningful followup over the past three months has been telling. For reasons only you know, you aligned the Heritage Foundation with the rising tide of antisemitism on the right. As Senator Ted Cruz observed, "this poison of antisemitism on the right . . . is spreading with young people." I agree with Ben Shapiro: "If Heritage Foundation wishes to retain its status as a leading thought institution in the conservative movement, it must act as ideological border control." Antisemitism is always the canary in the coalmine. History teaches us that any society that fails to protect its Jewish people is destined for despair.
I am not alone in recognizing how you wounded Heritage's moral standing. For more than a year, the Meese Center was planning a massive book signing at the Federalist Society National Convention. Heritage generously donated nearly 1,500 copies of the Guide, and everyone in attendance would have received a free copy. We arranged for nearly one-hundred contributors to autograph the book. Regrettably, your ill-timed remarks came only a few days before the Convention began. In short order, contributors told us that they could no longer autograph a book they already contributed to. The Heritage brand, once iconic, instantly became toxic. We made the difficult decision to cancel the book signing. This was a point of personal sadness, as John and I were so eager to celebrate the launch of this important work with the conservative legal movement.
The fallout is even greater. Judges who have spoken at Heritage told me they would no longer affiliate with Heritage, and would no longer recommend their clerks attend the Clerkship Academy. Scholars who won prizes from Heritage told me they would no longer contribute to any Heritage publications. Public interest litigators have tweeted that they will no longer attend the Legal Strategy Forum.
The Heritage Foundation is greater than any single President. But one President has done what was once unthinkable. The Meese Center cannot survive under Heritage's current leadership, and the damage to the Meese Center brand has been irreparable. My only hope is that the important scholarship in the Heritage Guide can continue to be studied.
Sincerely,
Josh Blackman
Former Senior Editor
Heritage Guide to the Constitution
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Good for you.
Any comment on Vance's purity remarks?
I must say that I actually agree with JD Vance.
I'm not antisemitic, I've walked the walk on that, when it mattered.
I don't even understand the motivation for antisemitism -- beyond the Islamic order to kill nonbelivers which include (but are not limited to) Jews.
On the other hand, I've seen ideological purity destroy the mASSgop.
It only took five years to go from a growing conservative movement in Massachusetts to an irrelevant RINO movement that thirty years later is a complete joke.
If we used the same standard that Blackman is using, we'd all have to boycott CPAC because of Matt Schlapp.
Now let me be clear here -- I don't care if he's gay or bi or whatever, although I don't approve of his cheating on his wife.
But sexually assaulting vulnerable undergrads is unacceptable.
How is it a lesser offense than what Dr. Kevin Roberts has done?
Tell it to someone who didn't read you saying within the past week that you could "become" antisemitic if some Jews did things you didn't like.
“an irrelevant RINO movement that thirty years later is a complete joke.”
The last five of seven MA governors in that period were Republicans.
Like he said - a complete joke.
"conservatives" in Massachusetts need to loose the all-too-cute RINO label for those not sticking to their personal exact definition of conservatism. The insane left has captured this state and the only way we're going to move the needle is to realize that a Romney or Brown is better than a Healy or a Warren any day of the week. Unless our associate starts down the path of race, sex, religious, ethnic attacks, we ostracize them at our own risk.
Good for you.
You're only doing them a favor, Josh.
Good move, Josh
I rarely agree with Josh. And when I do, I usually need to add some sort of qualifier to my agreement. Not here. Good for you, Josh, for acting with integrity. Period. Full stop.
Good show,Josh. Tucker is a cancer
What happened to Tucker?
He sided with the bigots.
If Tucker isn't anti-semite he's so close you can't tell the difference.
Tucker, like Vance, sold out to the highest bidder. Very sad to see someone with such great promise take the low road.
I would not put them in the same basket. At least not yet.
Vance, in my perception, is acting as a politician -- he wants to keep a coalition together without writing off anyone. If that means winking at, or at least tolerating, bigots, so be it. It's cowardly, but it's not in the same league as Carlson.
I don’t have anything to add. I tend not to comment on the other sides internal politics.
But what I would like to say, is that Josh is a superb writer. So elegant, so clear, so impactful. I’m always impressed, even when I strongly disagree. And from an academic at that!
Taking a principled stance towards those we once called friends, teachers, and allies is an act of intellectual courage, Josh. All of us, right and left, have a duty to protect the future for our own sakes and for our children's sake. We know what happens when we forget that and don't speak out against the extremists in our factions. Sooner or later they emerge from their lairs and spread their particular poisons, like pathogens, easily swallowed and very difficult to live with. To live the life of reason, that is, as taught to us by Socrates more than two millennia ago and by George Santayana in the early twentieth century. The dream and the project of reason is an essential part of our intellectual heritage. Another essential part of our heritage is our ability to recognize antisemitism, recism, and bigotry when we see them and to call out their human vectors.
By the way, I'm looking forward to reading all of your "Heritage Guide To The Constitution". Your lists of essays and authors offer a very compelling argument for buying the book when I can. For most of my adult life I've relied on my old (1953) "revised and annotated" guide to the Constitution edited by Edward S. Corwin. My copy belonged to my great-uncle Rudy, a former Wisconsin state legislator. One of the prefaces was written by a US Senator from Wisconsin who was the father of my 11th grade English teacher. It is out of date, I suppose, but it's priceless to me for obvious reasons.
Personally, my alarm bells would have started ringing as soon as Roberts started vigorously promoting lies about the 2020 election. But better late than never! Good for you!
Yes, Heritage has been a cesspool for a while now. It's good that Blackman has finally recognized the problem, though unfortunate that it took this long.
Roberts should.have resigned as soon as he said in his "apology" that he just read the script his aide wrote for him to read.
He really said that?
Have only obliquely followed it.
“History teaches us that any society that fails to protect its Jewish people is destined for despair.”
Seems too Old Testament to me. How about it’s wrong to promote bigotry against any group?
Anyways, JB writes often about courage. Here he exemplifies it.
Apparently, when the legal writing instructor said to make your argument pithy, Professor Blackman thought that he was thpeaking with a lithp.
Josh mournfully departs the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party,
Not that I don't approve. But still.
As with so many anti-Trump Republicans, it's good they've come over from the dark side, they did take a stand, whether on principle, or like Brooks or Will on marketing, but it's also evidence of slow learning. Did Josh just now discover there's anti-semitism on the right?
Oh come on, Prof. Blackman. Peer pressure is getting to you. The President's comments on some journalist taint Heritage unbearably? Your resignation adds fuel to the theory of Jewish domination. A better solution is to write something heavily pro-semitic for Heritage and see if they'll publish it (ask in advance).
Etc, that is a terrible take, you are expressing the exact cause catch-22 that antisemites try to put Jews in, not that I think that you’re an antisemite, just that you’re not following this properly: if we ignore antisemitism that suggests it’s true and we are accepting it. If we oppose it then we are demonstrating it’s true by showing supposed control. We’re not going to play that game and I joined Josh and refusing to associate with heritage until Roberts leaves.
See my Substack on the AEA expelling Larry Summers, similarly overkill punishment: https://ericrasmusen.substack.com/p/expelling-larry-summers-from-the
I have never paid any attention to Fuentes and will accept the truth of what is said about him, but I'm not really clear on exactly what Carlson did so wrong. Was it simply giving Fuentes a platform? Was it because he actually expressed sympathy for Fuentes' more extreme views? There is no doubt that Carlson is hostile to Israel and there are some observers who claim that the interview was actually intended to encourage Fuentes to moderate his more outrageous rhetoric and thereby be more effective as a "mainstream" critic of Israel. I guess that I will have to actually listen to the interview itself.
I'm not really clear on exactly what Carlson did so wrong. Was it simply giving Fuentes a platform? Was it because he actually expressed sympathy for Fuentes' more extreme views?
It's giving him a platform that consisted of only soft-ball questions. Carlson knows how to push hard on those he disagrees with. Like his interview with Sen. Ted Cruz. Or he softballs those he sympathizes with. Like Fuentes. (Or Putin, for that matter. )
Fuentes admires Hitler and Stalin. There is plenty to push back on that. Starting with they were both enemies of the United States. Carlson passed on all of that.
Is there anyone in the comment section that notices anything?
You sure you don't see any patterns or overrepresented groups?
Nothing stands out to you, huh?
That's really strange.
excellent, but not sole reason to disavow Heritage Foundation
good for you, but boy did you take your time to see which way this wind was blowing.
+1
Woke professor gets triggered and quits.
You did the right thing Josh- and Robert George and others were already ahead of you.
American institutions are in shambles- even the alternative institutions are in shambles; the only way to rebuild them is to stick to the truth. That starts with not playing games with the evil lies of antisemitism
The Heritage Foundation has always been like this. Blackman helped make it that way.
I'm sure I have some catching up to do. Initially, it looked like this guy said he "abhors" the views of the shock jock, but defended Tucker having an interview with the (apparently rather popular) shock jock, on some sort of open dialogue, free speech type grounds. But the Tucker interview was more than that, as it was too softball/sympathetic. Then Roberts gave a poor apology for defending it. However, Bernstein and many others (inaccurately or dishonestly, it seemed to me) accused Roberts of being an ardent supporter of the views he had expressly said he abhors and never said he supports. I have no problem believing Roberts' statements were nonetheless "problematic" and, as I said, I haven't kept up with all of it.
Establishment "conservatives" selling out once again. Where were you cucks for the last 50 years when Leftists were taking over and selling out this country and it's ideals? Off on the sidelines selling out pretending you were fighting while making sure everything done was cemented in place because decorum or some other flacid shit.
cucks
Hmmm.
Is this what the call cancel culture?