The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Columbia University Faculty Behaving Badly
A new report out of Columbia University documents abuses of faculty prerogatives and general outrageous misbehavior on the part of full-time faculty, instructors, and graduate assistants. Academic freedom does not include being abusive to students, using your classes for political organizing, teaching material unrelated to your classes ideological reasons, and otherwise treating your classroom position as if its your personal platform to pursue an ideological agenda. All of these teachers should face sanctions ranging from suspensions to being fired, but I'm not holding my breath. While these incidents all involve misbehavior on behalf of "Palestine," it's reasonable to assume that it reflects a broader culture of politicization of the classroom and perceived impunity more generally, and not just at Columbia. Luke Tress of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency provides a summary of some of the misbehavior:
The task force also reported that university instructors singled out Jews and Israelis for "personal scapegoating" during classes, noting that the practice violated federal Department of Education guidelines.
An instructor told an Israeli student, "You must know a lot about settler colonialism. How do you feel about that?" Another Israeli was called an occupier. An Israeli IDF veteran attended a class about the conflict, saying that the IDF was presented as an "army of murderers." The instructor pointed at the student in front of the rest of the class and said she should be considered one of the murderers, the report said.
A Jewish, non-Israeli student was told, "It's such a shame that your people survived in order to commit mass genocide." Other students avoided identifying as Jewish or Israeli in class.
During a required introductory course for more than 400 students at the Mailman School of Public Health, a teacher told students that three Jewish donors to the school were "laundering blood money" and called Israel "so-called Israel." The teacher later dismissed complaints as coming from "privileged white students."
Some instructors encouraged students during class to attend anti-Israel protests, canceled classes for the protests, moved classes off campus to use the classes as "political organizing sessions," and held classes in the protest encampment, where "Zionists" were not welcome.
Many students told the task force that teachers issued moral condemnations of Israel in unrelated classes. An introductory astronomy class started with a discussion of the "genocide" in Gaza, and in an introductory Arabic class, a teacher taught students the sentence, "The Zionist lobby is the most supportive of Joe Biden." Another instructor told her students in a class on advocacy that reports of sexual violence by Hamas were exaggerated or fabricated.
One student objected to a teacher about a course's framing of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in an email that the student had considered private. The instructor then read the email aloud to the class, without the student's permission, arguing against the email's positions.
Graduate students told each other to "teach for Palestine," regardless of subject, and anti-Zionist content was a "central element" in classes on feminism, photography, architecture, music and nonprofit management.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
As usual, David, poking past the surface claims reveals fundamental mischaracterizations of the truth.
The report conveys claims that were not investigated or proven - just alleged. The report's descriptions of putative events are curiously equivocal on important details: Who said this? What did they actually say? Was this person actually identified in the way that the framing is meant to imply, or was the framing used to avoid admitting that they were not? And so on.
Never mind the severe political pressure placed on Columbia both to produce the report and, one would surmise, to say the right things.
It's a shame that you're first to the front of the line for this asinine, intellectually dishonest, new McCarthyism, David, but I am not surprised to see you champing at the bit.
#BELIEVEALLJEWISHSTUDENTS
Many of the incidents are well-documented. One was on the record with a major news outlet! Others were in writing! There is clearly no standard of proof that will satisfy you, because you cannot conceive of a good Jew or bad Palestinian activist.
There are a couple that could be corroborated through press coverage, yes. But most of the accounts are paraphrases of hearsay.
So what if it's hearsay -it's a report, not a court of law. All reports collecting witness statements are, by definition, hearsay. What do you want, video-taped depositions of every interviewee?
If there was a similar report saying that Jewish professors were mistreating Palestinian or Arab students, I don't think you'd have the same skepticism.
"As usual, David, poking past the surface claims reveals fundamental mischaracterizations of the truth." But you identify not a single "mischaracterization of the truth," and adduce exactly zero evidence in support of your claim. Though nothing in the report is inconsistent with what has been known for years about this bias at Columbia, you maintain it is all "asinine, intellectually dishonest, new McCarthyism."
You're simply not credible, not even minimally so.
I'm not going to write a thesis to convince people, Nerdo. You can believe whatever you like and be wrong. I'm just flagging, for others, that David is once again not on the level, and for David, that his bad faith is showing.
If even half of these stories are accurate, it doesn't reflect well on the university.
I understand university students being this way; they're easily-swayed dummies whose brains aren't fully developed yet. But teachers? They should be better than this.
(and I say this as someone who is horrified at the things happening in Gaza)
Read the actual report from Columbia, and read skeptically.
Here's one passage:
The whole thing is full of stuff like this. One professor is faulted for telling a Jewish student that, if in-class discussions on protesting Israel make them feel uncomfortable, they should't come to class. (Eugene might have said the same kind of thing; uncomfortable discussions are supposed to happen in class.) Professors are faulted for encouraging political engagement by offering extra credit to attend a protest. (A little high school for my tastes, but what is supposed to be the problem?) The professor talking about "laundering blood money" is not directly accused of using antisemitic tropes, but it is hard to avoid the conclusion that the report is making precisely that insinuation (without justification, based on what was presented as evidence).
how were South African students treated during Apartheid? that's the last time I can think of there being campus protests and political battles within social sci classes.
Auburn Tennis Team had a number of South African players in the early 80’s, they did have a bit of trouble adjusting to the opposite spin of the ball (ht Coriolis)
Frank
UMass had members of the then-newly-empowered African National Congress purporting to be students -- instead of actually researching and writing things like the rest of us, they turned in ANC documents that they had "participated in writing" and were almost uniformly praised for the great things they were doing in .za -- with one exception.
Knowing a wee bit *about* Africa, I asked them some embarrassing questions about the lack of tribal diversity, particularly after one of them admitted that only members of their tribe could be in the ANC.
I was told that I was not supposed to ask such questions -- so much for scholarship and academic freedom. Welcome to UMass...
It isn't even that: faculty and staff are quite capable of being A-holes without student support -- I personally experienced this 34 years ago during and after Operation Desert Storm.
There were two separate surveys that found that over 94% of the students at UMass Amherst supported that war -- the second survey done because no one believed the first one and the presumption was that they'd somehow screwed it up.
But the war was protested at Planet UMass because the tenured radicals wanted to have it protested. And they had the political connections to do whatever they damn well pleased.
"The report conveys claims that were not investigated or proven - just alleged."
Fair enough, but this is true of all extra-legal activities. We only have allegations of the Klan lynchings of a century ago, they weren't "investigated or proven" so they didn't happen? And do you honestly think that there are going to be students coming forward to report this abuse?
I have NO DOUBT that the allegations are true because I know the type of people who currently hold power in the purgatorial cesspool that academia has become. I've seen worse.
I've LIVED worse...
And I'm not even Jewish.
I'm going to offend people here, but this isn't antisemitism. Or perhaps better, antisemitism is being used as a tactic for something else.
This is about bullying, psychological warfare, and terrorism. Yes, terrorism.
This is about using fear to prevent people from thinking certain thoughts and that ought to terrify anyone with a scintilla of belief in (small "l") liberal thought. This is why I say "Nuke Gaza" -- not because I want to see the use of thermonuclear weaponry nor that I even consider it feasible, but because I am defending all the lesser related positions.
I'm simply refusing to play their game.
At a staff meeting -- a staff meeting of professional state employees -- the conversation went around the table as to how one would dodge the draft if it returned. My diplomatic response was that I was "4-F/vision" -- legally blind without my glasses, I was not draftable. That wasn't good enough and I was repeatedly given "what if" questions to the point where I finally said "if my country needed me *that* badly, I'd go."
I got fired for that, i.e. my position was not renewed for the following year. In hindsight, I wish I'd said "Nuke them 'till they glow, so we can Shoot them in the Dark", followed by pounding on the table and saying KILL, KILL, KILL....
And it would have been a lot more difficult to fire me for that.
The only difference here is that the vitriol is being directed at students who happen to also be Jewish, and they have that to unify around for common defense and support. I didn't have that.
But this is so close to what I experienced that I have NO DOUBT that they are telling the truth...
It would be more persuasive if the professors and classes were identified. I don't understand why they are not.
Nothing like that has happened in any of my classes at Columbia the past few years. (Prof. Adam Tooze is pretty hostile to Israel, but he never said much about it in class.) Now, if you want, I could go back 45 years and remember the time that Prof. Victor Bers, at Yale, told our class that B.C.E. stood for "before the common error," but that might actually be the only comment I've heard in my entire academic career that denigrated a particular religion.
Yes, there is nothing secret about what a professor says in class. They should be identified. Maybe some have reasonable explanations.
I am not sure what is wrong with reading an email in class. A student emails the teacher in the hopes that the teacher will address it. Teachers do not need permission to address a student argument.
Roger, I am not saying I agree with this, but many university "acceptable use policies" explicitly preclude publicizing the content of a personal email. IF Columbia has such a policy -- and it'd be in one of multiple places so it isn't that easy to check -- IF the policy says "thou shalt not" then a professor ought not.
As an instructor (I've taught everything from 7th Grade to Grad School), I have a hard and fast rule of not intentionally humiliating my students. I would not read an email in class unless it was a really big class (over 300 students) because it would identify the student. I don't "out" students -- I don't.
I might summarize the email, I'd be vague and imply (or even state) that it was someone in a different section of the same class, or perhaps imply that I was combining multiple emails. If the student wanted to "out" himself/herself/itself by defending the position, fine -- but I'm not going to do it. And it would have to be an argument somehow relevant to the class, or at least sorta related.
Not that I personally agreed with, or even personally thought relevant to the class, but that the so-called "reasonable person" might conclude relevant. But that's me.
But Seriously -- check your employer's policies because like 2-party recording laws, I've seen this come back to bite people.
Conversely, I've seen people at public universities burnt by the state public record's laws.
The article does not say that the professor identified or outed the student. Yes, that would be rude. But I see nothing wrong with reading an anonymous email and rebutting it.
They're not identified with precision - and the persons responsible are often not even identified as professors, students, or other people - because the whole thing is a smear job. Remember? Columbia wanted federal funding. Putting together this report was a condition for receiving it.
One might charitably suppose that those behind the report chose to draft it in a way that would protect professors and students from firings, expulsions, or worse from the online mob. Nothing investigated, nothing proven - nothing to pin on anyone in particular. But that's not how it reads. Just typical pro-Israel propaganda, mixing a few true facts into innuendo and ellipses.
So Simon would have people sacrifice their futures so as to satisfy his prurient interests?
Does Simple Simon have any idea as to what will happen to students who get caught leaking this stuff to the outside world?
If they are not careful, they will wind up dead. Seriously -- I had a few close calls. *IF* they manage to graduate, it will be with a degree that is totally worthless, and it goes without saying that they will be shunned and ostracized.
It ain't gonna happen, the fascists know that it ain't gonna happen,
and you are being disingenuous in demanding that it does.
@SimonP
You are absolutely correct. Students who don't want indoctrination replacing education should attend a different university.
That's a fair point about the provenance of this report. In that light, probably the best thing for the lover of truth to do is ignore the report, along with much else produced by the Trump administration, and let the Conspirators continue to rage impotently.
The report is from a committee established at Columbia before the Trump administration came into office, and its run by several luminaries from the faculty, including the former dean of the law school.
The way I look at it is why should the US taxpayer have to keep paying for this foolishness. In an ideal world, this would be dealt with via accreditation, except that (a) accreditation is a joke and (b) the people doing it support this foolishness.
What's really going to have to happen is someone getting the 1971 Griggs v. Duke Power decision reversed because that is the one that established the "disparate impact" standard for aptitude tests but did NOT apply to college degrees because there were HBCUs.
Hence jobs that don't require a college degree but which *do* require literacy and similar basic skills (e.g. retail department manager) now require college degrees because that's the only way applicants can be screened without running afoul of the EEOC.
Federal and state governments don't answer to EEOC and they increasingly are dropping the hard "college degree" requirement (the FAA just did for ATCs). And private employers are doing this in Europe -- but can't here because of the liability.
The best thing for the lover of truth to do is ignore everything that comes from the Gaza Health Ministry.
I'm just commenting to bookmark the fact that Simon thinks it's ok for a professor to award extra credit for participating in a protest for a cause that the professor agrees with, just in case anyone in the future suggests that Simon is in any way a serious commentator on the academy.
I got a "D" as an undergrad, the only "D" I ever got, for refusing to go down and get arrested at the Federal Building, which at the time included the US Post Office on the first floor.
I don't even remember what was being protested and that wasn't the issue -- it was a combination of not believing that getting arrested was something one ought to do, and being told that I must do *anything* outside the scope of the academic (history) class, let alone something illegal.
Knowing what I know now, I probably should have gone to the US Attorney and/or the university president (who I was on a first name basis with) -- but I was young....
David, this stuff happens a LOT -- for example, 2 UMass credits for going up to New Hampshire to campaign for Barack Obama -- I was involved in putting the end to that one, see: https://www.nas.org/blogs/article/college_credit_for_campaign_volunteers
"All of these teachers should face sanctions ranging from suspensions to being fired, but I'm not holding my breath."
Yes, how will Columbia effect the needed change when the problem is on of such longstanding and so entrenched, with the MESAAS faculty thoroughly corrupted? There may be equally corrupted departments at other schools, but I doubt any are more so. And wait until corrective measures are attempted!
There are places that are worse.
I keep saying "PennCentral Railroad" -- what really killed the railroads as they had existed was Lyndon Johnson's 1967 decision to shift mail transportation from railroads to trucks and airplanes. (The PennCentral went bankrupt three years later.)
The railroads were so mismanaged and had been for so long that they were not savable. They were still paying a "fireman" to shovel coal into a Diesel engine that didn't burn it, they were paying multiple "brakemen" to manually apply brakes the way it was done in the 19th Century, before it was automatically done by air pressure, etc...
I don't see higher education being salvageable. A reform of the Federal largess will have the same impact that LBJ's decision had for the railroads, and that is why the angst and furor.
If true (see earlier posts by others) almost all the allegations are very troubling. But (IMO) not that penultimate one--where a student emailed a professor and the prof later read to the class, and responded to, the concerns in the email.
This seems entirely appropriate to me...for a professor to get information from a student, "Hey, here are some problems, as I see them, going on in your class, re to how information is presented to us students.', and for the prof to bring those concerns up to the actual class. Good for the professor, for being so open with his/her class, about potential shortcomings re the prof's teaching skills or methodology. *As Long As* the reading aloud did NOT identify the student who wrote it. IMO, that would be completely inappropriate for a teacher to do.
(I'd also like a little more information on what "[...in an email] that the student considered private." really means. Did the teacher promise the student that the email would not be disclosed to the rest of the class? Was it just the student's assumption? Did the student write, in advance, "I have some concerns I'd like to share, but only if they are kept private."? If a teacher had promised something and flat-out lied to the student, then that certainly would put a thumb on the student's side of the scale.
I apply the Scotch Verdict ("Not Proven") to anonymous sources, whether the New York Times or the Jewish telegraph. Doubly so, when the alleged perp is also unnamed.
And doubly so when the source a current college student. Whatever the political or religious persuasion, they're snowflakes.
Well David these are your chosen allies so good luck.
What on earth does that mean?
Besides you're too stupid or self-absorbed to read who the author is or think not everything revolves around you?
DB consistently pleads for Leftist academics to side with him and Israel while actively shitting on anyone outside that sphere for providing the support he's trying to Garner. To that fruitless endeavor I wish him luck with all the respect he shows others
Have you confused Prof. Bernstein with someone who exists only in your head?
A Jewish, non-Israeli student was told, "It's such a shame that your people survived in order to commit mass genocide."
Maybe they should hand out swaztikas to the faculty. So we can know who is who.
Maybe you should take some classes at Columbia. Is there anyone here, besides me, who has been in a Columbia classroom, or even on the Columbia campus, in the past five years?
You have any experience of Joseph Massad and his MESAAS colleagues? [https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-833590]
How about Katherine Franke? [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/us/columbia-professor-katherine-franke-retires.html]
You have any experience of Joseph Massad and his MESAAS colleagues? [https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-833590]
How about Katherine Franke? [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/us/columbia-professor-katherine-franke-retires.html]
Why do you think Columbia's president Claire Shipman ought not be believed about the gravity of the school's antisemitism problem? You think she has reason to exaggerate it?
Absolutely. As a condition of restored funding, the Trump administration is demanding Canossa-style self-abasement from universities. In that respect, Bernstein now has his reward.
y81,
Lest you miss it, here's what Professor Bernstein wrote a couple of hours ago (see above):
The report is from a committee established at Columbia before the Trump administration came into office, and its run by several luminaries from the faculty, including the former dean of the law school.
And there are a variety of sources you could look to in order to minimally inform yourself about this, including the movie Columbia Unbecomin; Bari Weiss' book; [https://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/01/education/panels-report-on-faculty-at-columbia-spurs-debate.html]; the writings of Joseph Massad and Katharine Franke.
And you ought to inform yourself
What? You asked about Claire Shipman. Now you want to talk about one of Columbia's committees? There's also one that reports on Islamophobia, which is also apparently a huge problem at Columbia. These snowflake reports don't persuade me. The rules Bernstein and his comrades advocate--no one can say anything that makes Jews or anyone else uncomfortable--are incompatible with free speech. Hence my contempt for the libertarian professions of the Conspirators.
Schizer has office hours on Tuesdays (at least he did this semester). The term is over, but maybe I'll stop in next semester and ask why his report is so devoid of the details that would give it credibility.
I went to a South Carolina Gamecocks Baseball game on the Columbia Campus this Spring, nice place, and you can say without getting dirty looks
“Let’s go Cocks!!!!”
Be careful with asking a Co-ed (can you still call them “Co-Ed’s?)
If she “Likes the Cocks”
That last “s” is so easy for people to miss
Frank
In the wake of recent antisemitic unrest in academia, has anyone explored the role of late Columbia prof Edward Said in stoking this culture? He wrote one of the key textbooks of Middle Eastern studies, "Orientalism," a book roughly the same age as the Islamic Republic of Iran that claimed that it was impossible for the West to assess the Middle East objectively, but not impossible for Middle Easterners to understand the West. Said also taught that the founding of Israel was the product of imperialism. I'd think that mix would breed an intensely cynical anti-Western/antisemitic culture.
He definitely played a part in stoking anti-Israel sentiment. What are you saying? Are you joining Bernstein and the other "libertarians" at the Volokh Conspiracy in saying that such writings should be punished?
I'm saying that there has been scarce attempt to investigate the role of several decades worth of Middle Eastern studies curricula in influencing academic antisemitism. My sole interest is in greater understanding of the situation.
I am not familiar with calls to punish "such writings," or what specific examples you have in mind to categorize as such, and if they truly compare to Said's opus. "Orientalism" is a poli-sci textbook. Even regarding public universities (Columbia is private) a state government would strain to come up with an objective means to regulate content for a field of study that is basically philosophical in nature, and where controversies often have more than two sides.
Investigate away. Said's works are published, and you can read all you want. (That's not my preferred reading, but de gustibus.) Or is it that you want someone else, like the Trump administration or the University, to investigate? For what purpose? Last I checked, harsh and unfair criticisms of Israel constitute protected free expression, so what would be the purpose of a third-party investigation?
He wasn’t “Late” Soon enough
Sad when Columbia SC is safer for Jews
Other students avoided identifying as Jewish or Israeli in class.
Makes sense. I wouldn't want to identify as a citizen of an apartheid state either. And Jewish advocacy groups like the ADL have gone to great lengths to tie Jews to Israel, so it's reasonable for a Jew to feel, well, tied to Israel. It's the position of their own advocates after all.
The situation would be very different for non-Israeli Jews if the pro-Jewish narrative were more "you shouldn't blame Jews for the sins of Israel" and less "you can't criticize Israel without being antisemitic." It's really just the libs such as myself who make the former argument.
Israel’s more diverse than about 52 of Barry Hussein’s 57 States, Moe-hammad, Kareem, or whatever the fuck your Moose-lum name is. BTW it’s Friday, isn’t that the day you take a break from Buggery?
Oh, if my Hebrew wasn’t clear
Moe-hammedwas an Ass-Pirate Homo and I’m making a Gravem Image of him Ass-Pirating as I type this
Frank
Randal, look up what the word "prejudice" means.
And I am told it is a bad thing...
Stereotypes exist for a reason.