The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
A Flashback to Justice Barrett's Confirmation Hearing
As I noted at the time, I was surprised how well she did. I wish we could see more of nominee Barrett.
Co-Blogger Jon Adler flashes back to two posts I wrote during and after Barrett's confirmation process in 2020. He suggests that I singing a different tune today than I did five years ago. I think if you read between the lines, you'll see a different message.
To state the obvious, Justice Barrett's performance at her hearing was masterful. Her performance was at the level of Chief Justice Roberts's. This is one area where the law professor mentality served her quite well.
My expectations going into the hearing were not high. Privately I expressed concerns about her to colleagues. I talked to many people who assured me that she would be solid. Yet as I watched the proceedings, I was truly impressed. Indeed, I was guardedly optimistic about what she might accomplish when confirmed.
But more importantly, I was surprised at how well she did. Indeed, her testimony alleviated some of my concerns.
In one post, I wrote, "She continues to impress me in ways that I frankly hadn't expected." In another post, I wrote, "She made a connection that I hadn't expected to experience." I suggested that she might one day fill Justice Scalia's shoes! I wondered if she would connect with the American people. Perhaps she could become an icon for originalism. None of these things have happened.
I wish we would see more of the ACB from the hearing. There is still hope. Longtime readers will recall my coverage of Justice Kavanaugh was quite harsh for some time. But, in candor, I've had a lot less to object to of late. With a few exceptions, he isn't doing the sorts of things that troubled me. There is always hope for tomorrow.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why doesn’t Blackman ever explain precisely what his problem with Barrett is? Is it just that she’s not a mindless Trump shill like he is?
whisper whisper whisper….shhhhhh, they might be listening
The article borders on : Hearings are useless.
Josh in 2020:
"I honestly did not think I would praising a nominee in this fashion."
"No matter how many new seat are added to the Court, Justice Barrett will still loom large over the others. Her greatest contribution will be to enrich our constitutional culture. I mean that sincerely."
Josh in 2025
"Based on Barrett's record, she should have never been nominated for the Seventh Circuit, she should have never been put on the Supreme Court "short list" before she decided a case, she should have never been a finalist for Justice Kennedy's seat barely a year into her tenure on the Seventh Circuit, and she should have never been elevated to Justice Ginsburg's seat with so much unknown about her. Yet, all the while, people who held important positions in the conservative legal movement assured us that Barrett was "solid.""
How do you go from praising a nominee to the Court to then saying, in a post titled "See, I told you so" that the nominee should have never been nominated to the federal bench (which Josh had been saying all along?)
Josh is seriously glitching right now
Seems like Prof. Blackman is desperate to say "I told you so" when the more accurate title would have been "I was wrong." But obviously he can't bring himself to say THAT.
If you read between the lines, it's clear that Blackman is more interested in claiming he's "right" than in being correct.
I told you so. Kavanaugh was Bush’s right hand man and Trump wanted to pull his nomination. And then Bush called Collins and ordered her to vote for him. Now Hegseth who actually fought in Bush’s asinine wars and defended Bush on TV gets no support from Bush. Hmmmm
You're embarrassing yourself.
[To be clear, since some comments have now been deleted via moderation, this one was directed at Josh.]
Are you new here?? Blackman is the Speaker Mike Johnson of the VC. Btw, Speaker Johnson would be Blackman’s number one choice for Supreme Court. While ACB was plopping out babies Johnson was in the trenches fighting libs and trying to protect the Christian institution of marriage. What’s weird is why Speaker Johnson even cares about politics when the “sanctity of marriage” was the most important issue of his lifetime?? Such a head scratcher. 😉
No, I'm aware. I'm saying that even by his own shameless standards, Josh is managing to embarrass himself.
Three simian statements need mocking
1) You have no idea who Blackman's nunber one is.
2) Saying being a parent was backing away from real work is just stupid, there is no arguing either position to the other side. But my side says that is stupid.BTW Johnson has a 'covenant marriage' , about as serious a view as there is.
3) As with the dumbest of my college students, you see that beyond doubt that J does care about politics and the sanctity of marriage so it can't be the most important issue of his lifetime !!-- and you testify against yourself to that effect. No head-scratcher there, you are just not good at thinking.
the jewish dyke judge appointed by the hnic's puppet still doing her dirty treason work.
too bad this ugly keikl can't defend gun rights with the vigor of her intermediate scrutiny bullshit for supposed sex distinctions.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/17/politics/judge-passport-sex-markers-transgender-people
Muted, obviously.
[This was a reply to a Nazi comment that's been deleted. Makes me wonder if Josh may actually read his comment threads.]
Not sure what's going on with Josh and Barrett. I remember when he seemed to have a teen-aged boy level crush on her.
Now that's all changed. Rejection is tough, but geez, Josh, get over it.
He still masturbates to her Senate hearings…he imagines titty fucking her…nasty style!
It's incredible to me that Trump is sending the country careening into war with Iran, and all that the VCers can bring themselves to say is continue to bitch about ACB.
What a bunch of worthless pieces of shit you all are.
Iran is a paper lion…htf did we get stuck in two quagmires when the real threat was so impotent?? Am I the only one pissed off about that??
NO, you are one of the few ignorant about that?
And the pun on Lion Rising is juvenille
Blackman is onto something. If there is one thing the nation needs, it's an, "Icon for Originalism." In short, some sort of immediately accessible pictorial expression of a mystery which not even its most devout exponents can profess to understand.
Judge Walker doesn't like you much, Professor Blackman.
"6MWE?" "1488?" Not even pretending to hide it any more?
You know, I don’t think Josh has too many supporters in the Academy or even in the Conspiracy. So it’s nice that he has one in the comments.