The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Festivus + Jews + Kanye West + Litigation
"Unlike 'Festivus,' the fictional holiday created by Jewish artists, wherein 'worshippers' are permitted to air their personal grievances but once per year," "Ye adheres to an artistic vision in which he is unencumbered to share his grievances at any time of the year—and so he does."
More from the "[Kanye West] is not merely a creator; he is art" motion to dismiss; the motion is dealing with this allegation:
On June 4–5, 2024, Ye sent a series of text messages to Plaintiff that Plaintiff
characterizes as belligerent, abusive, harassing, antisemitic, and otherwise offensive. The messages included statements such as "Shut the fuck up bitch," "Hail Hitler," and "You ugly as fuck," among others. Plaintiff alleges that these messages constituted harassment. Defendants assert that the messages are protected artistic expression …, and were sent in furtherance of Ye's constitutionally protected right to resist unwanted interference with his creative work and his rehearsal of his iconic artistic style of advancing grievances in dramatic vernacular.
Here's the defense lawyers' response:
The motion adds,
Plaintiff's attempt to frame the messages as discriminatory or antisemitic is similarly unavailing. Plaintiff does not allege that she even disclosed her Jewish identity to Ye or Yeezy prior to receiving the texts. Without evidence of knowledge or discriminatory intent, Plaintiff cannot sustain a claim for harassment or discrimination based on protected status. The messages were not directed at Plaintiff's race, religion, or gender identity, but it was, rather, an artifice to communicate a conceptual grievance.
Again, the motion makes some legitimate legal points as to some of plaintiff's claims. But proud as we are of Seinfeld, I'm not sure that noting that Festivus was "created by Jewish artists" really advances the argument.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
C'mon Man! "Ye" sounds like what you'd hear from a 14 yr old girl (OK, except for the "Hail Hitler") dissing one of her Frenemies
Frank "George Bush doesn't care about Black People*"
* Or White People, Brown People, Yellow People, Red People....
So what he's saying is that he cannot engage in harassment because everything he says is "artistic expression." Good luck with that. If it works, expect all sorts of other "artists" to claim the same.
Oy
Vey
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%B0zmir
Ok. So this lawsuit consists of two elements:
1. His communications to the public.
2. His communications to her.
Her objections to his communications to the public are not likely to get anywhere because otherwise any “adult entertainment” could be shut down simply by anti-pornography activists getting themselves hired and then suing the businesses, complaining the nature of the business itself constitutes harassment.
His communications to her personally are a separate matter. On this, I doubt his “everything I say is part of my art” defense will hold water.
It's interesting to compare and contrast this case with the moral panic and legal battles surrounding Eminem's lyrics in the early 2000s. His lyrics were full of outlandish threats to abuse or murder his baby momma and others, shoot up public places, etc. He created a persona (the "Real" Slim Shady), but teased his audience about what was parody (hence his "I'm an entertainer" refrain) and what was genuine, in a very gen-Z post-ironic style decades ahead of his time.
It must have been a nightmare to represent him in court.
Unlike Ye, Marshall Mathers didn't "keep up the act" offstage, and did occasionally concede to being parody. He also wasn't racist or anti-Semitic, even "ironically." Ye, in contrast, seems to be rolling with swastikas 24/7, and acting a fool in private as well as public. He's not doing it for irony, he's (weakly) justifying it as irony.
I'm getting off-topic here; but my recollection of that iconic "Seinfeld" episode was not that Festivus was the one day that that permitted an airing of grievances . . . it merely was the one day that *celebrated* such an airing. One of the joys of being around George's father was being exposed to an unending airing of grievances 24/7/365. That was almost the point of Mr. Costanza. Pure unadulterated anger and grievance, coming at us in unending waves. 🙂
"... permitted to air their personal grievances but once per year... "
Right - "but" doesn't belong in that sentence.
Serenity now ...