The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Trump's fake emergencies are the real crisis
My co-authored Washington Post op-ed today: "His vague national security claims chill speech and action far beyond his individual targets."
I have an op-ed out in the Washington Post today: "Trump's fake emergencies are the real crisis," co-authored with Serena Mayeri (Penn Law) and Amanda Shanor (Wharton). Here's an excerpt:
The Trump administration has doubled down on its refusal to remedy its mistaken deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego García, a Maryland father, to a notorious prison in El Salvador — despite a federal court order to facilitate his return. This case is one of many recent presidential actions that cloak flagrant violations of core constitutional rights in spurious claims of emergency power.
Alleging an "invasion" or "predatory incursion" of terrorists and foreign criminals, President Donald Trump is removing and imprisoning noncitizens without due process, asserting he is authorized to do so by the Alien Enemies Act. The administration invokes "foreign policy" to seize and detain students, including legal permanent residents, conflating political speech and peaceful protest with "terrorism." Citing "national security," the president has sought to revoke security clearances, order investigations into, and otherwise threaten and punish lawyers, law firms and former government officials who have opposed Trump in court or publicly criticized him.
In each instance, Trump asserts that the courts cannot stop him because, he says, these "emergencies" give him exclusive presidential power under Article II of the Constitution. But his true motive appears to be liberating the executive from all accountability to constitutional law.
The three of us have divergent views on many legal and political questions, but we all agree that the unchecked executive power the president claims poses an existential threat to liberty and constitutional democracy. . . .
As they say, Read the Whole Thing.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Would you people stop lying?
>The Trump administration has doubled down on its refusal to remedy its mistaken deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego García, a Maryland father, to a notorious prison in El Salvador — despite a federal court order to facilitate his return.
He asked, they said no. He facilitated. You liars are substituting "effectuated" because you are dishonest partisans. SCOTUS did not order Trump to physically bring that MS-13 human trafficking terrorist back into the US.
Why aren't all those secret government agencies that were out there "protecting our cognitive infrastructure from dis/mis/malinformation" cleaning up this nonsense? How are these ugly lies by hyper-partisan saboteurs like Sasha being tolerated by our Government Cognitive Defense Forces? This harms our democracy.
Sasha, you are harming our democracy.
Remarkable that a dictator who wanted to cozy up to Trump gave Trump the answer he wanted to hear. Of course, when Trump _actually wanted_ someone out of foreign jail, he was willing to use actual diplomatic pressure to secure it, which is why noted accused rapist and human trafficker Andrew Tate is now happily cavorting around the United States as our invited guest, instead of rotting in Romania.
There is probably not a single Dem on the planet worthy to lick Bukale's shoes. You didn't give a shit when countless people were being murdered, tortured, and raped but now you're going to cry oceans of tears when a gangbangers string of bad decisions catches up on him which actually if anything is probably complicating his release if he qualifies for it but you don't give a shit because you don't actually care about him either, you care only about the performance.
"You didn't give a shit when countless people were being murdered, tortured, and raped"
Of course I do. The difference between you and me is that I care when people are being murdered, tortured and raped regardless of the immigration status of the people doing the murdering, torturing and raping - it just so happens that those people are disproportionately citizens, not immigrants.
You just disparaged a man who saved a country.
None of your posts in this subthread show any concern for murder torture or rape victims. You're just whining about Drumpf.
You've (and most of the rest of VC) have spent more energy concerned about one illegal immigrating, system gaming traffic criminal, probable wife beating gangbanger than you have the collective el Salvadorean victims of rape, murder and torture.
You just disparaged a man who saved a country.
Your opinion of Andrew Tate is your business, Amos.
+1
I wonder if MAGA people realize how stupid they sound when they use the word "gangbanger." It's like bad Hollywood scriptwriters from the 1980s.
(That was rhetorical; MAGA people never realize how stupid they sound.)
Last I heard, Garcia hadn't been in CENCOT for three weeks, and was free to meet a Senator in a nice cafe over margaritas. Though the Senator claims that somebody just put the margaritas there unrequested. Happens all the time to me, darn it. It's really annoying, I don't LIKE margaritas.
Kinda burying the lede, of course, which is that he's now in a nice hotel, and has been for weeks.
When you're in a detention facility, and the people detaining you bring you to a location for a meeting and then return you to detention, you're not actually "free to" do anything. That's pretty much the point.
BTW, that was the hotel Van Hollen was staying in, not Abrego Garcia.
was free to meet a Senator in a nice cafe over margaritas
Good lord, you are the biggest sucker known to man.
The pictures do not lie.
The pictures do in fact lie. As do MAGA.
Of course he was, that's how we got that picture of the MS-13 across his fingers.
You mean, via Photoshop?
There's a thesis to be written on mass con-artistry. So many "proud individualists" willingly picking their own pockets and suborning their agency to a foul little weasel promising them return-on-resentment.
Really something to watch. From far away.
Quote from the Senator's account: "When he and Abrego Garcia first sat down for a meeting at the hotel where Van Hollen had been staying, the senator said, they “just had glasses of water on the table, maybe some coffee.”"
They didn't haul him off to the hotel just to meet the Senator. He's been living there for weeks.
I am NOT saying he's free to move someplace else, perhaps illegally immigrate back to the US again. I'm just saying he's not in durance vile now. Just durance.
They didn't haul him off to the hotel just to meet the Senator. He's been living there for weeks.
This is wrong, again. According to the State Department, “Mr. Abrego García is being held at the Centro Industrial penitentiary facility in Santa Ana.” They did, in fact, “haul him off to the hotel just to meet the Senator.”
I am very puzzled why you quoted something saying that Garcia was brought to the senator's hotel as evidence that Garcia was staying at the hotel.
They weren’t drinking margaritas, 10 seconds of googling will demonstrate this.
1) There is no evidence that he in fact asked.
2) No, asking does not constitute facilitating.
"He asked, they said no. He facilitated. You liars are substituting 'effectuated' because you are dishonest partisans. SCOTUS did not order Trump to physically bring that MS-13 human trafficking terrorist back into the US."
Alphabet guy, how do you claim to know what President Trump did or did not ask President Bukale? A reporter asked the latter, who sloughed off the question with a snide remark about smuggling.
The per curiam order of SCOTUS observed that "The [District Court's] order properly requires the Government to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf None of your argle-bargle has spooked those words off the page, nor the pixels off the monitor.
First of all, Kilmar Armando Abrego García is not a Maryland man. He is a serial wife beating illegal alien gangbanger....who is home now where he belongs.
So try not to canonize St Abrego.
Second, this will turn on definition of predatory incursion.
Oops, I guess this guy isn't a man and he wasn't living in Maryland! But wait, he's "serial wife beating", so he's got a wife... maybe he's a lesbian?
If you're going to snark. At least do it right. He didn't say Garcia wasn't a man he said he wasn't a 'Maryland man' which is correct he was and always has been a citizen of El Salvador
El Salvador being the one country that he cannot legally be deported to.
VC members are now seeing existential threats, maybe they should turn in their Federalist Society cards.
El Salvador being the one country that he cannot legally be deported to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And AFAIK he refused to go (despite having years ) and all the other countries refused to take him. So go yell at him and them.
Refused to go where? He was not told to go anywhere.
He is a male, living in an El Salvadoran prison, where he belongs.
He'll be somebody's 'special bitch', but no, he is not a lesbian.
For what crime is he serving time in that prison?
Ask Bukele. He is his citizen and all.
Wrong answer. I guess YANAL.
Be interesting how many people he will have libel arguments with when repatriated.
You're aware he will, literally, never set foot in this country, right?
Best case scenario for you: He's sent to a different country.
All repatriating him to the USA would mean is that he would receive a new hearing and once again be deported ( quite possibly back to El Salvador since the potential threat he claimed no longer exists).
As to him suing the fact is that truth is a defense and we know for certain that his wife filed complaints over domestic abuse, that two judges believed that he was MS13, that Tennessee police did stop him in what looked like human trafficking and that he has tattoos suggesting MS13 membership.
Well give him the hearing then.
Bukele can give him a hearing.
“… ensure his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.”
I don’t think a hearing in front of Bukele would be sufficient here.
So I guess you agree that Donald Trump is a serial rapist, then.
False. I've explained this multiple times already.
It looked so much like human trafficking (i.e., "driving") that they let him go after a short traffic stop without even a ticket.
He has no tattoos suggesting MS-13 membership. I guess you're another person fooled by Trump's photoshopping.
“tattoos suggesting MS13 membership”
The number of commenters in the last week who have purported to possess detailed knowledge of the symbology and clandestine meaning of Central and South American gang tattoos (or, more accurately, tattoos appearing on Central and South American individuals) is really quite something.
It is amusingly (perhaps grimly so) reminiscent of the sudden appearance here of multiple experts on traditional and historic Haitian culinary and religious practices last summer in a frantic effort to support the plausibility of the facially farcical claims that were made concerning that particular group.
It is of course not at all surprising that these experts— often the same people— seem not to remember that the Haitian claim turned out to be admittedly and intentionally false. Once bitten, twice shy? Not for these folks!
“If citizens accept that we are living in a state of exception, then they are also accepting that they too can be treated exceptionally […] If citizens endorse the idea that people named by authorities as "criminals" or "terrorists" have no right to due process, then they are accepting that they themselves have no right to due process.”
First of all, Kilmar Armando Abrego García is a man, who lives in Maryland, which makes him a Maryland man. Second, it will not have anything to do with predatory incursion, which is a term from the AEA, which does not apply to Garcia even if the claims about him are all true since MS-13 is not from Venezuela and is a different group entirely than TdA.
Third, MS-13 is a designated terrorist organization. Fourth, he was an illegal alien MS-13 gangbanger with no right to remain in this country. Fifth, he's back in his homeland of El Salvador, which claims he's a terrorist gangbanger is disinclined to import a terrorist to the US.
Was he now? I'm pretty sure that you're an MS-13 gangbanger. Just look at this photo I took of your commenter name:
M...S...1...3
R....i....v....a
It's an open-and-shut case!
"Second, this will turn on definition of predatory incursion."
Uh, no. One issue here is "Whenever there is . . . any invasion or predatory incursion [which] is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government."
The definition of predatory incursion addresses only one aspect of that.
If (an only if) that threshold question is resolved in favor of the government, there is also the issue of whether Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia -- a citizen of El Salvador -- is simultaneously a native, citizen, denizen, or subject of the hostile nation or government [who is] of the age of fourteen years and upward.
Statutes matter, XY. If and when you take your Trump loving head out from up your ass, you may actually come to understand that.
Its almost like the founders predicted Caesars aka Presidents would try to declare nonstop emergencies to take power.
Too bad they didn't predict that Congress and the courts would facilitate that concentration of Presidential power.
Balance of powers means the other branches can step in when they want to now when some internet commentator demands they do so. I bet you didn't care about the nonstop 'emergencies' legalizing millions of illegals over the decades.
What does this mean in English?
Nice to see that the left has moved on from the height of TDS inspired performances of Julius Caesar. Wait a sec..we see to have come full deranged circle. Now back to Russian collusion.
No, the real crisis is Congress abdicating their Article I authority and signing it over to the President, and the courts going along with it.
When tariff cases get in front of the S.Ct., what’s your prediction?
My current SWAG is 7-2 against Trump, with known executive power maximalists Thomas and Alito being the ones dissenting on the basis of weak rationales to ignore Art. I, sec. 8.
Maybe 8-1 against, with Alito being the lone voice. Thomas can be unpredictable.
Z, I think POTUS Trump loses the tariff case. Mostly b/c there isn't an emergency.
If you want to declare that Presidents being allowed to declare emergencies, PERIOD, is a big problem... I'm on board. I've been on board with THAT position since before I ever heard of Trump.
If it's only about Trump being allowed to declare emergencies, I'm unimpressed.
I've said it before: The problem with most TrumpLaw isn't that it shouldn't be law. It's that it showed up just for Trump, and will go away again when he's gone. Like it did for the last four years.
100%
"I have a pen and a phone" lol
The courts let Obama exercise prosecutorial discretion for millions of illegal immigrants who had young children in their family.
When Trump refuses to prosecute one illegal deportation, it's a crisis.
Stalin was right. One murder is a tragedy. Millions was politics.
If it's only about the guy who has been wildly abusing the system with a breadth and frequency no one else has...you're going to call it unfair.
Trump is extraordinary. You would have to be massively deluded to think otherwise...oh. Right.
Take some meds for your delusions. Great self-diagnosis.
Cheers to Sasha et al for penning that op ed, but I have to disagree with the headline.
"Fake emergencies" are not the "real crisis".
The real crisis is that Trump & company have no regard for the law, the constitution, the courts, the legislature, or any of the norms of behavior followed by prior administrations and will ignore anything or anybody who tries to get in the way.
When you say "his true motive appears to be liberating the executive from all accountability to constitutional law." That is the real crisis; falsely invoking emergency powers, and all the law-breaking and norm-defying are merely symptoms.
Usually the op-ed headlines are written by the newspaper, not the authors.
So what would your headline read?
"Trump’s National Security Emergencies are a Pretext for Suspending the Constitution"
Wowie Zowie, that's even more far out than the existing headline.
Hard to think that you really believe that.
Hard to think that you don't, as opposed to just not caring for the familiar Pastor Niemöller reasons.
Maybe it should have read
I stand behind the Washington Post as a source of objective, unbiased news, unparalleled professionalism and encourage all Marxists to see WaPo in similar fashion
OTOH, when I read
My co-authored Washington Post op-ed today...
I knew it would be better watching the grass grow. However reading your diatribes in the comments section: worse than what I expected from a WaPo contributor, and thats setting a really low bar
NB: Im not a Virginia man though I live in VA. Im a Latino man, and I have never beat my spouse nor have any affiliations with gang members, other than perhaps putting in check Volokh Conspiracy snarkists
I was talking about the headline here "Trump's fake emergencies are the real crisis".
I'm well aware of the poor choice of words headline writers often use.
The Biden regime, in gross dereliction of its duty to defend our borders, admits countless millions of illegals and the media cheers him on, yet now one illegal alien gangbanger is back in his homeland and the outrage never ends. Somehow I don’t take their complaints seriously and I suspect neither do the voters.
yet now one illegal alien gangbanger is back in his homeland and the outrage never ends.
Imagine if that outrage clouded the judgement of a Judge, who hypothetically speaking, was charged with two felonies for allegedly obstructing federal immigration agents and helping an undocumented immigrant evade arrest. Can you imagine?
Happily such a scenario would result, If convicted, a maximum penalty of six years in prison and a $350,000 fine. One can already picture what George Soros thugs rent a mob will do.
You forgot the scare quotes around "defend."
Anyone know how many "emergencies" have been declared and never rescinded?
Probably all of them.
There are 70+ ongoing national emergencies dating back decades.
Yet another article blaming Trump for all these "emergencies" and entirely ignoring Congress' role in setting up the rules that allow the executive branch to make such unilateral declarations.
If Congress hadn't spent the last century delegating away all their authority, we wouldn't be in this mess. And we won't have a permanent solution out of it until Congress takes back the reins and starts clawing back their own authority and responsibility.
And that will never happen. Why would they want to suddenly take on real responsibility? Much better to carp from the sidelines, like a chihuahua on a leash, knowing they can never be held responsible but they can be all brave and studly for the press releases.
They've spent a generation outsourcing their power to the Administrative State with unconstitutional "self-funded" "independent" agencies and tying their own hands with "mandatory spending" so much so that most of the work of government is out of their hands.
That way they have permanent foils to campaign against but yet never have any power to do anything about. They campaign, pay each other off, get their families rich, then play everyone else for suckers and dupes.
Trump is the one doing the bad things. That other people may have been derelict in their duty to stop him does not mitigate Trump's guilt.
Trump is using the congressional over-delegation to do some bad things. Biden abused the congressional over-delegation to do some bad things. Obama abused the congressional over-deletation to do bad things. Every president since Wilson has abused the congressional over-delegation to do bad things.
Are you starting to maybe see that you're whining about the symptoms and neglecting to address the underlying disease? Or are you just okay with the abuse as long as it's in the direction of policies you favor?
This is the situation demanded by past usurpations in the last 110 years. For citizens, the fight has been going on before our births. The dictatorship is built up over time by usurpations. Trump is no different than any other president has been. It's a natural process to grab authority and exercise it. It would be easy to combat if it were only a power struggle. SEE definitions regarding the differences between power and authority !
Because the current dictator is not yours, STFU because you are responsible for what's going on more than the average citizen. You personally, along with the other talking heads here, do not act against the dictatorship, but rather support it. And, one way is through your bastardization in the theory and practice of law.
Trump is very very different than any other president has been.
Paywalled, but I hope Giorgio Agamben's notion of the perpetual emergency got some play. Together with his take on Schmitt's doctrine of deciding the exception.
The reason they're pounding the table is that they haven't got the law or the facts. Don't imitate the table-pounding.
Mr. D.
The invocation of emergency powers is a textbook tactic for subverting a democracy. The Reichstag Fire Decree of 28 February 1933 is the obvious example, but there are many others.
The crisis wasn't the Biden administration throwing the borders wide open to transnational gangs and criminal cartels; the "real crisis" is Trump trying to stop them. Hundreds of thousands of fentanyl deaths and the rest of the human carnage = "fake emergency".
What Volokh really means is there's no emergency in his neighborhood, the only neighborhood that matters. There's no "predatory incursion" as long as the predators stick to victimizing the poors. He may as well throw in a, "They're animals anyway, so let them lose their souls." Acceptable collateral damage in the sacred pursuit of a steady stream of cheap labor.
You think fentanyl is because of illegal immigrants? I suppose you also think it's manufactured via liberal baby sacrifices in the basements of pizza parlors and that tariffs will fix it somehow.
What on earth do you think fentanyl has to do with illegal immigrants?
Deporting Kil Garcia was not a mistake. He was an illegal alien, with no right to stay in the USA.
It was more of a crime than a mistake. And he had the right to stay in the USA, unless the government followed the appropriate procedure to remove him.