The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Trump Goes 0-2 In The Span of About 30 Minutes
Back-to-back losses at SCOTUS and the 11th Circuit.
The first few months of the Trump Administration felt like a marathon run at a sprint pace. It was nonstop action in the courts that was sometimes difficult to keep up with. This week provides a preview of things to come.
In the New York criminal case, Judge Merchan announced that he would sentence Trump on Friday, January 10 to a term of "unconditional discharge."
In the Florida criminal case, Jack Smith announced that he would transmit his report on the Trump J6 case, and Attorney General Merrick Garland planned to release it on Friday, January 10.
And at the Supreme Court, on Friday, January 10, the Supreme Court would hear oral arguments in the TikTok case. Lurking in the background of that case was Trump's brief asking the Court to grant some sort of temporary relief so he can make a deal.
January 10 became this cosmic date on which all legal matters converged.
But it would be January 9 when most of the issues would be settled. Around 7:17 p.m., the Supreme Court denied Trump's emergency motion to stay the sentencing by a 5-4 vote. (I'll have more to say about that split later.) About 30 minutes later, at 7:46 p.m., an unsigned order from the Eleventh Circuit denied the emergency motion from Trump's two co-defendants, asking to block Garland's release of the Smith report.
Back-to-back losses. Wham-bam, thank you ma'am.
The sentencing of Trump will be held Friday morning. I wonder if Trump will have a chance to make a statement during the sentencing. My suggestion: twelve New Yorkers voted to convict me, and seventy-seven million voters didn't care. And around the same time that Trump is in the New York hearing, the TikTok oral argument will begin.
As I read the Eleventh Circuit's order, Judge Cannon's injunction was not vacated, as DOJ did not formally appeal that order. And Judge Cannon's injunction remains in place for three days after the Eleventh Circuit's ruling. The Florida defendants will probably take an emergency appeal. And I suspect Circuit Justice Thomas will grant an administrative stay, with an expedited briefing schedule. If my math is right, SCOTUS could rule on the matter on January 18 or 19, right before the inauguration. Garland can release the report shortly before he loses the job. If, for whatever reason, the process drags on past January 20, that report will likely never see the light of day.
What a strange confluence of legal events, all at once. Trump is once again the fulcrum of the legal order. Everything moves around him.
Update: Shortly after I published this post, around midnight, DOJ filed an appeal from Judge Cannon's ruling. The appeal asks the Eleventh Circuit to vacate the injunction. There is now a race to SCOTUS to get an administrative stay. Alternatively, DOJ seeks mandamus.
You can teach an entire class on federal and state court appellate procedure based on the events of the past few days.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If, for whatever reason, the process drags on past January 20, that report will likely never see the light of day.
🙂
Good one.
Yes, the Casablanca vibes were strong in that one.
And this isn't a politicized witch hunt....
Trump should eliminate funding for the NY train tunnel.
Sure, Trump should definitely have sole control over the expenditures of the Federal government, so that he can spend money or not depending on who has inconvenienced him or his businesses that day.
Correct.
Why?
Released or not, that report is subject to FOIA, isn't it?
I would think not.
https://www.foia.gov/foia-statute.html#:~:text=records%20or%20information%20compiled%20for%20law%20enforcement%20purposes
The Mueller report was mostly subject to FOIA.
Um, this is all well and good, except that DOJ said it had no intention of releasing the report.
The DoJ has already made its best arguments in court. If the report has evidence that has been withheld, then the DoJ might have to explain why it withheld it.
You know there hasn't been a trial, right?
Also, as long as we're calling out Blackman's stupidity, Trump was not a party to this 11th circuit matter, so it is not a loss for him.
If the NY case is based on his violating a Federal campaign finance law, they wouldn't he have the power to pardon himself for the violation of that law?
And then there is no violation....
The case required proof of intent to conceal a violation of the law. It is possible to have intent to commit a crime without committing the crime.
Moreover, even if a violation of the law were required, it wouldn't have to be his violation of the law he was concealing. Michael Cohen violated the campaign finance law.
Just leak the report and let "Judge" Cannon know where she can put her corrupt stay.