The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Second Amendment Roundup: The Court Should Grant Cert in Snope
Clarification needed as Colorado set to ban almost all semiauto rifles.
Four Second Amendment petitions were distributed for the Court's conference on Friday January 10. I just posted on the merits of these cases. A dramatic development has just occurred showing the dire need for the Court to clarify its jurisprudence in this area. The best case to do so is Snope v. Brown, which concerns whether Maryland may ban semiautomatic rifles that are in common use for lawful purposes.
Here's the urgency. Yet another state, Colorado, is about to ban virtually all semiautomatic rifles, large numbers of semiautomatic pistols, and even a number of semiautomatic shotguns. The previous state bans encompass America's most widely-held rifles such as the AR-15, but they don't apply to semiautomatic rifles that do not have pistol grips or other cosmetic features. The Colorado bill will ban ALL semiautomatic rifles that use a detachable magazine, which means almost all semiautomatic rifles. No other state goes that far.
The bill, SB 3, defines a "specified semiautomatic firearm" to include a "semiautomatic rifle with a detachable magazine." That will include a Browning BAR Semi-Auto rifle, a traditional hunting rifle that comes with a magazine holding only three rounds. The only exemption is for rifles that use .22 rimfire rounds, which cannot be used for large game.
SB 3 will also ban a "gas-operated semiautomatic handgun with a detachable magazine," which would include countless pistols such as the S&W M&P 5.7. It doesn't matter that the Supreme Court in Heller held that handguns as a class are protected by the Second Amendment.
The bill will also ban a "semiautomatic shotgun with a detachable magazine," such as a Remington 870 DM which comes with a six-round magazine. While most semiauto shotguns use a tubular magazine, detachable magazines are safer as they allow unloading without chambering each round.
SB 3 will make it a crime to transfer, sell, or purchase a specified semiautomatic firearm. A first offense will render one liable for a $250,000 fine. In addition to imprisonment, conviction for a second offense will leave the person ineligible to possess any firearm.
According to the Colorado Sun, SB 3 has 18 Senate cosponsors, and only 18 votes are needed for passage. The Sun notes that it will "almost certainly be approved by the House, where it has 24 original cosponsors." In support of the bill, Everytown mischaracterizes the subject firearms as "high-powered, military style firearms."
Some states and some circuit courts are pushing the envelope against the Supreme Court's Second Amendment rulings. It's time for the Court, as Chief Justice Marshall famously put it, "to say what the law is."
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We need these laws to put an end to gang violence in the ghetto!
There is approaching 0 chance that the current SCOTUS will do anything about it. Look at how disloyal Roberts and Barrett are
United States v. Rahimi was 8-1.
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen was 6-3. Roberts and Kavanaugh wrote a limiting concurrence.
"Look at how disloyal Roberts and Barrett are"
Well you just gave away everything anyone needs to know about your view of the law with that remark.
It should have been a 9-0 denial.
(Dr) Hunter S Thompson would roll over in his grave if he hadn’t already been cremated and his ashes shot in a cannon
The Remington 870 DM is a pump shotgun. It is not a semi-automatic.
"Some states and some circuit courts are pushing the envelope against the Supreme Court's Second Amendment rulings. "
A natural consequence of Rahimi, where 5 members of the Bruen majority told everybody, "Psych! Didn't really mean it."
This IS probably a bit further than the majority of the Court is willing to tolerate, to be sure... If they can't avoid taking the case in the first place.
Maybe it's time for the DOJ to take seriously going after states that deliberately violate civil rights.
I guess you have to be a lawyer to be confused by standard English
Article I, section 21 of the Pennsylvania State Constitution states: “The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.” Pennsylvania's lower courts have also consistently rejected article I, section 21 challenges to gun laws