Federalist Society Panel on Race in the Law after SFFA

I was the fourth and final speaker, at approximately 57.35 into the video, giving a brief talk about racial classifications after SFFFA.

Comments

[Randal]

A repeat of the standard Bernstein pack of lies, I assume?

[Bwaaah]

It would be nice if you would try to *elevate* the conversation. There's room for that.

[Randal]

There’s room for that.

No doubt! But it ain't gonna happen here, not with Bernstein's consistently bad faith.

[David Nieporent]

But you're the one who keeps bad faithedly (it's a word; I just made it up) misrepresenting Harvard's behavior. Also, his thing above had nothing to do with the facts of the case; it was the point he has made before about the arbitrariness of the classifications used in the U.S. and the haphazard way they came to be.

[Randal]

You always end up agreeing with my representation of Harvard’s behavior, what are you talking about.

At first you assume I’m defending Bernstein’s strawman, which I’m not. The strawman false choice is the lie. Which you eventually realize. But then forget again the next day.

[Bwaaah]

"Bad faithedly." Yes.