The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Kamala Harris's Indian Background Was Once a More Prominent Part of Her Curated Image
I was looking through some online archives available through my university's library, and noticed that there was a time in her political career that Kamala Harris talked a lot more about her Indian heritage.
For example, from 2009 (this was reprinted online in 2020): "One of the most influential people in my life, in addition to my mother, was my grandfather (TV Gopalan), who actually held a post in India that was like the secretary of state position in this country. My grandfather was one of the original independence fighters in India and some of my fondest memories from childhood were walking along the beach with him after he retired and lived in Besant Nagar in Madras." I take it that she was exaggerating both his contribution to Indian independence and the post he held …
From a 2003 profile (similar to one available here):
A product of two cultures, Harris delights in her multiculturalism. Her grandfather was an Indian diplomat who served in posts in Delhi and Zambia, and an aunt, an obstetrician in Chandigarh, is so beloved by her patients that they often leave baskets of fruit on her doorstep after she delivers their babies. In the 1940's, Harris told the San Francisco Examiner recently, her grandmother drove around India in a VW bug, urging village women through a bullhorn to use birth control. "Even though my grandma had an arranged marriage when she was 12, she and my grandfather were very open-minded people," she said. [Though they were initially "not too happy" when her mother declined an arranged marriage and married a black man she had fallen in love with instead.]
By 2019, the Los Angeles Times reported: "She seldom delves into her Indian heritage, reflecting a broader reticence to share personal stories beyond a handful of well-worn anecdotes."
I don't think any of this is damning in any way, but it's interesting to see how ambitious public figures curate their image over time. At some point in Harris' political career, for example, she thought talking about her grandmother's arranged marriage at age 12 and how that didn't stop the grandmother from being an outspoken feminist was helpful, and at some point she decided it wasn't.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just like Obama's foreign born credentials. Used to be prominent and a tool for advancement (see Sen. Pocahontas), then discarded when politically convenient.
“foreign born”
John Eastman— is that you??
Disgraced, disbarred, un-American Volokh Conspiracy dreamboy John Eastman?
(Have any of the Volokh Conspirators withdrawn their enthusiastic endorsement of John Eastman? One more thing these disaffected right-winger do not want to talk about.)
Well, they were fake foreign born credential, sure, but it was after all his publicist who was responsible for the claim, and they're usually trying to help you advance.
Always good to see Birther Brett checking in to provide the disaffected, bigoted, old, white. male, right-wing conspiracy theory perspective.
Although "We need a place where the Brett Bellmores of the world can offer their legal insights and huddle for warmth as America passes them by" turns out to have been a lousy idea for a blog.
We've been over this before. It was not.
It truly was a dastardly trick by Obama, wasn’t it Brett? To cleverly withhold his birth certificate to ensure that conservatives would still be bringing up self-beclowning birther questions… [checking notes]… fifteen years into the future?
Brett Bellmore still has that hook in his mouth.
Yeah, but did she grow up in a Jewish, Puerto Rican, Black neighborhood like Pop Corn's buddy, Joe Biden?
It was a tough neighborhood, his uncle got eaten by cannibals.
It's unfortunate that she's so ashamed of her culture and heritage.
Maybe she doesn't want anyone to figure out that she is not a natural born citizen within the meaning of the Constitution, and therefore not eligible to be President. Her parents were not USA citizens when she was born.
John Eastman posts under two pseudonyms on the Volokh Conspiracy.
John Eastman does whatever he wants at the Volokh Conspiracy. He's this blog's pinup boy.
Sorry, this idiot was native born. We produce enough idiots domestically, we don't really need to import them, even if we occasionally do.
"Maybe she doesn’t want anyone to figure out that she is not a natural born citizen within the meaning of the Constitution, and therefore not eligible to be President. Her parents were not USA citizens when she was born."
So what? When the United States citizen Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco, his parents were of Chinese descent and subjects of the Emperor of China. United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).
Yes, but Wong Kim Ark was not eligible to run for President.
Yes he was because "natural-born citizen" means "citizen at birth" (unless you want to argue it means born of a vaginal delivery and not conceived by IVF).
Are those delivered by C-sections not "natural-born citizens" and eligible to serve as president of the the US too? And IVF might make the conceptus ineligible to ever serve as president? Or are all questions of this sort self-evident nonsense?
What's this about "publicists," place of birth, and similar almost two decade old Trumpian, do those bringing it up here and now mean to be taken seriously, or they just trolling from the R-side of the plate?
And how does John Eastman pertain? Did he ever participate in the VC?
Why does faux-Reverend Kirkland perseverate the same mindless crap endlessly? If he isn't interest in serious engagement, why does he find something more meaningful to occupy himself?
At the time of the SCOTUS decision, Wong Kim Ark had not yet reached the age of 35. When he did, he became eligible to run for President.
Indian (as in from India), is one of those less useful minorities to be, from a political perspective. Like Jewish. Or Chinese. There's a few reasons.
1) Indian Americans make more than the average American household. Again, hard to claim a culture of discrimination when your ethnic groups makes more than the average American
2) Indian Americans aren't "traditionally" discriminated against.
3) You start to get questions if Harris is "really" Black (with the associated cultural attributes) or if she just has darker colored skin because of her Indian heritage. That question Harris would like to avoid.
Yes, lets do a close cost-benefit of Indians versus blacks.
Make sure to use "traditionally" in scare quotes as you dive deep into who is more discriminated against, and for bonus points talk about why you think that matters.
And absolutely question whether someone is really black, everyone loves it when white conservatives do that.
This is going to end great.
Censor yourselves Conservative Critics! Don't you know a Black Woman is speaking?!?! The law is every White person must shut up when a Black Woman speaks. And they must paypal them their illgotten racist White monies!
You have to love how this racist incel whines about black people complaining about racism while being racist!
Come for the racism, stay for the lazy stupidity!
The Nazi Child does like to flail about!
It's not racism to make cultural references to actual events or things.
Well, you'd need actual events or things first then!
Paypal me reference;
https://12160.info/m/photo/large?id=2649739%3APhoto%3A1714577
https://movingarts.org/project/listen-a-black-woman-is-speaking/
You people are always the most ignorant.
On the pure politics of it, it may well be a wash. Yes, there are people who will vote for her specifically because she's a minority, but there are also people who will vote against her because whatever she is, she's not white. Which group is larger, and how they might impact the results in close states, I don't know.
I don't think it's fair to assume this kind of identity thing is purely instrumental, but even assuming it is, it'll be like most other political branding - more art than science as to the cost/benefit.
You would admire the “art” of party propaganda practiced by the democrat media in favor of their preferred candidate. Who is let’s face it, really f’ing weird. Hence the projection that is now occurring.
You really are truly bad at reading.
Slow down, read what I said again, and then respond to what I actually said.
Rather you read what I said. If don’t want to see my responses to your absurd comments, feel free to mute me out you clown.
You're way too hilariously inept to mute, at least for now.
Look up the phrase 'art not science' just so you learn something today.
Like I write below. Imbecile.
Sarcastr0, you're talking to a woman who thinks that "Democrat" and "Marxist" are synonyms. As with the Queen in Alice in Wonderland, she likely believes six impossible things before breakfast.
He could be talking to an imaginary woman, don’t know. This is a comments section. And I suspect you know nothing of literature, or Alice in Wonderland, apart from maybe a POS Depp movie. Probably a big fan.
Riva, there are commenters here that I make a point of following only because the things they say are so hilariously stupid as to keep me cheerful all day. You're at the top of the list.
Woman? Bots don't have gender.
The Marxism thing is my current Riva highlight.
Calling everyone Marxist, accusing everyone of now knowing what Marxist means. And then when he's asked that Marxist means, quickly changing the subject.
Cherry on top was
Riva: 'do you deny you're a Marxist?'
Me: 'Sure do.'
Riva: 'I don't believe you.'
Awesome content.
Wow. My comments really bother you clowns with this scale of whining. Quite amusing. And sad at the same time.
Who's whining? I wouldn't part with all the entertainment you provide.
Sarcastr0 : "And then when he’s asked that Marxist means, quickly changing the subject"
Bot Riva has very limited programing. When someone ask for content outside of its primitive data base, its circuits freeze up. But the bot is engineered to automatically respond with a (child-level) brag or insult as cover until a successful reboot.
Krychek,
The mistake you're making is...not all minorities are treated equally by all people. You're grouping all minorities into one mega-group "minority"...and it's inaccurate.
Take a minority candidate in Dearborn, MI. If that minority is Muslim...the vote goes one way. If the minority is Jewish...the vote goes the other way.
An African American in Harlem does well. An Indian American...not the same. Both are minorities.
You get Victor Ramaswathy run in the GOP nomination process or Dr. Oz run for Senate in PA....that's not the same as having an African American run.
I was talking about how other people analyze it, not how I analyze it. That someone is a minority - any minority - makes it neither more likely nor less likely that I will vote for him.
Victor? Is that like a Ted, or a Nikki, or a Eugene?
Or a Vance?
A typical no-fact no information post from Sarcastr0.
Oh, my point was quite clear.
That you don't see it is all the more encouraging.
Something about "scare quotes" and "cost-benefit analysis," neither having been present in that to which he was responding. He seems to go with a vibey kind of approach, like a feeling that he's saying something.
But, yes, a typical no-fact no information post from Sarcastr0.
Oooh! It's so sweet to hear the bitter complaint of racists whining about how so much BETTER (sorry, "useful") it is to be black, because of all the benefits... Because of course it is! Except: while driving a car, walking into a store and getting followed, on the job market, on dating apps, in a TSA situation, getting into a club, living in houses, acquiring wealth (average white wealth is STILL 10 (TEN!) times that of black wealth) or you know ... running for president. Look ALL the stuff Al Caporn gets away with: rape, fraud, fascist desires, and being a surrender monkey to Putin. The so-called liberal media would NEVER have accepted Obama saying "in 4 years, you won't need to vote anymore", or "I like Putin, he's strong", mocking the disabled, celebrating grabbing pu---y, or promising to lock up political opponents. Reference: the 143 articles the NYT wrote about Hillary's email.
P.S. sKKotus only put drumpf above the law because they knew Biden wouldn't abuse that right to lock THEM up. Which maybe he should have. Biggest threat isn't GroperCleveland, but our KKonfederate sKKotus.
I guess one could try asking ChatGPT or Metas AI about it, but everyone knows they’ll just spit out whatever the campaign tells them. Truth and Democracy apparently both go to the Democratic Party to die.
What evidence have you for this preposterous claim?
I don't know about this claim, but ths concern AI will be used to sway public opinion is real.
Can you be this oblivious? Ask Meta AI about the assassination attempt on President Trump, Meta will say “I can’t assist with that,” ask it if Trump was almost assassinated, it’ll relate events from 2016 or 2017, ask about what happened to Trump in Butler Penn, Meta will discuss 2022. Do a google search and start tying, “assassination attempt on tru…” and you’ll get autocomplete selections for everything under the sun but Trump. Add “Trum” and it will suggest Truman”. Type “assassination attempt on Trump” zero autocomplete suggestions.
I would bet it says it can't assist because otherwise it would likely lead to misinformation (remember how many goofs here that night said the shooter was Chinese, a dedicated Bernie Bro, etc.,) and the resulting controversy would be bad for the company.
That’s asinine. There are clearly plenty of undisputed facts out there. They have no problem directing the reader to glowing BS about Kamala. These dem tech pukes are actively trying to diminish the significance of the assassination attempt and the heroism of President Trump. Clear election interference that should be investigated by Congress and/or the FEC. More the of same manipulations, just like they did in 2020.
There are clearly plenty of undisputed facts out there... the heroism of President Trump.
Lol.
Yeah. LOL. That’s quite a retort.
Quite a retort for a teenage girl that is.
What a weird thing to say.
I guess I’ll have to defer to you. The Democratic Party is the party of weird. Looking forward to the Chicago clown show.
I also love how it posted, waited a few minutes thinking about it, and then posted that.
You probably really want to say LOL again don’t you little girl clown ?
little girl clown
You're really upping your game today.
Again, that's a weird thing to say. Is it an insult that someone is a girl? Is it an insult that they are a little girl?
Most people probably don't consider it a pejorative to be called a girl, but here you are using it willy nilly like it's a gotcha insult. That's weird.
At least clown is an insult, so that part is clear.
Great comment at a blog operated and enjoyed by white, male, right-wing bigots.
It did seem to resonate beyond the usual MAGA echo chamber.
“Seeing Donald Trump get up after getting shot in the face and pump his fist in the air with the American flag is one of the most badass things I’ve ever seen in my life” -Mark Zuckerberg
It did. Because yeah, he looked awesome. But it's pretty blown off the pages with the current events on the Dem side.
I don't think that is due to a LLM-based conspiracy.
Heroism?? What did Donald Trump do that was heroic?
get shot in the ear and not cry like a little bitch as you would
I will think of this comment every time I see that complaint whimpering about how Northwestern declined to hire a racial slur-hurling bigot, or yet another a Volokh Conspiracy post whining about how mainstream academia is not sufficiently hospitable toward right-wing bigotry, superstition, and belligerent ignorance.
Carry on, clingers. Tears and all.
"The heroism of President Trump," what is that about, that a would-be assassin nicked his ear with a misdiected bullet? Ole bonespurs, disparager of true heroes and those who have sacrificed on behalf of others, is as unheroic as they come. (Am I addressing myself to a Russian bot?)
Does it have similar problems if you ask it about Joe Biden aborting his re-election campaign or 2024 Olympics results? The way these generative AIs usually work is to have a very large training period, and so they don’t have current events in their base model.
The publicly available, free version of these AI hyped up chatbots are all running on stale information. For instance, if you ask Google Gemini, it will tell you that most of it's training data is from 2021 or earlier, and anything after that it has to do its own google searches for.
But, also, they've limited these bots, forbidden them to answer obviously political questions.
Ha. Do you know how well limits on LLMs work?
As a former computer major who reads a lot, sure. I didn't say that the efforts to keep them from answering political questions were 100% effective against attempts to circumvent them, just that they've been made. You're not going to easily get political questions answered.
And you'd be a fool to trust any answers you got anyway, given the hallucination problem.
And this demonstrates why you’re wrong.
Prompt: “how up to date are you?”
Chat GPT: I’m up to date until October 2023
And Google will bring up Truman ahead of Trump in its “all” search because that attempt preceded Trump’s both chronologically and alphabetically. But if you search under “news” and start typing “assa”, “assassination Trump” is the second choice after “assassination”.
Despite my correcting your obvious mistakes, I am confident that you will continue to re-post about how Chat GPT discriminates against Trump, etc. etc
Then your statement is not wrong but incomplete: AI is already used to sway public opinion towards conservatism!
Thomas Crooks might well be our present day Von Stauffenberg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_von_Stauffenberg
Last time I checked, ChatGPT and Meta were private companies. If they want to program their AIs to ignore or even suppress certain questions, what exactly would you propose to do about it?
First of all, it’s not a hypothetical. They very intentionally and with much effort manipulate and censor search results, autocomplete suggestions, news sources and news results, social media posts and feeds, AI language/results, etc, all with the aim suppressing information they dislike and pushing the information they do like (propaganda).
There is a growing body of research showing that these efforts can be very effective in manipulating opinions. For example: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4535163
Now, to your point, there’s not necessarily anything illegal, per se, about any of this. So what should be done about it if anything? Answer:
1. Repeatedly point out and exhaustively document, measure, observe, and publicize what they are doing. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, the cure for speech is more speech, and so on.
We are still at the point where liberals deny until they are blue in the face that any of this is even happening (usually out of plain dishonesty, those who are unaware will simply question it). So we’ve got a long way to go. This is the most important point I think.
2. Related to #1, identify and support competing channels of information and media.
3. Continually examine antitrust issues and anti-competitive behavior. Google’s arguably monopoly-like power over search is what has allowed it to degrade its service considerably over the last 8-12 years which has harmed consumers, but even if they are in the clear now they may reach a tipping point at some time in the future. For another example, there are only two mobile app platforms (an oligopoly). When the only two platforms simultaneously deny service to an alternative social media platform, there’s a potential issue. When web services also deny service at the same time such that the competitor cannot even operate, there’s a potential issue.
4. Continually examine government censorship that is carried out more or less “voluntarily” by these private companies. This is the recent free speech cases. The government is so concerned with the political speech people are engaging in, that they go to social media companies listing people by name that they want banned, specific posts and information they want banned, etc.
5. Consider “common carrier” treatment of some types of communication networks as has been discussed on this blog.
6. Consider reevaluating the standards for immunity that some types of platforms enjoy for speech if they engage in extensive editorial functions with regard to that speech, and if they treat that speech as their own for purposes of free speech protections while disclaiming it as not their own for purposes of liability.
I could probably go on but that’s it off the top of my head.
7. Promote free speech as a societal virtue and a cultural value - not just a legal rule.
8. Free speech is too important to leave to the whims of private corporations, so establish a government-run social media powerhouse to ensure free speech is always protected. We could call it, "Truth Social".
Heh. As soon as I read that, I said, "I bet this is Epstein garbage." And of course, it is. He's one crank who keeps saying the same thing over and over again that nobody else agrees with.
So did Galileo
Truth in advertising. They shouldn't advertise them as politically neutral if they are in fact engineered for political gain.
Which has not been established by these Internet gumshoes.
Everybody's heritage is curated, based on internal and external pressures.
My maternal grandmother came from Hungary when she was 11; she never stopped leaning into her Hungarian heritage - cooking and clothes and the declaration before she took a shot ('egészségedre').
My maternal grandfather came from Ukraine at about the same age. He adopted a much more Americana-based heritage - Groucho Marx and Disney and Irish Spring and a smoking jacket. Of course at the time the expectations of a woman and a man were different, so maybe that accounts for it. Or internal choice.
If you want to go into politics, it gets more complicated to navigate. But it remains a personal decision.
And I predict many on here are gonna get freaky about Harris' decision anyway.
Great comment!
Everyone, listen, we don't want to disappoint Sarcastr0, the Thread Minder. Please stop discussing the curious inconsistencies in her biography, the official State position is that these are personal decisions therefore off limits for any conservative to criticize. So stay silent and do not speak of these matters!
No, everybody doesn’t have a party adjunct media to parrot talking points and censor/attack Democratic Party opponents. Repulsive isn’t good enough a description for your side.
"everybody doesn’t have a party adjunct media to parrot talking points"
There's this thing called Fox, Riva-bot! Party adjunct media parroting talking points to the max.
Don’t know about that little clown, I don’t watch Fox. But if they are also ventriloquist dummies for the latest dem talking points, feel free to criticize them too.
Well, I get that bots don't actually "watch" things....
Yeah, always the “bot” comment added to your high pitched whines when something strikes too close for comfort. Stupid and predictable. If democrats didn’t know how to cheat well, they’d long ago have ceased to exist as a party.
Riva 2 hours ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Given the extent of your whining complaints, I take it I’ve struck close to home. Always the recourse to the silly “bot” comment when you really want to distract and have nothing to say.
Stupid and predictable, indeed!
At least you didn’t write LOL little girl clown.
riva-bot:“everybody doesn’t have a party adjunct media to parrot talking points”
Malika: "There’s this thing called Fox, Riva-bot! Party adjunct media parroting talking points to the max."
Left-over Meatloaf literally CALLS IN to the Fibberaci Media when he gets upset, and they let him in live on air.
I get you want to talk about this other thing.
But I was not talking about that, so your reply is off topic.
That you can’t understand my comment is apparent. Because you an imbecile. You mention curated you f’ing moron. The subject of this article in fact. I simply comment on who is doing the curating and their motives.
Are you sure you don’t work in the public school system?
Both I and the OP are talking about curation by the individual.
You want to wank about media bias. So you do.
Honestly, maybe the smart move to avoid making it weird as so many are tempted to.
Tenuously connected off-topic ranting is your prerogative, but it sure makes you look like an unthinking bot!
Given the extent of your whining complaints, I take it I’ve struck close to home. Always the recourse to the silly “bot” comment when you really want to distract and have nothing to say.
Ah yes, the 'you calling me out as dumb only shows how much I got to you' subroutine.
Been leaning on that one a lot, lately.
Uh huh. Not quite convincing. But good to hear the whines.
Are you sure you even had any contact with a school system, public or private?
riva-bot: "Because you an imbecile." Rest my case.
Yes; bot is not programmed to respond like a human and talk about what's actually been said; it's programmed to react to trigger phrases. It's going to go around saying that Democrats are 'weird' because that's the latest iteration.
Do you know where in Ukraine? My mother's side and part of my father's side came from Lviv Oblast - though as Jews they weren't Ukrainian 🙂
I don't offhand, he didn't talk much about his native land and he died when I was pretty young.
I know a bit more about my grandma's home town, transliterated as 'Walnutburgh.'
Facts change.
The tradition of obsessive microinspection of multiracial Democrats continues.
You bring up a great point! Her diversity makes her immune from criticism by a bunch of bigots who don't worship people based upon superficial characteristics like we do!
It's the Democrats are microinspect race, gender, and whatever else suits their fancy.
No U isn't really going to play well in this thread, at least based on the comments so far.
Not based on all the overtly racist commenters here. Most of them appear to be Trump supporters.
They're both obsessed with race, just in different ways.
That's supposed to be why we're libertarians...
Yeah, but there's a difference. A burglar and a homeowner are both concerned with home security systems, just in different ways. The racists are concerned with race because they're racists. The Democrats are concerned with race because they are sincerely trying to fix it. Their efforts may not always hit the mark, but a good faith effort to fix something is not the same as wanting to perpetuate it, and the only way to avoid making mistakes is to not try.
"sincerely trying to fix it"
Yet doing the opposite.
What makes you think racists lack "good faith"?
I don't think the issue is bad faith, and I will repeat what I said on the subject on an earlier thread:
For most of our history we had a race-based caste system which on paper has now ended. However, it left a lot of problems in its wake, and you don't fix problems by pretending they're in the past and no longer exist. Because they're not. You need look no further than some of the regular commenters here to see that racism in all its ugliness is still alive and well.
It would be nice if we could all just pretend that everything is hunky dory and out race problems have gone away. But in order to achieve true healing, you have to lance that boil. You have to be willing to talk about root causes, and be willing to make necessary systemic changes.
I don't agree with every specific aspect and application of DEI and CRT, but they at least recognize that ignoring root causes fixes little. And the hostility to them stems in large part from hostility to actually fixing the problems.
Race relations have been improving slow but surely over the last century. DEI and CRT were designed and implemented stall the improvement.
You have evidence for that claim? You're essentially claiming that DEI and CRT are a conspiracy designed to keep racism alive. That's a fairly bold claim and I'd like to see some evidence for it.
both CRT and DEI are dividing people by race - What other result would you expect?
use some basic critical thinking skills - dont be a woke leftist living in a echo chamber.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality
Ranting about other people's echo chambers is your jam, but have you thought about learning what you're talking about for once?
Sure. They're dividing people into the group that would like to actually resolve underlying racial problems, and people who are happy to ignore them.
Krychek_2 1 hour ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
"Sure. They’re dividing people into the group that would like to actually resolve underlying racial problems, and people who are happy to ignore them."
K2 - you are Still not using basic critical thinking skills. Try again.
All right, explain which conclusions I would draw if, in your opinion, I were using critical thinking skills.
“DEI and CRT were designed and implemented [to] stall the improvement.”
I lean toward the unintended consequences theory.
Carl_N_Brown 8 hours ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
"I lean toward the unintended consequences theory."
"unintended Consequences" may very well be true.
However, once it became obvious that CRT and DEI were divisive, you have people like K2 not only defending it, pretending they are not divisive and repeating woke talking points.
"For most of our history we had a race-based caste system"
??? WTF are you talking about ???
Regular people do not engage in race-based anything. Normal people are raceless. Race is for the rest of the world to wallow in.
This race thing today is a manufactured abhorrent practice created by divergent "new" people who are majorities in their country of origin. Do not perpetuate false discord.
Show of hands. Other than NvEric, is there anyone here who does not know what I'm talking about when I say that for most of our history we had a race-based caste system?
K2 -
Again you are being very dishonest, along with confusing utopia with reality.
The woke leftist talking point is that DEI and CRT is to solve racial discrimination.
The reality is that DEI and CRT are designed to create racial division.
You should be able to recognize the difference but like most woke leftists you let yourself be fooled.
Yes, you've done a great job showing it's not you, it's the other guys that'r obsessed with race. The other guys!
DEI and CRT!
Keep on with such incredible insights.
And I'd like to see some evidence for that claim.
If they can’t understand that rewarding people and giving them jobs/positions of power purely because of the color of their skin is a bad thing, you’re wasting time trying to convince them Joe.
rewarding people and giving them jobs/positions of power purely because of the color of their skin
Purely? This is not DEI, this is a racial-grievance-monger's version of DEI.
"Leave the politician alone, waah!"
Maybe she should pull a Haley or Jindal and go by Kim?
Or she can serve a side of watermelon and grape soda with her chicken tikka masala and embrace both.
Don't forget the illegal Kools
Sorry Speaker Mike, but these are your people!
Speaking of Indian heritage, I wonder if Vance speaks much about his interfaith marriage and family in stump speeches to conservative religious crowds?
He doesn't. Because conservatives aren't obsessed with race the way you people are.
Corve5 1 hour ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Or she can serve a side of watermelon and grape soda with her chicken tikka masala and embrace both.
Lol, There's that lazy stupidity again!
It’s all pink on the inside
ROFLMAO.
Because replacement theory is totally not an obsession with race.
You people say that your primary purpose for supporting the immigration of non-whites is to get votes for Democrats1
Somehow I doubt the term "miscegenation" has crossed his lips since, er, Yale Law School.
That red dot on her forehead has got to drive her SS squad crazy
Usha?
It’s “Usher” and what’s he got to do with it?
Appears she has a long history of creating a toxic work environment
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13673913/kamala-harris-soul-destroying-bully.html
Still scrambling, eh?
Maybe this is the one that'll stick, but first you gotta struggle through all the people making it weird about race and gender and sex-having.
WTF are you trying to say? Rambling BS again.
Even a grammar-itically ignorant slob like me knows “Gender” is a grammatical term, you mean “Sex” which like the George Michael Sports machine said, is natural, good, not everyone does it, but everybody should
Frank “ Sex! Sex! Sex! I’ve had it up to here with Sex!
Not lately though, I’ll tell you that!
"Still scrambling, eh?"
The Trump campaign is not. Heavy immigration push about her right now. As expected, its a key weakness.
You are confusing blog/twitter comments with real life.
And Donald Trump is somehow supposed to contrast his peculiar management style with hers, favorably?
Former staffers might complain about Harris being mean or a poor manager, but I haven't seen any saying they were supporting her opponent because she was utterly unfit for office, as so many former Trump aides have.
Border Czar(ina) Border Czar(ina) Border Czar(ina) gonna be great when Laken Riley's grieving parents show up for the Debate and Cums-a-lot gets to tell them why their Daughter was raped and murdered by a Criminal who crossed the Border she was Czar-ina of, Oh, they won't let the family into the Debate site? Pretty sure "45/47" can figure that one out
Frank
Joe_dallas : “Appears she has a long history of creating a toxic work environment”
OK. Now research the Oval Office shambles from 2017-2021, the tendency of Trump’s employees to loathe him after the slightest exposure, the extraordinary number of people who worked in the White House & now say he’s unfit, the accounts of his crudeness, lack of ethics, lewd talk, and terrible-two-grade whiny snits.
Creating a better work enviroment is another contest where Harris beats Trump.
I don't think you need to look for a complicated explanation.
Early in their careers politicians talk more about their background. Later when they have established a track record they talk more about that. Voters would be right to wonder what's going on with a 60-ish candidate who still relies on stories about their formative years.
Yes, but Harris does pretend to be Black, in order to get Black votes and score diversity points.
Well she’s certainly had a little Black in her, Willie Brown for one
Frank
Northwestern made the right call.
UCLA did, too.
Carry on, clingers. Not necessarily on good law faculties, though.
Doesn't she, er, look black enough for you?
What's black about her? she doesn't even speak E-bonics like me
"Black enough"? Half my neighbors are black, I see black people all day. She doesn't look black, she looks Indian. Throw a sari on her and dump her in New Deli and nobody would look twice at her, she'd blend right in.
“New Deli”
Oy vey
Well, she does have a Jewish husband, after all. (Who, Trump helpfully explained yesterday, is a "crappy Jew" and a "horrible Jew.")
"“crappy Jew”
Checks out.
"The story of Hanukkah and the story of the Jewish people has always been one of hope and resilience. In the Hanukkah story, the Jewish people were forced into hiding," he wrote. "No one thought they would survive or that the few drops of oil they had would last. But they survived and the oil kept burning." Douglas Emhoff twitter, December, 2023
Maybe he should have paid attention in Sunday school.
Prof. Bernstein will issue a pass to Trump on that one.
Clingers gotta cling together.
I'm always on the lookout for a New Deli
Half my neighbors are black, I see black people all day. She doesn’t look black
Send this to JD Vance. It's such a good point I think everyone in the GOP should make it.
I think people can generally see it for themselves, and it doesn't have any bearing on why she'd be a horrible President, so, no.
No, it seems very important; the right (including you) really wants to talk about her specific physiognomy, to get down to specifics of what black looks like.
And I think they should be allowed to!
Literally the only reason I expressed an opinion of it was that it related to the topic in the OP.
Her race, (Mixed.) is irrelevant to why she won't be getting my vote. I expect it's irrelevant to virtually everybody who won't be voting for her. The shame of it is that it's not irrelevant to a lot of people who WILL be voting for her, because Democrats encourage people to care about meaningless crap like that.
I expect it's highly relevant to almost everyone who won't be voting for her. It's unlikely to be determinative to any who won't be voting for her, in that anyone who is going to vote for Trump is a loon or rabid partisan who would never have voted for any Democrat.
"loon"
80 million people!
Its still "deplorables" with you.
You are a libertarian, speaking of loon.
Anyone who thinks he got 80 million votes is a loon or rabid partisan.
And even if you can excuse some of the 74 million voters from 2020, that was before he tried to overthrow the government. Anyone who still supports him is a loon or rabid partisan.
And yes, deplorable too.
It will be 80 this year.
Ah, so the fix is already in?
My black wife begs to differ.
Pretend?
Politicians always talk about their identity - sex, race, religion - and why not? It makes a difference to some voters and if you aren't forthcoming they'll think you're hiding something. What they grow out of is stories about their parents and grandparents. After all, those are other people, people you talk about when you haven't got much to say about yourself.
Harris is half Jamaican and half Hindu. She can talk about that, if she wants to talk about her identity.
Hindu is a religion; one can't be "half Hindu." She is all Baptist. She is half Indian, though.
Meanwhile, you are half Nazi and half asshole. But I repeat myself.
So she can smoke a joint while she yells at the 100% Black kids to get out of her 7-11?(HT Parkinsonian Joe)
Donald Jasper Harris was born in Brown's Town, St. Ann Parish, Jamaica, the son of Oscar Joseph Harris and Beryl Christie Harris (née Finegan),[7][8] who were Afro-Jamaicans.
Harris does pretend to be Black, in order to get Black votes
Oh hell yeah, that's the good stuff.
Look at her. She does not even look Black. Maybe she wears a wig.
RIGHT INTO MY VEINS.
LOL!
Nah, lots of Light Skinned Black Women have hair like that, like Rachel Dolezal.
I used to answer “Amurican” when asked of my Ethnicity, till I heard that gets you on the FBI(who just announced 2 weeks after the fact that “45” was indeed, shot) naughty list
Frank
I don't think any of this is damning in any way, but it's interesting to see how ambitious public figures curate their image over time.
Even more interesting? To see how definitely-not-racist political partisans curate other people's images over time. Purely for not-racist, purely-political partisanship, of course.
By the way Bernstein, what do you think about Elon Musk's publication without explanation of an AI fake of Harris, using a likeness of her voice to brag that she was chosen as a DEI candidate?
Elon staying classy...
Meanwhile, from the "Just Asking Questions" file, David Bernstein couldn't resist just asking this question...
I mean, his partisan affiliation is pretty clear, but I do think he did it pretty adroitly, at least compared to many of his colleagues.
Still, this is a laugh:
“I don’t think any of this is damning in any way, but it’s interesting to see how ambitious public figures curate their image over time. At some point in Harris’ political career, for example, she thought talking about her grandmother’s arranged marriage at age 12 and how that didn’t stop the grandmother from being an outspoken feminist was helpful, and at some point she decided it wasn’t.”
‘I don’t think this is damming. Now I shall frame something that looks a lot like an attack on her feminism.’
Heck, my great-grandmother was in an arranged marriage, albeit at age 17, not 12. And one of my wife's grandmother's got married at age 15, and the other married her first cousin. I think going from "grandmother's arranged marriage at age 12" to "almost 50% chance of becoming president" in two generations is a pretty darn good American success story. I do think it's a bit odd that she just mentioned the "married at 12 thing" like it sounds perfectly normal to a modern American audience, but when you grow up with it, probably seems normal to you. But as I just suggested, instead of it being a story of her grandmother becoming a feminist anyway, I think it's a great "look how far my family has come, and look how great modern America is compared to India in the 1940s" story.
Past is prologue with you, Bernstein. Based on screeds and partisan articles you've published here before, it is highly doubtful you have a genuine interest in Harris extolling her heritage. Using someone's ethnicity for their diminishment has been a hallmark of Conservatism for decades. And you are a conservative, are you not?
I don't respond to substantively to silly harangues by people hiding behind pseudonyms. But thanks for playing.
“hiding behind pseudonyms”
Given your past posting here, I would agree this is probably the safest course of action
Says another coward hiding behing a pseudonym.
After your past performances here— why take the risk? Did you still want my boss’ contact info??
What the name of that CUNY student again?
Bullies make bad con law profs, IMHO
You also don’t say a word about the right-wing antisemitism and daily conservative bigotry at your white, male, bigot-hugging blog.
#Coward
#Bigot
#Clinger
#Loser
ambitious public figures curate their image over time.
You mean like "self-made" billionaire, maybe, Donald Trump?
Of course Trump curates his image, and was doing so well before he formally got into politics.
So, Bernstein, it appears you are trying to awkwardly insinuate that Harris ain't talking enough about her heritages like you do yours. I suspect you are hoping she'd talk more about them to remind rednecks about her otherness, or that she's not being progressive enough for the libs by not talking about them all the time. Seems to be a pissy little attack to make. Or are you mad that the Dem ticket is diverse and yours is, as usual, a WASP sausage fest
You have to love that DB's favorite two topics to post on are "all these people are caught up about ethnicity" and "criticism of my favorite ethnostate is bigotry against my ethnicity!"
Sometimes you have to wonder which nation state the hillbillies have more allegiance to: the shithole America that isn't great....or Israel
Be careful . . . the Volokh Conspirators don't like it when someone calls their hillbilly fans hillbillies. Eugene Volokh has censored and banned commenters (liberal and libertarian commenters) for that.
LOL
Two important points about this blog's viewpoint-driven censorship:
First, Eugene Volokh is and should be entitled to impose censorship at this blog. His playground, his rules.
Second, Eugene Volokh is to be credited for publicly acknowledging that censorship. Some people refuse to acknowledge it or even claim it never occurred.
(The guy who wrote that second song may be visiting your town soon. Try to catch that show.)
You want to pop Hobie's sphincter you don't have to grease him so much Jerry, just use one of your Rufies
This is why strong law faculties don’t want the likes of Bernstein, Blackman, and Volokh anywhere near them.
Neither of the people on the GOP ticket is a WASP.
Explain. I'll grant you Trump is not a Christian regardless how many gold bibles he sells
The letters "AS" in WASP are not just fillers so that it can be easily pronounced; they actually are initials for something. Which neither Trump nor Vance is.
They appear to be related to the Angles/Saxon tribes
On Trump's father's side, he's got German ancestry. Although the Anglo-Saxons were originally Germanic tribes, that doesn't make all Germans Anglo-Saxon. His mother was Scottish; you'd get punched in the face if you called them Anglo-Saxon. And Vance is Scots-Irish — again, not Anglo-Saxon.
Merriam-Webster gives a definition of WASP that seems to cover both:
Both have Northern European ancestry, and the second definition makes quibbling about Anglo-Saxon a bit pointless.
Better objections are that Vance is Catholic (now), and only entered the privileged class in his own generation; Trump is probably looked down on by traditional WASPs who would expect a longer lineage and a more respectable public persona.
And Vance is a Catholic.
Professor Bernstein, before too much more ethnic attribution regarding Vance's heritage, I suggest you explore the historical term, "Debatable Lands." Emigrants from that aptly-named region figured heavily in the settlement of America's central Appalachian region.
I do not have any insight to offer about the Bowman/Vance family tree, except to suggest it is likely to be a museum-grade example of ethnic confusions. Why not look into it and report what you find?
He’ll switch again soon enough.
What will his next name be?
German's are about as fucking "Anglo-Saxon" as you can get
There's a fucking "Saxony" (Sachsen in German as if you could speak any other language) and Saxony-Anhalt (see previous parenthetical to note your ignorance)
and pretty sure they're both "White" (OK, "45" does have an Orange hue, give you that) and "Protestant"
Seriously, do you sometimes forget to wipe your ass and wonder where that Shit smell is coming from?
Frank
This comment section is wild. Commentors really letting the racism fly free today. Yeesh.
Depends on your POV.
This could be seen as electoral gold, if they continue to be unable to contain themselves.
That's gold, Jerry, gold!
talking about race is not racism
Some people try to claim that habitual use of vile racial slurs is not racist. Other people claim to believe it.
and some disgraced Foo-Bawl Coaches call peoples "Klingers" and demand they "Comply" (Umm, sorry Jerry, think I'll go out for the team where I don't have to get anally raped) and don't get the Irony.
Of course there's a reason some peoples go into Foo-Bawl Coachery.
Frank
These are your fans, your defenders, and your target audience, Volokh Conspirators . . . and the reason your deans might pay Leonard Leo to get you off their campuses.
OK, point out the comments here that are habitually using racial slurs. I can't find a single one.
"habitually?" That's an exaggeration. But, it is true that racial slurs (and labels adjacent) do popup from time to time in these comments.
I know, the DemoKKKrats are horrible, maybe they should outsource Common-Laws Security Contingent (No threat, no knowledge of threats, but I am watching this Secret Service Retard (sorry, now I'm insulting the Retards, this Chucklehead would need 20 IQ points to reach "Retarded") try to explain how nobody saw a guy with a rifle on the nearest building.
Frank
The flamboyant illiteracy (when coupled with the bigotry) suggests Drackman might be a Conspirator’s sock puppet. Trying too hard to plant the “different commenter” flag.
(I take no credit for that insight. When someone else mentioned it I was skeptical. But that skepticism is eroding.)
Of course Bernstein would just take it some way that supports his political preferences, rather than provide any evidence. The Wikipedia page says he was Joint Secretary to the Government of India, described as the third highest non-political executive position, and held significant positions in Zambia during the Rhodesian/Zimbabwean struggle for independence.
"third highest non-political executive position,"
In the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation. Each ministry has one.
It's probably overstated (whether by Harris or her grandfather), but Bernstein's confident assertions from his political beliefs rather than evidence is a common feature of his posts.
LOL: "Probably" is not confident, and the reason I stated it was probably is that I assumed that if Harris's grandfather had been the Indian equivalent of Blinken, I would have heard about it by now.
Wow, Bernstein can name every Indian equivalent of Blinken for however many past decades? Or Bernstein makes assumptions based on his political preferences rather than do a brief internet search. Equally likely, I'm sure.
LOL. You don't think that if the Vice-President's grandfather had been one of India's highest-ranking officials, that would come up in bios of her and at least be on her Wikipedia page?
Well, it did come up in what you yourself quoted, so LOL right back at you. If you had looked at his Wikipedia page (pretty quick to find even with the wrong initials), you could have simply asserted it was overstated. But anyway it does say he was one of India's high ranking officials.
Shades of when Bernstein asserted in a post dated 1/21/2021 "the president has at the top of his agenda helping undocumented workers", even when his list of priorities listed it as sixth. If sixth can be the top, then why can't Gopalan?
Nothing keeps Michael P busier than hunting down esoterica to prove a point on this blog. Well done Magister, you spared the planet of him for at least 10 minutes
And Hobie? You can get stomped by Obie
You thirty-six-year-old bald-headed fag, blow me
You don’t know me, you’re too old, let go
It’s over, nobody listens to techno
Now, let’s go, just give me the signal
I’ll be there with a whole list full of new insults
I’ve been dope, suspenseful with a pencil
Ever since Prince turned himself into a symbol
But, sometimes, the shit just seems
Everybody only wants to discuss me
So this must mean I’m disgusting
But it’s just me, I’m just obscene (Yeah)
Though I’m not the first king of controversy
I am the worst thing since Elvis Presley
To do Black music so selfishly
And use it to get myself wealthy (Hey!)
Hey (man!) don't dat be some dope' lyrics? I be free-stylin' (well free-ballin')
Frank
Will any of the right-wingers who operate this white, male, conservative blog ever develop enough courage to say a word about the everyday stream of bigotry published by their fans at their blog?
Just one?
Once?
Carry on, cowardly clingers.
Watsa Matta U? U not be down with M&M?? (Seriously, that riff was from 2002) Not nearly as race-ist as some of your Homo-Stones lyrics.
Frank
Unhinged hobie, pretending that a moron posting moronic claims is doing good work.
Per Wikipedia: "In the functioning of the Government of India, a joint secretary is the administrative head of a wing in a department."
Unsurprisingly, Bernstein sounds right and Magister sounds unhinged.
>>I don't think any of this is damning in any way, but it's interesting to see how ambitious public figures curate their image over time<<
yeah, not that YOU think it is damning, just blatantly hoping your readers will
Please! David's "just asking questions"... (Whistling, too, probably.)
Why is it damning? I mean, if you hero-worship politicians, or at least Democratic politicians and assume that their public persona isn't curated based on what they think is most politically useful, perhaps you will be taken aback, but then that makes you a naif. Beyond that, it's a great American success story, to go from grandmother in arranged marriage in India when she's 12 to presumptive nominee for president. And it's interesting that she chooses not to tell that story.
"grandmother in arranged marriage in India when she’s 12"
That was every Brahmin class woman in that era. Harris' Indian family was upper class, as her grandfather's position shows. Went from upper class to upper class, a success story!
Vance's story is a far better American success story.
You're not doing Prof. Bernstein any favors here.
Facts are facts, even if you don't like them.
The relative quality of an American success story is not a fact.
" Vance’s story is a far better American success story. "
Bigoted hillbilly rides an affirmative action ticket to some education, nice jobs, and political position -- but is still a disaffected bigot afflicted by adult-onset superstition.
I can see the attraction for some clingers.
I'd say in fact going from your grand-mom being married off in an arranged marriage at age 12 to being the Democratic nominee for president is quite a success story, even if you grand-mom's family was well-off for her time and place.
Your right-wing fans might be gullible and dumb enough to swallow a claim that that was the message you were trying to convey here, but those who operate above the Drackman-Bumble-ML-throbbing male member guy-level are not.
I recommend you focus on praising Vance, Trump, and Eastman rather than saying anything about Vice President Harris.
He didn't say what I want to condemn him for saying, so I'm going to assume he meant to say what I want to condemn him for meaning. Then I'm going to condemn him for it.
I am surprised no one remembers the reporting on Harris in 2019 when she made a flippant reply when asked about pot use, she denigrated Jamaicans. It was nationally reported when her scholarly professor proud Jamaican father scolded his daughter in the press for besmirching her Jamaican ancestors and ancestry. His comment is damming. Politico has a summary however at the time, if I recall correctly, reports of the rift with her father occupied the news.
I am surprised no one remembers the reporting on Harris in 2019
Are you, though?
Now that she is suddenly the most "popular" presidential candidate in the history of America? No, I'm not surprised they want to memory hole that sort of thing.
So you think this 2019 remark is a big deal, politically?
Do you want to start a national dialogue on pot use? On her relationship with her father?
Still looks like flailing to me.
There isn't a big enough memory hole for everything they want to memory hole about her.
'Listen, there's a TON Of very important dirt. I'm just not super clear on what it is yet.'
Oh, come on. It's pretty clear what some of it is. For instance, the media haven't attempted to gaslight us about her having been made border "czar" because it was helping her.
CNN reports that Harris is "recalibrating her policy stances". Why? Because her previous stances hurt her politically.
Every previous statement that she's contradicting today is dirt in need of being memory holed. Like this one.
The distinction between the public not caring and something being covered up is not one I think you (or I) capable of making.
This is not an objective area - what you think is dirt has little relationship with what counts as dirt in the actual political trenches.
Never thought I'd see you get on the abuse of the word gaslight train.
Of course I'm capable of making that distinction. For instance, when Axios (Among other sites.) says today that Harris was never "border czar", and then goes back and alters previous reporting on her having been border "czar" to state that it was mistaken, what else are they attempting to do, except re-write history?
When people make a fuss about Harris having been the most left-wing member of the Senate, and the rating site used to back up this statement goes and changes their whole rating system to retroactively undo the designation, what else are they attempting to do, but re-write history?
This is 1984 scale history revision, going on right in front of our eyes.
BrettLaw, and now BrettPolitics.
Maybe the border thing will stick, maybe it won't. But you are not the arbiter of what the public cares about, no matter how much you think they *should* care.
Terminally online people love to give political advice, but we should realize that *we are very bad at it.*
You still think travelgate is important, FFS.
I'm not talking about what the public thinks is important, though. The public is perfectly capable of caring or not caring about something independent of whether a coverup is attempted. (Though caring where a coverup is successful is a bit hard...)
It really doesn't matter if the public cares that she was put in charge of border issues. She was, and the attempts to revise the historical record to conceal that are a "coverup" regardless of public opinion.
What's important politically is definitionally subjective, though.
Your personal moral dudgeon has zero relevance outside you.
Brettmore says:
"It really doesn’t matter if the public cares that she was put in charge of border issues. She was [...]"
What aspects of the Biden administrion's border policy were implemented at Harris's direction? What czar-like authority was she given? What were the border policies that Harris recommended or influenced that you disagree with?
Looks to me like you and your fellow Trump soap boys are just throwing up chaff to distract from the relevent issues.
Look, when the very person who called her a “czar” at Axios says, “Czar? She was never the czar!” you’re looking an an effort to rewrite the candidate’s history. Doesn’t matter what authority Biden gave her after publicly saying he was putting her in charge of it. He DID publicly say he was putting her in charge of it, and now she wants to disown that because the border became a stinking mess by design.
And the media immediately jumped to help her disown it.
Likewise going back and revising a whole system of past officeholder ratings just to erase her being listed as the most liberal Senator. It’s rewriting history, going on right in front of us.
I don’t think it’s going to be successful, because the past is too well archived. It’s just making them look stupid. But it’s like my favorite Solzhenitsyn quote:
“We know that they are lying, they know that they are lying, they even know that we know they are lying, we also know that they know we know they are lying too, they of course know that we certainly know they know we know they are lying too as well, but they are still lying. In our country, the lie has become not just moral category, but the pillar industry of this country.”
We used to laugh at the USSR over that. Not in a position to laugh at them anymore, I guess. The media are morphing into MiniTrue right in front of our eyes.
Brettmore says “Look”
At least try to pay attention (though I know that for someone with your impairment it may be difficult). The relevant question is, to what extent was Harris responsible for recommending/implementing Biden administration border policy. Was she given czar like authority or not? What Axios writers wrote back then or now doesn’t have anything to do with it. Nor what is written in propaganda sites like Daily Caller.
If you disagree with Biden administration border policy, even if your disagreement is not rational, to which a large extent it is not, criticism is fair. Whining about whether or not she was a czar or the most leftist member of congress is just bullshit chaff dispersal. Of course, that is no surprise.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/20/kamala-harris-father-pot-1176805
He must be a very proud father to publicly chastise his daughter for her self-deprecating joke with a humorless, heartless press release.
Thanks, Dad!
Prof. Bernstein can't muster a word of objection to his white, male, right-wing blog's regular stream of conservative antisemitism, but he finds the time to whine about Vice President Harris' provenance.
He won't have much to say about war-criming right-wingers in Israel, either. He seems to adore Smotrich and the other theocratic, violent bigots in Israel's government as much as he does Eastman.
Carry on, clingers. For a bit longer, anyway.
I don't know why the man publishes here. The conservatives are all raging antisemites, and the rest are anti-Israel government and anti-religion
Hobie, check your Man-Bun, your Tertiary Syphilis is showing, There’s more Anti-Semitism (rhymes with Jism) in Representative Mullah Ill-hand-Job Omar’s Turban and Priapism Slap-a-Jap-a-Paypals flaring Nostrils than all of the Josh Harley’s Randy Pauls, and Lindasy Buckingham-Nicks Grahams dreamt of in your Philosophy.
Seriously, Hobie, you make me feel like I’m in 5th grade, beating up the retarded 7th grader (Why are you hitting yourself? Stop hitting yourself!) who got put back in our class, I guess maybe you’re into humiliation?
Frank “pull my finger”
.
Who else would have him?
Biden / Harris administration - Friends of Israel - that is very questionable. Actions speak louder than what is said on the campaign trail
"According to Reuters, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin doesn’t want Israel to go ahead with its anticipated military response to Sunday’s deadly terror attack and would instead prefer to “see things resolved in a diplomatic fashion.”
“United States Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin does not believe that a fight between Israel and Hezbollah is inevitable, and said Washington would like to see things resolved in a diplomatic fashion,” the news agency reported Tuesday.
Reporting on the Biden administration bid to ‘deter’ Israel from hitting major targets inside Lebanon, including the Beirut airport — the main transit point for Iranian weapons to the terrorist group,
Just gotta slam every morsel you get into the VC, no matter how off topic.
Seems desperate.
Great comment!
Advising a blowhard acquaintance to refrain from issuing checks that might not cash seems very friendly.
Israel may be a step or two away from writing such a check. If those right-wing assholes lose Biden, they could lose everything.
(I don't know why they would do something that stupid, but it's their call to make. It's their funeral.)
Her Indian mother (if Wikipedia is to be believed) literally did cancer research.
A Harris candidacy can help dispel the racist notion that intelligence has a genetic basis.
Fortunately we only need her candidacy for that, she can retire in ignominy after losing to Donald Trump.
How exactly is it a racist notion, though? It's pretty uncontroversial in genetics circles that intelligence has a large genetic component. It's large enough that it would be pretty difficult to deny, not that some fools don't attempt to.
The slight correlation with race is pretty controversial, but let's not throw out the whole truth just because one little corner of it might be mildly inconvenient or misleading. (Even if race and IQ were genetically correlated, this would tell you absolutely nothing about any particular person, given how broad and overlapping the distributions are.)
"the racist notion that intelligence has a genetic basis"
Like a dog peeing on trees to mark his territory, so too do people take legitimate subjects of inquiry, like the relationship between intelligence and genetics, and piss on them so as to say, "Do not go there."
That falls under the category of dumb-ass declarations at the intersection of contemporary progressive politics and natural science. For example, for merely having studied the question and having found significant correlations, the Southern Poverty Law Center labels Charles Murray as a "white supremacist." Let that be a lesson to others who might ask "racist questions" about genetics.
Sigh, I guess each and every joke needs a /sarc tag.
I'm just trying to say Harris isn't particularly intelligent, at least not in the sense that cancer researchers are intelligent. Maybe she's crafty and clever, which are the close-enough-for-government-work equivalents of intelligence for politicians. I would have added single-minded dogged determination, but there are some things dogs just won't do.
You folks think someone mentioned this post to Trump and he tried to use it?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-31/trump-questions-harris-race-at-event-with-black-journalists
“I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn Black and now she wants to be known as Black. So, I don’t know, is she Indian or is she Black?”
Congratulations to Professor David Bernstein on becoming Donald Trump's racism whisperer!
By all accounts it was a big hit at the event too! Trump should work that routine into his regular stump speech, right between the whole electric boat-shark thing and his call-out to Hannibal Lecter.
Professor Bernstein would really be proud then.