Edited Version of CFPB v. CFSAA for the 2024 Barnett-Blackman Supplement

I have finished editing CFPB v. CFSAA for the 2024 Barnett-Blackman supplement. I compressed about 60 pages down to 17 pages. You can download it here.

I will have more to say about this case in another post.

Comments

[OtisAH]

“I will have more to say about this case in another post.”

Please, God, find him something else to occupy his time.

[Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf]

Yeah, like commenting on YOUR blog about how useless YOU are.

[CJColucci]

Promise or threat?

[NvEric]

Josh, there're the same paper. Where's the 60 page one ?

[MatthewSlyfield]

Presumably, the 60 page one is the original court decision.

Here's the raw decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-448_o7jp.pdf

59 pages.

[Noscitur a sociis]

Prof. Blackman,

How many people actually use these supplements?

I’d put the over/under at .5.

[Dilan Esper]

I appreciated them as a law student.

[Noscitur a sociis]

You used Josh Blackman's casebook supplements when you were n law school?

[Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland]

Mr. Esper likely was referring to study aids in general (the Emanuel series was popular at one time) rather than to anything Profs. Blackman and Barnett were involved with.