The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Biden Administration Lets Migrants Who Entered Under Uniting for Ukraine Apply to Stay in the US For Another Two Years [Updated]
It's a step in the right direction. But a better solution would be for Congress to allow them to stay permanently.
Since April 2022, the US has admitted some 200,000 or more Ukrainian migrants under the Uniting for Ukraine (U4U) program, which enables US citizens and legal residents to sponsor Ukrainians fleeing Russia's brutal invasion to live and work in the United States for up to two years (I am myself a sponsor for two Ukrainian families). Although the program has many virtues and has been highly successful, the two-year time limit has been a major downside, from the beginning. Many of the Ukrainians will need a permanent refuge. And giving it to them will also enable them to contribute more to our economy and society.
Yesterday, the Biden Administration began a program under which U4U participants can apply for "re-parole." Those whose applications are accepted would be allowed to live and work legally in the US for an additional two years.
This is a step in the right direction. The war in Ukraine shows little sign of ending anytime soon. And many of the refugees may be unwilling or unable to return even after the fighting stops (e.g. - because their former homes have been destroyed by the Russian military). Past refugee crises show that it is often impossible and undesirable to force everyone to return to their original homes, even after the fighting is over.
But the re-parole process does have some downsides. One is that the relevant forms and application process seem unduly complicated, and some aspects of the system are unclear. For example, I cannot figure out whether the two-year extension is tacked on to the end of the original two years, or whether it begins as soon as USCIS accepts an application (in the latter case participants may end up with less than four years total) [see update for clarification on this issue]. The filing fees are also hard to determine, though they seem to be $575 per person, if I understand the USCIS website correctly. That goes well beyond any plausible administrative expenses and is a considerable burden for the many parolees who lost everything in the Russian invasion and may be employed at working-class jobs today. At the very least, the fees should be lowered.
In addition, the extension, like the original U4U program, is a matter of executive discretion. What Caesar giveth, he or his successor could taketh away - a very real danger, given the prospect of Donald Trump returning to the White House. It is not entirely clear whether the president could unilaterally strip U4U parolees of their status before their term ends. At the very least, the president could simply let the term expire and refuse to renew it.
Despite such limitations, the re-parole system is a useful step. Otherwise, many U4U participants will see their residency and work rights expire in 2024 or 2025. But, like the earlier grant of a right to apply for TPS status, this is not a substitute for giving Ukrainians permanent residency rights. Congress must pass an adjustment act to do that; I outlined the case for doing so here. There is in fact a bipartisan Ukrainian Adjustment Act proposed by several members of Congress. But it doesn't seem likely to pass this year. Similar adjustment acts should be adopted to cover Afghans, Venezuelans, and others in similar straits, who fled war and oppression, entered the US through the use of presidential parole power, and now face arbitrary time limits on their residency and work rights.
If you are a U4U participant or a sponsor who needs help with the re-parole process, please let me know and I will see if I can get answers to your questions.
I have made inquiries with government officials and other experts to try to clear up some of the uncertainties noted above. If I learn anything useful, I will update this post.
UPDATE: A USCIS official has now confirmed to me that Ukrainians who successfully apply for re-parole will get an additional two years on top of their full initial term. Thus, if someone's parole is expiring on April 25, 2024, they file for re-parole and USCIS grants it, the re-parole period will be a full two years beginning on April 25, 2024 and ending on April 25, 2026. The official also indicated that agency will be prioritizing the re-parole of persons whose initial parole period expires earliest, to minimize the risk of anyone losing employment rights in the meantime.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Going to be hard to save You-crane if they're all over here.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13143577/Russia-Vladimir-Putin-weaponise-migrants-Europe.html
"migrants"?
I thought they were refugees, temporarily given shelter? Its always "camel's nose" with open borders fanatics.
Yes.
Another rousing meeting of Libertarians For Authoritarian, Bigoted, and Cruel Immigration Policies and Practices is convened . . . at one of top gathering spots for immigrant-hating faux libertarians.
"But a better solution would be for Congress to allow them to stay permanently."
It's right there in the sub headline, did you not even read that far? That's his entire point. Are you okay?
No need to read it. Somin is always in favor of poisoning America with foreign migrants.
Funny, your last name doesn't sound Algonquin.
You are the right-wing immigrant-hater these disaffected conservative law professors court as a target audience. And the reason their colleagues and employers wish they would leave campus and, until then, find somewhere else to sit during faculty meetings.
Those pesky American right-wingers. What do you reckon they're going to do to you when your culture war invariably turns hot?
It won't even take that -- what's going to happen to law schools when they stop funding student loans?
You assert without evidence or argument what must be. I take it these are merely expressions of philosophical preference, since you do not take the time to present an argument, much less buttress it with evidence.
I say shoot them.
Let's compromise -- they go home and don't get shot.
Can you go 48 hours without advocating for the killing of other humans on this ostensibly legal blog? can you?? I’m starting to wonder if you are actually physically able to abstain. Cmon, give it a try! You might like it!
Without clinger calls for violence, the proprietor launching a vile racial slur or indulging his trans fetish, or the conservative commenters responding to the Conspirators' cues with a steady stream of bigotry, it would not be the Volokh Conspiracy.
Carry on, clingers.
They are the effect, not the cause: people like AIDS here want them to come, and have systematically disregarded the law to permit and encourage mass illegal migration to happen for decades.
So, where should those guns really be aimed…?
Did you read the second sentence?
Have you considered getting psychiatric care for your necrophiliac fantasies?
How many Laken Rileys will it take till Joe knows,
that too many people have died?
Frank
I would have sworn I've read this article before.
There is no problem that can’t be solved by importing more human beings. If the importing of these human beings also brings along with it crazy-ass religious beliefs or clashing culture traits, the problem gets solved even better.
"The problem" is that there are Ukrainians who had to flee their country because it was invaded by Russia. Not sure what that has to do with "importing more human beings." Since your comment has nothing to do with the post, I have to assume you composed your little sarcastic bon mot and simply trotted it out the next time you saw a Prof. Somin post that had anything to do with immigration.
No, the Russian invasion is not the problem. Somin is always in favor of importing migrants from everywhere. The Ukrainians should go fix their own country, before messing up ours.
My comment was a reply to mulched's comment. Mulched sensed some kind of familiarity in this post. My off-the-cuff response was a sequitur, for that very reason. Because in prior posts by this author, there is no global problem for which immigration to the United States is not a solution.
I grieve deeply for the Ukrainians. I don't understand why the hard-right in the house is against any further support. It's probably because Trump hates the Ukrainians so much. I'm for the aid. I think the sponsorship mentioned in the post is a fine idea, for some number of years. Making it permanent is the issue which needs more debate, in my opinion.
.
Want to try to identify a religious belief that is not crazy-ass delusion, especially silly nonsense, and/or childish superstition?
Bring it on, clinger.
Exactly, AIDS. Welcome to the dying days of the concept of equality (and of free will). No god made people equal, and there's no necessity to consider them to be such either. Choose reason and science.
How much better will the world be when your 'mainstream' value system is dead and gone. 🙂
The mainstream will ,continue to stomp conservative misfits, Republican bigots, and right-wing malcontents into irrelevance.
See you down that road, clingers.
No, AIDS. The masses are abandoning your values, and shall continue to do so.
Not that they matter so much for the longer term. Look at your youth. Look at your birth rates. Look at your mass immigration. Your values are doomed.
Doomed, AIDS.
I meant that literally and figuratively. Literally, I thought Somin had written before about making Ukrainian temporary status permanent. I didn't go back and check and I'm not going to. I don't see how that helps Ukraine a bit.
Figuratively, yeah, 98% of Somin's articles are about why more immigration, wherever they're from, is a great thing so any limits on it of any kind are bad.
Let's try this one.
A population trap in Canada caused by excessive immigration
https://www.vicnews.com/opinion/uzelman-population-trap-has-been-triggered-by-surging-population-7300809
This is an opinion piece liberally quoting from a report that it does not link to.
Reading the report (here: https://www.nbc.ca/content/dam/bnc/taux-analyses/analyse-eco/etude-speciale/special-report_240115.pdf)
it is 5 pages and makes some extraordinary claims. It could be true - it looks legit to my non-expert eyes. But it’s a bit over a month old and I’d wait for some other experts to weigh in.
It is also about Canada. The OP is about the US.
If Armchair’s thesis is ‘there is such thing as too high a rate of immigration’ I’m willing to say he’s provided support for that, though I’d wait for replication before I’d call it proved.
That’s great; it doesn’t tell us much about the OP, or US immigration policy generally.
Canada is showing us how excessive immigration can ruin a nation.
We survived enabling millions of bigots, traitors, and losers to resume statehood and citizenship. It was a grave mistake, but we withstood it. We can handle continued immigration.
Where we = better (educated, modern, reasoning, accomplished, liberal-libertarian mainstream) Americans.
Bitter clingers can't handle it, but who cares?
In 1776…?
It’s looking ever-more likely that, regardless of who wins in November, those ‘clingers’ are going to mass murder your lot. What’s your exit strategy, AIDS?
What’s so wonderful about mass immigration to the US this time round is that, unlike your 19th century experience, your middle class is shrinking and your poor are getting poorer. Yet your colour teams still want to dump millions of unskilled illiterate labour into the country. Further, you systematically exploit them in every blue city in your union, violating all labour laws, etc.
So, what do you say to ‘progressives’ and ‘liberals’ from more civilized countries about your mindless hypocrisy, exploitation, and betrayal of everything the left and American ‘liberals’ ever fought for?
How about a trade: one of them can stay if you leave forever, Tankie.
Is Rev... tankie?
If your presence can be tolerated, then Ukrainians are certainly welcome.
That was supposed to be a reply to Roger S' bigoted comment regarding Ukrainians "messing up" our country.
Replies and edits are broken with the new commenting update.
Mass immigration is screwing things up royally nationally.
Shocked the open borders acolytes have not noticed any problems...
Do you want Russia to win the war? It certainly will be easier for Russia to do so if we help Ukraine's population leave the country.