The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Conviction for Threatening (in the U.S.) Supporter of Democracy in China
From yesterday's Justice Department press release:
A Berklee College of Music student, who is a citizen of the People's Republic of China (PRC), was convicted by a federal jury in Boston today of stalking and threatening an individual who posted fliers in support of democracy in China around the Berklee campus area.
Xiaolei Wu, 26, was convicted following a four-day jury trial of one count of cyberstalking and one count of interstate transmissions of threatening communication. U.S. District Court Judge Denise J. Casper scheduled sentencing for April 24, 2024. Wu was arrested and charged by criminal complaint in December 2022 and subsequently indicted by a federal grand jury in January 2023….
On Oct. 22, 2022, while Wu was attending the Berklee College of Music, an individual posted a flier on or near the Berklee College of Music campus which said, "Stand with Chinese People," as well as, "We Want Freedom," and "We Want Democracy." Beginning on or about Oct. 22, 2022, and continuing until Oct. 24, 2022, Wu made a series of communications via WeChat, email and Instagram directed towards the victim who posted the flier. Among other things, Wu said, "Post more, I will chop your bastard hands off." He also told the victim that he had informed the public security agency in China about the victim's actions and that the public security agency in China would "greet" the victim's family. Additionally, Wu solicited others to find out where the victim was living, publicly posted the victim's email address in the hopes that others would abuse the victim online, and he reported the victim's information back to a member of the Chinese government….
You can also read the FBI agent's affidavit describing the facts as the government alleged them to be. An excerpt:
12. On or about October 22, 2022, at approximately 10:48 pm, after Individual 1 had posted the photograph of the flier to Instagram, WU posted in Berklee Class of 2024 WeChat group. At the time, the group had over 300 members, including Individual 1. WU's posts were in Chinese. A translation of WU's posts indicates that he said the following:
@[Individual 1] don't you fucking post reactionary posters
Fucking tear [tore] all of them you bastard
You go to post them at Tian'anmen Square
Post more, I will chop your bastard hand(s) off
…
Let barklee [sic] bite your hand(s) off
Not killed by pandemic but about to be killed by Public Security
[image of law enforcement personnel]13. On October 23, 2022, at approximately 1:54 am, WU posted another message to the Berklee Class of 2024 WeChat group, in which he said the following:
I already called the tipoff line in the country, the public security
agency will go greet your family.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The PRC needs to teach its sleeper agents not to out themselves so obviously.
Yes, Chinese nationals can never be insane on their own, it must be a PRC agent with shit tradecraft!
It's bigoted to not let Chinese nationals be shitheels all on their own.
The PRC regularly uses undercover agents to target and harass dissidents in foreign countries even in cases that seem nonsensical to westerners. For example they regularly attempt to detain and repatriate low level critics through overseas police stations and send nastygrams to foreign officials to try to prevent them from seeing certain dance shows and they pay agents to try to smear youtubers they don’t like. None of this excludes chinese being dumb on their own.
This is widespread and accepted knowledge. Its a reasonable assumption until good evidence shows otherwise that there is a good chance the PRC is somehow directly involved whenever an antiPRC dissident is significantly harassed.
I was half joking. I did not expect you to double down. Default reasonable assumption is chine is behind all anti China stuff. lol.
The volunteer member of the 50 Cent Party would not have had significant motivation -- or a credible threat mechanism -- to harass the pro-democracy demonstrator without the CCP regime back home. So, yes, in some very real senses the PLA was behind this.
I would think that a member of the "stochastic terrorism" party would recognize this.
Every time someone critical of Trump is killed I always say default blame a spy controlled by the Trump cabal.
This is a normal an not crazy thing to think, and I must endorse it since I a, the party of stochastic terrorism.
Sarcastro -- it is a different culture and this IS what they do.
They don't understand ours -- they REALLY don't understand ours and I've seen CCP agents make some spectacular blunders but then they (a) have protections they shouldn't have via their student status and (b) it ain't J Edgar Hoover's FBI anymore.
Yeah, OK chief. Your deep understanding of Chinese culture lets you sniff out PRC agents based on the data presented and we should trust you.
Actually, I'm going to continue in my position: A Chinese national doing Chinese nationalist shit does not, by itself, give rise to a reasonable suspicion they are a PRC agent.
Maybe more evidence will arise later. But in the absence of such evidence, you and Amos and Michael are taking your anti-Chinese nationalist bigotry kick and using it to speculate your way into facts that are not in evidence.
Yeah, OK chief. Your deep understanding of Chinese culture lets you sniff out PRC agents based on the data presented and we should trust you.
When they try to recruit you, yea, you kinda notice it.
They REALLY don't understand Americans...
Liar.
The PRC regularly uses undercover agents to target and harass dissidents in foreign countries
If this guy is an undercover agent he's not very good at the "undercover" part of it. I'd guess the guy is more of a loyalist than actual agent, but you could be right.
No matter how well the "liberal establishment" shows itself, in brave and enforceable ways, a true defender of free speech, we will hear here about how it is actually part of the "woke" anti-speech conspiracy.
Threatening to "chop [someone's] hands off" for putting up "reactionary posters"? Sounds pretty "woke" to me...
That is because you are a worthless, bigoted wingnut. And the target audience of a white, male, hypocritical right-wing blog with (for a few more months) a receding academic veneer.
Kirkland, exactly how many "worthless, bigoted, white, male, hypocritical right wing wignuts" know how to read Mandarin?
Do YOU know how to read Mandarin?
Do you even understand why "read Mandarin" is technically the wrong term?
And as to Stanford, isn't it slightly more prestegous than UCLA?
.
Perfect!
(Do you contend a janitorial position at Stanford is more "prestegous" than a law faculty appointment at UCLA?)
Rev, I heard it’s bingo night! Lots more fun to be had than trolling the comment section.
If I remember correctly, his *assistant* is getting a 6 figure salary.
How does this have anything to do with this story? Oh it makes sense now and your frequent use of the word “clinger” as in anyone who wasn’t on board with the Great Leap Forward.
Is the CCP supposed to be "woke"?