The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Canadian Immigration Officials Block Citizenship Grant for Russian Immigrant Because She Was Convicted of the "Crime" of Speaking Out Against Russia's War of Aggression Against Ukraine
If the absurd decision stands, she could potentially be deported back to Russia, where she faces an 8-year prison sentence.

Maria Kartasheva, a Russian migrant in Canada may be denied citizenship and potentially be deported because she was convicted of a "crime" back in Russia. What was her heinous offense? She wrote blog posts condemning Putin's invasion of Ukraine and war crimes committed by Russian troops there:
Federal officials are blocking a pro-democracy activist from Canadian citizenship because a Russian court convicted her for blog posts opposing Moscow's invasion of Ukraine.
Maria Kartasheva is appealing the decision by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, and says she fears being deported to a Russian prison.
Kartasheva left Russia in 2019 because of rising authoritarianism, and is now a tech worker in Ottawa who co-founded a grassroots activist group for democracy in Russia….
Kartasheva, 30, learned via her family that in late 2022 she was charged by Russian authorities with a wartime offence of disseminating "deliberately false information" about Russia forces. The charges related to two blog posts she wrote while living in Canada.
Kartasheva notified Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada about the charges and uploaded translated court documents last May. Days later the department gave her an invitation to her citizenship ceremony.
On June 7, 2023, she logged into the ceremony alongside her husband. In the pre-interview that takes place before someone is allowed into the ceremony room, they were asked if anyone had been criminally charged, as part of a list of standard questions.
When she explained what had happened, an official pulled her out of the ceremony, though her husband went ahead and was given his citizenship…..
Last month, the department sent her a letter, saying that her conviction in Russia aligns with a Criminal Code offence in Canada relating to false information.
Kartasheva's blog posts condemning the invasion of Ukraine and atrocities committed by Russian forces ran afoul of new draconian Russian laws criminalizing dissent on the war. A Russian court convicted her in absentia, and sentenced her to an eight-year prison sentence. Ironically, Elena Lenskaya - the judge who sentenced Kartasheva - is under sanctions by Canada, for her role in perpetrating human rights violations. Yet Canadian immigration authorities are relying on her decision in this case as a reason to deny citizenship.
There is much stupidity and downright evil in US immigration law and policy. But if Canadian authorities don't reverse this decision, it would be up there with some of the worst of ours.
If anything, Kartasheva's conviction for speaking out against the war should help her cause, not hurt it. Like the US, Canada has a law granting refugee or asylum status to people who have a "well-founded fear of persecution" for their political views. If anyone has such a "well-founded fear," it's a person who faces a lengthy prison sentence for speaking out against her government's war of aggression and atrocities.
Last year, Canada granted refugee status to a young Russian fleeing conscription into Putin's war. Kartasheva's case is at least equally worthy. And the idea that her conviction is a crime meriting denial of citizenship in a liberal democratic society is absurd.
Since the start of the conflict, I have been making the case that Western nations should open their doors to Russians fleeing Putin's regime, on both moral and strategic grounds. For some of my writings on this topic, see here, here, here, and here. But even those unwilling to go as far in this direction as I advocate should at least be open to accepting Russians who face persecution and imprisonment for speaking out against the war.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Think about it, Ilya.
This woman thought for herself instead of thinking like she was told to by the government. Canada can't have that kind of person in the country. Next thing you know she would be driving a truck into the city and parking it.
Think about it, Longtobefree.
This is 95% an issue of some bureaucrat making a dumb decision. It will undoubtedly be overturned, the only question is whether it would have been overturned without the media attention.
Next thing you know she would be driving a truck into the city and parking it.
Yeah... we can inhibit the right of a handful of people to blockade the capitol, create a major public nuisance, and close down major trade arteries.
Longtobefree is a longtime reliable supporter of antisocial, half-educated, roundly bigoted, disaffected, virus-flouting, science-disdaining, selfish, boorish right-wing assholes.
Well, assuming they are on the wrong side of our elite opinion.
If, OTOH, they want to destroy Israel and "Free Palestine," then we give them coffee to keep warm while blocking traffic.
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-the-double-double-standard-when-it-comes-to-policing-protests
Ain't rule of law grand?
Last month, the department sent her a letter, saying that her conviction in Russia aligns with a Criminal Code offence in Canada relating to false information.
It seems that Canada (and Russia) shares Somin's apoplectic concerns about "false information". As the recent trucker protests i Canada demonstrate, Justin Trudeau would deal with his political opponents as Putin deals with his, if only the government would give him the tools, which it has not fully done. (Not yet, anyway). She was willing to criticize the Russian government. Heck, tomorrow she might be criticizing the Canadian government. Can't have that.
This decision by the Canadian government is, of course, ludicrous, and, while Trudeau and his government are rather ludicrous themselves, I am fairly confident a little common sense still exists there, and this decision will ultimately be reversed. And, despite Somin's eye-roll-inducing comment about our "downright evil" immigration system, it is impossible to imagine the same decision here.
- Dean Steacy, Candian Human Rights Commissioner
In Russia the trucker protests would have been in favour of Putin, so he'd probably have let them do whatever they wanted.
"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don’t give it any value." (Dean Steacy, Canadian Human Rights Commissioner)
compare:
According to a recent book, "the Western idea of freedom" is intrinsically / inherently racist.
Well for most of western history westerners have refrained from applying western ideas of freedom to people who weren't them.
Wow. You can never pass up a chance to attack the US as evil even when the post has nothing to do with the US.
He said a law and policy is evil.
I expect you've done the same about abortion or guns or something. Do you think the US is evil?
While I think there are some bad, stupid, self serving (by the legislators), dishonest, and misguided laws I don't think any are evil. Russia and some other governments are evil and have some truly evil laws and Somin always does a good job of calling out the evil of communist regimes. But the US is not evil nor are its immigration laws.
Again, you conflate a country having an evil law with that country being evil.
Those yelling about abortion in the US don't all think the US is evil (some do, but I like to think those are the fringe).
Same deal here.
Well, I don't think the US is very evil, relative to the world average for governments. (Which is pretty bad indeed.) But no government is entirely good, government at best being a necessary evil, and ours certainly exceeds the absolute minimum increment of evil by a fair margin.
Somin gets to attack the US, and send lawbreakers into Canada.
The problem with claiming everyone is fleeing oppression is that the few who truly are get lost in the mix.
I can see how the initial confusion could have happened - she notified the immigration department of these criminal charges not long before her scheduled citizenship ceremony, it is understandable they might need to delay while investigating.
But all that happened 7 months ago and it isn't resolved yet. Someone in Ottawa will have a camera in their face while making excuses for not prioritizing higher a case with such obvious blow-up-in-your-face potential.
Indeed. And it should not have taken long to find out that the conviction was: (a) in absentia, so inherently questionable; (b) from a court in Russia, which does not have an independent court system; (c) for an offense which might correspond to an offense under Canadian law but was in fact for actions which would not be criminal in Canada. Indeed, this could have been determined in a few hours.
Well, obviously, speaking out against Russia’s actions in Ukraine isn’t something that would be criminal in Canada. But they’d be analogizing it to speaking out against Canada’s actions in Ukraine, and in today’s Canada?
You couldn’t rule out THAT would be criminal in today Canada. They’re heading in the direction of a police state so fast they’re leaving a vapor trail.
'You couldn’t rule out THAT would be criminal in today Canada.'
Couldn't rule it in, couldn't rule it out, that's as good as a fact.
Well, if I were making the case for Canada denying her application, I’d say: if you let her in, then any Russian who wants to emigrate to Canada, can, simply by going there, and then blogging against the Russo-Ukrainian war, getting themselves charged in Russia with speech-crime, and then applying for asylum. Does Canada really want to deal with an army of Russian emigrants pourinhg in through this new loophole? First thing you know they’d be forming Russian mafias, and having children who would kill the curves in school and in standardized tests, by doing shit like taking the SAT at the age of 18 months, and getting all the math questions right. Ordinary Canadians wouldn’t have a chance!
She checked all the other boxes for becoming a citizen, and they were going to let her become a citizen if she never spoke out. Disqualifying her solely because Russia convicted her (in abstentia, no less) for speaking out against its war of aggression is deeply unjust -- unless you think a Canadian court would have convicted her for the same anti-Russia speech.
But even those unwilling to go as far in this direction as I advocate should at least be open to accepting Russians who face persecution and imprisonment for speaking out against the war.
Agree....as long as we are very discerning about who we take in. The people who come here are likely to stay for life. Can we just take in the very best and brightest of the dissenters, starting with STEM? They will help build the America of tomorrow. We (America) cannot save them all (Russian anti-war protesters), but we can save some. Why not do two good things? We can save lives taking in some of the dissenters, and help our country at the same time by filling very specific needs.
I just think when it comes to discernment criteria, that is where the disagreement happens.
Should we also sift for gullibility, immaturity, and ignorance, considering, for example, whether an ostensible adult believes in or claims to believe in childish superstition?
Carry on, clingers.
Okay, I agree but why is this in contention to begin with.
Persecuted for speaking out against the Government? Where’d she think she was, the U.S.??
Frank “Actually, this IS Russia”
An interesting point to advance at the Volokh Conspiracy, which banned at least one dissidents (for making fun of conservatives) and has repeatedly imposed viewpoint-driven censorship.
No "Klingers"? "Replacement"? "Bettors"? "Stomping"? you're not the "Reverend"!!!!!!!!!
Point and laugh at this clown.
Who does not know the difference between being banned from an anonymous blog, and being arrested and jailed.
And he claims to be one of our "betters."
https://tenor.com/view/haha-jared-dines-laughing-that's-funny-lol-gif-10377262323148394637
In congruence with this blog's customary standards, the headline seems overblown and the attempt to provoke outrage might be misleading.
Another report:
.
If you read Kirkland's hate response and compare it with Canada's you should forever know that a World Court would be a horror.
Maria Kartasheva's plight highlights the importance of safeguarding freedom of speech and protecting those who speak out against injustice. Denying her citizenship over her courageous stance against Russian aggression is a grave injustice. Learn more about immigration policies and cases like Maria's on Canada's immigration news website