The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Academic Freedom Alliance Protests USC Prof's Ban from Campus
University of Southern California appears to ignore its own policy to remove professor from campus over alleged speech
The Academic Freedom Alliance today released a letter sent to the University of Southern California over its suspension of Professor John Strauss. Professor Strauss briefly exchanged words with pro-Palestinian protesters on campus. There is a factual dispute over what exactly was said, but in any version of the exchange Professor Strauss engaged in lawfully protected political speech in a public space on campus.
From the letter:
Even if the words falsely attributed to Professor Strauss in the Trojans for Palestine video had in fact been articulated by him in the context of a public political rally, they are fully within the bounds of protected First Amendment speech and within the scope of protected speech under the university's policies. Private speech on controversial social and political topics can sometimes be heated, ill-tempered, ill-considered, and broadly offensive. We do not hold such speech to the standards that we would properly expect from speech in the classroom or from scholarly research. The video in question does not portray Professor Strauss as issuing a genuine threat to any individual nor as engaging in any harassing conduct. Of course, it is contested whether Professor Strauss even issued those words, and the words he and other witnesses assert that he actually said are even further from the line that would separate protected from unprotected speech. There is no proper investigation to be conducted as to whether Professor Strauss behaved contrary to university policy in a manner that might merit discipline. To the extent that any investigation might be justified to establish the facts of what happened at the rally, it could be concluded extremely quickly and would not justify an administrative leave.
The full letter can be found here.
Local news coverage here.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The allegation is that Professor Strauss yelled “Death to Palestinians.” The claim is disputed but the Academic Freedom Alliance assumes its truth.
Would note that this is different from yelling “Death to Israel.” Israel is a foreign state. But “Palestinians,” like “Jews,” are an American ethnic/national origin group. “Death to Israel” doesn’t call for the death of students, however subjectively hurt some students may feel about it. But “Death to Palestinians” does.
A single yell isn’t necessarily enough to constitute harassment or to take matters out of the First Amendment. But it may be enough to make the matter a closer call than the Academic Freedom Alliance argues. “Death to Palestinians,” like “Death to Jews,” is not so obviously a purely political statement as the AFA and Professor Whittington suggest.
perhaps the situation would not have arisen if there wasnt a pro - kill jews rally on campus masquerading as pro - palestinian rally.
Was it really a pro palestinian rally or a pro hamas rally or a pro kill jews rally.
The transcript that I heard was that Hamas were killers without reference to palestinians. or very little reference to palestinians.
https://www.uscannenbergmedia.com/2023/11/13/usc-professor-put-on-leave-after-offensive-comments-at-palestinian-memorial/
That beings said, I am having trouble locating a video of the confrontation.
The allegation in the AFA letter is he said “death to Palestinians, not “Death to Hamas.” Saying “Death to Hamas,” the foreign organization, would be political speech, the same as “Death to Israel,” the foreign state. But “Palestinians” refers to an American ethnic group that includes students. It’s a set of people, not a political entity. The two statements are completely different, not comparable.
Let me withhold further response on your point until I have access to either a good video or good transcript. Google search that I did not provide a good link. The report that I did hear had multiple references to Hamas, not palestinians which conflicts with your statement which doesnt make me comfortable with either side of the story.
that being said, my other comments are valid that the rally was a pro - hamas rally and a pro - palestinian rally in name only. If it was in fact a pro palestinian rally, then it would be an anti-hamas rally.
The AFA accepted the allegations as true and argued they alleged political speech even if true.
I’m aware whether they are true or not is hotly disputed, and they may well not be. My comments focus on the AFA’s position, including its assumptions.
I would quibble with Strauss's statement, “But this started as a result of Hamas terrorist attacks.” I don't know when it started, but it has been going on a long time.
It started with Ishmael and Hagar.
It's fairly clear this round of violence started with the Hamas terror attack. Why attempt to obfuscate that except to excuse the actions?
Apparently, some believe the attacks on October 7th were made up by the Israeli government....
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/11/15/the-battle-for-the-truth-about-the-7-october-pogrom/
Why attempt to obfuscate the fact that Israel has been oppressing and murdering Palestinian civilians for 100 years except to excuse the actions?
No one's pretending Hamas's attack didn't happen. But somehow, a lot of people's memories don't go back further than a month and a half.
In the hypothetical counter-case, Professor Hamed does not get suspended for shouting "Death to all Zionists", a large number of the student body protest vociferously in his favour during the academic hearing on the matter, and Jewish students are instructed to respect the USC's values, specifically freedom of speech.
I'm not sure I agree with the AFA position that it would be protected for him to yell "Death to Palestinians." Obviously there's a dispute about whether he did in fact say that. But if he did, I don't think the argument "Well, he said it at a Palestinian rally, so it's protected political speech" would be a very good one. (That is, I question whether it's protected in this context. Seems like it would be awfully hostile environmenty.)
I suppose there's some small possibility he said that, but I would presume innocence unless there's some actual video evidence, or the testimony of impartial bystanders.
Seems pretty clear he denies saying "Death to Palestinians."
Instead he said that a bunch of terrorists by the name of Hamas who enjoy raping innocent women and throwing babies into ovens should all die.
Most rational people think the same.