The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Controversy Over New "Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Jain US Congressional Caucus"
From Prof. Howard Friedman (Religion Clause):
Last week, Michigan Congressman Shri Thanedar announced formation of the 28-member "Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Jain US Congressional Caucus." According to India West Journal: "The group will address cultural misunderstandings, promote interfaith dialogue and harmony, and support initiatives to promote the well-being, education, and empowerment of the Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, and Jains in the US." However, four Hindu, Sikh and Muslim civil rights groups issued a press release sharply criticizing formation of the caucus, saying it does not represent all parts of the South Asian community across faith, caste and ethnic lines. The press release says in part:
"… In June of this year, Congressman Thanedar announced his intention to form a Hindu Caucus without input from the full spectrum of Hindu American civil society, including Dalit and linguistic community organizations. This caucus seems to be a new iteration of that previous announcement."
"If this caucus is that announcement repackaged with a more inclusive label but the same makeup, it will likely combat meaningful oversight of the U.S.-India relationship, ongoing work to protect the civil rights and safety of Sikhs and other marginalized groups, and efforts to ban caste discrimination at a federal level. Moreover, given the lack of Muslim representation, it may oppose ongoing efforts to combat Islamophobia. In short, any caucus without inclusive representation from the Indian diaspora will serve as nothing more than a vehicle for Hindu nationalist policies that will inevitably harm the entire South Asian American community, including Sikh, Muslim, Dalit, Buddhist, Jain, and even Hindu Americans."
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Looks like Thanedar is correct about the need to promote interfaith dialog and harmony. The point has been made.
As India is now the world's most populous nation, and Indian immigration has grown the number of Indian-Americans, there's a gigantic debate, which has connections to the debates over Hindu nationalism in India itself but which also has a lot to do with Lefty coalition building, concerning whether American Hindus are better off casting their lot in some sort of identifiably Indian or even mostly Hindu group (most notably excluding Pakistanis), or whether they are better off taking a "South Asian" identity that includes Pakistanis, Muslims more generally, Indonesians, etc.
This is a gigantic issue and nobody really knows how it is going to turn out. But you see the two sides of the debate here.
They're only of worth insofar as they can be coerced into an identity group some politicians can claim they are here to rescue.
Prof. Bernstein should write a book about this!
Splitters.
https://youtu.be/iS-0Az7dgRY?si=7CJgz5RB6WmkU0b3
HA!
Are there any Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, or Jain members of Congress who are not included in this caucus? Have Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Jain voters of different perspectives they think are not represented by this caucus being blocked from election to Congress by the Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Jain who are represented in Congress? If no to both, then it sounds like someone's just trying to get extra attention or influence.
It sure does seem that way.
Sounds like they're missing some people besides Muslims:
https://www.christianpost.com/news/christians-observe-first-indian-christian-day-feast-of-saint-thomas.html
And they're forgetting another (((group))):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_India
(((We))) already run the government, why do we need to join this caucus? 🙂
Hey, SRG2.
Have to maintain cover.
Get a bunch of Dot-Heads to get together, what could go wrong?
Only everything.
Heck, even a few hundred pasty-doughy white boys with a few hot chicks thrown in can't settle their shit in private,
and why isn't the story
"DemoKKKrats throw Speaker McCarthy out"
They could have kept him in if they love him so much
It's almost enough to make me "Identify" as an (Redacted)
Frank
“Dot-Heads”
Do you know anything about Jains? Serious question.
Donavan included them in a song - - - - - - - - -
Same question
Hurdy Gurdy Man??? well played!
There's a lot of congressional caucuses.
I'd expect the Algae Caucus to get way less attendance for their potlucks than the Beef Caucus or the Chicken Caucus. Unless they teamed up with the Bourbon Caucus, the Rum Caucus, the Wine Caucus and the Small Brewers Caucus.
How often does the Single Parents Caucus cancel meetings because they can't get babysitters?
Meetings of the Unexploded Ordnance Caucus could blow up at any time.
Meetings of the Sleep Health Caucus are probably a snoozefest.
Meetings of the blockchain caucus go on for much longer than expected and no-one understands the point of the meeting anyway
There's a Candy Caucus? Sweeeet!
But this wins: Congressional Caucus for the Advancement of Torah Values - member Don Bacon.
Heh, heh.
There's a Congenital Heart Caucus. I totally support congenital hearts; it's great when people are born with a heart.
Kinda weird how the country themed ones are named so differently. You have the Friends of Belarus Caucus and the U.S.-Bermuda Friendship Caucus, but then you have the Argentina Caucus, the U.S.-China Working Group, and the Albanian Issues Caucus. Seems like some places we want to be friends with, some places are just kinda there, some we want to work with, and some have issues.
Colorectal Cancer Caucus: Is this related in any way to the high average age in Congress?
Copper Caucus: Police or the metal?
Dyslexia Caucus: Do they meet in a bra?
Peripheral Artery Disease Caucus: Why does a disease need a caucus in Congress (this isn't the only one)?
SALT Caucus: But there's no pepper caucus...
Tourette Syndrome Caucus: Why isn't Fetterman a member of this one?
If the need is created by a small group trying to get recognized, maybe a constitutional caucus should be started. congress members that know and support the constitution is a small group
Ain't no phone booth in the world that small.
Today is another Muslim Day (with special appearances: Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Jain) at the Volokh Conspiracy.
Yesterday was another White Grievance Day at the Volokh Conspiracy.
Tomorrow might be another Transgender Parenting Day, Drag Queen Day, Black Crime Day, Transgender Rest Room Day, Lesbian Day, Racial Slur Day, or Transgender Sorority Drama Day.
The Volokh Conspiracy: Official Legal Blog of Keeping an Eye on Those Muslims.
Are there any members who are Dalit? I thought all Dalit miraculously became Brahmin on the plane over here.
So a group forms a club, and a bunch of whiners bitch about not being included.
Then a bunch of bigots get lathered about it.
And you become a complainer complaining about the complainers complaining about the “woe is me”complainers. You people do that quite a lot. You’re two for two on this thread—for now.you deserve pity, but unfortunately all I can muster is disdain.
Got to agree with LGTBF.
Just form your own caucus.
I Don’t Want to Belong to Any Club That Will Accept Me as a Member -Groucho Marx
Ah, the usual supporters of eternal rule by the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty complaining about any whisper of support for actual democracy in India.
If you want a religious caucus, then you will want to exclude the religions you disagree with. Isn't that obvious? No one can agree with all the religions.
Did the Muslim groups across the country, including Muslim caucuses, reach out to Hindus for opinion? How many Hindus serve on Muslim caucuses? Wow --- the hypocrisy is crystal clear here. First of all, this is NOT a "south asian" caucus. It's not about a region or a country. It's about a faith group, that continues to be persecuted, case and point here, where they can't even get representation in America, for their issues. Per the network contagion research institute -- 70% of the religous hate attacks online, is directed at Hindus. Less than 30 is against Muslims. Global, the Abrahamic faiths dominate. Each of the Christian, Muslim and Jewish populations, outnumber the entire sum of the Hindu, Jain, Sikh, and Buddhist (known as the Dharmic faiths). Yet somehow, we must include them? In 2013, a Sikh Caucus was launched. Where is the opposition to that not being inclusive? That caucus still exists. This is nothing more than some Muslims, can't stand, that Hindus exist in America.