The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Free "2023 Supplement" for "Firearms Law and the Second Amendment"
Covering the many developments in 2022-23.
If you would like to know what's been going on with right to arms litigation in the past two years, you're in luck. Published a few weeks ago is the 2023 Supplement to Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, Rights, and Policy, coauthored by me and Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), George Mocsary (Wyoming, Director of the Firearms Research Center), Gregory Wallace (Campbell), and Donald Kilmer (Lincoln). In 330 pages, the supplement brings you up to date on the legal developments on the right to arms in 2022 and 2023.
The third edition of that textbook was published in late 2021. At 1,400 pages and $275, it's a bargain when calculated on cost per word. But the supplement is absolutely free, even if you didn't buy the main textbook.
Of course, the supplement examines in depth the U.S. Supreme Court's monumental Bruen decision from June 2022. That case affirmed the right to bear arms in public for lawful self-defense. More broadly, Bruen instructed lower courts to decide Second Amendment cases the way that Court had decided District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008: based on the original meaning of the Second Amendment, rather than on judges' personal evaluations of the costs and benefits of gun control. The 2023 Supplement catalogues the profusion of cases challenging many different laws on the ground that they are contrary to the Second Amendment's original meaning.
Although Firearms Law and the Second Amendment and its 2023 Supplement were created for use in advanced law school courses, they are also a treatise meant to be useful to courts, practitioners, and interested laypersons. That is why the textbook has been cited in five U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals opinions (including by then-Judge Kavanaugh), by the Illinois Supreme Court, and five other cases from lower courts. The textbook has been cited in 91 briefs in the Westlaw database, including by Everytown for Gun Safety, and twice this August in United States government briefs in the Circuit Courts of Appeals.
Among the many topics in the 2023 Supplement are firearm bans aimed at young adults; various categories of prohibited persons under federal law (such as marijuana users); new federal ATF regulations against pistol braces and other devices; the incompetently-drafted 2022 congressional Bipartisan Safer Communities Act; litigation of some state governments' "massive resistance" to accepting the right to licensed concealed carry; and international developments in Canada and elsewhere.
Starting with the first edition of Firearms Law in 2012, the textbook has been a cyclopedia of the legal history of the right to arms, including the broader social and technological context. That continues with the 2023 Supplement; the final section of the supplement is a detailed explanation of the evolution of firearms technology: in particular, how the kinds of guns—such as breechloading repeaters—that in the 1500s were only available to people like King Henry VIII became affordable for the 1800s to the average American.
As Dr. Seuss observed, "The more that you read the more things you will know." So if you want to know more things, I invite you to read the 2023 Supplement to Firearms Law and the Second Amendment.
[This post will be cross-posted at the Firearms Research Center Forum, the weblog of the University of Wyoming's new Firearms Research Center. I am a Senior Fellow at the Center. Contributors to the FRC Forum include "pro-gun" writers, such as me, and also gun control advocates such as law professors Dru Stevenson (South Texas) and Megan Walsh (Minnesota).]
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"If you would like to know what's been going on with right to arms litigation in the past two years, you're in luck."
Spoiler alert; there were infringements.
See also freedom of speech, of the press, of religion, 4th Amendment (various), 5th Amendment.
I had a hard time finding the link: http://firearmsregulation.org/www/2023%20Supplement.pdf
This is a great book. At work, it’s our primary source for historical information.
If you rely on historical information for anything you consider important, consider finding a source written by a historian. Gun advocate history is worse than law office history, which is already pretty bad.
Steve forgot to mention: he's one of them, and he's here to help.
ONS, nope. Not a historian. Never claimed to be. Repeatedly corrected folks like you who want to make that mistaken claim on my behalf. I did get graduate-school historical training, but went on to become a newspaperman instead. Then did other things.
I comment on history and historical methods here not because I am an expert, but because there are so many folks who contribute and comment here who pretend to historical insight they manifestly do not have. If Baude is not here to comment, I seem to be among the best this blog can expect to hear from. There are a few others whose commentary also shows historical insight, not many.
For a blog where the term "originalism," gets almost daily use, customary display of both historical ignorance and historical disregard signals a deficiency. Baude, of course, has much better things to do with his time than to waste it here trying to straighten out folks who don't care anyway, so you are stuck with me. Basically, I am the fool who is trying to help people who are certain they do not want to be helped.
The problem here is that the most important historical sources are court cases, statutes, legislative history, and state constitutions. Which attorneys are trained to review. The sorts of historical documents that historians tend to look at are of much less importance. (Re)read The recent 2nd Amdt trilogy (Heller McDonald, and Bruen, and esp the latter) to see what Justice Thomas is looking for.
Want to know the quickest way to get 2A removed?
Have people keep making statements like former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee.
"Huckabee then said that if Trump doesn't not win the 2024 election because of his court cases 'it is going to be the last American election that will be decided by ballots rather than bullets.'"
The point of the 2nd Amendment is to ensure that the government knows that the people can revolt. That's literally the whole point.
Whether the people want to "remove" the 2nd Amendment or not is kinda up to them. And I fully expect they will do so within the next century.
In the meantime, if Trump starts Civil War II over losing the 2024 election, the 2nd Amendment will be the least of our problems (at that point).