The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
An Introduction to Constitutional Law: The Illustrated Coffee Table Book
With nearly 500 distinctive and intriguing historical images, this unique book brings readers face-to-face with the people and events that have shaped American constitutional law.
Randy Barnett and I are pleased to announce the launch of our newest project: An Introduction to Constitutional Law - Illustrated Edition. Yes, we made a constitutional law coffee table book. And the 400-page glossy hardcover spread is visually stunning. With nearly 500 distinctive and intriguing historical images, this unique book brings readers face-to-face with the people and events that have shaped American constitutional law. It will make a discussion piece for every office or library. I have been assembling this library for more than a decade! I am so happy to have guided the project to publication. Our publisher only made a limited print run, so I encourage you to order a copy soon.
Here are many of my favorite spreads:
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
While my son actually did enjoy the copy of the Federalist papers I got him, I suspect I'd be better off getting him What IF 2, rather than this.
Ah, Wickard
the biggest upside to a nationwide, no-exceptions abortion ban is this.
The ban will be challenged on grounds that Congress exceeded its Article I subject matter jurisdiction.
The feds would defend the ban, citing it is authorized by the Commerce Clause as interpreted by Wickard.
Lower courts reject Article I challenges.
The Supreme Court strikes down the ban, overruling Wickard in the process.
Yeah, no. Courts know where their paychecks come from. Upsetting Wickard would throw out 90% of government. I'd be happy to throw out 99%, but it will never happen.
Huh, only $75. Probably lots of interesting pictures and captions and text, not a bad deal, but other books are a priority.
Found an interesting bug in browsers or the Reason web site.
Replied to Michael Ejercito.
Clicked the back arrow to get the /#comments URL. That also prefills the comment text box with the reply comment.
Backed over the prefilled comment and wrote a new comment. Clicked reload (but not SHIFT-reload) to make sure it was empty.
Wrote the new standalone comment and clicked SUBMIT.
The comment apparently relied on some cookie and made it a reply too. Perhaps SHIFT-reload would prevent this.