The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
#TheyLied Prosecution Over Alleged Perjury and Faked Evidence
The defendant is one Rovier Carrington, who "sued Hollywood executives alleging that the executives had sexually assaulted him, and that they had defrauded him in connection with a decision to refuse to produce [his] reality television program."
I missed it when it was filed in September, and just heard about it because of a procedural development:
ROVIER CARRINGTON was charged in a criminal complaint unsealed yesterday with perjury…. "As alleged, Rovier Carrington faked evidence to support a $50 million lawsuit in the Southern District of New York making extremely serious allegations, and then lied about faking that evidence under penalty of perjury. Now he will return to the Southern District of New York—this time to face criminal charges."
According to the allegations contained in the Complaint …:
Between at least June 2018 and July 2018, CARRINGTON committed perjury in connection with a civil lawsuit (the "Civil Case") filed in the Southern District of New York. In the Civil Case, CARRINGTON sued Hollywood executives alleging that the executives had sexually assaulted him, and that they had defrauded him in connection with a decision to refuse to produce CARRINGTON's reality television program. CARRINGTON sought damages of $50 million in the Civil Case.
In support of his allegations in the Civil Case, CARRINGTON included as exhibits to an amended complaint ten email chains that included the following purported exchanges:
CARRINGTON: I need your help. I'm not built for this. [third party] has threaten me and [Executive-1] thinks I'm supposed to constantly sleep with him for my projects. I was promised my series and reality show would make the studio a lot of money. [Third party] is a piece of shit and a pimp. I'm not a whore. After this Harvey [Weinstein] bullshit. I'm done.
Counterparty Account-1: Trend my man. You have to obey [third party] if you plan on continuing. [Executive-1] has ruined your chances after that Harvey [Weinstein] shit. I understand screwing these Hollywood fucks is tough but it's that Hollywood shit man.
CARRINGTON: Thank you for reviewing my reality concept. I have so many ideas like a bisexual love interest and I could seek a third whose fully gay, but pick only one during the finale. Major right ? Hopefully that doesn't take away from the public's interest in my dramatic series, which I'll send you. I'll discuss with [third party] and [third party] for the press. Omg, we could totally pitch to [Executive-2's company] due to you convincing [third party] to release me I just request you protect me from him and [Executive-1] who ruined my [third party company] deal. I must mention, I pondered if you had me eradicate my business relationship with [third party] just so you could own me and not really produce my shows… You totally request sex before business so just thoughts.
Executive-2: Babe, all I can think about is pounding you like I did when you were a boy. Daddy owns you. My boy… 🙂
But those email chains were faked. In response to an investigation by the District Court overseeing the Civil Case, CARRINGTON was unable to produce the original versions of any of the email chains. The versions of the email chains attached to the amended complaint could also not be located in the email accounts belonging to others that had allegedly sent and received the emails chains. Moreover, law enforcement determined that versions of two of the email chains attached to the amended complaint did in fact exist in the email accounts belonging to others, although the versions attached to the amended complaint had been substantially altered by CARRINGTON in order to support his allegations in the Civil Case.
CARRINGTON deleted the contents of one of his email accounts that allegedly contained some of the email chains the day after he filed the amended complaint. He deleted the contents of another of his email accounts that allegedly contained some of the email chains two months later, in violation of a preservation order that the District Court had issued in the Civil Case.
CARRINGTON submitted a statement swearing under penalty of perjury that the email chains in the amended complaint had not been faked or altered….
The charges in the Complaint are merely accusations and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
For more on that new procedural development, see "Arrest Order Issued for Rovier Carrington After No-Show in Criminal Case," Hollywood Reporter (Winston Cho), and this filing, which includes the judge's response.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Either he's the victim of a vast conspiracy, or he has a pretty relaxed grip on reality. Maybe he's been watching too many TV shows and movies.
Perhaps he hopes to sell the rights to the show about his perjury trial
Believe the Accuser. Thank the vile feminist lawyer. No witness testimony without physical corroboration. The Rules of Evidence should be updated from the 1400's, you idiots. That goes for confessions. In exonerated capital cases, 25% had falsely confessed, you vile toxic morons. The police, the agents of the worthless prosecutor, had induced a false memory containing facts only the killer knew.
In the absence of physical evidence, the clerk of court should be authorized to dismiss the claim. Avoid the cost of the rent seeking lawyer games. Eugene can really make himself useful by including all the legal costs to date of a matter.
Is there a reason why you regularly split your comments in two, immediately following the first with second though there is usually no apparent logical separation between them?
It is for your convenience. You can follow all my thoughts, feelings, aspirations, dreams in one place. Eugene has told me that editing and deletion functions will soon be added to the Comment section, but that has yet to happen. If these bother you, put me on Mute User.
If lawyer rent seeking is reprehensible and worthy of mass arrests, medical rent seeking is twice as big, and kills 10 times as many people. Compare 15000 murder victims to 150000 victims of fatal medical error. It is too big even for me. Plus, docs are violent and dangerous. I am afraid of them.
When he is sent to prison, they should put him in the same cell with Jussie Smollett. They'll have a lot to talk about.
Awfully big prison they have Jussie in from what I recollect of the current state of that case.
Sounds like he is going to get some "pounding" of a different kind if you know what I mean....
This must be the comment the Volokh Conspiracy was looking for when it chose to highlight this important legal development (while disregarding so many others).
Carry on, clingers.
You have no sense of humor, do you?
He does not. I suspect he isn't so happy with the news in the article.
Aside from being not remotely funny, how does this even make sense? Isn't the "pounding" you're talking about (i.e. being raped in prison) exactly the same kind of pounding being described in the fabricated email?
Yes he will get "pounded" for perjury you idiot.
At least you're embarrassed about your original comment, but you should be almost as a embarrassed at this pathetic attempt to walk it back.
Well, the person who committed perjury won't need to be walking anything back, the guys behind him will walk forward when it's their turn.
The only thing embarrassing here is your lack of any sense of humor.
To be clear, you're saying that when you said "Sounds like he is going to get some 'pounding' of a different kind if you know what I mean....", but your joke that after fabricating an admission to being "pound[ed]"' (i.e. raped) he was "going to get some 'pounding' of a different kind"' in the form of facing prosecution?
I would be fascinated hear from anyone who both understood your comment that way and found anything even mildly amusing about it.
My guess is you don't get a lot of invitations to parties and social functions, right?