The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
How Well Do You Know America's Racial Classification System? (First of a Series)
As discussed in my forthcoming book Classified, contrary to popular belief, racial and ethnic classification in the US is not solely a matter of personal choice. The federal Office of Management and Budget created a classification scheme in 1978 to be used by all federal agencies, and barely amended since. The classifications you see on employment forms, applications for mortgages, applications for university admission, and so on, are taken from the official federal classifications. Importantly, while these forms rarely include instructions, the OMB classifications have official, legally binding definitions.
With that background, let's try a series of quizzes to see how well you know how these classifications are defined. Let's start with the Hispanic/Latino category. All quiz answers are based on the official OMB definitions. Note that a few federal agencies use slightly different classifications, and states have their own classification schemes, particularly for affirmative action in government contracting, that can differ, though not dramatically.
(1) A couple immigrates from Spain. Their son Bram is born in the US. Is he a member of the Hispanic/Latino category?
(2) Same scenario as the first example except the couple is from Brazil. Is Bram Hispanic/Latino?
(3) Binyamin Goldberg immigrates to the US from Israel. His father's family came to Israel from Poland, but his mother's Turkish family traces their ancestry to Sephardic Jews who fled from Spain in 1492. They stopped speaking Ladino, the Spanish-based language of Sephardic Jews, several generations ago. Is Binyamin Hispanic/Latino?
(4) Juan Castro immigrates to the US from Peru. Despite his Spanish-sounding name, his parents trace their ancestries only to members of the Inca tribe. Not only that, but Juan grew up in the Peruvian Amazon speaking only an indigenous language, he only knows a few words of Spanish. If he has to fill out a form, should he check Hispanic/Latino or Native American, or both?
(5) Jose Acarda was born to a poor, black single mother, and adopted by the Acarda family, immigrants from Argentina of Spanish descent. Is Jose Hispanic/Latino?
Answers below.
Hispanic is defined as "of Spanish origin or culture." Thus,
(1) Bram is Hispanic/Latino, if he so identifies.
(2) Bram is not Hispanic/Latino. While Americans often consider Brazilians to be Latinos, because they come from a Portuguese rather than Spanish-speaking culture, they are not "officially" Hispanic/Latino. The category was originally called "Hispanic"; Latino was added in 1997, but the definition remained the same. The Federal Department of Transportation counts Brazilians as Hispanic/Latinos, and also Americans of Portuguese descent. Several New England states have a separate Portuguese classification.
(3) Binyamin's family seems to have lost most of the Spanish culture they once had, but on his maternal side he is of "Spanish origin." One can question whether "Spanish origin" should go back over 500 years, but there is a Small Business Administration decision that a Sephardic applicant without a Spanish surname is Hispanic, with no evidence that the individual spoke Spanish or otherwise had any Hispanic cultural ties. Another SBA ruling states that Sephardic heritage is evidence of Hispanic status (but in the case in question, there was much more evidence). Beyond that, Sephardic Jews literally come within the definition of "Spanish origin." Verdict: Goldberg is Hispanic, if he so identifies.
(4) Juan technically is neither of Spanish origin nor of Spanish culture. But in practice, being of Spanish origin or culture is defined as having ancestry in a predominately Spanish-speaking country. So Juan is classified as Hispanic, and a Basque-speaker from northern Spain would also be so classified. Juan is not, however, classified as Native American, because that classification is limited to American and Canadian Indians. American Indians have lobbied hard to keep their classification narrow.
(5) Jose, assuming he identifies as Hispanic, counts as Hispanic, as someone of "Spanish culture," given that his parents are Latino immigrants, though I've never seen a case with that scenario. A more interesting question would arise if he were adopted by a third-generation American Hispanic couple who are well-assimilated and no longer speak Spanish or otherwise do much of anything specifically "Hispanic." If I had to rule on such a scenario, I'd say "not Hispanic" even though, if the adoptee has a Spanish surname, he might be subjected to discrimination by people who think he is Hispanic.
My impression, by the way, from running scenarios such as these past quite a few people, is that a large percentage of well-educated Americans would get each of these wrong. How well did you do?
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You equate with "understanding" with being "well educated"? They are unrelated. If you clutter your mind with this you're wasting brain cells.
All this is out the window. I told my privileged, lilly white dauhter to identify as African. She got a full scholarship to a top business school worth $130000. She did well. The school got to count her as a diversity success. She attended the African American Student Association meetings. No one said a word. Race is now self identified.
Well Elon Musk is African American. Africa is a continent not a skin color.
I wonder if his net worth is included in the Census success story of African immigrants. Musk is a real curve buster.
No, it's well-educated people who are more likely to encounter these classifications, because they are ubiquitious in higher education, law, medicine, and more.
Well credentialed, perhaps, but not necessarily well educated.
They come up in every company of more than 50 employees.
Let's get scientific about this and mandate DNA testing for everyone. Your "race" would then be determined by whatever was the largest percentage shown by your DNA.
This would then be recorded in your permanent record and tattooed on your wrist.
You forgot the neat patch for your clothes.
DNA testing will show very messy results, a bunch of mongrels.
Exactly. We are all mutts.
Ya gotta use Kleenex, lots of Kleenex
Nah. It's time we went to unquestioned self-identification on race, including an entitlement to take physical steps to make yourself more like the race you identify with, and to define new races if you don't feel the existing ones are a good fit. If the government wants to continue using classifications, they should be required to go with the self-identification.
After that, we can have a libertarian vs communitarian debate on whether schools, employers, and co-workers should be required to pro-actively affirm your self-identification and those physical steps you took.
Discrimination based on perceived characteristics isn't based on DNA. People who discriminate are likely to not have that information and are making their choices based on their own belief systems and what they think they see. There is no value in measuring DNA if the goal is to collect data on how some Americans treat other Americans based on the color of their skin or other traits.
I don't trust DNA; it no longer can even distinguish male from female.
It is useless.
Wrong on 4 out of 5.
Exactly as well as I wish to.
Is there anything more injurious to social bonding than legal racism?
If you're not making friends with nonwhites because of politics, that's on you.
And if nonwhites are not making friends with Dave, that would be on them. Correct?
If it's motivated by not liking some government policy, yeah.
Yes. System racism, for starters. When the establishment clearly signals that some races are preferred over others, that create social barriers.
Replacement theory is another example of something "more injurious" than "legal racism."
Isn't the true answer in all cases African American from a purely scientific standing?
Exactly. It always depends on how far back you go.
So, reparations for everyone?
Explains the Universal popularity of Chick Fil-A
2 of five.
What about Scott fujita, former NFL linebacker. He was adopted as an infant by Rodney Fujita, who is a third-generation Japanese-American, and his wife Helen, who is white.
Rodney was born at the Gila River War Relocation Center in Phoenix, Arizona where his father Nagao, a 442nd Infantry Regiment combat veteran who later became an attorney, was one of many Japanese-Americans whose family was interned during World War II. Fujita grew up in a traditional Japanese household, celebrating Japanese festivals and holidays, and considers himself "half-Japanese at heart"
I'll have a separate quiz on Asian American in the future, but the short answer is that he is not Asian American, "officially" though of course he can identify however he wants.
Fortunately, the Census and by extension everyone else in the US Government, relies on self-identification.
So he can check whatever box he likes.
Did he have a weight problem? Brutha could have had some Samoan in him.
Got the first two right. Didn't have any idea how the government would handle the last three, so didn't even try to guess.
Wait until we do "reparations". These crazy examples will look like child's play.
re: "How well did you do?"
No better than random chance. And I have to admit that I thought I was moderately well-informed on this topic.
I got 5 of 5, but only because I've read David's previous posts on this topic. It doesn't make a lot of sense, and I don't think the government should be classifying people and treating them differently based on classification. It's fundamentally un-American.
It's one of the few things when they say it's "literally Nazi Germany" is literally Nazi Germany
Nothing is fundamentally more American than treating people differently because of their race. When in our 200+ years of history has it ever been different?
Juneteenth is this weekend but emancipation certainly didn't stop how we treated folks because of their race. It still existed during WWII when we disenfranchised thousands of Japanese Americans and placed them in internment camps. It didn't stop in 1964 when the Civil Rights Act was passed. It didn't stop last decade as we saw from white nationalists marking with tiki torches. It certainly didn't stop this decade as one can see from all of the Critical Race Theory conspiracy theories and associated laws banning/discouraging teaching about racism in schools.
If the US Government stopped tracking race, it would only make it harder to collect data on the impact of actual racism in our society and work to eliminate it.
1: You left out the disproportionate murder of Whites by "Minorities" (and to be fair, the disproportionate murder of Minority Babes by White Abortionists) but I think you meant to, some statistics are better than others. 2: Yeah Right, so Poke-a-Hontas can keep 1/1,024th of her fraudulent Hah-vud Law Professorship???
Frank "against murdering most babies"
Transgressions don't define a country, principles do. "All men are created equal" is the goal. Slavery, treatment of native Americans, internment of Japanese, etc., were all mistakes, and anathema to the principles of the founding of the country.
OMB defines "Hispanic or Latino" as a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race.
https://www.census.gov/topics/population/hispanic-origin/about.html
also
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/fedreg_1997standards/
Brazil is in South America
"or other Spanish culture or origin" ie, only South or Central Americans of Spanish culture or origin.
David,
My paternal grandfather moved from Italy to Argentina where he had a family (his children there eventually migrated to the US). Following a dozen years in Buenos Aries he moved to the US. Can I claim I am of Hispanic origin?
Sure, I mean you changed your name from "Mengele" didn't you?
What’s more Latin than Italy?
"What’s more Latin than Italy?" You just, but a major reason that "Hispanic" rather than "Latino" was initially challenge was that one of the three people charged with creating the classification thought that Italian Americans would claim to be Latinos.
"What’s more Latin than Italy?" You just, but a major reason that "Hispanic" rather than "Latino" was initially chosen was that one of the three people charged with creating the classification thought that Italian Americans would claim to be Latinos.
DN, that's a tough one. I'd say the rule is that if you sincerely consider yourself to be of partly Argentine heritage, then yes. But there is an oddball NY state case stating that under NY law, a man with an Argentine-Italian father is not Hispanic because none of his ancestors came from Spain.
It doesn’t say only South Americans of Spanish decent.
It says South Americans. And to this list it appends other Spanish cultures.
So Brazil counts but Portugal doesn’t.
But realistically, “Hispania” refers to the entire Iberian peninsula so it makes as much sense to include Portuguese immigrants as it does the descendants of Conquistadors.
So good luck using that language to disqualify a Brazilian from self identifying as Hispanic. I’m sure white lawyersplaining would be very convincing to the relevant tribunal.
Yes I grasp the irony of accusing/teasing someone named Bernstein of whitesplaining.
Are you arguing that the German and Japanese diasporas in Brazil are Hispanic?
It's a culture not a race. Black African diaspora in Latin American countries are considered Hispanic. "White Hispanic" is very common.
And protective as hell of their Barrio's
I guess for the census this classification may have some merit to define demographics. But other than that it should be thrown in the garbage since using it for preferences or to discriminate is illegal, see 14 A and the CRA.
Well "January 6th Committee" Bennie "Uncle Remus" Thompson (He calls (Justice) Clarence Thomas an "Uncle Tom", I can call him an "Uncle Remus") is certainly "Black" (more of a Cafe au lait actually) he says so!!
Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., is standing by remarks he made on a New Nation of Islam radio program where he alleged that criticism of President Obama is motivated by racism and called Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas an "Uncle Tom."
When CNN reporter Dana Bash noted that the term wouldn't be appropriate if used by someone who is white, Thompson replied, "But I'm black."
Frank "Black where it counts"
And how is Elon Musk, Born in Africa, now an Amurican Citizen, not an "African Amurican"????
I'll admit he's not "Black" like Bennie "Uncle" Thompson
Frank "Native Amurican" (Born in Atlanta GA, home of Delta Airlines, Coca Cola and the (World Champion) Atlanta Braves, can't get more Amurican than that)
Because African American/Black is defined as being descended from "one of the black races of Africa."
Ok, so does the Governent keep track of how many abortions are of those descended from "one of the black races of Africa."??? Might be interesting to see if there's some conspiracy or "Systemic Race-ism" resulting in more that race(s) getting nipped in the Endometrium...
Frank "Against nipping in most cases"
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”
Pretty sure Yogi Berra said that
Frank
Or was it Yogi Bear. I get them mixed up.
Does he have a bat or a picnic basket?
Easy tell.
It was in Parents Involved that Chief Justice Roberts wrote: “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”
All this obsession with race, when find me one Person of Southpawness (we lefties prefer "POS") playing anything except Pitcher/DH/Outfield in MLB, it's literally Pre Nazi Germany!!!
Frank "Lefty" Drackman
OK I forgot Firstbase
Who?
What?
I Don't Know.
OK, how about these:
(1) Alison is a descendant of white Americans who moved to Texas in 1825 (as part of Stephen F. Austin's colonization program), and the family has been in Texas ever since. At that time (and until the Texas Revolution of 1835), Texas was indisputably part of Mexico; ergo, she descends from people from a predominantly Spanish speaking country.
(2) Noah is a descendant of fundamentalist Mormons who migrated to northern Mexico after Utah banned polygamy, and returned to the US several generations later.
If either of them self identifies as Hispanic, does the gov't have to accept that?
I don't know, do they have "High Cheekbones"???
Anyone involved in racial classification is a racist.
Why are you so obsessed with this stuff?
I dunno, it's a good question. I mean, if I had just written a major law review article on the subject, and had a book coming out in a month, both of which fill a major gap in the academic and popular literature on the topic, then it would make sense that I keep posting about it but...
OH, WAIT! I did just write a major law review article and have a book coming out in a month, both of which fill a major gap in the academic and popular literature on the topic. So I guess that does explain it.
Not really, it's like saying John Hickley went to see "Taxi Driver" 200 times, so that's why he's (stiill, unfortunately, hopefully Jodie F has security armed with (actual) Assault Rifles) obsessed with Jodie Foster.
History and Etymology for ‘Hispanic’
Latin ‘hispanicus’, from ‘Hispania’ Iberian Peninsula . . .
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Hispanic
“Hispania, in Roman times, region comprising the Iberian Peninsula, now occupied by Portugal and Spain.”
https://www.britannica.com/place/Hispania-ancient-region-Iberian-Peninsula
Conclusion: Your Latin tutor deserves a good caning
On OPM Form 181 from the federal Office of Personnel Management, employees are told the following: “Providing this information is voluntary and has no impact on your employment status, but in the instance of missing information, your employing agency will attempt to identify your race and ethnicity by visual observation.”
If it all boils down to a stranger looking at you and guessing, what keeps anyone from making up their own ethnic history?