The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Scarlett Johannsson finally makes an appearance on the Cyberlaw Podcast
Episode 398 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
For the third week in a row, we lead with the cyber impact of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Paul Rosenzweig comments on the most surprising thing about social media's decoupling from Russia – how enthusiastically industry is pursuing the separation. Facebook is allowing Ukrainians to threaten violence against Russian leadership and removing or factchecking Russian government and media posts. Not satisfied with this, the EU wants Google to remove Russia Today and Sputnik from search results. I ask why the U.S. can't take over Facebook and Twitter infrastructure to deliver the Voice of America to Facebook and Twitter users in Russia who've been cut off by the social giants' departure. Nobody likes that idea but me. Meanwhile, Paul notes that The Great Cyberwar that Wasn't may yet make an appearance, citing Ciaran Martin's sober Lawfare piece.
David Kris tells us that Congress has, after a few false starts, finally passed a cyber incident reporting bill, notwithstanding the Justice Department's over-the-top tantrum in opposition. I wonder if the bill, passed in haste due to the Ukraine conflict, should have had another round of edits, since it seems to lock in a leisurely 3 1/2 year reg-writing process that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) can't easily cut short.
Jane Bambauer and David unpack the first federal district court opinion to consider the legal status of "geofence" warrants. With such warrants, where Google releases data in stages to the police about people whose phones were near a crime scene when the crime was committed. It's a long opinion by Judge M. Hannah Lauck, and she was clearly trying to write something precedential, but none of us finds it satisfying. As is often true, Orin Kerr's take is more persuasive than the court's.
Next, Paul Rosenzweig digs into Biden's cryptocurrency executive order. It's not exactly a nothingburger, he opines; it's more of a processburger: Nothing will happen in the field for many months, but the interagency mill will begin to grind, and sooner or later it will likely grind exceeding fine.
Jane and I draw lessons from WIRED's "expose" on three wrongful arrests based on face recognition software --but not the lesson WIRED wanted us to draw. The arrests do reflect less than perfect policing, and they are a wrenching view of what it's like for an innocent man to face charges. But WIRED is unpersuasive when it blames face recognition for police mistakes that could have been avoided with a little more care on the part of the cops.
David and I highly recommend Brian Krebs's great series on what we can learn from leaked chat logs stolen from the Conti ransomware gang. My favorite insight was the Conti member who said, apparently when a company didn't want to pay to keep its files from being published, "There is a journalist who will help intimidate them for 5 percent of the payout." I suggest that our listeners could feasibly crowdsource an effort to find journalists who might fit this description. After all, how many journalists these days are breaking stories that dive deep into doxxed databases?
Paul and I spend a little more time than it deserves on a proposal for the Internet community about ways to block Russia from the network. But I am inspired to suggest that the country code .su — presumably all that's left of the Soviet Union – be permanently retired. I mean, really, does anyone respectable want it back?
In quick hits:
- Jane gives a lick and a promise to the Open App Markets bill coming out of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
- I alert the ACLU to a shocking porcine privacy invasion.
- What about Scarlett Johansson? We save her for last, as I discover that none of the other panelists thinks it surprising that 15% of people have already had sex with a robot but every one of them finds the idea of falling in love with a robot preposterous.
Download the 398th Episode (mp3).
A special reminder that we will be doing episode 400 live on video and with audience participation on March 28, 2022 at noon Eastern daylight time. So mark your calendar and when the time comes, use this link to join the audience:
https://riverside.fm/studio/the-cyberlaw-podcast-400
See you there! You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed. As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com. Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug!
The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of their institutions, clients, friends, families, or pets.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"15% of people have already had sex with a robot"
That's one hardworking robot.
Was it Robbie the Robot? R2D2? Inquiring minds want to know...
C-3PO is fluent in over three million forms of _______.
Lieutenant Commander Data claims to be familiar with multiple techniques.
C-3PO is fluent in over three million forms of _______.
So, a cunning linguist?
"I ask why the U.S. can't take over Facebook and Twitter infrastructure to deliver the Voice of America to Facebook and Twitter users in Russia who've been cut off by the social giants' departure. Nobody likes that idea but me."
This is self evident to everyone but the scumbag lawyers in Washington. Seize them in civil forfeiture for the billions of internet crimes on their platforms, and for the millions of crimes they committed themselves. They inflated their viewerships to advertisers, with half their members not being human. Seize them.
"But WIRED is unpersuasive when it blames face recognition for police mistakes that could have been avoided with a little more care on the part of the cops."
End all immunities. To deter. Let the careless police pay the plaintiffs from personal assets, since incompetence is not part of their tax payer job description.
Worse, they have been repeatedly warned for over 10 years that facial recognition is a tool, and that they must manually verify the people picked out are who they actuslly are.
In high school we would joke that my friend's mom had that number beat by a lot.
Did you look at that survey?
It's idiotic. The results mean nothing.
Then I'm sorry I took it so seriously. 🙁
You must be a hoot at parties.
"15.8% of men answered “I’ve had sex with one/own one”, while 15.3% of women said the same."
Very clearly a bad survey. This number implies you could make a small city with a balanced gender ratio out of Americans who sex robots. The fact the gender ratio is balanced is suspicious, given the well-known differences in sexuality between genders.
In the article, the picture of the female one has idiotic artificially plumped lips with lipstick drawn on larger than her fake lips.
You know there are people with naturally large lips, clone that. This reminds me of comic book artists drawing superheroines with big breasts. Big, fake breasts that look like what they are, foreign blobs slid under fatless skin.
Wait, let me check that robo chick again. Oh my god.
And did you further know drawing on lipstick larger than your lips is an old stage makeup trick, useful from afar, and is not to be used close up because it looks stupid?
Hello, half of Hollywood! Wtf is wrong with you?
If you persist in this robodiscrimination, the robolawyers will robosue you.
In the article, the picture of the female one has idiotic artificially plumped lips with lipstick drawn on larger than her fake lips.
And it still looks more natural than half the women in Beverly Hills.
I'm guessing the women assumed they meant vibratory. Which are in fact, sex robots that are used in nearly every household.
Which are in fact, sex robots that are used in nearly every household.
I suspect your definition for "nearly every" is a tad generous.
By sex robots, the women mean those lumps laying beside them in bed.
Yeah sex is cool, but I'm starting to think the glorification of Ukraine and the war there in the media is for some other purpose....