The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
My New York Times Article Making the Moral and Strategic Case for Accepting Ukrainian Refugees - and Russian Migrants, too
The article also addresses some potential objections.

The New York Times just published my article making the case for accepting Ukrainian refugees - and Russian migrants, as well. Here is an excerpt:
The United Nations reports that at least 1.5 million refugees have fled the fighting in Ukraine. Sadly, that figure is likely to grow.
To ease the suffering caused by Vladimir Putin's invasion and strengthen our position against him, the United States should open its doors both to Ukrainian refugees fleeing the conflict and to Russians seeking to escape Mr. Putin's tyranny.
There are several things we can do quickly: President Biden has taken a valuable first step by making Ukrainians in the United States eligible for temporary protected status, which will shield them from deportation and allow them to seek employment. But this measure applies only to those who arrived in the United States by March 1 and lasts only for 18 months (though that could be extended). He can also protect Ukrainian students in the United States by granting special student relief, which would make it easier for them to remain here. Further, he should grant parole status to newly arriving Ukrainian refugees, allowing them to remain in the United States….
In addition to taking in Ukrainian refugees, the United States and its allies should offer safe haven to Russians seeking to escape Mr. Putin's oppressive regime. As the science writer and aerospace engineer Robert Zubrin explains, Russian emigration can help drain Mr. Putin's "brains" by depriving his war machine of some of the scientific and technical expertise it relies on…
Expanded Russian emigration to the West would be a tremendous moral victory for the United States and other liberal democracies. During the Cold War, America welcomed refugees from the U.S.S.R., Cuba and other Communist nations in part for this very reason…. An open door to Russian immigrants would also be a powerful signal that we do not regard the people of Russia as our enemies — undercutting a pillar of Mr. Putin's domestic propaganda…..
The latter part of the article addresses various possible objections, including security concerns, claims that emigration would weaken domestic opposition to Putin's regime, and arguments that it is unjust to open the door to Ukrainians and Russians, but not to people fleeing comparable violence and oppression elsewhere. The latter objection has some validity, but the right way to address it is by leveling up, not leveling down: liberalize policies towards other migrants, not bar Russians and Ukrainians.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Plus anybody who wants to come, legally or illegally, amirite?
Most will do well, and vote anti-Commie once they become citizens. What if they are physically or mentally disabled, however?
They are the wrong color. That’s why so many Democrats and Leftists are shutting their borders to them.
When you visit friends in Russia, you take the windshield wipers with you up the stairs to the apartment. It is a klepto culture. Somin wants to bring that here. Have them all on Somin's street. Force Somin to take his windshield wipers inside.
One of the few times I agree with Prof Somin. Most refugees from Ukraine and Russia are actually fleeing war and/or political persecution. But we are already swamped by hundreds of thousands of people from the south of our border who are fleeing neither of those things, but are abusing the asylum process.
Fleeing neither of those things? Do you honestly have zero idea of what happens south of the border? Cartels, a murder rate the highest in the world in Honduras, etc.?
Get educated man.
"Cartels, a murder rate "
Neither of those are "war" or "political persecution".
If the cartels, murder rate, etc were the problem, we would see illegal immigration go steadily down, since violence in Latin America which has been steadily going down for a long time.
But instead, it rises and falls almost entirely on the US economy, or other special events. Look at how it spiked in 1987, right after the 1986 Reagan amnesty. Look how it crashed right in 2008, during the housing crisis, etc.
https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/southwest-border-fy-data-1.jpg
Get educated man!
How are either of these OUR problem?
People can get refugee status based on their government's poor policies?
That's literally what one gets refugee status for.
Even setting aside that America's war on drugs is what empowers the cartels.
Correct. Actually the border situation is shocking. Throughout the Biden administration new records are being continually set with millions streaming over the border. Over 2 million in 12 months! And that was as of Oct 2021, it just keeps going up. And the Biden administration just welcomes them in and buses them all over the country.
Europe should take these refugees. Europe created the problems leading up to the war and Europe is having a demographic catastrophe. Europe is also more culturally compatible.
This is not America’s responsibility.
"Swamped."
Not to mention that they're white, and thus easily assimilable into America, unlike Amerindians from Mexico, Somalis, Syrians, and other non-white groups.
It is estimated, how accurately I don't know, that there are 147 million people who want to come to the US.
Are there any ideas about limits? Adding fifty percent to the population in one or two years might result in some problems.
They would end the labor shortage, drive all wages to the ground, including those of professionals. Our oligarchs would cut labor costs and increase their assets.
Rents might rise a little.
Really? I heard it was 2.5 billion people. I also don’t know how accurate that is, but I assume it falls within a negligible margin of error. Bringing in 2.5 billion people in a matter of a few weeks is going to be disastrous!
And that only takes into account inhabitants of this planet. I heard there were over 845 quintillion sentient beings in the universe who wish to come to the US.
I'm not sure how accurate that is.
Each should receive full civil rights, to generate worthless make work jobs for the lawyer profession. 845 quintillion new clients.
He’s on to something. If we let all the Ukrainians move here and all the Russians move here (except for Putin of course, he’s yucky) then there’d be no fighting in Ukraine at all.
This is getting extreme. I have nothing against regular immigration but Somin wants EVERYONE to move here, which seems a bit crowded. We can’t let everyone from a bad country come here to stay - besides which I thought we were simply the worst anyway.
Even if Somin’s arguments weren’t complete b.s., what about the desire of Americans for the country to have some social and cultural continuity?
I’m an immigrant. When I immigrated, US immigration was difficult and merit based. I didn’t come to the US to have every refugee and third world peasant from around the world become my neighbor. If the US has been honest about its future Immigration policies, skilled immigrants like myself works have looked elsewhere.
You're really speaking for all "skilled immigrants like myself?"
Your opinion is objectively not the majority view. Look no further than the EB-5 visa program, which created huge demand in China to both pay money and create jobs in the US...in exchange for immigration.
Next time read the label on the door. Something about "your tired, your poor... the wretched refuse of your teeming shore."
The Jewish communist Emma Lazarus' poem is not a law.
The cultural issue is arbitrary. Interstate cultural differences are big (think about Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Louisiana, New Jersey, and West Virginia). Even rural vs. urban cultural differences are large within a state (central valley California and upstate New York are nothing like the urban parts of the state).
Each generation is culturally distinct from the previous generation and it rapidly changes over the decades. Consider how the views on sexual activity, race, music, and gender roles has changed each decade.
I'm not sure what the objection is anyway. People enjoy exploring other cultures on vacation. When someone immigrates they move that culture physically closer to you, pick up some of your culture, and their kids will have indistinguishable culture from your kids.
Culture isn't zero sum. When someone brings their culture near you they do not displace your culture. The Lutherans in Minnesota haven't become Muslim, stop eating wild rice and walleye, or helping neighbors build a deck because of Somalian immigrants. Instead, cultural juxtaposition results in cuban sandwiches, rock and roll, and Christmas.
Remember, Ukrainians and Russians are Europeans with largely Christian values. They are about as close to "Caucasian" as possible without being from the caucuses. The people that come here do so because they want to be part of our culture and economy.
Yeah....NO!
Somin's only got a hammer in his toolbox. After hitting everything in sight, he might accidentally hit a nail some day. Today isn't that day.
For Reason writers, there is no problem that can't be solved by the United States opening our borders wider. Just bring everyone in, issue them their voter I.D. and SNAP benefit cards as they cross.
You could even put card dispensers at the areas where they are known to cross illegally. Make it a bit like the old photo booth. They could enter booth, have their picture taken, enter the name they want to be known by, and voila! They now have a photo id, are registered to vote democrat in any election, and immediately have access to $1,000 (replenished monthly). What could possibly go wrong? We would have plenty of blue-collar workers, wages would go down, and housing rents would go up. Zoom workers for the win!
By the way, how many white law professors have quit this week so a POC could be hired in their place? That many, huh?
Another spirited meeting of ("Often") Libertarians For Authoritarian, Bigoted, Cruel Immigration Practices And Procedures, convened, naturally, at a white, male, right-wing blog.
If there is anything this blog's target audience can't abide, it is the occasional bit of genuine libertarian content.
(The 'Somin is repetitive' objections, coming from clingers who seemingly can't get enough of this blog's incessant regurgitation of a few right-wing rants, is particularly humorous.)
OK, Boomer. When are you being replaced by a immigrant lawyer? Stop talking, start acting, Artie. Your words are empty until that happens.
These are sinking ships of countries. We should prioritize refugees as we would lifeboats. Women of childbearing age and children first. Second. And only.