The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
"Because in All Matters That Deal Not With Railways His Knowledge Is Great"
The maritime shipping industry site gCaptain, which seems to be pretty prominent and often-cited, criticizes the appointment of the new U.S. Maritime Administrator (thanks to InstaPundit for the pointer):
[F]or the fourth time in a row, and during the worst shipping crisis of the century, the US Department of Transportation, has appointed someone to the US Maritime Administration (MARAD) who is not a captain and has no commercial shipping experience.
[October 14], President Biden announced his intention to nominate Rear Admiral Ann Phillips, US Navy (Retired), as the next US Maritime Administrator, a position that has been vacant since Rear Admiral Mark Buzby stepped down following the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol in January.
Phillips is a highly decorated Navy leader with a long list of accomplishments and is highly respected by everyone gCaptain has interviewed. She was head of the Navy's Climate Change Task Force and is a highly sought after consultant on climate security issues. She holds an MBA. She was chairman of a local government Sea Level Rise Preparedness and Resilience project. She once captained a Navy warship. The appointment looks great on paper except for one kinda big problem. This is not a warship position. It's a commercial shipping appointment and she has zero experience aboard any commercial ships. She does not even have experience leading navy military sealift ships.
I can't speak to whether this criticism is apt, but it gives me the opportunity to quote one of my favorite Kipling poems, Public Waste, which begins thus (some of the specific references are lost on us, unless we know the history of late 1800s Anglo-Indian administration, but the overall thrust should be clear enough):
By the Laws of the Family Circle 'tis written in letters of brass
That only a Colonel from Chatham can manage the Railways of State,
Because of the gold on his breeks, and the subjects wherein he must pass;
Because in all matters that deal not with Railways his knowledge is great,Now Exeter Battleby Tring had laboured from boyhood to eld
On the Lines of the East and the West, and eke of the North and South;
Many Lines had he built and surveyed—important the posts which he held;
And the Lords of the Iron Horse were dumb when he opened his mouth.Black as the raven his garb, and his heresies jettier still—
Hinting that Railways required lifetimes of study and knowledge—
Never clanked sword by his side—Vauban he knew not nor drill—
Nor was his name on the list of the men who had passed through the "College." …
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is it just me, or is this actually inexplicable?:
What connection could the head of the US Maritime Administration have to the Capitol protest? There was a change of administration on the same date, which you would think might be more relevant to a decision to retire, but the author quoted apparently doesn't think so.
The new head checks diversity boxes and is likely Woke, but elections, even at least partly stolen ones, have consequences. Subject matter familiarity is for minions, right?
What is the date that you think the January 6 Capitol riots happened on?
HA!
Rear Admiral Buzby resigned before the change of administration and seemed to indicate that he was doing so in response to the events of January 6th. A number of other Trump Administration officials did the same. I would think that's why the author made the connection between those events and the timing of the MARAD vacancy.
"...his heresies jettier still..." That's a good line. I'm going to steal that one.
The reference to Anglo-Indian administration reminds me of a story about Churchill and Roosevelt, who were having a state dinner or something during WWII and someone asked about Indian policy, and Churchill (I’m paraphrasing without checking) said “Do you mean brown Indians, who are thriving, or red Indians, who are no more to be found?”, causing FDR to chuckle.
I believe the (very unwoke) expression now is "Dot or feather?"
I didn't know it was unwoke. Hard to think of another way to put it that's so brief.
I have an Indian friend who has used that phrase, in a light hearted way.
"containergeddon" lol
too bad there is little actual infrastructure in the infrastructure bill. we do need more port capacity.
So we have no MARAD administrator and a Sec Trans who has been absent for the last 2 months, all in the midst of the “worst shipping crisis in a century”.
Darn it! I was hoping for a Jones Act/FELA post.
Eugene, I know you sometimes dip into the comment sections. Could you ask Reason for notifications when somebody replies to a comment? It is very easy to lose track of something you posted and it looks like you've abandoned your position when you don't reply to people who've responded.
Thanks,
Dunno if anything will happen. Establishment libertarians are almost as inept at tech as they are at politics.
A lot of extremely high executive positions these days merely require that you have a vagina and you check the minimum number of past sinecures and meaningless ribbons (that you also achieved by having a vagina) that would prevent raised eyebrows. Rather than any extraordinary talent or standing out from the rest. So I guess maybe not that different from the past, except for possessing the female anatomy part. And more change is already afoot with gender theory sweeping from the class room to the boardroom. Sorry ladies.
You know, I am going to assume that Rear Admiral Ann Phillips, US Navy (Retired) is not a total idiot and surround herself with very capable people. That is her record when you dig a little deeper. I just don't see the problem. She is qualified.
Personally, I think fleet reserve fleet readiness is a lot more important right now (looking at you, China and Taiwan), than resolving a supply glut; and that is right in her wheelhouse.
"Not a total idiot" and "surround oneself with capable people" are not really sufficient criteria to run an organization. One should really have some SME.
Like I said David...reserve fleet readiness is really important right now.
If I can figure out the Kipling poem, they bought out an actual competent and experienced administrator and put an inexperienced, but better-connected, guy in his place.
That was 19th century Britain, and I resent the suggestion there is any comparison with modern America.
Gilbert and Sullivan made the same point in a far more amusing manner:
https://victorianweb.org/mt/gilbert/porter.html
Also:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSGWoXDFM64
https://genius.com/Gilbert-and-sullivan-i-am-the-very-model-of-a-modern-major-general-annotated