The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: June 4, 1923
6/4/1923: Meyer v. Nebraska decided.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In Nebraska, as late as a few years ago, state park employees conducting tours of fossil sites were instructed to give creationist explanations.
Also the home of Roman Hruska, he of "in praise of mediocrity" fame.
On the other hand, birthplace of an old squeeze of mine, though she left the state after graduating.
Bob Kerrey was a pretty good governor and senator, though I doubt he could win an election in Nebraska today.
True. Another Democratic combat veteran painted by draft-dodging Republicans as unpatriotic.
Cite?
"painted by draft-dodging Republicans"
Did the survivors of Thanh Phong paint him as anything?
If he had been a Republican, that incident would have helped him instead of hurt him. In fact he’d benefit from waving one of the dead baby’s skulls at rallies. The crowded would have gone wild.
Imaginary situations are the bestest situations.
"You can't be nice in war. He did what he had to do. I admire him for it."
One can easily imagine Trump (draft-dodger, pretend tough guy) saying this, and if Trump admired him, so would Trump's lockstep legion of followers.
"easily imagine"
No need to imagine that Democrats ran Kerrey.
The revelation ended his future in the Democratic Party.
"I doubt he could win an election in Nebraska today"
He lost in his 2012 comeback so sharp punditry.
Any ideas on why Holmes (and Sutherland) dissented here (well, in the companion case) and not Pierce v. Society of Sisters?