The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Classes #6: Does the First Amendment protect tortious speech? and The Bundle of Sticks
NYT v. Sullivan, Snyder v. Phelps, Jacques v. Steenberg Homes, and State v. Shack
First Amendment Class #6: Does the First Amendment protect tortious speech?
- New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1409-1415) / (681-688)
- Snyder v. Phelps (1421-1430) / (693-702)
- Supplement: Chapter 55
Property I Class #6: The Bundle of Sticks
- The Right to Exclude and its Limits, 205
- Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, 205-207
- State v. Shack, 207-209
- Notes, 209-211 (skip note 4)
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You know who else talked about a bundle of sticks?
RE: "Does the First Amendment protect tortious speech?"
I don't know. Does it say anything about talking snakes, or lizards, or alligators?