The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Classes #2: Punishing Sedition & Efficiency and Fairness
Schenck, Debs, Abrams, Gitlow, Stromberg; Ghen, Keeble, Popov
First Amendment - Class #2 - Punishing Sedition
- Sedition and "Clear and Present Danger" (1310-1311) / (582-584)
- Schenck v. United States (1311-1313) / (584-586)
- Debs v. United States (1314-1315) / (586-588)
- Abrams v. United States (1316-1320) / (588-592)
- Gitlow v. United States (1320-1324) / (592-597)
- Stromberg v. California (1325-1326) / (597-598)
- Supplement: Chapter 52
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So, Josh took a shower and blow dried his hair but his shirt and tie look the same. This is what you can do during the pandemic.
I’m not going to listen to any professor who gets historical facts wrong again and again and again and again and again —
I don't doubt that Blackman gets a lot of things wrong, but I'm curious as to what you specifically are referring to.
I'm referring to his performance as poster of the "Today in Supreme Court History" series. Most recently, getting the 20th Amendment wrong.
And then there are his posts about Trump using a First Amendment defense in his upcoming impeachment trial. Why would I watch a video on the First Amendment made by someone who apparently has no grasp of it?