Classes #2: Punishing Sedition & Efficiency and Fairness

Schenck, Debs, Abrams, Gitlow, Stromberg; Ghen, Keeble, Popov

First Amendment—Class #2—Punishing Sedition

• Sedition and "Clear and Present Danger" (1310-1311) / (582-584)
• Schenck v. United States (1311-1313) / (584-586)
• Debs v. United States (1314-1315) / (586-588)
• Abrams v. United States (1316-1320) / (588-592)
• Gitlow v. United States (1320-1324) / (592-597)
• Stromberg v. California (1325-1326) / (597-598)
• Supplement: Chapter 52



Property 1—Class #2—Efficiency and Fairness

• Ghen v. Rich, 27-30
• Notes and Questions, 30-35
• Keeble v. Hickeringill, 35-36
• Notes and Questions: 36-39
• Popov v. Hayashi: 46-51
• Notes: 52



Comments

[John W]

So, Josh took a shower and blow dried his hair but his shirt and tie look the same. This is what you can do during the pandemic.

[captcrisis]

I’m not going to listen to any professor who gets historical facts wrong again and again and again and again and again —

[bernard11]

I don’t doubt that Blackman gets a lot of things wrong, but I’m curious as to what you specifically are referring to.

[captcrisis]

I’m referring to his performance as poster of the “Today in Supreme Court History” series. Most recently, getting the 20th Amendment wrong.

[ah....Clem]

And then there are his posts about Trump using a First Amendment defense in his upcoming impeachment trial. Why would I watch a video on the First Amendment made by someone who apparently has no grasp of it?