The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: December 18, 1944
12/18/1944: Korematsu v. U.S. decided.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Another day which will live in infamy.
Easy to say nearly 80 years later. The fear after Pearl Harbor was very strong.
Feh. I thought we were talking law here. What constitutional basis is there for putting legal residents and even citizens in concentration camps? None. It was an utterly lawless act, and the Supreme court rolled over and played dead.
Would you have said the same if we'd marched Muslims into concentration camps after 9-11? More people died in that attack.
"I thought we were talking law here. "
No, its the Supreme Court, you know they make policy decisions and public opinion influences them.
I can't see how this decision would hold today.
The US can barely hold individuals in Guantanamo due to habeas corpus (Boumediene v. Bush) - never mind an entire race or nationality.
Was it not already overruled?
Hmmmm...not sure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._Hawaii
"I can’t see how this decision would hold today."
If we were facing a similar threat level, probably. We just flatter ourselves that we are above it.
The Court the War on Terror cases waited until the immediate threat [much much smaller] was gone and it was largely just an assertion of judicial authority. I don't think anyone in Gitmo has actually gotten release by habeus.
"If we were facing a similar threat level, probably."
Doubtful.
There are enough SJWs out there and plenty of internets to fight this if it ever came up again.
And as I always say, we've moved in quite a progressive direction in the past 80 years (and of course will continue in this direction [with the occasional set backs]).
Look at the fuss about the border detentions - and those have some blush of legality about them.
Hopefully we will never know. History however would tend to be on my side but maybe you are right.
Would FDR and the military have obeyed an opposite result in Korematsu? Don't think that didn't weigh on the Supreme Court's decision.
No, probably not. FDR is as close to a dictator as the US has had since Lincoln. Scared people so much they amended the Constitution to prevent anybody being President for that long ever again.
Inter arma enim silent legis.
Was this ruling made before or after Roosevelt threatened to pack the courts?
Well after.
Detention camps for immigrants? It’s happening now.
Word for word, this might be the dumbest comment I have ever read on the VC, and there has been stiff competition.