The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
D.C. Circuit won't rehear Second Amendment right-to-carry-guns-in-public case; likely next stop: Supreme Court
In July, a D.C. Circuit panel held, by a 2-1 vote, that the Second Amendment secures a right to carry guns in public. This leaves considerable room for "shall-issue" licensing requirements (under which pretty much any law-abiding adult can get a license but might have to undergo various checks, training and the like) and other regulations; but the old D.C. rule, under which the government could deny you a carry license just because it thought you didn't have a good enough reason, was struck down.
D.C. asked for rehearing en banc, by the whole D.C. Circuit; but today, the court denied rehearing, apparently without any judge requesting a vote. D.C. can now petition the Supreme Court for review, and I think the court will almost certainly agree to hear the case: There would be a request for review from the D.C. government (the court takes such requests for review from governments fairly seriously). And there is a split of authority on the subject between the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 9th Circuits on the general no-right-to-carry side (though with some differences in the analysis among the courts) and the 7th Circuit, D.C. Circuit and Illinois Supreme Court on the right-to-carry side. Should be very interesting to see.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?