How Texas Beat California on Housing
YIMBY policies in Texas have led to lower rents and increasing supply. The same cannot be said for California.
HD DownloadSan Francisco and Austin are both known for their trendsetting tech sectors and cultural scenes. But while Austin is enjoying the best of times, for San Francisco, it's starting to feel like the worst.
San Francisco's population has dropped for the fourth year in a row. It saw one of the largest percentage declines among major U.S. cities during the pandemic. Meanwhile, Austin's population is exploding while rental prices continue to get cheaper and cheaper.
In Austin, you can rent a gorgeous apartment for about half the price of a similar place in San Francisco that only has about half of the amenities.
"I had a one-bedroom in San Francisco, a lot smaller. I didn't have an in-unit washer-dryer," says Alim Virani, an engineering manager at Etsy who moved from San Francisco to Austin during the pandemic. "Here, I'm living in the heart of downtown. Wonderful views; [a] two-bedroom; really sprawling, modern building. I'm getting way more for a little bit more."
Virani isn't the only one making the cross-country move. The greater Austin area grew by 11 percent between 2020 and 2024. Yet despite the influx of people, prices haven't gone up—they've actually dropped.
Jake Wegmann, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin who specializes in housing affordability and real estate development, says there are several reasons why Austin's rents are falling even as more people move to the capital of the Lone Star State. But there's one key reason: In Texas, counties can't zone outside city limits.
That opens the floodgates for new construction. Developers outside Austin's city limits can simply decide to build 100 new units.
"There are some regulations," Wegmann explains. "It's just a whole lot less regulated than probably just about any other state in the country."
Compare that to San Francisco, which, along with New York City, has one of the most regulated housing markets in the country.
"There's something that's gone awry when you've got prices that only allow for millionaires to access the American dream of home ownership," says Nicole Nosek, a Berkeley transplant who moved to Austin in 2019. She now leads a nonprofit aimed at cutting red tape to make building easier.
In Austin, she says, "after 45 days of waiting for the city department to give your permits back, you can then go to an engineer or you can go to an inspector to work on the permits to be able to speed up some of that backlog."
In San Francisco, it can take over 627 days to get a simple permit, explains Nosek. That's part of the reason the city added around 1,800 new units in 2023—about 13 times fewer than Austin.
San Francisco also has a supply problem rooted in rent control. More than two-thirds of tenants live in rent-controlled units, often priced well below the market rate. The result? People stay put and new housing doesn't get built. Texas, on the other hand, gets to avoid this scenario entirely.
"Austin has a vibrant community that is building more housing, that is advocating for more housing. So you don't have rent stabilization," says Virani. "But what you do have is rents [that] are stabilizing naturally through the influx of more units and responding to people's demands for those units."
The idea is simple: A lightly regulated housing market benefits everyone. And in Texas, support for this approach transcends party lines.
Liberal Austin has embraced YIMBY-ism ("yes in my backyard"), and it's part of what drew Virani to move there. In San Francisco, however, the movement has struggled.
"I was actually quite involved in the YIMBY movement in San Francisco…but it's just been really hard to get liftoff in terms of getting new development," Virani says.
"You often saw people being like 'Well, what are you coming to San Francisco for? You're gentrifying the city,'" he adds. In Austin, "there is much less of that. There's almost like an enthusiasm of 'Come to Austin….We actually need you to come rent from us.'"
With new buildings popping up across the Texas landscape, landlords are fiercely competing for tenants.
"We have a lot of inventory and not enough population to fill that inventory," says Austin realtor Yasmine Acebo, who explains that Austin landlords are offering everything from several weeks of free rent to gift cards, cash bonuses, free Wi-Fi, and paid utilities to get tenants to move in. "It really just depends [on] what that property itself has to offer."
Acebo explains that Austin is evolving into a more walkable, amenity-rich lifestyle. "I really think that Austin wants to be at the top with the rest of the big, trendy cities, such as Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, New York. So having living that's walkable to so many restaurants, gyms, community centers, I think that's the step that they're trying to take in that direction."
San Francisco and Austin represent two distinct paths: growth vs. stagnation, markets vs. government, and welcoming newcomers vs. protecting the status quo.
Austin proves what economists have known for centuries: Build more housing and prices will come down. The question is, will older, more established cities like San Francisco catch up, or will they continue to hemorrhage talent and turn away the very people who want to call them home?
Music: "Spider Theory" by Sage Oursler via Epidemic Sound; "Unsolved Mystery" by Josef Falkenskold via Epidemic Sound; "Which Way" by Josef Falkenskold via Epidemic Sound; "Domo Arigato" by Lofive via Epidemic Sound; "Kiss Me Honey" by Nicky Dowling via Epidemic Sound; "An Introduction" by Dream Cave via Epidemic Sound; "Tightening Tensions" by Josef Falkenskold via Epidemic Sound
- Narrator: Nick Gillespie
- Audio Production: Ian Keyser
- Graphics: Lex Villena
- Writer: Katarina Hall
- Video Editor: Hana Ko
- Camera: Kevin Alexander
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Aspiration = Racism
In Austin, you can rent a gorgeous apartment for about half the price of a similar place in San Francisco that only has about half of the amenities.
Fucking idiotic analysis. Compare Austin's rental or home purchase prices to the rest of Texas and what do you get?
Sure, Austin is more affordable than San Francisco. So is just about everywhere else in the United States. That's a retarded comparison, especially since Austin is perhaps the most unaffordable place to live in the entire state of Texas. Californians might be able to pay that, and it might even be attractive to them, but to anyone else this is total bullshit.
A better headline would be, "How Texas is Becoming California."
Picking Austin as the example already shows that the author is mostly comparing the same type of people with a different state government. I have zero interest in going to either place and find their decisions terrible.
I was disappointed that it was the "as in a foot race" definition of "beat" and not the "with a barbed-wire-wrapped bat" definition.
Shorter version:
Q: How do you not be like California?
A: By not being like California.
California's supermajority Democratic legislature just TODAY changed course and enacted two huge revisions to its draconian environmental restrictions that were signed into law in 1970 by Ronald Reagan and have been used by NIMBYs -- many of whom are Republicans -- to stop every bit of progress. One of the revisions exempts high density development and the other provides for expedited reviews. Jerry Brown had tried and failed to revise the law to exempt urban housing but the NIMBY grifters defeated him. Newsom himself has been trying, with some small success, to break the NIMBY grift stranglehold on development, and this is his biggest success to date.
This is as momentous as last year's massive upzoning of most of NYC. There, it was progressive Democrats, not centrists like Newsom, who led the way. And every Republican voted with the NIMBY grifters. The Republican candidate for Mayor in this fall's election has called for that upzoning to be reversed. He is looking for NIMBY grifter votes and will probably get them.
Meanwhile, it is important to remember that Texas just as a massively greater amount of developable land than California does. And Texas's development has largely been sprawl, especially in the Dallas and Houston areas. Traffic is almost as bad as New York City and the traffic jams last for miles and miles and miles. And Texas's property taxes are confiscatory compared to California's or New York City's.
From Groc:
‘Austin, Texas, has a crime rate of approximately 39 per 1,000 residents, which is higher than the national average of 33.37 per 1,000 but aligns closely with or is slightly lower than the Texas state average. The overall crime rate includes both violent and property crimes, with property crimes being the primary contributor.
Violent Crime: The violent crime rate in Austin is about 3.34 to 4.67 per 1,000 residents, depending on the source, which is higher than the national average (2.7 per 1,000) and slightly above the Texas average. Violent crimes include murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Your chance of being a victim of violent crime is roughly 1 in 199 to 1 in 214. Notably, Austin’s murder rate is lower than both state and national averages, at about 4 per 100,000 residents compared to 6.5 nationally and 6.6 in Texas. In 2024, homicides were reported at 70, down from a peak of 88 in 2021 but still above pre-pandemic levels (e.g., 14 in the first half of 2019). Aggravated assaults have also decreased by about 12% from 2023 to 2024.
Property Crime: Property crimes, including burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson, dominate Austin’s crime statistics, with a rate of about 34 to 55 per 1,000 residents, significantly higher than the national average of 13.84 per 1,000. The chance of being a victim of property crime is approximately 1 in 30 to 1 in 31. Motor vehicle theft is particularly high, with Austin ranking among the highest in the nation for this crime, though rates have slightly declined since 2023.
Trends: Crime in Austin has been trending downward. Total crime dropped by about 8% from 2022 to 2023, with violent crime down nearly 10% and property crime down 13% in the first half of 2024 compared to 2020. The first quarter of 2024 saw the lowest crime rates since 2020, with 14 homicides, 51 kidnappings, and 56 rapes reported, compared to 23, 52, and 79, respectively, in the same period of 2023. However, auto thefts remain elevated, following a national trend.
Neighborhood Variations: Crime varies significantly by neighborhood. Central Austin, including areas like Downtown, MLK, Riverside, and Saint Johns, sees higher crime rates (e.g., 18,256 incidents annually in central areas), driven by population density and socioeconomic factors. Safer neighborhoods include Rollingwood, West University, Barton Hills, Hyde Park, Allandale, Comanche Canyon Ranch, and Barton Creek, which benefit from lower crime rates and community engagement. The northwest and west parts of the city, like Comanche Canyon Ranch, report the lowest crime, with as few as 475 incidents annually.
Cost of Crime: The estimated cost of crime in Austin for 2025 is around $515 million to $1.02 billion, translating to $203–$404 per resident or $523–$1,038 per household, covering criminal justice costs, victim losses, and economic impacts.
Context and Perception: Despite higher-than-average crime rates, Austin is safer than other major Texas cities like Houston and Dallas. Public perception of safety may be skewed by high-profile incidents, particularly in downtown and nightlife areas, but data shows Austin is safer than 38–41% of U.S. cities. The Austin Police Department’s proactive policing and community efforts contribute to the downward trend. However, underreporting remains an issue, with some estimates suggesting only half of crimes, like theft and rape, are reported.
For real-time data, you can explore the Austin Police Department’s CrimeViewer tool at austintexas.gov or the Texas Department of Public Safety’s Crime in Texas portal at txucr.nibrs.com. These platforms provide detailed, neighborhood-specific crime statistics.”
“driven by population density” hmmm. Maybe there’s another reason for lower rent prices in downtown Austin?