If you're like me, you're not watching the Olympics, currently taking place in that winter wonderland of Beijing, China, where the snow is totally fake but the silencing of American athletes is depressingly real.
The TV audience for the opening ceremony was down 43 percent compared to the last winter games, and it's not just because of yet another hideously ugly mascot, time zone differences, and the "cultural genocide" of Uyghurs killing the buzz. Interest in the Olympics has been dropping for decades now, which is a welcome development if you care about human dignity and wasteful government spending.
The games are a global grift run by one of the most corrupt, scandal-ridden bodies in sports history. The International Olympic Committee is happy to massively rip off whatever sucker cities and countries are dumb enough to beg for the right to host them. (I'm looking at you, Los Angeles!). Like vampires, they suck their hosts dry while providing legitimacy to tyrants and monsters such as Adolf Hitler, Leonid Brezhnev, Vladimir Putin, and Xi Jinping.
More important, they are the embodiment of a worn-out, collectivist 20th-century attitude toward competition among nations that makes no sense in our increasingly globalized, individualistic world. The modern games got started in 1896 by French aristocrat Pierre de Coubertin as a way of reviving Gallic national pride after his country got its ass kicked by Germany in the Franco-Prussian War. That's why athletes represent countries rather than themselves. And it's also why the Olympics were politically charged to the hilt throughout the 20th century, such as in the 1936 Berlin games, which Hitler overtly staged as a showcase for rising German military might and aggression.
During the Cold War, the Olympics functioned as one more proxy battle in the twilight struggle between the free world and communism. When the U.S. and Soviet teams faced off in basketball and hockey, it was every bit as much a geopolitical showdown between superpowers as anything happening in Southeast Asia or Central America.
That made the Olympics more exciting to watch—Bruce Jenner kicking commie ass in his world record–setting 1976 decathlon victory wasn't just about surpassing the limits of the human body, it was somehow about realpolitik and nuclear war. But there was a ton of collateral damage from such a framing, with ongoing national boycotts over political disputes meaning that athletes who had trained for years were figuratively sacrificed on the altar of nationalism. Or, as in the case of murdered Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich games, literally killed in the name of international politics.
Coubertin famously said, "the most important thing in the Olympic Games is not to win but to take part." But when the games are taking place in an authoritarian country, and we're still tallying medals by country, and the athletes are treated like geopolitical pawns rather than superlative individuals, it makes more sense than ever to tune out the Olympics.
Let the competitors represent themselves on a neutral playing field far from the distraction of politics and you'll see the audience return, ready to cheer athletes who inspire us by embodying the Olympic ideal of going "Faster, Higher, Stronger."
Edited by Regan Taylor. Written by Nick Gillespie.
Photo Credits: Valery Sharifulin/TASS/Newscom; Sergei Bobylev/TASS/Newscom; Angelika Warmuth/dpa/picture-alliance/Newscom; Anton Novoderezhkin/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Video by jol acen from Pexels; Thomas Krych/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Video by Ron Lach from Pexels; Mark Edward Harris/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Steven Williams, via Wikimedia Commons; Uri R, via Wikimedia Commons; Holocaust Encyclopedia; Derzsi Elekes Andor, via Wikimedia Commons; World History Archive/Newscom; Kremlin.ru, via Wikimedia Commons; Harald Steiner/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Alphonse-Marie-Adolphe de Neuville, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons; Rauantiques, via Wikimedia Commons; Edited by A.W.Ward, G.W.Prothero, and Stanley Leathes, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons; Richard Ellis/UPI/Newscom; Valery Sharifulin/TASS/Newscom; SVEN SIMON/picture alliance / SvenSimon/Newscom; RIA Novosti archive, via Wikimedia Commons; British official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons; Malayan Department of Information official photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons; DIRECCION DE DIVULGACION Y PRENSA EJERCITO DE NICARAGUA, via Wikimedia Commons; Linda Hess Miller, via Wikimedia Commons; U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons; John Blackfoot/Polaris/Newscom; Everett Collection/Newscom; Benjamin E. "Gene" Forte - CNP / MEGA / Newscom; KURT STRUMPF/AP Feature Photo Service/Newscom; Monte Fresco Mirrorpix/Newscom; Mickael Chavet/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Sergei Bobylev/TASS/Sipa USA/Newscom; Valery Sharifulin/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom;; Yonhap News/YNA/Newscom; Kyodonews/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Maxim Thore/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; THUMB Dai Tianfang Xinhua News Agency/Newscom; CHINE NOUVELLE/SIPA/Newscom; Seung Jin Yeo/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Atushi Tomura/AFLO SPORT/Newscom; PhotoXpress/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Olympic Winter Games Beijing 2/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Daniel A. Anderson/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Olympic Winter Games Beijing 2/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Lan Hongguang Xinhua News Agency/Newscom; Mickael Chavet/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; CHINE NOUVELLE/SIPA/Newscom; YUTAKA/AFLO/Newscom; EyePress/Newscom; ANP Sport / ANP/Sipa USA/Newscom; Mickael Chavet/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Valery Sharifulin/TASS/Newscom; Aleksandr Kazakov/Kommersant Photo / Polaris/Newscom; YUTAKA/AFLO/Newscom; Li He Xinhua News Agency/Newscom
Music Credits: "Pushing On," by Ikoliks via Artlist, and "Black From The Edge," by Ikolis via Artlist.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We need to ban the troons from competing before the next Olympics roll around. I'm the furthest thing from a feminist, but a champion like Katie Ledecky (who also happens to be cute as hell) shouldn't be knocked off her pedestal by some grotesque science experiment like "Lia" Thomas. Blech.
Yes, there should be two categories:
1. Has Y-chromosome
2. No Y-chromosome
Couldn't be easier.
Oh, and maybe a 3rd category:
3. Drug-enhanced
3.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAdG-iTilWU&ab_channel=SaturdayNightLive
I would tune in for the enhanced athletes, absolutely. Roid rage racers goooo!
In 2022 many people are now joining online jobs very fast because it has potential. TYu i joined this 3 months ago and in 3 months I totally received $50743 and all I was doing is copy and paste stuff in my part time.
Join now and start making money from this website: ....... http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
Who is the "we"? IMO the Olympics are for the competitors not nations, not committees, not commercial interests. Metals should be provided the athlete for their accomplishments, others haven't won the metals. Ideally Olympic Committees should be composed of current competitors setting the rules and accrediting sponsors. Allowing input from prior winners.
cute huh? well.. to each his own.
You left out the part where amateur athletes competing for the love of competition and their sport were replaced by professionals shopping for a country to compete for.
You left out the background of run-of-the-mill amateur athletes competing for the love of competition against state-run armies, getting replaced by motley crews off-season pro athletes competing for money against state-run armies, getting replaced by paid propagandists competing for money against state-run armies.
Not new, it it has been that way for decades. Hell, professional basketball players have been competing in the Olympics since the 1992 Games in Barcelona.
Even before that, large nations were creating "amateur" professional athletes through collage scholarship programs. Offering athletes free room & board and free access to the world's best coaches and equipment... as long as you could maintain a "c" in the requisite basket weaving classes (and in many cases, they would take care of that too if you could not).
The perception of professionals "shopping for a country" has increased mainly due to international recruiting of of athletes in everyday professional sports, rather than any other changes.
The reason why aristocrats like Coubertin made the Olympics an "amateur" competition was that they didn't want to have to compete against professional athletes or even regular working class folk who were likely to be in better physical condition than effete aristocrats. Also, if you're a working person you don't have the kind of time needed to train for a specialist sport. Even taking the time off for trials and competitions was a problem for all but the wealthy. You had to be rich to be an amateur athlete, well, until collegiate athletes got involved.
That was also a period of time that saw the movement of 'muscular Christianity', which ascribed certain moral attributes to fitness. Partly this was also a way of controlling the masses by engaging them in healthy activity that kept them occupied. It also addressed 'immoral' aspects of urbanism, which had risen with the industrial revolution. But the reason that I bring it up is that some of the tenets of muscular Christianity were also cheered on because of large numbers of men being found physically unfit for military service. While many effete aristocrats were at private schools that pushed sporting life as part of their curricular, many of their working class peers were overworked, poorly housed, and underfed.
So I threw this reply in to complicate matters some and include a bit of (possibly relevant) background.
YES
Use "Peking"!
And Duck!!
Just call em West Taiwan
Well, as has been pointed out, he already dead named Jenner in this article! Might as well the city, too!
Are you kidding? Tribalism always was what sold the Olympics. It was birthed on nationalist pride and competition.
People who didn't give half a fig about track were cheering Bruce to beat the commies, as was said, and it's only grown more competitive since.
Don't change that. Just don't host games in nations undergoing active fucking genocides and tyranny.
People who didn't give half a fig about track were cheering Bruce to beat the commies, as was said, and it's only grown more competitive since.
What tribe was Bruce then? What tribe is he now? It wasn't tribalism it was individualism.
Americans would not have been cheering him on if he had been, say, Italian.
It was American tribalism.
Daley Thompson, an English Decathlon gold medalist was cheered in the LA games.
Americans have gotten behind multiple foreign athletes.
Usain Bolt is only popular because of White American Nationalism at the Olympics. If it weren't for the evil white nationalists, Usain would've just been someone else who ran kinda fast.
Individualism, Nativism, Nationalism who gives a fuck? The point is that the Olympics is Nationalist, even at the individual level, and that anybody who even cheers for one single person, even if they know them personally, does so because they're a stupid American projecting their White Nationalism on a Nationalist past time.
^ this was intended point.
Americans have cheered on particularly inspiring athletes from other countries. Olga Korbut [Soviet] was the first I was aware of, Nadia Comaneci [Romania], and Kamila Valieva [Russia] this year, or at least up till her disqualification potential. All have had huge fan bases in the US.
Kaitlyn was always my heroic model of the most macho American man alive!
Man's so good he won woman of the year. That takes balls cold as formaldehyde.
LOL. There’s a reason the Olympics get exponentially more interest than the world track and field championships, and it’s all about nationalism.
A thing of the past. What's killing them now is the fact that NBC and China [the lines are pretty blurred between the two] as well as the IOC are sucking the lifeblood out of it and replacing it with the Tiktok/American Idol version of Olympics.
It used to be that you could kind of get a feeling of what it is like to be there and watch an event in real-time. You spent an hour just watching the jumps, including the boring parts and the also-ran guys who end up in 25th place but are damn happy to be there. Now it's basically nothing more than a highlight reel for the top performers intermixed with their saccharin bios, separated out with ad nauseum advertising.
There's plenty of drama in the competition itself without having all the personal drama set to music. I don't want to know about how her mom is single and gave up her career to make sure that Mitsy got to the rink every night.
I've always enjoyed watching the opening ceremonies, especially the parade of athletes. The sight of a bunch of young Germans in uniform marching around a stadium lit by torches really stirs the soul.
Tears at rhe national zeitgeist - look good in uniform, or still too soon?
I stopped watching decades ago, not for political or ideological reasons, because the US coverage sucked. 1/3 commercials, repeated ad nauseum; 1/3 saccharine biographies; 1/3 American 20th place losers. Seldom got to see any non-American winners or any sports without Americans.
Why would I want to watch such drivel?
was it 1/3 actual sports?
Because I vaguely recall it (it has been a LONG time since I watched) and I'd put it at half crappy sappy biographies and maybe 10% competition. Except for skating, which is about the least interesting of all the events.
Want good coverage? Show the competitions. Lots of them. And get over this dancing on ice drama shit, show the shooting range at the biathalon, or the bobsleds and the skeleton, and the downhill skiing. All of it, winners and also rans. I mean, dude flying down a hill at 70mph on a couple of flat sticks is exciting to watch. Even the ones with a slower time. I don't care about the athlete's story, or that he saved a puppy when he was 8 or volunteered at a soup kitchen. And I REALLY don't care about a "sport" that for years was determined by whether the russian judge or the french judge got to boost their girl's scores.
Yeh, my 1/3 was just a handy fraction. Actual sports coverage was considerably less, and even that little had so much boring stuff and losing Americans instead of winners and interesting events that it's be a stretch to call it sports.
I am enjoying the Curling. But what happened to hockey? Are they even playing?
I don't know. I'm too busy watching curling. Really enjoyed the mixed pairs.
Curling totally rocks.
I always like the speed skating, both long and short track. The latter is vulnerable to biased and/or corrupt umpiring, though. I broke an arm learning how to skate as a kid, but watching the Grenoble games the following year, I picked up enough proper technique to get back out on the pond and become minimally competent. I worked my way up to world's worst pond hockey goalie on skates. Kids who played in their boots were in a different category. We never got enough safe ice on Long Island to get enough ice time, even with a cove of our local lake right behind our house. It was always the first ice to freeze in our area.
Non-Olympic fun: sledding downhill until one reached the frozen cove. We launched ourselves off a slight rise and slammed onto the ice, skidding as far as we could. We'd have the occasional scene reminiscent of George Bailey saving Harry, but we knew to stay away from bad ice. You 'd expect Currier & Ives or Norman Rockwell to show up and take it all down.
Watch the Genocide Games? Sure, but only to see who the advertisers and sponsors are. NBC is helpfully providing millions of Americans like me with a target list of what companies to shun doing business with, and trash on social media for supporting genocide. The big three are out (GM, Ford, Chrysler - whatever they call themselves today).
"That made the Olympics more exciting to watch— [deadname] Jenner kicking commie ass in [pronoun misgender] world record–setting 1976 decathlon victory wasn't just about surpassing the limits of the human body, it was somehow about realpolitik and nuclear war."
Wow.
I'd expect this transphobia from The Federalist. Not from Reason though. Maybe you should promote your LGBTQIA+ correspondent Scott Shackford to editor in chief so this never happens again.
#TransWomenAreWomen
Referring to trans athletes by the names under which they won their medals in sex-segregated competition is historically accurate. Caitlyn Jenner didn't win gold: Bruce did. Denying that is like Stalin erasing Politburo members out of May Day photographs.
BTW, Ms Jenner opposes MTF trans athletes competing against females who are staying with the sex they were born with.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/caitlyn-jenner-lia-thomas-ncaa-transgender-participation-policy
Now, if there were some "gold kryptonite" that erased the physical advantage of having lived as a male for 15-21 years....
I love when people respond seriously to OBL.
That was one of his best in a while
There is no "transphobia" here -- that's a blatant attempt to silence discussion with bad rhetoric (a form of an ad hominem fallacy).
From a certain social/cultural standpoint, trans women are women; however, social and cultural demarcation isn't real in the sense that it ceases to exist if no one believes it.
From a biological standpoint, trans women are not women. Their physiology from their chromosomes on up are distinct from women. Admittedly there are a few who don't fall into the male/female division cleanly: human chimeras and those with Klinefelter syndrome are examples.
These differences (social/cultural vs. biological) are generally elided over in discussions, and there has been no real conversation among those with different models of gender -- this is largely the result of those who favor a largely social/cultural interpretation having generated their views in something of a vacuum, and rather than engaging with those who favor a biological interpretation, simply labeling them "transphobic".
I don't know, maybe. Well, at least in part.
It would be interesting to see how much of it stems from other typical market driven factors...
1. "National Pride" in the US is pretty low... how much does the rise and fall of it effect viewership in an event that is solely about national pride?
2. Most Olympic sports do not command much of an audience away from the Olympics. With tons 24/hour sport networks and steaming sport view options available to the general public, how much of that has removed the "exotic" from the Olympics? Much like being able to get Christmas, Valentines, and Halloween Peeps makes them less special during Easter, how much have they saturated the viewing market between the 4 years? (An example: used to, the only way most people could watch Curling was during the Olympics. Now, you can find it fairly regularly on various ESPN type channels and whole steaming channels fully dedicated to it...).
3. It has to compete with tons of new sports that are all fighting for market share. Professional axe throwing, professional tag, professional surfing, professional disc sports, professional spikeball, etc. are all already eating up our limited attention spans.
4. How much comes from the distaste for the activism of some of the athletes during the Summer Games spilling over into the Winter Games? Not just the athletes, but the seemingly endless droning on and on and on by the announcers about it. Anytime an announcer is talking about something other than the sport they are announcing, it is not good.
Corruption, civil right abuses, stupid mascots, oppressive governments, and such are not new. While it might be nice to want to believe that people are not watching for those reasons, I am not sure I really buy it.
The millennials in particular are very unpatriotic, and shitty Americans in general. Let’s hope they all die young.
They suck because we're no longer watching working class amateurs kick ass on the Soviet National team. That's when the Olympics was fun. America, fuck yeah!
Personally I don't mind the restrictions on expression while they're there representing the USA. They have the rest of their career to lick Xi's ass as good commies or kick it as people who believe in human rights.
I stopped watching the Plympics when the media stopped covering the Olympics and instead focused on the Olympians. I enjoyed watching sports I'd rarely seen before and trying to figure out the rules, but you cannot do that in a 30 second highlight reel between bios of people I'd never heard of and never will again.
Do they spend a lot of time telling you what the athlete does with his cock or her vagina in their off time?
Do they still have those things, or have they invented something new for playing gender pretend?
"I stopped watching the Plympics when the media stopped covering the Olympics and instead focused on the Olympians."
This is something I really don't get with the networks and media covering sports. If you look at the two largest sports in the US, NFL and NBA, the networks have tried over and over to cover more human interest stories during the game instead of the actual games. Interviewing parents in the stands about the player growing up, going into what charitable work a player is doing, or chatting what chick they beat the hell out of. Over and over they find is bad for audience retention to discuss anything "not football" or "not basketball" in game and up pulling back from it. If the Big 2 cannot pull it off, why does NBC think they can do it during solo synchronized swimming (yes, I know... it is a summer game and hasn't been around since 1992)?
That is all done to get women interested.
Absolutely... that and the modern metrosexual and anybody who pretends to like Tour de France.
Doesn't change the fact that "softer side of NFL" only lasted about 3-4 years before all the networks backed off it. The NFL is still trying various outreach programs to get women to tune in, some of them having surprisingly positive results. Just not in-game commentary.
They're trying to gin up women viewers. I've only tuned in twice this year, both times the focus is women's sports. Who knows what's competing there ? I watched part of the downhill slalom last night, then they got carried away with coverage of the American girl who came in 8th or 10th place ignoring the other competitors. I shut it off.
They're maximizing ad revenue, which means expanding air time-- i.e., adding crappy filler like human interest stories-- until the prices for ad spots decline to the point where it's no longer profitable.
Always follow the money. They don't give a shit about the product, except to the extent it sells ads.
Plympics.......
I'm imagining George Plimpton trying all the events. 🙂
There's a Jackass film in this idea somewhere....
"The games are a global grift run by one of the most corrupt, scandal-ridden bodies in sports history."
And that's saying something, considering the sterling reputation of FIFA, the hypocrisy of the NBA, and the mendaciousness of the NFL.
Too woke. Practically every national culture in the world is represented. When is enough enough!
So broken.
Well...the Nazis had their Olympics in 1936. Believe they treated the competitors far better than the Chinese this year. But less than ten years later the Nazi regime was history. The Soviets had their Olympics in 1980. Am sure the Soviets treated the competitors far better than the Chinese do. But eleven years later the Soviet regime was history. Like to think the same will eventually happen to the Xi regime in China, headed for the dumpster of history, too.
Bring Jim McKay back from the dead.
Bring back Bob Costas and his oozing ocular infection!
I quit the NBA back when it became about baby-daddies and rape allegations and controversial personalities like the brilliant Charles Barkley were replaced by the woke and boring AF LeBron. Wilt Chamberlain claimed to have slept with 20,000 women. Kobe Bryant was nearly pilloried over a hotel maid. Which man do you want to watch dunk a ball?
I quit the NFL because the best part was watching the QB stumble groggily to his feet and throw a touchdown with a concussion and a separated shoulder. I got to watch Joe Theisman get his career ended on live television.
The Olympics was always best in 'the Agony of Defeat'. I can't even describe the clusterfuck it has become. Let them juice and rip each others arms off and I might watch it again.
Women's field hockey.
You should watch cheer. Highest number of catastrophic injuries of any college women’s sport.
The first one or two modern Olympics did not require teams to represent nations. Several athletic clubs sent teams. If only that had persisted it might have reduced the jingoism and bad sportsmanship associated with the games.
The what?
The way that the author conflates nationalism with collectivism is risible. Further, the Olympics have always been about the representation of individual states by athletes from those states. They have always been about peace amongst disparate factions, if only for the duration of the games. These Olympic ideals were forged by the Greeks long before French aristocracy existed.
Particularly sad was the suggestion that the national pride exhibited (or "framed" by) at the Olympics was the cause of the terrorism in Munich. No. The terrorists were the cause.
It's too bad that the author is taking the time to write about something he freely admits he hasn't seen. I've been greatly enjoying the Olympics this year. The coverage almost exclusively shows the competition between the world-class athletes.
No, none of that has anything to do with why I've stopped watching the Olympics. I don't sit around obsessing about communism in countries I don't live in. If I was going to obsess about such things I'd obsess about our corporatocracy Ayn Rand warned us about (rather than the communism she escaped) or the UN influence on local matters giving us a de facto one world govt.
I quit watching because the network doesn't focus on sports and tries to hide the sports people want to see to force the sports people don't give a crap about. It's all pre-recorded, edited and sanitized. There's often the excuse of time differences but they do the same with US/Canada hosted games.
You used to be able to watch live Olympics that were replayed for prime time.
If they wanted to make Olympics better they would stream everything and let people decide what they want to watch live. Those results would tell them what to broadcast. But it's not the answer they want so we can't have that.
They do stream everything live.
Yep. Peacock Premium has all events, plus on-demand replays.
But then I would have to give financial support to a major enemy of Freedom - the NBC news corporation. (Who at one time managed to slander me and my profession personally so I hold a grudge,)
Life is too short. Let it go. If you have cable TV, you do not need to give NBC any additional money for the streaming service.
I'm sick of nationalism in general, and certainly sick of the nationalism in the Olympics. Get rid of it. All team sports should be with mixed nationality teams. Every effort should be made to design games that retain the essence of athletic competition while stripping them completely of nationalistic significance.
Or just get rid of the whole fucking thing.
I'd much rather they televise live helmet camera footage of real war combat between countries. That is the truest Olympic Games in that it is the most direct and high stakes form of competition between the persons trained to represent their governments through physical contest.
Plus, it would turn off the public to all the wars around the globe by showing all the atrocities committed by troops against civilians and enemy troops, plus hopefully all the false flags. Instead of people cheering on their country's team, the people would be protesting for peace and against war.
But we all know the governments of the world would hide this war footage from us so that they can happily murder people while we watch the Olympics and other sportsball distractions.
You need to go on Reddit and watch the sub Reddit r/combat footage.
All 100% combat photography, all the time.
Ranging from airplane gun camera views of strafing Japanese merchant ships in WW2, to helmet cam ofI Isis fighters showing how they were killed.
From the perspective of the person being killed!
The comments are mostly from soldiers critiquing the performance on the video.
Drone footage from the recent Armenian-Azerbaijan war shows how war has been completely transformed by Turkish Bakyatar drones.
the US govt still hiding most of the Jan 6 "insurrection" video?
I think these Olympics are great. Empty stadiums, obedient slaves wearing not just masks but N95 masks even outside, fake snow, major media companies like NBC afraid to even let their reporters in the country. This is great because it shows what totalitarianism in China - and it's a reminder that if we don't keep pushing back at all the totalitarians here with their mandates and lockdowns and censorship (by labelling unpopular opinions as mis/mal/dis information) we're heading down that path.
what totalitarianism *is* in China
My favorite moment from the Peking games:
BEIJING—Olympian skier Väinö Mäkinen won a gold medal for Finland this morning after making an incredible jump over a concentration camp prison yard.
"After years of work, I'm very happy with my performance today," said Mäkinen. "I do hope the Uyghur slaves got a great view of me as I sailed like a little birdie over the prison yard."
https://babylonbee.com/news/olympic-skier-makes-incredible-jump-over-concentration-camp-prison-yard/
I doubt there are any greater geopolitical reasons why viewership is dropping.
The Olympics used to give us an opportunity to see sports we rarely saw. And they were generally in venues that were charming or quirky.
Now we have access to anything we can possibly want to watch. And the recent games have been played in some really depressing venues.
I was watching the men's downhill last week. The course looke like reverse bacon strips. Two piles of shit on each side with a white stripe running down the middle. Add in the fact there are no fans, it's just a depressing scene.
Stop trying to inject politics into everything Nick. Most people really don't care about it.
You know who else used the Olympics to score collectivist/tribalist ideological points and geopolitical status?
The Dream Team?
Why the Olympics suck so hard - - -
Let's see, massive government involvement in what is supposed to be a private venture, and massive private corruption; what could go wrong?
Who is John Galt?
Olympics? What Olympics?..... I will not watch an Olympics where a country that is an ememy of freedom, glorifies itself. Two many feed it, and it will bite when it gets big enough. Enjoy your Chinese stuff.
I've watched hockey, men's and women's, and nothing else, because that's a sport I care about and because every college in Boston has players in both tournaments. The Olympics in general were great in the days of Jim McKay on ABC and all of five channels to watch(now we have a thousand). If the Olympics disappeared after this year, I wouldn't care. They have run their course, and fewer and fewer nations want to host them.
The author ignores what is happening with TV. The reason for low ratings is because people cut their cable. People are used to watching TV when they want and not by a schedule that is dictated to them. NBC made a huge mistake by not streaming the content free with ads. Instead they make people subscribe to the Peacock channel. It's not the Olympics that are out of style, it's the TV presentation.
I have pretty much zero interest in "sports" where a score is handed out by judges, and it seems that winter olympics are especially filled with them. I also have pretty much zero interest in "sports" that appear to have been invented recently to create more olympic events, and it seems that winter olympics are especially filled with them.
Add Chinese propaganda, NBC's insipid bios and non-action coverage, and 50% commercials, what is the possible point. I've watched literally zero minutes of coverage, if we don't count olympic results blurbs that might happen to wander through news broadcasts.
OTOH, I did tune in for about 30 seconds of the Super Bowl last night, which was about 30 seconds more than I had watched the NFL all year.