Tulsa May Ban Sex Offenders from Halloween … and Christmas (Nanny of the Month, 10-13)
HD DownloadThis month's slate of the nation's most scarifying scolds includes college administrators who want coeds to keep sexy costumes off campus (especially geishas or "squaws"), and the most frightful control freaks of all--two Tulsa city councilmembers who are bent on banning registered sex offenders from passing out candy and decorating their homes at Halloween? In fact, they're mulling a similar kind of ban for all holidays.
What's the motivation for the proposed ordinance? The children, of course.
Never mind that there's not much in the way of actual evidence that trick-or-treating (where plenty of parents are out and about) is a tradition that puts children at heightened risk of being victimized. Never mind that spending just a few minutes on an online sex offender registry could provide parents with enough information to steer their children away from any sex-offender homes. And never mind that children's lives are often ruined by being placed on sex offender registries for minor offenses like streaking and public urination.
After all, what's most important is getting in front of a microphone and telling voters you're doing it for the children.
Just over one minute.
Follow Nanny of the Month on Twitter (@NannyoftheMonth) and submit your nominees for next month!
Nanny of the Month is written and produced by Ted Balaker (@tedbalaker). Motion graphics and research by Matt Edwards (@MattChrisEd). Opening graphics by Meredith Bragg.
To watch previous episodes, go here.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to ReasonTV's YouTube channel for notifications when new material goes live.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?