A Soho Forum Discussion of COVID with Tom Woods
In lieu of the planned debate with Brent Orrell, Gene Epstein and Tom Woods discuss the prudence of COVID-related restrictions.
Important Update from The Soho Forum: "[We regret] to inform you of a significant change to tonight's debate between Brent Orrell and Tom Woods. Unfortunately, Brent Orrell will not be able to participate as his granddaughter tragically passed away over the weekend. Our hearts go out to Brent and his family during this difficult time. In light of this, we've made adjustments to the event to ensure it can still proceed. Our director Gene Epstein will read, word-for-word, the script that Brent prepared, along with the slides Brent submitted. Tom Woods will then make his case for the negative. In lieu of an Oxford-style before/after voting, we will extend the Q&A portion and conclude the program with a 5-mins summation from Tom Woods."
The originally scheduled event was as follows:
Brent Orrell of the American Enterprise Institute and podcaster and author Tom Woods debate the resolution, "Government-imposed restrictions during the Covid pandemic were prudent and essential."
Taking the affirmative is Brent Orrell, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute focusing on job training, work force development, and criminal justice reform. Orrell has over 20 years of experience in the executive and legislative branches of government and was nominated by President George W. Bush to lead the Employment and Training Administration at the U.S. Department of Labor. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he wrote extensively on the impact of the disease on working conditions and the role of social distancing policies and practices in protecting worker and public health.
Taking the negative is Tom Woods, the host of The Tom Woods Show and author of 13 books, including latest Diary of a Psychosis: How Public Health Disgraced Itself During COVID Mania. He won the $50,000 first-place prize in the Templeton Enterprise Awards for his book The Church and the Market and was the winner of the 2019 Hayek Lifetime Achievement Award, given in Vienna by the Hayek Institute and the Austrian Economics Center.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That tells me all I need to know about the American Enterprise Institute.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A030wZ8kjyQ
I certainly hope there wasn't any causal link between Pandemic Policy and the death of his granddaughter.
I will admit that same thought crossed my mind.
I'm a big fan of Woods, so I'll probably watch this. I was kind of curious what kind of arguments people could still be making in favor of the restrictions, though.
I imagine the people arguing for restrictions were trying to figure out how to argue that in 2024 as well.
The libertarian case for Covid tyranny? Really?
Is AEI supposed to be libertarian? I thought they were just generic "pro business".
They aren't even good at that if they think the government knee-jerk control-freak reaction o shut down the economy was prudent and essential.
St. Louis should never be used as some sort of paragon of Covid policy.
Our leaders during that time period should have all been removed from office, tried, convicted, and executed.
If the state hadn't stepped in, I wonder if we would still be under emergency protocols. Fuck every one of them.
Can we contribute Mayor London Breed and Governor Gavin Newsom to the firing squad?
Pretty sure any comparison between CA and FL shows the debated pretty much settled in favor of 'hands off', as predicted by the Great Barrington Declaration: https://gbdeclaration.org/
12 comments? But have so idiotic comment from ENB or The Jacket on abortion, open borders, or sexual mutilation of kids being just fine and you get hundreds of "libertarians" supporting the lunacy. So, by the few comments I conclude Reason readers are in complete agreement with Dr. Woods...