The Infrastructure Bill Makes Building Back More Expensive
The U.S. government doesn't reflect on its spending history, and that shows.

In this week's Reason Roundtable, Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, and Nick Gillespie gather to berate one of the most expensive legislative packages in U.S. history and discuss some significant takeaways from last Tuesday's elections.
Discussed in the show:
1:52: That $2.1 trillion (yes, trillion) infrastructure bill that just passed.
20:35: Lessons from last week's elections.
29:05: Weekly Listener Question: I'm an attorney. All of my colleagues and I are fully vaccinated, yet we wear masks in the office. We are all required to be vaccinated. I hate it. Your response would be to find another job. I think Peter just had the audacity to suggest that switching employers is similar to going to a different restaurant because you don't like the spaghetti at the Olive Garden. For me, libertarianism is more than just a paradigm for government. It's a life philosophy. I am weary of the idea that anything goes, even if it's bad, as long as it only happens in the private sector. I am writing this email using a ridiculous pseudonym because I would not want my employer to know that I read and listen to Reason. They could fire me if they associate me with anything that looks un-woke; is this OK with you? Sure, I could quit my job. But any other job will have the same requirements. That doesn't really represent choice. Out here in the real world, you do not get to choose your job so easily. I do not have the option of being a professional libertarian. So I jab and mask, so I can keep making enough money to help my parents, no matter what I believe or what I wish to do with my body. This is OK with you?
41:53: The unveiling of the OSHA/vaccine mandate specifics.
51:58: Media recommendations for the week.
This week's links:
- "Biden gets his 'infrastructure week,' crossing another goal off Trump's to-do list," by Matt Viser
- "Self-Cancellation, Deplatforming, and Censorship," by Nick Gillespie
- "These 6 House Democrats voted against the infrastructure bill. These 13 Republicans voted for it." by Annie Grayer
- "Here's what's in the bipartisan infrastructure bill," by Katie Lobosco and Tami Luhby
- "Congress Finally Passed Biden's Inefficient, Deficit-Hiking Infrastructure Bill," by Eric Boehm
- "The Details of OSHA's Vaccination Rule for Private Employees Suggest Several Ways It Could Be Vulnerable to Legal Challenges," by Jacob Sullum
- "They Just Keep Closing Schools and Mandating Masks," by Matt Welch
Send your questions to roundtable@reason.com. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.
Today's sponsors:
- We all want to make sure our family is protected in a medical emergency. What many of us don't realize is that health insurance won't always cover the full amount of an emergency medical flight. Even with comprehensive coverage, you could get hit with high deductibles and co-pays. That's why an AirMedCare Network membership is so important. As a member, if an emergency arises, you won't see a bill for air medical transport when flown by an AMCN provider. Best of all, a membership covers your entire household for as little as $85 a year. Now, as a listener of our show, you'll get up to a $50 Visa or Amazon gift card with a new membership. Simply visit AirMedCareNetwork.com/reason and use offer code REASON.
Audio production by Ian Keyser
Assistant production by Regan Taylor
Music: "Angeline," by The Brothers Steve
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Brokeback Better…a mountain of debt
Well, there’s certainly some rather queer accounting afoot here.
Dear Federal Government: I WISH I COULD QUIT YOU!!!
I am making $165 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience masses freedom now that i'm my non-public boss.
that is what I do...... Visit Here<b
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…And i get surly a check of $12600 what's awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won't regret it! ……...........VISIT HERE
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily.ZXv simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now……………… READ MORE
I am taking in substantial income two Hundred$ dollar online from my PC. A month ago I GOT check of almost $31k, this online work is basic and FEk direct, don’t need to go OFFICE, Its home online activity.
For More Information Visit…………Pays24
Just because your broke doesn't mean you can be gay about it.
Who’s happy? Pretty soon I won’t be able to afford the ferry!
Pretty soon? They already charge you up the ass.
You can avoid that if you pay too dollar. Otherwise the bottom line can really suck!
We must repair the racist highway designs. Top priority.
I never expected to actually post a sentence like the following—let alone with complete sincerity—but here goes: That lawyer has my full sympathy.
Mine too --- but the principle stands: his bosses own the law firm it's their business, literally. I have quit several jobs whose bosses got too weird.
Is his current employer really the only choice he has? Lawyer guilds (the ABA) have done an admirable job of restricting schools and keeping wages high. Yes, find another job! If you are such a poor lawyer that you literally have no other choices, then you are working on borrowed time anyway. Sometimes life sucks and you have to do something hard, like find a new job or even a new line of work. Buck up!
Or maybe he married the boss's daughter and doesn't dare upset her or him; maybe they paid his tuition and would want it all back if he quit.
Dear Mr Lawyer: you made the deal, honor it, face the consequences, or find a way to alter the conditions.
Don't go whining that the government should step in and tell your employer how to run his company.
You kind of missed the point about libertarianism being a life philosophy. I completely agree with his assessment. No one (including the lawyer) is suggesting that Josh Hawley has to come in and pass a law, but he's simply asking if anything which occurs in the private sector is worth a half-hearted condemnation from a so-called Libertarian magazine.
If Visa gets touchy with a website and causes a sex-worker to be demonetized and that gets a vocal condemnation (even though no government actors were involved), can we get a forceful condemnation of a vaccine mandate, or will we continue to get the dry, on-the-one-hand-on-the-other-hand legal analysis of the policies-- an analysis which would be perfectly solid and reasonable from a straight news organization.
This kind of confusion has been increasing here on the pages. Confusion about what censorship is: That censorship isn't censorship if the government didn't do it. That is wrong. It may not be legally actionable as a first amendment issue, but it is still censorship. Is there any condition where censorship can at least solicit a half-hearted condemnation? Even an "I disagree with it but [defense of mega-corporate rights inserted here]" would be nice.
I actually thought that was your question sent in.
I'm no lawyer... or doctor, but I wish it had been my question.
Sure -- and I think his employer is a woke-ass company I would quit from. But that wasn't the question as I understood it.
He follows up later with a different viewpoint.
Then veers again.
If that middle quote is a reference to the OSHA ETS, then I agree, that is anti-freedom.
It's that third quote which annoys me. I have quit several otherwise-good jobs because the bosses went nutso. I have turned down at least two jobs for wanting a dress code that was pointless since I never meet and greet customers.
Again: why does he think changing jobs is so hard? If he married the bosses daughter, or they paid his tuition and he can't afford to pay it all back if he quits or is fired early, then he made a choice and my sympathy is for the bad choice he made. He says he has to support his parents; how does that tie him to this particular job?
"Again: why does he think changing jobs is so hard?"
Fucking LOLbertarians. Alphabet, for most people in a professional job, who're potentially changing jobs due to collective insanity, changing jobs is a really big fucking deal. Not limited to, informing clients of your new location (assuming the old firm doesn't view this as a business tort, like breach of a fiduciary duty or theft of trade secrets), going to a new firm, maybe with a new practice area: all of this is a really big deal. Maybe involving a geographic change.
It isn't like quitting McDonald's to work for Chick-Fil-A. Why in hell, do such a group of medium-achievers, that defend this rag, and espouse Libertarianism in general, simp for corporations the way they do?
This guy is a lawyer. Unless he specialized more than most, it shouldn't require anything as drastic as a geographic change.
Every job involves tradeoffs, including flexibility vs pay. I have lived with the consequences of choosing less pay for more flexibility. This guy has to live with the consequences of his choices, and if the pay he needs to support his parents requires a crap job that he can't leave, that was his choice. Anyone smart enough to be a lawyer could have done a lot of other careers; he chose lawyering; Any lawyer worth his salt could choose from hundreds of employers; he made his choice for his reasons. If that locks him into this job, if he has no other options, if life dealt him a bad hand, that is no one else's fault. I'll give him all the sympathy he wants for the bad hand; how he plays it is his business alone.
Without knowing any more, nothing more can be said.
SHE is a business immigration attorney. This is a niche practice. Choosing a new area of law is not feasible unless I want to try to venture out on my own. If you are under the impression that lawyers can easily find other jobs, you don’t understand the legal job market.
My point was not that government should act, but that I am sick of listening to libertarians dismiss diminishing freedoms in the private sector. I would like to hear more overt condemnations of irrational and oppressive shit demanded by the woke philosophy that is so dominant in this country.
Trust me, if I thought I could find a job with comparable pay where my personal views and choices were respected (if not validated), I would do it.
No, not an "business immigration attorney", an attorney specializing in said practice area.
Find another practice area. Ambulance chasing is popular
Mollycoddled, de-brained leftists like to re-define terms to generate arguments out of thin air. See Fraudci for a very high profile example.
In more casual conversation, the leftist might re-define language to make a disjoint point about someone elses profession, which always concludes with them telling someone else what to do with their jobs and lives.
Are you one of them? Haven't you suffered enough defeat lately?
"Are you one of them?"
Poes law kills. You probably aren't.
" all of this is a really big deal."
Bigger than freedom, apparently.
The ABA has done nothing of the sort. The market is flooded with attorneys. The AMA restricts the number of med school grads each year, but law schools proliferate without anything to check the number of grads against available jobs.
"I am weary of the idea that anything goes, even if it's bad, as long as it only happens in the private sector"
Me too: because this rag is excusing fascism.
This isn't a free market, and you're not free to set up a competing service.
Fuck you, Reason, and fuck this jab that doesn't do a motherfucking thing besides show which side of the culture divide you're on.
Ok, literal LOL
(On the never thought you’d say you had sympathy for a lawyer.)
This podcast is no longer showing up in my RSS feed.
29:05: Weekly Listener Question: I'm an attorney. All of my colleagues and I are fully vaccinated, yet we wear masks in the office. We are all required to be vaccinated. I hate it. Your response would be to find another job. I think Peter just had the audacity to suggest that switching employers is similar to going to a different restaurant because you don't like the spaghetti at the Olive Garden.
Sounds like someone discovered the well-guarded borders to Reason's Libertarian takes.
For me, libertarianism is more than just a paradigm for government. It's a life philosophy. I am weary of the idea that anything goes, even if it's bad, as long as it only happens in the private sector.
Anything which criticizes or interferes with a trillionaire CEO's ability to run his company as he sees fit will get clear, unambiguous condemnation.
So I jab and mask, so I can keep making enough money to help my parents, no matter what I believe or what I wish to do with my body. This is OK with you?
Amen, brother.
I walked into my first restaurant since the COVID passport became law, saw the sign on the door and realized that my liberty has not been interfered with in any way because I was getting "takeout" which is exempt from the law. Choices abound.
And to suggest that there's some kind of liberty infringement... pshaw!
Poor you! Does sound just like Nazi Germany Diane. Jews in Buchenwald had to take their food to the dorm and never got plastic knives with the forks.
Exactly! They had choices! They could have just not lived in Germany!
Remember Joe Friday is a really smart contractor so he knows a thing or two about building back better.
Asshole Joe is a lying pile of lefty shit who needs to fuck off and die.
How long has this guy had syphilitic dementia and how long does he have? Is someone keeping him comfortable?
Yet he’s not wrong.
I'd be worried if a guy with dementia characterized me so well.
Besides, you know what I think? I think Asshole Joe is a lying pile of lefty shit who needs to fuck off and die.
I'm inspired by Sevo's consistency.
Diane, I encourage you to choose exodus and no doubt success in finding a new home where your disregard for other citizens is welcomed for the "freedom" signaling at it's heart.
Barbie, I encourage you to stay in California, where you will no doubt continue to endure to consequences of your voting and disregard for essential freedoms in the pursuit of adequate Karenhood.
Barbie? KLAUS Barbie? Oh. Explains a thing or two
Amd like another Barbie I can think of, is probably also being fucked by Ken.
I'm vaccinated! Therefore I have the moral high ground!
Really Diane, how brave of you, given the dangers of vaccines you tout here regularly, or like the Donald and the GOP, is that just gruel for the rubes that the country club set knows to ignore? If only many of them got it before their last aided breath in the ICU!
I have never once touted the dangers of the vaccine. Never... once.
I have only discussed their lack of efficacy.
If only many of them got it before their last aided breath in the ICU!
Like Colin Powell!
So Diane, you took the vaccine as a well, why not? step and don't recognize data like this (as to it's "efficacy"):
"Unvaccinated people are 11 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than those who are fully vaccinated, new research has found, bolstering evidence that the inoculations continue to provide powerful protection, even against the delta variant.
The latest studies from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released on Friday also found that vaccinated people were nearly five times less likely to get infected and 10 times less likely to get so sick they ended up in the hospital.
The CDC "looked at COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths in 13 states and offers further evidence of the power of vaccination," Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC, said at a White House COVID-19 briefing on Friday.
"As we have shown, study after study, vaccination works," she added...."
or .... you're drunk? Please explain.
BTW, what does Colin Powell - a person with multiple myloma, which damages our immune system - have to do with a rational discussion of Covid?
Lol. Quoting Walensky.
Dude stop. Hilarious. I can't take anymore. The biggest know nothing on government that is a pure politician.
Lol
Vanity Fair
Subscribe
Politics
Business
Hollywood
Style
Culture
Royals
Celebrity
Newsletter
Video
VF Store
VF London
Magazine
Archive
Image may contain: Text, Word, and Alphabet
DeSantis Sues Biden Administration
The NIH’s Wuhan Admission
Sen. Burr’s Shady Stock Dump
Birx: COVID Exacerbated by Election
Subscribe now
LEVIN REPORT
Biden’s CDC Director: If You’re Not Scared Shitless About COVID-19, You Should Be
Dr. Rochelle Walensky warned Monday of “impending doom.”
BY BESS LEVIN
MARCH 29, 2021
Dr. Rochelle Walensky director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention testifies during a Senate Health...
BY SUSAN WALSH-POOL/GETTY IMAGES.
With more and more of the country opening up a year into the pandemic, it might seem as though life is returning to normal, and that COVID-19 will soon be in the rearview. Obviously, that would be a welcome development after 12-plus months of lockdowns and death. Yet according to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the new director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. is rapidly moving in the wrong direction on COVID-19 and, in her professional opinion, people should be shitting themselves in fear over what will come next if the country doesn’t get a handle on cases.
During a press briefing on Monday, Walensky told reporters: “When I first started at CDC about two months ago I made a promise to you: I would tell you the truth even if it was not the news we wanted to hear. Now is one of those times when I have to share the truth, and I have to hope and trust you will listen.” Warning of what she sees happening down the line based on the surge in new coronavirus cases, a visibly shaken Walensky said, “I’m going to pause here, I’m going to lose the script, and I’m going to reflect on the recurring feeling I have of impending doom. We have so much to look forward to, so much promise and potential of where we are and so much reason for hope, but right now I’m scared. I know what it’s like as a physician to stand in that patient room, gowned, gloved, masked, shielded, and to be the last person to touch someone else’s loved one because their loved one couldn’t be there. I know what it’s like when you’re the physician, when you’re the health care provider, and you’re worried that you don’t have the resources to take care of that patient in front of you. I know that feeling of nausea when you read the crisis standards of care and you wonder whether there are going to be enough ventilators and who’s going to make that choice. And I know what it’s like to pull up to your hospital every day and see the extra morgue sitting outside.”
Diane, I'll take your non-response as admission of having none.
Now you draw a line between dying with and of Covid, Barbie? Or should I call you Jack in this little ditty for your new obsession?
Also it's a real laugh that you trust the CDC and Walensky. Totally not misinformation and political agendas there. Real honest, impartial science. Consistent.
Salted, maybe you can provide me data as to Covid deaths and Covid ICU populations by vaccinated vs non-vaccinated.
Well, no, you can't. Google it and you'll find article after article by by local news sources on their states reporting and all of it proves you don't know anything. By the way, in another thread I believe you questioned the seriousness of Covid and resulting fatalities. 750,000 dead so far.
Number of deaths for leading causes of death:
Heart disease: 659,041
Cancer: 599,601
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 173,040
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 156,979
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 150,005
Alzheimer’s disease: 121,499
Diabetes: 87,647
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 51,565
Influenza and Pneumonia: 49,783
Intentional self-harm (suicide): 47,511
And a big 'not gonna touch that' on the distinction of dying with and of Covid, huh Barbie Jack?
You know what else most ot those causes of death have in common with Covid?
Fatties hit the hardest. Comorbidities are a bitch when trying to sell panic porn on a 99.95% nonfatal disease.
"Diane, I'll take your non-response as admission of having none."
Joe, discussing anything with an overtly authoritarian, de-calibrated, divorced-from-reality case like you isn't worth the time of someone who has a meaningful life. Thats all i gotta say about that.
And after speculating about Paul's intentions, I hope we won't see you whine about any ad hominems again.
Because Peter is a fucking coward who would never, not ever, advocate for anything Libertarian that might cause his paymaster even an eyebrow raise.
God, do I detest the writers here. What a thing you've done to run this magazine into the ground.
I see Meta is already putting out ads with hip, svelte looking BIPOCs nodding their head to... contemporary music.
I miss the Herb Tarleks of the corporate world.
I wish that there was more mention of the "Jones Act" when people write about all of the inefficiencies (stupidities) of these laws. If we rescinded the Jones Act, we could ship a LOT more cargo via more-efficient sea routes, and NOT tear up (and clutter up) the roads with ten tons of giant trucks! Thank You, Government Almighty! May I have another whupping of my bleeding tax-paying naked ass?!?!?!
How dare you recommend a solution that leads to less government. I don't care if it does lead to more efficiency and better outcomes. The only solution to problems is MORE government.
On a serious note, I have to admit that I admire your ability to paint very vivid word pictures. Also, yes, repealing the Jones Act would help.
Thank You Kindest of Kind Sirs!
I too wish I could read more about all the sea routes to and from Colorado that would only open up if foreign ships were allowed to come here.
Tearing down the Jones Act isn't perfect? Who knew, and WHEN did they know it?
And now, can you DEFEND the Jones Act? Or are you a "special interests" American ship-builder?
Jones Act seriously affects Hawaii, Alaska, and Puerto Rico and kind of affects oil product barges along the coast. Other than that, it is near irrelevant. Internal river traffic IS going to be US-built (because barges are not ocean-capable ships) and SHOULD be US-crewed. Coastal transport is not really competing with trucks but with pipelines. Container ports and ships are designed for massive loads - not the dribs and drabs of one truck container at a time.
Do I support Jones Act? No. But I find it very much like a lot of libertarian 'anti-crony' stuff. Kind of irrelevant to the real serious cronyist stuff that libertarians really don't spend very much time/effort opposing - wars and MIC, banks/homeownership, Wall St and corporate finance, etc.
You forgot that it also affects shipping along the Pacific coast (including into Alaska), Atlantic coast, Great Lakes and into the Gulf of Mexico. There is a substantial amount of shipping that can be done more efficiently by water especially with the removal of the Jones Act. I also disagree that internal river shipping should only be handled by American crews and ships, but maybe you have a good reason for that.
I agree that this is not a solution that completely solves everything, but it is a good step in the right direction to relieve pressure on the land based infrastructure. Everything else you mentioned is of course important, but I think it is good to discuss the restrictions imposed by the Jones Act when the opportunity presents itself, such as a discussion on infrastructure.
re coastal stuff. the competitor to trucking is generally going to be rail not ships. Ports now must specialize - containers, bulk, passenger/cruise. In both cases of containers and bulk, any intercity coastal traffic now is going to be much less than ship load. There's no such thing as baby container ships and if there were they could only use a different port infrastructure than exists. So do you really want to build port infrastructure to compete with the free road infrastructure that trucks use so that ships that don't exist can move stuff via routing patterns that are basically speculative?
I know libertarians go all lalalalala when it comes to rail. And should re passenger. But the reality is that freight rail is not competing on those routes because they concentrate on bulk now and they make more money closing down route-miles and selling the land. They are not even really able to pick up from LA/Long Beach ports. 35% or so of containers are picked up via rail - and the number of trains/day is about half of what it was 15 years ago. That is private infrastructure folks. Jones Act is irrelevant. Hell - it is even ignoring the subsidies for trucking.
Lots of sea-shipping (Maine to Florida for example) COULD replace trucks and railroads, if foreign ships were allowed to compete.
From
https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/jones-act-burden-america-can-no-longer-bear#environmental-costs ...
"As if to make even more compelling the environmental case for ending the Jones Act, according to the Congressional Research Service, “some of the most congested truck routes, such as Interstate 95 in the East and Interstate 5 in the West, run parallel to coastal shipping routes, and water shipment through the Saint Lawrence Seaway and the Great Lakes has the potential to relieve pressure on major east–west highways, pipelines, and railroads in the Midwest.”"
Those highways run parallel to geese migration routes as well. Doesn't mean geese are a solution.
If these geese can place competitive cargo-transport contracts AND deliver satisfactory results to their customers, I say, GO for it! Get goosed, and GO like shit through a goose!
But... Sad to say, some of them are explicitly CANADIAN geese, and so, will NEVER be allowed to "pass inspection" with USA jerbs-for-me-but-not-for-thee kinda folks! Worse yet, NO species of birds properly respect the USA-Canada border, nor do they grease the palms of border-control agents! All they have EVER contributed to border control agents, is the occasional bird droppings!
So sad to say, even if they can deliver, we will pass up on any "golden eggs" that these geese could lay for us!
Holy shit you said something reasonable I agree with. Weird.
Jokes aside, Jones and other acts of special interest groups are the kind of political clusterfuck that will only be touched, briefly, when all other excuses are exhausted.
Actually, SQRLSY is consistently quite good I have found. Often very passionate, which I think throws people off, but generally good positions. Granted, I have not been in the comments section here for very long, so maybe there was something that happened in the past, but for as long as I have been tracking, I have not found much to disagree on.
And so far left on some things he chases his tail in medicated circles...
Today in Libertarian commentary.
Alternative take: Conservatives are so petty, they bitch about pronouns and fictitious birds!
I ID as " normal"
‘COP26 is a neo-feudal performance’
He is great, Paul. Thank you for pointing out where O'Neill and Greenwald ended up.
Janet Yellin ( sp?) said the carbon based AGW scam is over. Its fallen apart.
That statement aired on US TV last weekend.
Now theyre inventing a new scam.
CFCs/ ozone failed
CO2/ cow farts failed
Now what
Francis Collins just claimed that the ONLY way out of the Pandemic is to get 330,000,000 people, including infants vaccinated and continue to wear masks and social distance.
The logical next step to this, since the virus doesn't recognize international borders, would be to get 7.79 billion on the planet fully vaccinated, because according to the logical implications of what he's claiming, a single unvaccinated soul wandering in a sea of vaccinated people is a continuing danger to us all.
But sure, you believe that our public health officials are going to allow us to return to normal when *most* of us are vaccinated.
The protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn't protect the protected in the first place.
Diane, you ignorant slut Covid vaccines are approximately 90% effective in keeping recipients from catching the disease. That stat is similar to other virus vaccines, so your use of "protected" is just ignorant. No one is "protected" to the extent that they cannot catch it and we all benefit - vaccinated and unvaccinated - from others getting it and their also wearing masks in close situations.
If you're paying attention, you're running out of excuses for trying to convince others to not get vaccinated, like you conveniently are.
liar.
No one catches covid. They catch a virus.
Covid is a lung disease resulting from a persons immune system failing.
What's the efficacy in 4 months? About 40%? Unless you're on CDC numbers provided by the manufacturer, who also are trying to argue the vaccine is more effective and enduring than your natural immune response....
yes at $50 a pop...plus continuing mask sales.
Billions of dollars profit yet to take before the scam collapses.
Theyre desperate to make it b4 the Courts strike Brandons Decree down.
Oh, and he also added continuous boosters because of waning vaccine efficacy, which some people claim isn't a thing... while screeching at people to get their boosters.
Yeah, fuck that. We now have therapeutics. I got jabbed 3X (have immune disorder). Still though, I thought the principle of 'quarantine' was that you isolate the sick and those at risk; not society.
Commenter, Regeneron costs $2100 a dose. Moderna about $20
How much for Ivermectin?
thats regular medical quarrantine.
This is POLITICAL QUARRANTINE to isolate and imprison political dissenters.
Never let a good crisis go to waste.
Diane, this AP news story is from May 13, but then again maybe I dreamed it because according to you and your paranoid friends here, it is impossible!
"WASHINGTON (AP) — In a major step toward returning to pre-pandemic life, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention eased mask-wearing guidance for fully vaccinated people on Thursday, allowing them to stop wearing masks outdoors in crowds and in most indoor settings.
“Today is a great day for America,” President Joe Biden said during a Rose Garden address heralding the new guidance, an event where he and his staff went without masks. Hours earlier in the Oval Office, where Biden was meeting with vaccinated Republican lawmakers, he led the group in removing their masks when the guidance was announced.
“If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask,” he said, summarizing the new guidance and encouraging more Americans to roll up their sleeves. “Get vaccinated — or wear a mask until you do.”..."
...but fully vaxced people are spreading it and madks dont stop it.
SALES!! This is a TRILLION DOLLAR SCAM!
Billions of dollars just in mask sales.
Chinas loving it.
Spend Back Bigger?
Dig Debt Deeper?
So I guess international travel finally being fully reopened means that the "pandemic" is officially over now, even though they'll never directly say that?
Yes, the pandemic is over Mikey.
You can safely resume your job in the airport mens room.
It wont be ovah as long as there are 80 M people (future heart attack and blood clot recipients) to make money off with two vaccine doses at $50 ( ? ) each BEFORE the Pill becomes availiable which then will make their vaccine stockpiles useless.
Recall the news about 10 years ago, the Gummit whining about flu vax stockpiles going to waste. The mass media marketing of " everyone must get a flu vaccine" came shortly thereafter.
Biden doubles US rig count
The U.S. rig count currently stands at 533, which is 264 more than this time last year. Of the total U.S. rig count of 533, 433 of these rigs are classified as oil rigs, 99 are classified as gas rigs and one is classified as a miscellaneous rig. Compared to year ago figures, the U.S. has added 240 oil rigs and 26 gas rigs, while dropping two miscellaneous rigs.
https://www.rigzone.com/news/north_america_rig_count_more_than_doubles-11-oct-2021-166684-article/
What's up Peanuts?
I rarely post at night but something has been bothering me.
Since Fat Rush Limbaugh has gone to Oxycodone Heaven who will replace him as thought leader of the GOP?
There is a lot of posturing going on. The Beckerhead is making his move.
Stay tuned.
Seems pretty optimistic to me to say that building back is going to be more expensive - what makes you think anything is going to get built?
Low expectations.
I'm pretty sure a Censorship Machine within media's "oversight boards" and that good old journals 'living wages' subsidy program.
Oh; you meant Non-Nazi building.... My bad.
it didnt last time Brandon was involved...Obama era Shovel Ready jobs scam...all we got were shovels of promises and shovels of money thrown at banks
The U.S. government doesn't reflect on its spending history
That's not necessarily true. Seems they're somewhat careful about STEALING just enough MORE to keep the frogs temperature arising. Haven't seen in Quadrillion spending bills yet but I'm sure they're just around the corner as the temperature rises.
They have perfected a racket to keep the Frog happy. They turn up the heat and use the Frogs Deby, in the meanwhile, to give it glasses if cold Lemonade while its boiling.
correction " Frogs debt...."
keep it up for more information like this.
Great work
“Useful post”
buy CAS 150780-67-9
https://rna.bocsci.com/product/5-o-dmt-n2-isobutyryl-2-o-methylguanosine-3-cas-150780-67-9-84599.html
5'-O-DMTr-N2-iBu-2'-O-Me-guanosine-3'-CED phosphoramidite; 5'-O-(4,4'-Dimethoxytrityl)-N2-isobutyroyl-2'-O-methylguanosine-3
where can I buy Genaral Electroporation kit
https://transfection.bocsci.com/product/genaral-electroporation-kit-338870.html
BOC Sciences electroporation kit provides a versatile, efficient, and low-toxicity solution for electroporating DNA or siRNA into cell types that are difficult to transfect.
And how to install breathalyzers and driver monitoring systems in all post-2026 vehicles... How to go electric while still being upset with Musk...
Fucking farce.
At some point it goes from doing things " for us" to doing things " to us."
The breathalyzer thing is a profit scam. It would apply to very few people but all would have to buy it.
They want infrared surveillance in every vehicle capable of monitoring the driver's physical state.
Wtfffffffff Orwell.