How Bitcoin Is Freeing People in China, Venezuela, Iran, and…America
Cryptocurrency is a human rights issue, explains Alex Gladstein of the Human Rights Foundation.

Since launching a decade ago, the decentralized, peer-to-peer cryptocurrency bitcoin has been lauded (and denounced) for its potential to route around traditional state-based monetary systems and allow individuals to trade directly with one another.
Much of the discussion has understandably focused on how it is transforming economic exchange. But Alex Gladstein, the chief strategy officer of the Human Rights Foundation, a nonprofit that promotes and protects civil liberties in closed societies, is interested in how it empowers people in autocratic countries to escape government control. Only about 8 percent of global transactions use cash and the switch to digital payments means that authorities can track what individuals are up to with greater ease than they used to.
Bitcoin, its underlying blockchain technology, and the emerging Lightning payment network are allowing people to escape surveillance, says Gladstein, who has co-authored a brand new book on the subject, The Little Bitcoin Book: Why Bitcoin Matters for Your Freedom, Finances, and Future.
In today's Reason Podcast, he tells Nick Gillespie how bitcoin is changing the way people live and transact in places such as China, India, Iran, and Venezuela. He also explains how in an increasingly cashless America, cryptocurrency is helping us to escape what's been called "surveillance capitalism," why Human Rights Foundation's annual Oslo Freedom Forum is more important than the World Economic Forum in Davos, and how bitcoin and associated technologies will "really bankrupt the ability of authoritarian regimes to do what they do and basically force their hand to reform."
Audio production by Ian Keyser.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Bitcoin is not anonymous.
No, it's not. It's pseudonymous. But there are anonymous cryptocurrencies, too.
Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular ASD office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
on this page….....MORE READ
It can be made to be, and I say that as a harsher Bitcoin critic. But I agree, it's important to point out that a Bitcoin transaction CAN be traced to a specific person, forever and ever, amen.
The happiest place on Earth has been mostly closed for about 10 months and probably won’t be re-opening anytime soon >>>>>>> USA ONLINE JOBS <<<<<<<<<
If one of the hijackers had just showed up in the ER with cutaneous anthrax, which would not be “skin irritation “ or a single lesion and not been diagnosed and aggressively treated he would probably have died………………… Read More
Google paid for all online work from home from $ 16,000 to $ 32,000 a month. The younger brother was Abw out of work for three months and a month ago her check was $ 32475, working at home for 4 hours a day, and earning could be even bigger….So I started......Visit Here
Bitcoin - now consuming as much electricity overall as Austria - and as much as 20 days worth of an American households electricity consumption (or alternatively the same as 725,000 Visa transactions or 48,000 hours watching YouTube) for every single transaction.
No overhead there.
I don't think this is accurate. You have to consider the fixed electricity usage of all of Visa's infrastructure, including their office buildings (not just the datacenter), as well as the usage of employees that Bitcoin doesn't need. It's not fair to compare nearly _all_ of what Bitcoin uses to a fraction of what other solutions use.
I don't know what the numbers show, but there's evidence that a single bitcoin transaction uses far more electricity than a single Visa transaction due to the distributed nature of its validation. I think this is probably an imminently solvable problem, but may not be for Bitcoin specifically- but possibly another competing crypto-currency.
Obligatory: If competing cryptocurrencies emerge- and they can-- infinitely, what value is bitcoin?
Right, but my point is that the counting isn't fair. If the cost of a "single Visa transaction" is just datacenter usage, then yes, BTC is far more energy-intensive. But it's not--what about the loads of people working in compliance, or just maintaining day-to-day operations with banks? These roles are not necessary in Bitcoin, but they certainly use a lot of energy. It would only be fair to count them, too.
Yeah, there are consensus mechanisms in other cryptocurrencies that use far less electricity, so it is a promising direction.
The same as any other object--it's valuable because people want it (i.e., are willing to give up something in exchange for it). In an answer that is a bit less of a cop-out, I would say it gets its value the same way private currencies did during free banking. There were tons of private currencies in the mid-19th century in the US, but I don't think that particularly harmed the others. Indeed, there are already over 2000 (last I checked) cryptocurrencies--and you can start your own today, if you want. But that doesn't seem to be particularly harming Bitcoin.
I say this as a general friend to cryptocurrencies, and someone who likes Bitcoin but doesn't think it's a god. I just like competition in money, like all else.
Meanwhile, in my social media feed tonight, one of my more leftist friends is arguing that there is no such thing as scarcity . . .
Is it worth to take a bet in bitcoin? Could it be seen as a safe haven investment if it becomes turmoil in the stockmarket? Bitcoin could be a good investment in the long run.
Great work I think you are doing very well i could add some thing that a href="https://www.cfipak.com/">freight forwarding companyare providing many services are people just like freight forwarding / logistics services for clients throughout Pakistan. Our workforce is in a position and professional in dealing with every type of shipment, from small or fragile cargo to moving large quantities of shipment throughout giant distances consistent with patron necessities.So your much.
Great work I think you are doing very well i could add some thing that a href="https://www.cfipak.com/">freight forwarding company are providing many services are people just like freight forwarding / logistics services for clients throughout Pakistan. Our workforce is in a position and professional in dealing with every type of shipment, from small or fragile cargo to moving large quantities of shipment throughout giant distances consistent with patron necessities.So your much.
Completely agree with the author. Usig Bitcoin wallets and other blockchain technologies is the best way give more finance freedom for those who live in countries with authoritarian regime.
It is not..
What do you think about how Blockchain + IoT will provide offline coordination? I think this topic is very relevant right now. If you are interested in it, I advise you to read this wonderful article about http://www.theworldbeast.com/how-blockchain-iot-will-enable-autonomous-negotiation.html negotiating classes. It has helped me to look at many issues from a different perspective. I hadn't even thought about the fact that Blockchain and IoT can be integrated into decision-making devices. And that, I think, will happen very soon.
Ugh! The the purpose of the title of this podcast (vis a vis freeing people), the distributed nature of leager is THE MOST INTERESTING feature of Bitcoin. The others features are technically important and necessary, but not more interesting than the "anti-conterfiet" features of the 100 USD.
For example, if Bitcoin were to be everything EXCEPT controlled by Visa or MC, it would be no better than fiat currency.