Sen. Mike Lee on Brett Kavanaugh, Trump's Tariffs, and Congressional Dysfunction
The way Congress crafts spending bills has "effectively disenfranchised almost 300 million Americans."
Congress is "given a pile of papers, sometimes a couple thousands pages long, a few hours before the expiration of a spending deadline," says Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah). "When there's no opportunity for debate, for discussion, for amendment, for individual members to improve [legislation], you've effectively disenfranchised almost 300 million Americans."
Since toppling longtime incumbent Bob Bennett in a 2010 primary and then riding the Tea Party wave to become the junior senator from Utah, Lee has been one of the most careful and liberty-friendly legal minds in public office.
As a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he'll participate in the upcoming confirmation hearings of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. But he was almost in the hot seat himself: Lee was one of the seven finalists Trump considered to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Lee talked with Reason about the Supreme Court selection process, Kavanaugh's Fourth Amendment views, and the senator's longstanding goal to get a sentencing reform bill on President Trump's desk.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.
Shot by Paul Detrick and Alexis Garcia. Edited by Detrick.
Photos of Sen. Mike Lee, Credit: Jeff Malet Photography/Newscom
Photo of Sen. Mike Lee walking, Credit: Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Newscom
Armadillo by Silent Partner is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Source: https://www.youtube.com/audiolibrary_download?vid=cfa8d2f35697f58e&f=m
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I see a guy like this, and listen to him, and for a brief moment my cynicism fades and think maybe we aren't fucked with a dick big enough for an elephant.
Then I snap back to reality.
"Then I snap back to reality." Great butt what about all the sphincters out there worried by your daunting imagery? Inquiring sphincters want to know.
Easy, just carry the "snap back" metaphor all the way through.
Damn the penumbras, full weed ahead?
One of my fantasy changes to the Constitution is the entire bill-making process.
Any legislator could introduce any bill at any time.
After 30 days of public review, you tally how many legislators have approved the bill. You have to get 2/3 in every chamber to become law.
Any changes to the bill restart the 30 day clock.
Every law can be repealed if 1/2 of the legislators in any chamber sign a petition to repeal it.
As an emergency escape valve, bills become law immediately if they get 90% approval as an emergency measure. But if that law is ever repealed or found defective, every legislator who approved it as an emergency measure can no longer receive any government benefit, for life.
You'd still have parties penalizing members who go against their wishes. But you'd get more mavericks bucking the party system, and you'd put a huge crimp in legislators not reading bills.
Well done interview.
I split my feelings over the 4th amendment in two parts. I want the strictest possible limits on searches used as evidence, and believe that is relatively easy to enforce because trials are public. What I don't get excited about is NSA snooping, because enforcing such limits is just about impossible to enforce. It is just too easy to sneak around it.
I have read some of his book Written Out of History and it has a tendency to be overwrought; a few too many adverbs and adjectives. Not histrionic, but you can hear the emotion and excitement in this interview, and the book is a little too close to the edge where I get suspicious of what wasn't said. It's a lot easier to take in conversation. He would write some interesting decisions. I wish he would get on the Supreme Court.
Re: his bill to protect Utah from federal land grabs for national monuments: why specific to Utah? Why not make ti for all such designations? Ugh.
How about Rand Paul & Lee in 2020?
Oh gak. Rand Paul has caved on his "libertarian" leanings so many times, I'm seeing Ayn Rand reaching her hand up from her grave and taking her name away from him.
Excellent interview, both of them. Matt, thank you for asking about the Antiquities Act, AND letting Mike Lee so ably discuss it.
Sadly, I pretty much feel the same as Iheartskeet above. Nevertheless, keep up the good fight.
Download Latest Version of PES 2018 - < a href="https://pes2018apk.com/">PRO EVOLUTION SOCCER 2018 2.3.2 Apk Mod
Download Latest Version of PES 2018 - PRO EVOLUTION SOCCER 2018 2.3.2 Apk Mod
Hi, I was wondering your opinion on this video that I found last year. NEW DISCOVERY-The Ancient Sunken City Of Cape Town And The 65 Mile Long Mile Wide Wall https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHIlyecDwhQ It can be found on Googlemaps or googleearth, zoom in at Latitude: 33?33'58.40"S Longitude: 17? 1'47.81"E Neuswabenland - New Antarctic Discoveries and The Battle of LA in 1942 - 1433 Shots Fired https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSXqo0A9EM8 Pt. 1 - NEW CLUES - The Zodiac Killers Last Letter and Map - "The Map,You,Fall" "He's a Park Ranger" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9OJ1XdKklA Mediterranean Discoveries - Heracleion - Thonis Have Some Friends https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6iFkbePmYI The Black Hole Son - Stephen Hawking https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTtdKl0ePGc Banned Worldwide on YouTube - Regulators Lets Dance - Shootouts - https://vimeo.com/253888114 Banned Worldwide - Iraq/Syria Graphic War Footage 18+ https://vimeo.com/253900326 Thank you. if you watch n if you like it please share these gems. Thanks?
Thugs of Hindostan is a Hindi movie starring Amitabh Bachchan, Aamir Khan, Fatima Sana Shaikh and Katrina Kaif in prominent roles.
It is an action adventure period drama directed by Vijay Krishna Acharya. If you are a representative of the production house, please share the details
of the film with Thugs of Hindostan Review, Trailer, Songs, Movie, Cast, Actors, Actress, Story etc.