How Reason Became a 'Mainstream Intellectual Magazine with an Unusual Point of View'
Podcast with Virginia Postrel about libertarianism, trade, immigration, biotech, and Reason's first 50 years

"When I was in college," explains journalist, author, and speaker Virginia Postrel, "I developed the career aspiration to be the editor of Reason magazine." Just a few years after graduating, she had accomplished that goal (and much, much more), joining Reason's staff in 1986 and then running the magazine from July 1989 until January 2000.
Founded in 1968 by Lanny Friedlander (1947–2011), Reason is celebrating its 50th anniversary by hosting a series of in-depth conversations with past editors about how the magazine has changed since its founding, what we've gotten right and wrong over the years, and what the future holds for believers in "free minds and free markets."
No one has had a more profound intellectual and journalistic influence on Reason than Postrel. During her tenure, Reason.com was launched in the early days of the web revolution; Reason was a four-time finalist for National Magazine Awards, the highest honor in the industry; and Ronald Bailey, Brian Doherty, Jacob Sullum, Jesse Walker, and I all joined our masthead. Postrel became one of the leading public intellectuals of her generation, publishing her first book, The Future and Its Enemies, in 1998. Since leaving Reason, Postrel became a pioneer in blogging; served as a columnist for The New York Times, The Atlantic, and The Wall Street Journal; and published The Substance of Style (2003) and The Power of Glamour (2013). She is, in the words of Vanity Fair, "a master D.J. who sequences the latest riffs from the hard sciences, the social sciences, business, and technology, to name only a few sources."
In this wide-ranging discussion, Postrel lays out how her vision of the magazine differed from her predecessors' and talks about how many of the issues that dominated her tenure—immigration reform, trade and regulatory policy, the biotech revolution—remain front and center in public discourse.
She also speaks to the strengths and limits of libertarian thought. "A lot of libertarians like to imagine that we can start with a clean slate…and have what I call 'libertarianism as algebra,'" she says. "But that's not how society works. We're all embedded in history."
Envisioning Reason as "a mainstream intellectual magazine with an unusual point of view," Postrel explains, "I wanted Reason to be part of a long and deep and broad and complicated classical liberal tradition stretching back through thinkers, not just 20th century thinkers like Friedman and Hayek…that stretches back not only through those kinds of thinkers but also through the Scottish Enlightenment people, Smith and Hume."
She also discusses her next book, "whose working title and I think final title is The Fabric of Civilization. It is about textiles, technology, and trade from prehistory to the near future." She says the book allows her to explore topics ranging from human nature to history to computer code.
Postrel currently writes regularly for Bloomberg View and Reason; all her work, including many talks, lectures, and upcoming appearances, are archived at vpostrel.com.
Subscribe, rate, and review our podcast at iTunes. Listen at SoundCloud below:
Audio production by Ian Keyser.
Don't miss a single Reason Podcast! (Archive here.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And the New York Times likes Reason.
+ 1 some kind of moment
Same rag that just ran an article about how Marx was right?
No. It was a column.
Oh, totes cool then. I'm sure they would publish a "Why Hitler was Right" column.
Actually, that is more probable than a "Why Hayek was Right" column.
yes, the establishment likes Reason because Reason ignores the war waged by the establishment on the white working class ...and because Reason ignores the fact that the media is funded by globalist corporations via ad buys...and that the media therefore speaks for the globalist corporations...and so therefore the media's love of nonwhites and immigration and dislike of whiteness is something that their corporate funders approve of...because mass immigration increases corporate profits...
all this stuff reason ignores...so..the mainstream media welcomes you!
"A lot of libertarians like to imagine that we can start with a clean slate...and have what I call 'libertarianism as algebra,'"
Michael Hihn, thou art exposed!
"Left - Right = 0"
His math checks out
Really it does. The Frumious LeftandRight fits entirely inside the Socialist bubble on a Venn Diagram. It wouldn't do for teevee-watching vidiots to discover there is a whole nother dimension off of the single straight line running from Molotov to Ribbentrop. The Dilbert guy who concludes men should have no power whatsoever to order women at gunpoint concerning abortion--and doesn't even hate The Don--is pilloried in the looter press as "right-wing." The pitiful wretches are programmed to believe that contemplating the libertarian platform is Thoughtcrime. Their loss...
Links to Reason articles are showing up increasingly more often in Google News.
Yes, but mostly as "Even crazy Alt-Right tentacles of the KKKochtopus hate Trump."
"Even crazy Alt-Right tentacles of the KKKochtopus hate Trump."
To be sure, even libertarians support what the #MeToo movement stands for.
What, abolishing the presumption of innocence and statute of limitations whenever women accuse men?
It absolutely does not stand for the abolition of due process and due process rights for those accused of sex crimes (even though they are "especially heinous") but it does stand for agency and non-aggression.
Yes?
Yea but only when I google 'cocktail parties.'
I won't tell you which of my search terms turn up Reason articles, but it's disturbing.
"A lot of libertarians like to imagine that we can start with a clean slate...and have what I call 'libertarianism as algebra'"
Liberty as computer science: A global binary set to False.
She's probably giving a shout-out to Burke and his criticism of "political geometricians."
Fuck the NYT. Bunch of commie sympathizers who would justify people being lined up against the wall. They would turn on the people on a dime.
" Intellectual Magazine with an Unusual Point of View'
Is that how Dalmia is described now? Unusual eh?
Leftists exalt the biggest dummies.
What, no mention in her list of accomplishments that she single handedly forged into history the moment at which all subscriptions were cancelled?
What does she think of Tony? For that matter what does she think of Gillespie?
She's never seen Tony and Gillespie in the same place...
Just so you know...
Just so you know...
Squirrels...
No, you. The posts are different, thus you retyped it and clicked a second time.
Yes, I did it the second time because the page refreshed but no comment posted. I refreshed the page several more times and still no comment. I thought maybe the bare link was the problem and set some of the text outside the link and reposted. On the page refresh, the first post appeared. 🙁
I dare Postrel to come into this comment thread. I double DOG dare her!
Maybe she's already here........
I would like to than everyone for being civil and keeping the debauchery down to a minimum. We know how much beloved ex-editor Postrel hates that kind of stuff.
Happy Anniversary, Reason!
What is the gemstone for the 40th Anniversary?
For a libertarian? The answer is always gold.
That's ridiculous. You can't give cash for an anniversary.
Envisioning Reason as "a mainstream intellectual magazine
Mainstream
Intellectual
Virginia, where can I get the weed you use?
All about Reason
Well...that didn't work.
Google ("reason foundation" OR "reason magazine" OR "reason tv" OR "reason.com" OR "reason.org" OR "reason.tv") -site:reason.com -site:reason.org
"The Future and it's Enemies" is why I'm here. Read it a long time ago and really liked it.
"Three cheers to the woman who got us invited to all the good cocktail parties! And all we had to do was become cultural Marxists."
Michael Hihn|5.4.18 @ 11:44PM|#
"Libertarians have been fiscally conservative and socially liberal for half a century. Now over 60% of Americans.
This drives extreme socon fascists INSANE."
What did it to you, Mike? Was it the booze? Were you always bat-shit crazy? Did you get some really bad dope?
What was it Mike? What makes you such a fucking ignoramus?
The world wants to know.
I don't.
Fuck off.
This probably took Nick forever to type seeing as it is obvious he was only using one hand.
I really only started reading in the 2000s... Soooo does this mean she was the one that Ruined Reason magazine and sent it down the path to being Progressives Who Understand Some Economics Magazine? Or was she the last one who was actually running the thing decently? It's definitely got worse in recent years, but if she hired all those people it does make me question things...
Postrelism made Reason a technophile journal offering diluted libertarianism.
Squirrels.
Nah. I think Gillespie hired the squirrels.
"How Reason became a mainstream intellectual magazine with an unusual point of view"
And like all mainstream magazines, during that time Reason slowly morphed from espousing radical alternate viewpoints to becoming purveyors of Conventional Wisdom. Even if their views are a little unorthodox for the Respectable Washington Crowd, deep down inside they are just a part of the Media establishment as any other DC-NY publication. A Weekly Standard that supports pot legalization and gay marriage, so to speak.
The speed at which the Reason editorial staff accepted the "Hands Up, Don't Shoot" narrative, and celebrated rioting and looting at Ferguson like a bunch of star-struck groupies, was I think the first sign that the magazine had become essentially indistinguishable from Time or Newsweek.
They got almost everything wrong about the shooting, and still haven't fully admitted their error, but their dislike of cops was so strong they couldn't resist going along with the Media mob.
Rioting and looting are not "libertarian values".
You know, I love me some Virginia Postrel, but honestly, who the hell has time to listen to an 85-minute podcast? And that's one of their shorter ones.
No one has had a more profound intellectual and journalistic influence on Reason than Postrel. bandar piala dunia 2018
Is that what we're calling going Progressitarianism these days?
Going "mainstream"?
I suppose it's accurate enough. Reason goes MSM.
Yay?
Virginia was also a member of the Libertarian Defense Caucus back when all the cowards wanted to surrender to armed Socialism like so many Frenchmen.
Michael, you are nuttier than a pecan farmer with polyorchidism.
Sez who? Izzis the same innumerate clique that claims 97% of people with science degrees want goons with guns to ban electricity because CO2 and water vapor?
When that poll was commissioned by the Koch bros you still had control of your bowels.
Fucking ignoramus is fucking ignoramus.
hello.|5.4.18 @ 10:54PM|#
When that poll was commissioned by the Koch bros you still had control of your bowels.
That's FUNNY!
And probably true.
Hihn long ago lost control of his bowel and his brain.
Fuck off, Mike.
A libertarian mantra for over four decades.
Means left and right support different dictatorships, but their VALUES are identical, both severely hostile to individual liberty. Both with Authoritarian mentalities
And you think Libertarians would not be authoritarian if they got the chance to govern?
Because acknowledging mistreatment of white people is the same as the KKK.......
You constantly shout down everyone. Whoever you really are.
You claim to be libertarian and hate left and right. Yet you spend 109% of your time attacking conservatives.
You're a progressive, whoever you are.
Blatant fascists like Ron and Rand Paul? Care to elaborate?
Quit pretending to be Hihn. You couldn't possibly fill his diapers.
You've been copying and pasting for 50 years?
You've been copying and pasting for 50 years?
You keep bringing up things no one is talking about. Except maybe the voices in your head. Whoever you are.
LOL After all my posts on here you STILL think I'm some line towing Republican!?!?!?
I am fiscally conservative. I am pretty socially liberal. I don't think it's THE GOVERNMENTS PLACE to regulate what people do in their bedrooms, or what they smoke into their lungs. I have some personal beliefs on some things, like that marriage is a good thing and fucking 100 people is probably going to fuck up your life... Mainly because statistics show exactly that to be the case. But I don't want any laws about that stuff.
It is true that I am not in favor of open borders. I don't think we need to flood a country that already has an excess of low/no skill labor with more half illiterate people from around the world. But does that make me an insane Nazi? Kinda just sounds like someone who knows how to read stats and realize you don't flood an already flooded labor market even more.
I could go on, but it's pointless. You're just an idiot who thinks anybody who isn't a total bleeding heart pussy is MECHA HITLER. Which we're not. In some cases we just have a little more logic and reasoning ability than you.
I doubt it.
Is it bad that I come here mainly for the Hihn posts?
It's like listening to a Coast to Coast AM call-in, or your paranoid Uncle who forgot to take his meds.
Grandpa got no Kek
LOL
You're
"So ... tell us how you fantasize left-wing economics here Please be specific so that I (or any other fiscal conservative) can explain it to you"
Hardly even makes sense as a sentence! Are you saying I fantasize about left wing economics? Because I don't. If you mean to imply I am saying Reason pushes left wing econ, that's not what I said or meant by "Progressives Who Understand Some Economics Magazine."
I meant that they've gone full on progressive on most things THAT AREN'T economics. In other words they're bleeding heart pussies who understand free market economics work better than socialism. That's a plus compared to normal progs mind you.
A lot of it is just attitude honestly. I am in favor of gay marriage, think abortion should be legal, etc. But if you swoon and fawn all about stupid crap like that like it's the best stuff on earth, and not some unimportant side issue used to wedge people one way or another... Then you're an idiot. Open borders are outright bad. Anyone who understands markets should know that flooding a 1st world country with 10s of millions of illiterates is going to destroy the standard of living there. THAT may be 110% freedom, but in that case it's a freedom I could live without!