Remy: People Will Die!
Remy channels his inner Elizabeth Warren to vilify the other side.
Written and performed by Remy
Music mastered by Ben Karlstrom
Video by Meredith Bragg
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes
LYRICS:
People need kidneys, it's sad but decreed
yet this Senator's hoarding one more than she needs
I offer this bill and I hope you'll vote "aye"
Unless, of course, you just want PEOPLE TO DIE!
Traffic deaths have many crying with fear
Over 30,000 people are dying each year
this modest change I propose must be applied
Unless, of course, you just want PEOPLE TO DIE!
Alcohol deaths are exceeding comparisons
Black people, white people, Native Americans
We need to ban alcohol, it can't be denied
Unless, of course, you just want PEOPLE TO DIE!
Murders are bad. They have no defenders
yet many are committed by repeat offenders
I say lifetime in prison, whatever the crime
unless, of course, you want PEOPLE TO DIE!
So I don't have a bill, or a groan to detail
I just need a short clip for my donor email
Tim THERE'S BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS! YOU WANT PEOPLE TO DIE!
That good? Cool. Tim, dinner at five? Yeah.
These car deaths I mentioned are terrible stuff
It just doesn't seem that one seatbelt's enough
Either vote for my act so that fewer will cry
Unless, of course, you just want PEOPLE TO DIE!
The carbs. The container. We cannot ignore
Whipped cream's killing more people than ever before
This bill would be passed and be ratified
if those people there didn't want PEOPLE TO DIE!
Why not weigh all the costs, the effects, the results
Empathize with each other as if we were adults
Use our brains to craft arguments--not vilify
See that freedom's a trade-off--YOU WANT PEOPLE TO DIE!
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So the govt can't regulate away all causes of death and make us immortal? Sad
Not that many guys vernments, going all the way back to Gilgamesh, haven't tried. Frankly, Gilgamesh's efforts to wrng the secret of immortality from the gods strike me as more to the point than anything the current bunch have tried. OTOH , I can't seemany of the present batch of superannuated pols going on a Heroic Quest....
"Noted Alt-right Provocateur, Remy, Makes Racist Video Mocking Those Impacted by Right-wing Policies"
- Slate
Haha, awesome. This is one of Remy's best. Love the quick cut to Warren when he mentions Native Americans.
Yup. Came here to say that. This one is gold.
That really was a clever dig right in the face of that Professor Pocahontas in glasses and a wig!
Animal abuse, it's simply terrible,
SIV in the chicken coop, it's not a parable,
My rule requires the dick lashed to the thigh,
Unless, of course, you just want ROOSTERS TO DIE!
Wonderful! My hat is off to you for that fine versification.
All of these arguments, things get so personal,
Commenters emptying their locutory arsenal,
Naught's settled till Tony and Hihn testify,
Unless, of course, you just want ALL THREADS TO DIE!
You've been lurking in the Libertarian Voter thread, haven't you.
Is there a wiki I could read to make sense of Hihn's posts? Because I just do not understand what he is yelling.
I actually do want people to die. Overpopulation, people. It's a thing.
Watermelons are on aisle #6.
If no one ever died, it would become an actual problem.
RACIST!!!1111!!!!!111!!!!1111!!!!1111!!!11111!!!!!
Mike!
And if no one died the world would be overrun by old people. Probably driving. Think about that for a minute.
Like Florida, but with fewer carnivorous lizards.
Alligator:
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Crocodilia
Family: Alligatoridae
Subfamily: Alligatorinae
Genus: Alligator
Lizards:
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Superclass: Tetrapoda
Class: Reptilia
Order: Squamata
Suborder: Lacertilia*
But only us old guys actually drive in Florida. With the top down, even in the 'winter'!
If no one died, then all of us would die.
Think of the endless turn signals!
Overpopulation, people. It's a thing.
Fake news. Just like there being intrinsic differences between races and sexes.
The gender construct thing is real though. People are legitimately suffering with the appendages nature attached to them.
People are legitimately suffering with the appendages nature attached to them.
Aren't we all.
People without the appendages nature attached to them are probably suffering more.
Where's Robby and why is this Remy guy wearing his hair?
That's actually Jared Kushner's hair.
No, the other guy. The one playing Sen. Knowbetter.
Whipped Cream: serving size 2 tablespoons, carbs zero.
FAKE NEWS!!! Sad.
Look how the edge of his eyeglass frames disappears against the green screen when he turns his head.
I watched it carefully and think it must be skinny frames, because the top part of the frame is still visible against the dark wood background when he turns his head, even while the outer edge of the frame does seem to disappear.
I'm a medical student out in California. A classmate posted that the bill is "literal genocide." Dozens of classmates "liked" it. Not one dissent.
So I posted that even though I don't support the bill or the PPACA, calling it genocide is pretty intellectually bankrupt.
I didn't get a serious response, mostly emotive insults.
I will share this with the hysterical mob. It's about as serious a response as theirs. Perfect timing. Thanks.
"A classmate posted that the bill is "literal genocide.""
In a book about China, written not long after it was opened to western journos, the author pointed out that most Chinese were conscious of the date of the medical license when they saw a doctor; if it was granted during or shortly after the Cultural Revolution, they found reasons to look elsewhere for medical care.
You might share THAT with the hysterical mob; hysterical mobs typically don't perform difficult tasks well.
I literally want to genocide all those pigfuckers that use the word literally figuratively.
Catchy, I will be humming this as I load up the duffel bag.
Awesome, just bloody awesome! -- for someone who wants PEOPLE TO DYE their t-shirts.
Pass my law, "The American Immortality Act " and we are all good. If you die then we fine you 100% of all your assets and it goes towards funding children's climate change education studies provided by Al Gore himself. So if you vote against it, you want people to die, hate children and the earth.
The most important line in the video
"Freedom's a tradeoff"
There's no such thing as an affordable healthcare that covers everything and gives you the best available treatment. It doesn't exist. It's not possible for you go to the hospital and get tested for every known deadly disease or receive treatment every time you don't feel 100%.
If you want some sort of single payer scheme, the funding comes right out of your pocket. Gas price is something like $4.50 in Canada and probably higher in places like Japan. If you spend your entire life paying taxes and working 12 hours a day to support your minimalist lifestyle, then paying 40 bucks for MRI is the least your country can do for you.
Very good, Remy.
Nailed it.
That was awesome, LOL.
Jeez, Hihn is really fucking this thread dry. I guess Medicaid pays for his catheters.
Too bad it didn't pay for a straitjacket and a padded room as well so he could argue with the voices in his head in a safe environment.
Someday, just for kicks, I'm going to pick a Hihn post and just lavishly agree with absolutely everything in it, just to see if he's ever had to handle that situation before. Should be fun.
like Todd responded I'm blown away that a single mom able to get paid $480000 in four weeks on the computer . go to the website????
my stepmum recently bought an awesome gold Hyundai Elantra Touring Hatchback by working parttime off of a pc online ||| EARN MONEY JOB -
What the hell is wrong with this guy Hihn? Does anybody understand what the hell he's talkign about? Why don't they kick him off? At least Tony makes basic sense.
Hihn, I and everyone else here have literally NO idea what you're talking about. You keep writing as though we know about whatever pet issues/factoids you're talking about, and you fail to explicitly spell them out. And then you start using sarcasm but you keep changing pronouns so I can't tell if you're saying that us libertarians are saying sometrhing by saying the opposite sarcastically or... I dunno, I honestly just can't tell. You can't even keep your pronouns/persons right.
Are you saying that the enstatement of medicaid way back when involved co-opting charity money from hospitals? If so, I honestly had no idea, and I doubt many of us here did.
On a very basic note, Berniecare or Obamacare or whatever, cannot by any stretch of the imagination be libertarian. And "the people" do NOT want it, at least not by any large margin. We all would like to see the uninsured and pre-existing conditioned covered, IF it's fiscally possible, but that's a big if. There is nothng liberty-oriented about shoving it down everyone's throats, and making everyone pay more taxes for it.
You seem to be trying to say so by walking it through some very particular interpretation about some factoid relating to medicare and charity dollars that, as I explained above,
you have yet to even explain to us. If you'd like to explain it, we're all ears. Until then, maybe calm down a little?
They don't kick anyone off.
Sadly, I do usually understand what he's talking about. It's all based on logical inconsistencies and it takes hundreds of posts to nail it down.
Maybe all that goal-posting shifting is what put that cancer in his head.
You understand hihnonese? That's deserves a merit badge
Ha ha..what a delicious parody! -- I spotted it on the daily caller lst, I believe....good stuff.
Charlie bit me!
Who?
Well, yes, by stealing and controlling, those people would be "slavers" by the current (non-official) definition. And it would fix itself by what we like to call "incentives" and "the free market". People like living, and they will pay hard-earned money in order to live.
http://reason.com/blog/2017/06.....-p#comment
"Hypothetically, assume an entire Congress is elected on the same platform -- single-payer healthcare. Would it then be proper for Congress to do so? Why not? (I assume you answered wrong.)"
"Do governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed? Is that principle superior to the Constitution?"
"You have NO power to shit on Will of the People and Consent of the Governed."
So Hihn doesn't believe in any unalienable rights, as the majority can simply vote their way into giving government the power to stomp on any "right" you may claim.
"The Hihntard says..."
If I was among the people YOU would allow to die ... while smirking ... I'd hunt you down, blow your fucking head off ... and jam the cake up your ass
Lol, you can't even comment on an internet board without boilerplating the same arguments, you silly bitch. The only thing you'd end up blowing up is your own colostomy bag.
"I'm in cancer treatment. Bills so far look to total $100,000 total."
Which is why you save money over the course of your life to pay for medical costs and/or buy insurance. If you want the government to force you to save money because you think you're too stupid to remember, fine, but don't make it another underhanded way to redistribute income: if you're estimated life time medical costs are $1,000,000, then the state takes enough out of your salary (factoring in interest) from the moment you start working, based on expected earnings, life expectancy, etc. That way you see and pay the real cost, instead of getting to piss away your money on cruises then shirking your medical costs onto the net three generations (which is called a ponzi scheme).
"If I was among the people YOU would allow to die ... while smirking ... I'd hunt you down, blow your fucking head off ... and jam the cake up your ass"
For all the pant-shitting you do accusing people of aggression for daring to disagree with your nonsense, you've just uttered the most violent, aggressive threat I've ever seen in a Reason comments section.
'Isn't it ironic, don'tcha think... a little too Ironic...'
It's fucking LOL watching a "true libertarian" like Hihntard have a conniption fit over the idea of a Medicaid repeal--a program that now costs $368 billion a year in grants to states--and then flip out at the "anti-gubmint" ghost in his head.
Did you just respond to yourself?
The reality of elections is usually tyranny. I oppose tyranny. Why don't you, Mr. Pure Libertarian?
Gonna have to explain that one... Unless you think government is an outcome of an election, you've lost me.
???
Oh, no, they can choose to support whatever they want. They just can't use force-of-arms against those who haven't initiated force against them. If you believe that you can use force-of-arms against people who haven't initiated force against you, you are A, a slaver, and B, against all unalienable rights (as those rights can and will be taken away by the "reality of elections"). Or is it that you think your one, true unalienable "right" is to choose your tyrant?
I'll take that lack of naming to mean that you can't think of any.
But:
May the Lord bless you
and protect you.
May the Lord smile on you
and be gracious to you.
May the Lord show you his favor
and give you his peace.
Pathetic retard, YOU are the one defying the unalienable right of people to choose what they support
"SOMEONE ISN'T PARROTING WHAT I SAYSO I'M GOING TO LAUNCH UNPROVOKED AGGRESSIONS FOR HAVING MY OWN WORDS QUOTED BACK TO ME WHILE CLAIMING I DON'T LAUNCH UNPROVOKED AGGRESSIONS! I'M A REAL-LIFE BENJAMIN BUTTON!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"
Shorter Hihntard: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!"
(skips away chuckling)
Sever denial is a mental deficiency .. especially denying a self-evident truth.
Niow wipe the shit off your face, goober
Try typing slower so you don't look like you're having a seizure, princess. LOL.
The only goobers are the ones dribbling out of your nose, goofy.
You complain about verbal aggression a lot, but this whole response chain was just unprovoked verbal aggression on your part.
"Dufus"
Awwww what a burn!
Now tell us the new list you demented old loon!
Yes, I've read what you wrote. But you don't clearly represent your thoughts so it is difficult to get what you are saying.
I am presuming you are sarcastic when you say, "the entire private charity infrastructure -- and funding -- will magically reappear."
But then you accuse libertarians of stealing the money for themselves. Which I don't understand. What libertarian stance are you associating that with. Because it seems like you would be in agreement with most people here, that people should decide what to do with their money. So I don't understand what you are criticizing.
Finally, "What did the founders intend? An ELECTED government." Are you attempting to say that any government action is justified as long as it comes from elected action?
I am attempting to engage with your for real, by the way. So I would love to have clarification on your points without being accused of violent aggression.
LOL, you certainly are nothing without your strawmen, Hihnarrea.
WHOOOOOSH 2
That's the sound of the wind swooping through your skull.
Sorry, I can't dumb it down to your level.
Please, the Ancient Aliens guy has more credibility than you do.
Will it now launch (another) butthurt whine?
(hops away chortling)
"WORDS HURT REEEEEEEEEEE!!"
"WATCH MY INTERNET HISSY FIT IT TOTALLY MEANS I HAVE SOMETHING SUBSTANTIVE TO SAY REEEEEEEEEE!"
New infantile hissy fit ... punishing me for ridiculing his fuckup. Typical bully,
"SHUT UP GHOST IN MY HEAD I DID TOO EMBARRASS YOU HERE!!"
(shuffles away tittering)
Mike the Hihnister One wrestles himself down into the murky mud and mire, then declares Himself to be a "Victim"... Beyond being a "Victim" of His Own Smugness, there's NOTHING new to be seen here, so move along now...
More smugness at 11:00 !!!
"I am attempting to engage with your for real."
Boy are you in for a treat.
Don't get Hihn started on who built the pyramids.
"WATCH ME INDULGE MY ANAL FIXATION AFTER A SIX HOUR NAPPY!! REEEEEEEEEEE!!"
"WATCH ME SHITPOST LIKE A SPAMBOT!"
"I BURNED MYSELF OUT SO BAD FROM MY SHITPOSTS TWO HOURS AGO THAT I HAD TO TAKE ANOTHER NAP SO I COULD SHITPOST AGAIN!! WATCH ME REEEEEEEEEEEEE!!"
(moonwalks away cackling)
"WATCH ME HAVE A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN IN REAL TIME ON THIS THREAD!! MY INFANTILE PROJECTION IS UNRELENTING!! DON'T YOU DARE SAY EVEN THE MOST ANODYNE OF REBUKES TOWARDS ME OR WHAT I WRITE OR I'LL SHITPOST AT YOU AGAIN!!
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!"
Sticks and srones may break ,my bones, buy childish names will never hurt
"THAT'S WHY I REPEATEDLY SHRIEK IN PERPETUAL ASSPAIN WHEN SOMEONE DOESN'T TAKE MY SHITPOSTS AT FACE VALUE!!"
No, I defend rights (the one right to not have force initiated upon you). "Rights" are not supposed to be affected by the rule of anyone, even in the poor system of government we now have.
That's a good thing. Charities are great. I give to some of them. I have no issue with this.
No, it is to give the dollars back to their rightful owners. The owners can then do with them as they please.
I usually ignore these, but if you're going to insult, at least proof-read first!
Stop right there. If people are want something and are willing to pay for it, it will happen in the private sector. If it doesn't happen in the private sector, the people aren't willing to pay for it (definitional truth).
No, I'd return their money.
Still:
May the Lord bless you
and keep you.
So... Why are you arguing with me and accusing me of everything you can think of? I'm simply showing you why your logic is wrong (logical inconsistency). You accuse "libertarians" (you may be using the word differently than the rest of us, true) of theft.
Answer me clearly, Hihn, can the majority overrule individual rights or not? It seems that "consent of the governed" (if it means majority rule) is incompatible with individual rights. (Yes, this would mean that The Declaration of Independence is logically inconsistent.) So, which one is supreme? If the majority votes to disarm me, enslave me, then kill me, do they have that authority?
"WHEW IT TOOK ME ALL DAY TO WHINE ABOUT AGGRESSION LIKE A MEWLING PUSS!"
(more spambotting)
(titter)
Answer me clearly, Hihn
Hercules had an easier time completing the 12 Labors than someone getting anything more than spittle-flecked projection out of Hihnohoser.
Hihnarrea losing his shit in real time, everyone! Watch projection in action!
(cartwheels away cackling)
"I HATE AUTHORITARIANS THAT'S WHY I HATE A HISSY FIT WHEN PEOPLE SAID WE SHOULD TAKE AWAY MEDICAID! NOW I'LL ACCUSE PEOPLE OF MAKING ARGUMENTS THEY NEVER MADE! "
How is MINORITY rule compatible with individual rights?
How is cutting Medicaid or eliminating it altogether incompatible with them?
I don't, in any way.
It isn't. Government isn't compatible with individual rights (unless there is 100% consent).
No, proving logical consistency.
No government. Problem solved.
Then it isn't taxation.
There is no distinction.
Was that an answer? Did you just answer they they DO have the authority to do that? Answer directly!
Don't.
Why do you deny the right to form voluntary associations? Why must they include you?
No one's made that statement, moron--just the voices in your head.
If 20 people form a Kiwanis chapter ? why can you then join, demand rules benefiting you alone? ? claim you do NOT support minority rule ... without being ridiculed? (lol)
No one's made that statement, moron--just the voices in your head.
If 100 people agree to tax themselves ... and taxation is theft TO YOU ? . why MUST it be theft to them? And who the FUCK are you?
Only a moron would conflate a Kiwanis club org with the federal government. No one forces you to pay dues, but we're all forced to pay taxes for Medicaid, dummy.
AGAIN: How can you govern a society ? never even seeking majority support .. and NOT be a fucking authoritarian?
Hey dumbfuck--you're making an excellent argument for why Medicaid should be cut.
Red Rocks:
If justice is repayment, you are definitely being just in your responses.
If Hihn is reading this, you know how annoying Red Rocks is being to you? That's because he's doing to you precisely what you do to all of us. I guess you just made him snap. If you're that annoyed by what he's doing, think about how annoyed all of us have been at you for years!
Not all of your arguments are terrible, but you simply cannot change your worldview when presented with copious amounts of evidence and even proof otherwise. Nothing thus far has made you learn anything, at all. That, combined with your inability to see disagreement as anything other that "aggression, bullying, and stalking" and your insistence in acting like a spoiled 4 year old makes most people treat you like they do.
But even if you never change, Hihn:
May the Lord bless you
and protect you.
May the Lord smile on you
and be gracious to you.
May the Lord show you his favor
and give you his peace.
If you're as big a fucking bully as him
And you're a dementia-addled dork who can't handle a iota of contradiction to your worldview without losing your shit.
That is far and away the stupidest thing you've ever said. You have outdone yourself, Hihn.
And in case you think it's still true, I don't consent to government. I am forced to deal with it every day. I am not "freely and voluntarily" agreeing to anything.
Is this really what your entire philosophy of government depends on? No wonder it's so screwed up!
So, your theory is that the only way to resign from the government (that I am not a part of) is to leave? If I live on this earth, how, precisely, would I do that?
Also, just because the cartel (which describes government quite well) controls a town, does that mean that the only manner I can "resign" from the cartel is to leave the town?
Also, wouldn't that entire theory negate the American Revolution? Wouldn't that mean that the Civil War should have gone the other way?
Or if you think the Colonists didn't "consent" to British rule anymore, wouldn't that mean that we could now rid ourselves of government because Congress' approval rating is so low?
When did I sign the social contract, Hihn?
retarded!!
Yes, your posts are the epitome of emotional infantilism.
At Kiwanis ... pay the dues or leave. Same here dumbfuck!
HOW MANY TIMES MUST I DUMB IT DOWN FOR YOU ASSHOLES?
Only a dumbfuck would equate a private organization with a government organization or program.
2% OF THE MEMBERSHIP REFUSES TO PAY THE DUES ... AND CLAIM MORE POWER THAN THE 98%.
"Citation needed"
The rest of your post is SJW "well if they don't like it they can leave" blooing. That cancer clearly ate whatever is left if your brain, dumbshit.
I'll be happy to note that you consider me a "dictator" when I complain as they put chains around my hands and feet and lead me away to be executed. Guess I should have just left, right?
Government isn't voluntary any more than taxes are. Being born into the cartel town doesn't make me a part of the cartel and doesn't make the cartel voluntary, nor does it make the cartel just.
Yes, please, link to this. Link to you saying that government is voluntary and the only thing you can do to protect your rights is to leave. Please, please do so.
I won't even need to post my own links to your logical inconsistencies if you do it for me.
Finally:
May the Lord bless you
and protect you.
May the Lord smile on you
and be gracious to you.
May the Lord show you his favor
and give you his peace.
Will be seen EVERY TIME these assholes (acer & red rocks) continue 1+ year of stalking me.
Every time THUGS try to shout down blasphemy to their "god."
You're such a whiny little bitch, Hihn. Don't blame us just because you can't stop yourself from posting unmitigated bullshit in a desperate attempt to constantly get the last word.
I baited them. They bit. (snort)
Lol, please. The only thing you've demonstrated is what a dishonest, senile, demented waste of carbon molecules you are.
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS MEANS 0.0001% CAN OVERRULE THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
Hihntard's SJW manifesto. Next he'll be telling us that property is theft.
Sure, Hihntard, that's why you exploded in self-righteous fury about the site making fun of the hysteria over a government medical welfare program possibly having its funding cut.
You're such an unself-aware dumbshit that you can't even keep your outrages straight--just like an infantile SJW.
FUCKING GOOBERS *REFUSE* TO RETURN THE MONEY TO PRIVATE CHARITY ... AND IN THEIR MINDLESS CONFORMITY .... WANT TO PRESERCE MOST OF MEDICAID ... AND THE DUMBFUCKS *brag* THEY WOULD INCREASE BIG GOVERNMENT SPENDING ON MEDICAID!
Here Hihntard makes an argument against a position that literally no one on this site or comment section other than biggov progs have advocated.
(smirk) JAMMED it up the bully's ass --- and twisted -- in self-defense ... after baiting them in a setup,
You're really letting your fleshlight fantasies
Here's where I turned you inside out in self-defense of your aggression!
http://reason.com/reasontv/201.....nt_6889282
(hops away chortling)
Culture =/= government.
Killing it is hard.
Yes, I "impose" myself by not initiating force. Also, the cartel still isn't voluntary.
Society =/= government.
If by that you mean "government", then can you tell them that? I just want people to stop initiating force.
By "liberty" you mean the liberty to leave when they take all you have, enslave you, and kill you? Good luck with that!
So, your theory is that the only way to resign from the government (that I am not a part of) is to leave? If I live on this earth, how, precisely, would I do that?
Also, just because the cartel (which describes government quite well) controls a town, does that mean that the only manner I can "resign" from the cartel is to leave the town?
Also, wouldn't that entire theory negate the American Revolution? Wouldn't that mean that the Civil War should have gone the other way?
Or if you think the Colonists didn't "consent" to British rule anymore, wouldn't that mean that we could now rid ourselves of government because Congress' approval rating is so low?
When did I sign the social contract, Hihn?
No, make up your mind, Hihn, I'm trying to translate your ramblings into English. My only assumption is that you think that "society" does mean "government" (which is very wrong).
I did say I usually understand you, but not here.
No, you misunderstand me (and that's not terribly shocking). If the only way to assert your rights from government is to leave the location, then the American Revolution was wrong as that territory was claimed by the British government. The Revolutionaries should have left, according to your logic.
That's a massive revision if I ever saw it. You are right in your chain of events, but the Fort was in the South and it should have been left to them.
I didn't endorse it, I brought it up.
If I live on this earth, how, precisely, would I "leave" government?
Also, just because the cartel (which describes government quite well) controls a town, does that mean that the only manner I can "resign" from the cartel is to leave the town?
Doesn't Congress' approval rating mean that we don't consent to government anymore?
When did I sign the social contract, Hihn?
Yep.
Who, again? You didn't answer last time.
Also, I'm fairly certain that Rothbard was an An-Cap, and calling that philosophy "authoritarian" is great violence to the English language.
True, however they believed that rights were still unalienable, and that no election could result in taking everything you own, enslaving you, and killing you. But you do, because when you have to choose between "consent of the governed" and "unalienable rights", you chose "consent" (which, to you, means majority/mob rule). In fact, above you say:
And I don't even need to comment further to make that look as evil as it is. Speaking of, you also said:
And yet:
May the Lord bless you
and protect you.
May the Lord smile on you
and be gracious to you.
Well-played, Michael, but I think you're being too kind. You must do what you gotta do. I must do what I gotta do. If you suffer any more attacks, for defending an alternative to cut government the most, on a libertarian website, well, I follow comments on 17 libertarian websites and blogs. If needed, I shall be posting your alert on Kennedy and Rand Paul everywhere I can.
It's the best I can do to support my fictional namesake.
If you're religious, God Bless. Either way, He will know my blessing.
Behold the self-righteous
This atheist will AGAIN refer yoi to the Holy Bible, Jesus of Nazareth.
And AGAIN school you on the same Sermon on the Mount that you keep screwing up. He even likened your ilk to "the hypocrites." --for making a public spectacle of their faith.
Sermon on the Mount. Matthew 6:5
do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others... And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words
Self-Righteous
... making a public spectacle of your faith ..... in defiance of the Christ you claim to worship ... like a hypocrite .... WHILE COMMITTING AGGRESSION.
Reject the Anti-Christ. Accept Jesus Christ as your personal Savior. Fall on your knees. Beg His forgiveness.
I'm thinking Germany 1933... (Technically a plurality, not a majority, but it was an election, and they got the "consent of the governed" by your definition.)
No, you refuse to say it, even though you do believe it. Prove me wrong, deny that "consent of the governed" (majority rules) can trump unalienable rights!
But you did say:
So apparently you do indeed think that when (not if) the majority votes to take everything you have
No, I don't. I recognize that government, defined as that which taxes and claims a monopoly of violence, is the antithesis of unalienable rights.
Again, Hihn? I will link to the history of your multiple handles when I get back to my notes on your behavior.
Yes, indeed, he did say that. He also said:
"Bless those who curse you, and pray for those who insult you." Luke 6:28
Also:
"Do not repay evil for evil or reviling for reviling, but on the contrary, bless, for to this you were called, that you may obtain a blessing." 1 Peter 3:9
"Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them." Romans 12:14
As I am not praying here, I can't possibly be guilty of what you quote. And as blessing always takes place directly to the person receiving it, I can't bless you any other way. But of course, you'd have to know the Scripture to actually know that...
No, a sinner, saved by grace through faith. I do my best, and by God's blessing get better every day, to follow precisely what my God has said.
Read carefully, that's not what the Sermon on the Mount says. Of course, that would require you to change your mind, and we all know that's impossible, Hihn.
So, again:
May the Lord bless you
and protect you.
May the Lord smile on you
and be gracious to you.
May the Lord show you his favor
and give you his peace.
Clown-ass Hihntard can't figure out if he's an atheist or a Christian.
Jefferson here was the personification of logical inconsistency, holding slaves while writing the Declaration!
And yes, whining along the lines of "Jefferson said it so it must be right" is what we like to call "Appeal to Authority".
"WATCH ME INVOKE JEFFERSON'S NAME LIKE A TOTEM IN THE VAIN HOPE NO ONE NOTICES I CAN'T MAKE A COHERENT ARGUMENT WITHOUT SHITTING MYSELF!!"
Didn't finish that one sentence:
So apparently you do indeed think that when (not if) the majority votes to take everything you have, enslave you and kill you, then they can legitimately do so, if you haven't had the wisdom to leave first.
Lol at Hihntard responding to his own post with his sockpuppet.
Anti-gubmint goobers would repeal PART of Medicaid ... just enough to offset tax cuts for the rich
And here Hihnarrea argues with the strawman in his head.
You're arguing with the ghost in your head again, Hihntard.
Spambot Hihntard. A disgrace to coherent thinking and keeping drool within the mouth.
Hihnarrea achieves spambot status.
(more spambotting)
Captain Hihnsane-O the Spambot King.
unless EVERYONE consents to HIS choices and values!
"WATCH ME PROJECT AGAIN LIKE A 70S-ERA PORN HOUSE THEATER!! I'M TOO STUPID TO KNOW WHEN I'M POSTING UNDER MY OWN SOCKPUPPET BECAUSE I'M A SPAMARRHETIC DIPSHIT!!"
http://reason.com/reasontv/201.....nt_6890613
You must mean "allowed". He also allowed divorce, even though he hated it.
No, just that they stop oppressing me (and us).
Government codified slavery and defended it. It was an initiation of force on two levels, the enslavement of the slave owner and the protection of the state. Without the state, there couldn't have been slavery in places like Mississippi (vast majority of pop. was slaves).
No, that's you. You think rights are dependent on "consent of the governed" which to you means "elections". So, when the Germans elected the Nazis in 1933, that was "consent of the governed" (by your definition) and those Jews should have had the foresight to leave before they were stolen from, enslaved, and killed (by your own responses to my questions).
Not even close to me, as I continually tell you I am not righteous, I am a sinner, saved by grace, through faith. Also, by your own definition:
http://reason.com/blog/2017/06.....bertarians
I can't be Taliban, as I'm an An-Cap.
Once again, I'm an An-Cap, so I don't use the state for anything. And, as you have such a poor definition of "aggression" (meaning anyone who dares to tell Hihn he's wrong more than once), I keep to "initiation of force" because it better defines what NAP is supposed to refer to. If I call someone an idiot (whether they are one or not) I have not "aggressed" in the manner specified by NAP. You may not respond to that insult through force-of-arms.
I will use the entire quote this time so Hihn no longer has the excuse of ignorance:
"This is how you are to bless the Israelites. Say to them:
'The Lord bless you
and keep you;
the Lord make his face shine on you
and be gracious to you;
the Lord turn his face toward you
and give you peace."'
http://reason.com/blog/2016/12.....nt_6652623
Completely loses his mind by using 3 (!) different handles, also uses his Hihn handle to respond to himself? 3 days after no one other than he or I were posting anymore.
http://reason.com/blog/2017/01.....nt_6730841
Says precisely the same thing using 2 different handles. Begins with a quote of mine "If the child is a living human".