Was Trump's Inaugural Weekend the Worst Ever, Did the Women's March Succeed, and Is School Choice Unstoppable? [Reason Podcast]
Nick Gillespie, Katherine Mangu-Ward, and Robby Soave debate and discuss one of the wildest weekends in Washington's history.

In the newest Reason podcast, Reason magazine Editor in Chief Katherine Mangu-Ward and Reason.com Associate Editor join me to talk about the spectacle and substance of Donald Trump's inaugural address, the size and force of the Women's March (which pulled an estimated 500,000 people), and the start of National School Week, an annual event promoting the ability of parents and students to have greater options in K-12 education.
School choice—whether via charter schools, education savings accounts, vouchers, or other measures—has been growing by leaps and bounds over the past 20 years, even in the face of a powerful establishment that mostly wants to keep things the way they are. Whatever else you can say about President Trump, he is full-throated in his support of choice and his controversial pick for Education Secretary, Betsy DeVos, is a high-profile activist in the school-choice movement. Will the Trump era be the moment when letting parents and kids choose where to go to school becomes the norm? Or will the toxicity of Trump on other issues kill the momentum in favor of choice?
Produced by Ian Keyser.
For all past Reason Podcasts, go here.
Subscribe to the Reason Podcast at iTunes and never miss an episode. Listen now via SoundCloud by clicking below.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Subscribe to Reason magazine for just $15 a year!
National School Choice Week runs from through January 28. Over 21,000 events involving almost 17,000 schools from all 50 states will take place over the coming days. Go here to get more information about events and data about how increasing school choice—charters, vouchers, educational savings accounts, and more—is one of the best ways to improve education for all Americans.
As a proud media sponsor of National School Choice Week, Reason will be publishing daily articles, podcasts, videos, interviews, and other coverage exploring the ways in which education is being radically altered and made better by letting more people have more choices when it comes to learning. For a constantly updated list of stories, go to Reason's archive page on "school choice."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Reason is firing posts from a tee-shirt gun today.
At least they threw some bones to us West Coast scum!
the size and force of the Women's March (which pulled an estimated 500,000 people)
Estimated by who?
The Washington rally alone attracted over 500,000 people according to city officials.
So the people that can't fix an escalator.
Dean,
President Trump, in my opinion, will prove to be yet another inferior president. I also think that you and others will likely dispute the approximate number of protestors involved in the "Women's March" regardless of who makes the estimation.
I thought crowd sizes were supposed to be super-important again, is all. A bunch of hard-core Dems estimating the size of a hard-core Dem march doesn't inspire confidence. I'm wondering if there might be a less . . . invested number out there.
Will Trump be an "inferior" President? Probably, but that kinda begs the question of "inferior to whom", no?
On the bright side, Trump's term can only go up from here. Right?
Let's see ---- the marchers did absolutely nothing. It was just a gathering of sore losers that have no power in any branch of government and almost no state governments.
Trump has both houses of congress, a soon to be Supreme Court, and the senate has 8 GOP vs. 25 Dems up in 2018, many in states Trump Won.
School choice is already here. The rich progs already send their kids to private schools or move to areas with great public schools. Just expanding that choice to others.
The women's march had no goals, so it was a wild success.
Unless you ask any of the perpetually-butthurt identity politics victim cultists, who felt left out because the marchers were overwhelmingly white and cisgendered, and didn't pander enough to trannies. Then it was not a success.
No
Depends on your definition of success
No
Trigger warning: WorldNetDaily
Mom convicted for homeschooling not backing down
School choice = inevitable. Yessiree.
'Did the women's march succeed?'
If you mean convince nearly everyone that they're a bunch of idiots, then yes it did.
Heard the march called "a good cry after a breakup with normal America." So in those terms, success.
Perfect.
I feel bad for people I went to high school with. Some of them have clearly been brainwashed, it's the only way. It's sad watching them spit things they heard without thinking.
my opinion isn't valid, though. That much has been made clear.
my opinion isn't valid, though. That much has been made clear.
I have not ignored your comment and by not dong so I have also read your opinion.
aww
*hug*
I was about to go, "oh come on that's ridicu....." then i realized how boring Washington DC normally is.