Should Teachers Be Forced to Pay Union Fees? Friedrichs v. CTA Brings Protests Outside Supreme Court
In testing the limits of individual conscience, the Friedrichs case may reveal the Court's commitment to freedom itself.
"The unions force me to fund collective bargaining efforts that are harmful to my students," declared plaintiff Rebecca Friedrichs on the steps of the Supreme Court. "And that's offensive to me."
Is it fair for employees to have to pay fees to a union they disagree with? That's the central question heard on Jan. 11th during oral arguments in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association. Friedrichs, a public school teacher, contends that compulsory union fees violate her First Amendment rights of free speech and association. She seeks to overturn Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, a 1977 decision that affirmed the right of public employee unions to demand so-called "fair share fees."
The California Teachers Association believes their negotiating power, and even their very existence, is at stake. If employees are permitted to opt out of these fees, the bargaining power and the viability of public sector unions could be permanently diminished.
Moreover, the union argues that opting out encourages teachers to "free ride" on the achievements of collective bargaining. Non-union teachers could end up with all the benefits of union membership – from salary to health plans and tenure agreements – without having to contribute to the cost of negotiation.
Lead counsel for the plaintiff, Michael Carvin, shrugged off the unions' free-rider argument:
"The proof is in the pudding. Most states don't require agency fees. The federal government doesn't require agency fees. And those unions do fine in that environment… It may impede their ability to become the largest political contributors to the Democratic Party."
Outside the Court, a rally in support for Rebecca Friedrichs was met by a somewhat larger counter-rally that favored the public sector unions. With a few hundred protesters from both sides crowded together on the steps of the Court, speakers attempted to out-shout and out-chant each other in the public square.
A decision is expected in the summer.
Runs about 2:45.
Produced, shot, and edited by Todd Krainin.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to ReasonTV's YouTube Channel to receive notification when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
the union argues that opting out encourages teachers to "free ride" on the achievements of collective bargaining.
That's the line of bullshit that really makes me feel stabby.
The fucking presumption that Guido's doing somebody a favor by stealing their money to buy hookers and blow for mobsters and politicians.
-jcr
From WSJ:
"Justice Elena Kagan said a ruling against unions could disrupt labor relations across the country, unsettling long-standing expectations among public agencies, unions and workers. In many instances, she said, unions had bargained for agency-fee provisions?which cost the employer nothing?instead of other measures."
This seems like the essence of corruption. It is collusion to transfer payments from employees to union bosses.
Justice Elena Kagan said a ruling against unions could disrupt labor relations across the country, unsettling long-standing expectations among public agencies, unions and workers
SO, what's the downside?
-jcr
So what's more important to her: stability, or getting the law right?
"... It may impede their ability to become the largest political contributors to the Democratic Party."
What do you think?
If this is one of the 'onners that ruled it was OK for faceless corporations to buy off secret ballot elections, it would be fitting to open up her space to a more worthy specimen of legal parasite by applying the H.L. Mencken impeachment method.
My first job out of High School was at St Paul and over the next 5 years Iearned so very much. Seeing the hospital torn down tears a small piece of my heart out. The Daughters of Charity and the doctors and staff of St Paul Hospital will always be with me.
???????????http://www.Jobstribune.com
"unsettling long-standing expectations among public agencies, unions and workers."
Good. Fuck those people. You do not have a right to bargain with the people you helped elect. You want to bargain? Organize a meeting with the taxpayers in your community and make your case to them.
Organize a meeting with the taxpayers in your community?
How many people would that be?
Try getting agreement from thousands of people.
And, if "the community" can't come to an agreement, who goes through the process of hiring a new batch of employees, when the current ones say FOAD.
The system has to work by voters electing representatives and the representatives make the decisions - it's called a republican form of government. If the voters don't like what their elected representatives have done, they get to elect different ones. Guess what? That doesn't happen, too often.
Yes but if you vote your conscience for a good party, the spoiler votes force the looters to back away. The Socialist and Prohibition parties hardly elected a dog-catcher, but their spoiler votes pushed two force amendments into the Constitution. Integrity is its own reward; that it can repeal bad laws is icing on the cake.
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8012 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
Open This Link For more Information.........
??????? http://www.Wage90.Com
"could quite possibly lead to the death of unionization in the public sector as we know it"
And never was a death more well-deserved.
My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..
Clik This Link inYour Browser....
? ? ? ? http://www.workpost30.com
My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..
Clik This Link inYour Browser....
? ? ? ? http://www.workpost30.com
my neighbor's half-sister makes $83 every hour on the computer . She has been without a job for 9 months but last month her payment was $17900 just working on the computer for a few hours. why not try this out
+++++++++++++++++ http://www.Wage90.Com
There is an additional reason for dumping these collectivist freeloader extortion rackets left over from when communism had the bargaining power that comes with hydrogen bombs. Elsewhere in the world communist, socialist and fascist demagogues point to the Suprema Corte Americana, ultimate arbiter of laissez-faire capitalism, to argue that forcing workers to transfer their earnings to union goons, parasites and drones is the free market at work. "Like it, or we'll tear up your work permit!" It is criminal aiding and abetting, if not treason worthy of the gallows, to lend aid and comfort to such organized criminal enterprise.
My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..
Clik This Link inYour Browser.......
? ? ? ? http://www.WorkPost30.com