Brendan O'Neill: 'The Real Threat To Free Speech Now Is Conformism and Cowardice'
Spiked's Brendan O'Neill on free expression, environmentalism as "an apology for poverty" and why he is "a Marxist libertarian."
"The real threat to free speech now is conformism and cowardice," says Brendan O'Neill, editor of Spiked and a columnist for Reason.com (read his archive here).
The 41-year-old Londoner has similarly blunt and outspoken views about "left-wing environmentalism," which he calls "an apology for poverty" and simply the latest iteration of religious "end-of-worldism" in which "we will be judged for our sins."
O'Neill is also a critic of European policies that he says marginalize religious and ethnic minorities even as they "protect" immigrants by passing hate-speech laws and banning burqas. "In their efforts to enforce Enlightenment values," he says, policymakers "actually undercut them."
O'Neill got his start at the defunct Living Marxism, the publication of Britain's Revolutionary Communist Party, and these days he sometimes calls himself a "Marxist libertarian." "It seems like a contradiction in terms," he acknowledges, "but that's because people haven't read the original Marx and Engels, the early stuff…if you read the early stuff it's all about liberating humanity from poverty and from state diktat and allowing them to have as free a life as possible."
In this lively, wide-ranging interview with Nick Gillespie, O'Neill also defends consumerism and explains that Spiked's mission is to deliver on Trotsky's belief that "we want to increase the power of man over nature and decrease the power of man over man."
About 12 minutes.
Edited by Amanda Winkler. Camera by Meredith Bragg and Todd Krainin.
Subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel for daily content like this
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
REAL LIBERTARIANS QUOTE ....um, Trotsky?
Not Friedman?
Man....
3:00 "I think political correctness is very right wing,.."
And I stopped watching. That is too stupid to continue listening to, and I feel it was sucking iq points out of my head...
Thanks, Nick for that asshattery. And don't challenge it or anything...
If he thinks "Marxian" is ok because you have to use the early stuff, not what it has become --- then why is he using "libertarian" instead of "liberal"?
Poser.
Because he's embarrassed about his past and trying to spin it into something that isn't totally brain-dead?
^ This
Nothing wrong with having a brain-dead past. It happens to a lot of us. I'd wager lots of libertarians were Red or Blue Teamsters during their misspent youth. Then they got wiser and more cynical. Well, some of them. I read commenters on here who are still very much Team Red or Team Blue under an all-too-thin veneer of liberty-mindedness.
1) He loses me with the hat...
2) I, too, have read a lot of Marx and I've gone on record that I agree with 70% of what Marx said. I am a secular, humanist, materialist and so was Marx. The unfortunate part was the "third act", which was a cobbled together mess of contradictions that basically resulted in he (and his ilk) getting a nice share of stuff without actually having been productive in any tangible way. If I'm going to include a phrase in the basic moniker of what I call myself philosophically, it's not going to have a messed up third act. If I've redacted the Republican portion of Libertarian-Republican (due to their idiocies circa 2003 and afterward) I'm sure as hell not going to toss "Marxist" in because there are some essays I find useful and intriguing.
cont
cont
For many people, communism is all the beer and skittles of an endless cornucopia if things were just adjusted properly. People deride the idea of Top Men - in theory, there are no Top Men in communism, at least after the dictatorship of the proletariat are done harmonizing everything. Of course the problem is that all is a huge bunch of nonsense. The pivot point is property rights - a secular, humanist, materialist philosophy with no property rights versus a secular, humanist, materialist with well fixed property rights. Where he has to turn the corner into la la land is where I just keep true to the course. I take a Jeffersonian viewpoint that there will be some form of Top Men, you just need to keep them in check when the get out of hand, every 75 years or so.
Marx was poor all his life. He didn't get a nice share of anything but misery.
There is no such thing as a libertarian marxist. Without government, there's nobody to rob the productive to support the fedora-wearing blathering class.
-jcr
The hat is off-putting, but I enjoyed the rest of the video, and I really enjoy O'Neill's writing.
Practice what you preach, Nick. Funny how I only bother to read the comments to these articles most of the time. Kind of like 1/3rd of all the Yahoo finance headlines by that rick newman clod.
Marx was an excellent observer. His solutions to the problems were not in line with reality. Marxism's goal was the withering away of the state, not unlike libertarian ideals. It didn't quite work out that way, in Communist countries or in capitalist countries.
Please name the capitalist countries of which you speak.
Sorry I'm late to the party. Brendan if you are reading this I visited your country in the early eighties, and I saw this amazing thing in Hyde Park. Anyone could set up a "Soap Box" platform in Hyde Park, and say their "Two Cents" without being shut down by the cop's. Of course you could heckle them if you thought they were full of bullshit.
In my point of view you can call yourself an Agorist. without shame.
Free the Agora.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agora