Why Student Activists Need Free Speech: What to learn from Mizzou and Yale
Student attacks on the First Amendment are misguided and counterproductive.
What started as protests over offensive Halloween costumes and racial insensitivity at Yale and the University of Missouri has spread to campuses—with thousands of student-protesters across the country demanding an end to what they see as systematic racism on campus.
At the University of Missouri, a student's hunger strike over racism, and an unprecedented football team boycott of future games, led to President Tim Wolfe's resignation. Protesters have succeeded in ousting administrators at other campuses. These developments prove that student activists have plenty of institutional power, and we ought to support their right to flex their muscles and advocate for the changes they want.
Unfortunately, a lot of these student activists have the First Amendment in their crosshairs. At Amherst, students demanded the censorship of pro-free speech fliers. At Yale, students demanded the firing of officials who reaffirmed the right to wear offensive Halloween costumes. And at both Missouri and the University of Chicago, demonstrators physically prevented members of the media from talking to activist students. At Missouri, one of these censors was a professor—of journalism.
Student activists say they want their campuses to become safe spaces. But they are conflating two very different kinds of safety. Of course students have the right to physical safety—universities are required prevent violence and illegal harassment on campuses. But too many students think they are also entitled to emotional safety.
Free speech isn't an obstacle that prevents radical activists from getting what they want, it's a necessary condition for them to promote their ideas. Students should fight racism and inequality on college campuses. And they'll actually need free speech to do that.
Approximately 1.40 minutes.
Produced by Joshua Swain. Written by Robby Soave.
Music by Podington Bear.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel for daily content like this.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Honestly, I really don't hope for it, but I can't help but think there'd be a little justice in seeing the ousted administrators replaced with the most petty, vindictive socon pricks that can be rounded up for the job. And to watch the socon pricks turn every one of the rules the "activists" want on them.
That would be "karma," which unfortunately is triggering and a microaggression, so it has been banned on college campuses. Now none of these special snowflakes will ever have to worry about the possibility of someday getting what they deserve. It's a great time to be a SJW douchebag. #CompletelyShamelessAmerica
They'll get what they deserve when they try to pull this kind of bullshit on the job. It won't be pretty but they should learn the error of their ways pretty quick.
They should, but won't. More likely they will sue.
I'm making $86 an hour working from home. I was shocked when my neighbour told me she was averaging $95 but I see how it works now.I feel so much freedom now that I'm my own boss.go to this site home tab for more detai....
http://www.4cyberworks.com
I hoe they all meet the business end of a nightstick.
Faculty officials should be forced out in any college where triggering speech is tolerated. The value of such "speech" has been made very clear by prosecutors in New York. See the documentation of America's leading criminal "satire" case at:
http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/
Better, you're getting better. Still, pounding your one issue over and over is not the best plan.
You mean like the entire state of Texas, where talking about slaves as slaves is a "trigger" for the faculty so they replace references of slaves to "workers" and "immigrants" and so-on?
I've learned we need a new, much bigger, Kent State incident. Hippies suck, in any galaxy.
Free speech isn't an obstacle that prevents radical activists from getting what they want, it's a necessary condition for them to promote their ideas.
Not your free speech, privilegeboy.
But they are conflating two very different kinds of safety.
Because they are, basically, pussies. And they are also adults who have the intellectual and emotional capacity of toddlers.
There is definitely a generational arrest of emotional development at work here.
Free speech isn't an obstacle that prevents radical activists from getting what they want, it's a necessary condition for them to promote their ideas.
Not if they are in charge.
What do you expect from the Participation Trophy Generation? These kids were coddled their entire lives. They have this intense expectation of not being offended - even losers get trophies. This expectation goes to extremes. The extreme being anything they deem offensive must not occur. But we cannot allow them to become arbiters of taste/expression. To these students, I say a heartily felt FUCK YOU.
No one ever told them, "So what?"
Would've been a powerful two words early in their lives.
We all have 'safe spaces' it's called home, your room or maybe even your car. So if you don't like something you can always go home and close the door or shut off the radio or close the magazine or shut off the television. These children seriously think the world should revolve around them. When they are out there no one can say or do anything they've deemed offensive. I don't know how it is the rest of us are supposed to know what they find offensive. It sounds like pretty much everything offends them and hurts their little feelings. They are insane and I am sorry to say I don't think it's going to get better anytime soon. If we don't turn this around we are going to have generations that think like this. I can't even imagine what the future looks like with people like this in control but I am quite sure it won't be pleasant.
All this PC and liberalism is hopefully going to bite the education system and others right where it should. They are creating monsters and I saw and heard them at Yale. I am very proud to say none of those things are related to me because if they were they would be home getting straightened out right now in their 'safe space' bedroom packing their bags. Time for some tough love and dose of the real world.
All this "PC and liberalism"?
What a load of crock. My entire adult life I've been told I shouldn't even hold hands with my boyfriend - now my husband - because "what'll I tell my kids?" I've been told you can't have gay characters on TV or in movies because it'll corrupt the youth. That I can't get married because some busy-body doesn't want to have a five minute conversation with her own child. We have children's books pulled from shelves because some idjit wants to make the world a "safe space" for their kids, where "safe space" means never hearing about gay people. We had busy bodies in San Francisco, the only city in America where you could walk around as God made you, outlaw public nudity because "think of the children". If you don't want your ugly children to see a naked person, don't bring them to the only city in the US where people can strut their stuff! We have people in the south teaching about the "War of Northern Aggression" and that slaves were better off when their families could be ripped apart at the whims of their owners.
So sure,you can think people shouldn't try to make the world conform to their desires, but don't try to pass it off as a "PC and liberalism" thing, it's just a *human* thing.
Given that this article is focused on a strain of PC liberalism in American colleges, I don't see how you can fault him for coming to that conclusion.
But no, you see, since it's universities doing the censorship---and not the legislature---this has nothing to do with the first amendment, you fucking teabaggers. Read a book!
-Progtards
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.buzznews99.com
I have never understood hunger strikes, or more specifically, why people fold to hunger strikes. I mean, they throw a tantrum and refuse to eat; why should I care about that?