Don't Be Afraid of Those 6,000 Felons Just Released From Prison
Families Against Mandatory Minimum's Kevin Ring makes the case for even more wide-ranging and far-reaching sentencing reform.
Only a few days ago, about 6,000 felons were released from federal prisons, their sentences shortened due a 2014 change made by the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC).
Immediately, the media was filled with stories featuring panicked headlines such as "Obama's Trick or Treat: 6,000 Convicts Go Free" and "Has Obama Set Loose a New Willie Horton?" (the latter is a reference to a violent criminal released under a program administered by 1988 Democratic presidential candidate and Massachusetts Gov. Mike Dukakis).
Such accounts have it all wrong, says Kevin Ring of Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM), a nonprofit that has been fighting for sentencing reform since 1991. For starters, he notes that the Obama Justice Department fought the prisoner release and that the USSC is independent from the executive branch. As important, he stresses that the people being released are almost all low-level, non-violent drug offenders with no history of violence. There is broad, bipartisan support for sentencing reform, says Ring, and it includes not just liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans but major employers such as Walmart and Koch Industries.
When the Sentencing Commission voted in 2014 to reduce sentencing guidelines for future drug offenders, they also applied the changes retroactively to those already serving time. Over the next decade, that means about 46,000 federal prisoners will see their sentences shortened, with the average reduction amounting to just less than a year.
In a wide-ranging interview with Nick Gillespie, Ring explains why mandatory minimums, which grew in popularity as a response to increasing crime rates throughout the 1970s and '80s, have fallen out of favor even among tough-on-crime legislators; why bipartisan support for criminal justice reform will only continue to grow; and why some of the biggest changes are actually coming from private-sector actors who are moving to hire convicts and reintegrate them into the workforce. Politics matters, says Ring, but the larger culture is far more important in changing both crime and punishment.
Ring also talks about his own experiences in federal prison and what serving time taught the one-time Republican operative, former associate of disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, and editor of Antonin Scalia's jurisprudence.
"If conservatives looked at [the Department of Justice] like they looked at EPA or FDA," says Ring, "they'd see the same sorts of abuse, fraud, and overzealous abuse of power—and that's what they need to do."
About 11 minutes long.
Camera by Josh Swain and Austin Bragg.
Music: "Firefly" by Poddington Bear
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to ReasonTV's YouTube Channel to receive notification when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
crime has already gone up in California due to a different release program created by Judges and stupid Californians voting for an early release program. So yes Crime will go up thats a FACT.
Not only will crime go up, but there is a risk that certain unsavory individuals who pose a really serious threat to society will be allowed to go free?people like the insidious Dead Sea Troll, who intimidated some of our nation's leading Bible teachers with unwanted criticism and satire until he was silenced by attentive New York prosecutors. If we are forced by public pressure to release some of the drug-dealers, then let us at least increase the penalties for those who disseminate inappropriate "speech" online. See the documentation of America's leading criminal troll and satire case at:
http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/
Don't you love how people say things with such certanty? That they are able to look in to the future and someones heart and tell us we have nothing to worry about. I mean really, 6000 felons and we are sure that none of them will be involved in a Murder, Rape, or other violent crime.
I guess we will see...
So your solution is that we keep pot dealers and shoplifters in prison for a long time? So that they end up joining a gang for protection? And/Or learning new skills from other, harder criminals, like how to cook meth or break into cars? And they spend more time isolated.
You're right, don't punish anyone for fear x, y or z will happen. It's like saying let kids bring knives to school because if you don't then they will bring guns. Most Americans have no problem paying for law enforcement, border enforcement, prisons and the like. It's all the welfare spending that needs to be cut. Our priorities are way out of whack.
Wow, first two comments are from "law and order" types offering a dearth of evidence for their "claims" or essentially asking "can you prove none of these people will ever do something bad ever again?". Amazing.
Responsible, well heeled Americans could not care less. No one on the Internet seems to understand how big the world really is...
Al Gore does
Welcome to Reason.
Where actual libertarians are a minority.
End the un Constitutional drug war.
So, Gentlemen, how many of these released felons are you going to offer quarters to in either your homes or neighborhoods?
So gentleman, where does the federal government get the authority in the US Constitution to control weapons, drugs, and to force you to buy some Obamacare?
OK 6,000 - that's ~120 per state...
but what's the federal total prisoner count - WHY DON'T WE EVER GET THE INFO WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO MAKE A HALF STUPID JUDGEMENT WHY ARE THE ARTICLE WRITERS SO IGNORANT ?
SO DUMBED DOWN
SO CLUELESS
MATH MATTERS