Hillary Clinton Is a Brazen Liar (in 30 Seconds)
"I have said repeatedly that I did not send nor receive classified material."
In March, Hillary Clinton said, "there is no classified material" on her private email server.
Reuters located 30 Clinton email threads containing classified material on her private email server.
On Monday, 188 new classified emails were discovered from her private email server.
So what's Clinton saying now? "I have said repeatedly that I did not send nor receive classified material."
Question for you Democrats: Do you really want a liar this brazen in the White House?
Written by Matt Welch; shot and edited by Jim Epstein.
30 seconds.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube Channel to get automatic notifications when new stories go live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Do you really want a liar this brazen in the White House?"
The answer is: yes. Because TEAM overrides every ethical consideration.
I was going to post this. The obvious answer is: Yes.
Or the more nuanced answer is: "No, unless the choice is between her and a Republican."
This will go down in history as the election that did not matter because the GOP is so splintered that republicans will again stay home if their candidate is not nominated. Again the democrats will win the White House as they will in 2020, 2024, 2028, etc, etc, etc.
Sweet, this country will be so democratic by the time Queen Chelsea Madoff Rodham the VIII ascends to the throne.
Way -- You mean the country will be so socialistic by the time comrade Chelsea takes control.
I can just hear Queen Chelsea VIII on TV now:
"Yeah, I stored all official White House email and other electronic traffic on my phone. And my phone got ripped off when I accidentally dropped it somewhere on a state visit to Riyadh. But I swear to you, I didn't have anything top-secret on that phone. There was no classified material there. Now, can we get back to discussing my plan to offer moms ten years of employer-paid maternity leave?"
And there is no reason to believe that the Donkeys will be any less imperialistic than the Elephants, ESPECIALLY with HRC in charge.
She was called out as a "congenital liar" in the NY Times nearly two decades ago:
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01.....-lies.html
But she has good intentions! Ends always justify means for progressives.
Bullshit
it's more like means justify ends. like even though the ADA actually lowered employment among disabled people obviously they were trying to help, and opposing anything that has the (stated) intention of helping someone is EVIL
It isn't ends justify the means, because they then would have to prove good ends.
Intention and feelz justifies any means or ends.
Her intention is to occupy the Oval Office for as long as possible. It's her only intention. She has no other convictions; she is not altruistic; she believes in nothing and cares about no one except possibly her own kid and grandkids. She's always been available to the highest bidder; the one that will make her pockets the fattest, and give her the most power.
Sadly, the people who need to see this won't and the people who do already know she's a liar.
Fuckin website
no,it's the "Main Stream Media".
They're a major reason why America is getting so screwed up. They have been corrupted and co-opted by the "progressives",along with the entire US Education System.
socialists targeted education in the early 1900's;
they've been working at it a long time,have been wildly successful at gaining control of it,and now we're seeing the effects of that,all across our society.
Legislators, JUDGES, doctors, scientists, MEDIA, teachers,etc; all a product of a socialist education system. All indoctrinated in socialism,and applying it in their everyday lives.
Never forget that the socialists have a dominance at nearly every university,and at most every public grade school.
Socialist indoctrination begins at an early age and continues throughout high school and college.
THAT is what is really hurting America,and I'm not so sure we can overcome it,it may already be too late. it took a long time for the commies to become entrenched in education,and it will take a long time to weed them out,if it can be done at all. America,IMO,does not have that much time left,not enough to do what needs to be done.
LOL. Thanks.
The thing is, being a liar doesn't disqualify you to be President. Many of our most revered (Democrat) Presidents have been liars. What disqualifies Shrillary is that she lies unthriftily, amd gets caught at it. Often. She's bad at it.
Also, you can be a liar and still be an effective President. Her husband was a case in point (after he got a Republican Congress). What you can't be is both a liar and blindingly incompetent...and her history clearly shows that she's both.
Frankly, I think she fits onto the Von Moltke's matrix in the Stupid/Energetic box.
Just because she's said it repeatedly doesn't make it any less false.
I think she's hoping the electorate will forget that. I also think that nobody has taken her aside and told her "Your husband gets away with this crap because he's charming. You aren't"
It will be interesting to see how she explains away her long running affair with Huma Abedin. I'm sure the campaign is working on it. Should be fun.
Eh? She did not have sexual relations with that woman!
Look, if she and Huma were swapping fluids that would be on the news so fast that it would break necks. Sexually exploitative husband? Finally finding herself? Coming out of the closet? This shit would be published faster than you can blink.
Hillary is simply telling you what she said, "I have said repeatedly that I did not send nor receive classified material." Nowhere does she make a comment about the veracity of the statement, only that she has repeatedly denied doing anything wrong, This looks to me like the height of honesty and openness, especially from a Clinton. She's really trying to hard to be truthful, and it doesn't come easy.
Hmm, very good. "The last five statements I have made about that situation are true."
A brazen liar...hmmm...I guess that is an improvement over one that parses his words.
The warm sincerity of her gaze is poignant and overwhelming.
What is the point of this article/post? In Amerika, where people with an I.Q. in single digits can vote for the lying piece of shit that promises them the most "free" stuff, scum bag, corrupt, psychopathic, greedy, pathological liars can not only hold public office again and again but become rich off of raping the collective said shit-heads with the low I.Q. and exposing said lies does absolutely nothing to change any of that.
So again, what is the point in preaching to the choir?
People with single digit IQs usuall can't find the polling places. I'm told a German Shepherd dog has an IQ of about 55-60. I suspect that people with that IQ vote regularly, BUT a German Shepherd will know if he is being lied to stupidly (as in the old fake throw of the tennis ball, repeated once too often). Keep pointing out that Shillary lies stupidly and some of those dumb voters she's counting on might wonder if her word is good on, say, giving them free stuff. Or even on her ability, when President, to do so.
people with single digit IQs can't find their own elbow.
( that's an IQ of 1 to 9,SEVERELY retarded,not able to function at all. I doubt any such low IQ people exist.)
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
http://www.onlinejobs100.com
Liar, liar, pantsuit on fire!
If She can't pleasure her husband, how will She pleasure America?
Do they want a liar this brazen in the White House?
Er.
But.
BUSH!!!!
Question for you Democrats: Do you really want a liar this brazen in the White House?
It never bothered them before. Why should they care now?
Ah, but she has shifted her statement and is not saying she didn't send or receive anything "marked classified".
None the emails were marked classified. Some of the emails now considered classified were deemed so after the fact. Please don't ask her any more questions about this stuff because she has other important stuff to do! (Ignore the fact that she ignored Obama's orders about all foreign government related emails being automatically classified, ignore the fact that she's supposed to be smart enough to know the difference between a classified document, classified material, and classified information, and ignore the fact that she didn't turn over all the Blumenthal emails that were clearly "close to work related" -- as she promised she and her team did.)
I'm waiting for Donald Trump to offer a million dollar reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of anyone making classified material public through the use of Clinton's personal email server.
I love this idea. Offer a reward or bounty for something that will put her behind bars. Trump would do it, too, the wanker, and it would work.
Well, evidently this is now a thing:
http://radaronline.com/celebri.....ails-sale/
And you saw what happened to Obo when he was caught in outright lies, right?
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.online-jobs9.com
Clinton is a scam artist. As are Trump, Paul, Sanders, and all the rest of the blowhards.
Scam artists who work within an even bigger scam, government itself.
However, for most here and elsewhere:
In your dreams Donald Trump is not a scam,
In your dreams Sanders is not a scam,
In your dreams all the rest are not a scam,
"In your dreams Obama is not a scam,
"In your dreams George Bush was not a scam,
"In your dreams Clinton was not a scam,
"In your dreams Reagan was not a scam,
In your dreams, all the rest were not a scam"
"In your dreams the constitution is not a scam,
"In your dreams the Supreme Court is not a scam,"
......
And so on and so forth, ad infinitum 🙂 .
Original music and lyrics: "Dreams[ Hormegeddon Blues]":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0o-C1_LZzk
So, dream on, or not? As always, your choice dear reader. 🙂
Regards, onebornfree.
personal freedom consulting
onebornfreeatyahoodotcom
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
http://www.jobnet10.com
Funny, what I have heard her say now is she hasn't sent or received emails marked classified. A subtle but significant change in her original statement.
"[Hillary Clinton] emerged in politics working on the Nixon-Watergate investigation. Her supervisor, Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, laid her off, but said in interviews later, 'If I had the power to fire her, I would have fired her,' adding that he 'advised her that I would not ? could not recommend her for any further positions.' Zeifman said Clinton 'was a liar,' 'unethical' and 'a dishonest lawyer'."
http://www.ocregister.com/arti.....eople.html
Reason: You guys need to address the argument that these emails were classified retroactively
I can tell you right now that that's not a thing.
SO what ended up happening to our resident woodchippers anyways?
Extraordinary rendition?
Nope, not a liar. She's a competent politician and leader. I've never met a politician who hasn't made a mistake and she is no exception. Some politicians lie, some are good at positioning the argument and some are way too honest. Hillary is somewhere in the middle. This article is dated but look at the incorrectness of the assertions in light of the accepted facts. Are those lies or are they memes wanting a swiftboating foothold?