Encryption Protects Free Speech: Lavabit's Ladar Levison on Online Freedom, Net Neutrality, and Cryptography
"If we are going to continue to preserve our right to free speech in the electronic age, then we need to use tools like encryption."
"If we are going to continue to preserve our right to free speech in the electronic age, then we need to use tools like encryption," says Ladar Levison, founder of the Lavabit, the encyrpted email service used by Edward Snowden prior to the NSA leaks.
Levison shut down Lavabit after the FBI asked for access to all of his users data during what many suspect was a hunt for Snowden. He talked about that decision in an interview with Reason TV last year.
Reason TV's Zach Weissmueller sat down with Levison at Freedom Fest in Las Vegas this July to discuss the latest developments in the Dark Mail Alliance, a collaborative efforts by some of the world's top cryptographers to create a user-friendly email service that encrypts data on the user devices themselves, rather than over a server.
As Levison describes it, this technical fix would prevent the government from doing what it tried to do to him when it asked that he divert all traffic onto their servers, because the diverted traffic would already be encrypted at the device level and hence already unreadable by a third party by the time it reached any server.
Levison also disussed the recent Congressional hearing on encryption, the state of free speech on the internet, his alternative to FCC enforcement of neutrality, and how his outlook has changed since the government tried to spy on his users.
"I find myself becoming more radicalized," says Levison. "I love this country. But what I despise is the job our government is doing. I've come to hate the government we have."
Approximately 10 minutes. Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Shot by Todd Krainin, Paul Detrick, and Meredith Bragg. Music is "Slow Grind" by Digital Sin.
Click below for downloadable versions of this video.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"I've come to hate the government we have."
I have come to fear and hate the government we have.
I call upon all Americans to respect the dignified and noble rulers of this nation, particularly since they have shown the will to roll back on some of that "Internet freedom" baloney and made it clear that certain forms of inappropriate mockery will not be tolerated in a system of ordered liberty such as ours. See the documentation of America's leading criminal satire case at:
http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
http://www.jobnet10.com
But will I be just an independent contractor, so that you can take advantage of me? No, thanks.
I remember watching this unfold. Levison was in a tough spot.
The idea that a man would shut down his business and source of revenue to protect his client's identity and communications was the ABSOLUTELY INSPIRING!
Many of us fellow tech business owners out there paid attention to that move. It was all over Ars Technica and other outlets.
Although I am sure he would have much rather not been seen as a bad ass. That move was pure badassery!
I agree.
LL for President!
Also, you know who else wanted to decrypt Americans' communications?
As Levison describes it, this technical fix would prevent the government from doing what it tried to do to him when it asked that he divert all traffic onto their servers, because the diverted traffic would already be encrypted at the device level and hence already unreadable by a third party by the time it reached any server.
PGP already does this, but thus far the mechanics and logistics of managing public and private keys has been too cumbersome for the average user.
Also, how do you maintain privacy for the vast amount of communications that must be sent to people who aren't using your encryption scheme -- businesses, less-savvy friends, etc.?
It's really easy to provide strong encryption and privacy when the people on both ends of the communication are committed to doing so. What's hard is a service that maintains your privacy and anonymity for general communications use as well.
Mostly - there are certain parts of smtp that you can't encrypt even if you might really want to, like the recipient address. With the right scheme, the most an FBI agent would be able to accomplish is to see what server it was sent to and maybe do some statistical analysis on the message length
You don't. You have to hope that this gets adopted by a big player and people are encouraged to switch to the new mode of operation. perhaps something like bob@gmail.com and bob@secure-gmail.com
Right - that's what they're trying to do - introduce secure communications in a transparent (to the user) fashion
A.K.A Encryption so easy, even my grandma can do it!
As Levison describes it, this technical fix would prevent the government from doing what it tried to do to him when it asked that he divert all traffic onto their servers, because the diverted traffic would already be encrypted at the device level and hence already unreadable by a third party by the time it reached any server.
PGP already does this, but thus far the mechanics and logistics of managing public and private keys has been too cumbersome for the average user.
Also, how do you maintain privacy for the vast amount of communications that must be sent to people who aren't using your encryption scheme -- businesses, less-savvy friends, etc.?
It's really easy to provide strong encryption and privacy when the people on both ends of the communication are committed to doing so. What's hard is a service that maintains your privacy and anonymity for general communications use as well.
BAMF
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.online-jobs9.com
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
http://www.jobnet10.com
Encryption technology is only good if Terrorist doesn't use it... Truly sad... "...it does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step." (Jeremiah 10:23)
-According to Chronology, the Bible is 3,500 years old, & if you doubt this, go to a *Museum not the Internet. The Bible has been translated into about 2,600 languages, and billions of copies printed & distribute. More than 90 percent of the people in the world can read the Bible in their own language. And each week, more than a million people get a Bible! Yes, there is no other book like the Bible. Have a Bible question?