How Rand Paul & Eric Holder Are Working Together on Criminal Justice Reform: FreedomWorks' Matt Kibbe
"I think a great demonstration of the old rules not applying anymore is look at the co-sponsors of The Smarter Sentencing Act," says Matt Kibbe, president of the libertarian activist group FreedomWorks. "It's guys like Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and of course Rand Paul and Jeff Flake, also with Patrick Leahy and Sheldon Whitehouse…. They all agree there is an over-criminalization of American life and they all agree the government has overstepped its bounds."
The Smarter Sentencing Act will reform federal mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenders and give judges more discretion in sentencing. It's part of a wide-ranging push to reduce America's prison population and address the militarization of police and other issues. As Kibbe explains to Reason's Nick Gillespie, criminal justice reform is a place where true bipartisanship is not just happening but is a good thing.
"I had a sit down with Eric Holder on these issues, we've meet with the White House policy staff, I've been working with [progressive groups] Moveon.org and The Center for America Progress, says Kibbe, author of Don't Hurt People and Don't Take Their Stuff: A Libertarian Manifesto. "This isn't typical bipartisanship, where you split the difference on [an] idea, this is a genuine coming together on core values."
"I think the overall trend is a skepticism of Washington," says Kibbe. "The smartest people in the room dictating how things should be doesn't work for families. Communities work better."
About 5 minutes.
Edited by Joshua Swain. Production by Alex Manning, Paul Detrick, and Zach Weissmueller.
Scroll down for downloadable links, and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel for daily content like this.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
They're still dicking around on the fringes, marginally decreasing the amount of prison cock that gets shoved up a drug offender's ass.
Fuck incremental reform. Legalize all of it already.
That's why I've been a party pooper concerning decriminalization of marijuana. Even full legalization of MJ will do nothing to end the freedom crushing atrocities carried out in the name of the drug war. All it would do is shift "the most damaging drug ever" focus elsewhere. And to make things worse, sadly, many who use marijuana are just fine with that and even fully support it.
I understand.
They all agree there is an over-criminalization of American life and they all agree the government has overstepped its bounds.
Yeah, they all agree until special interests start putting real pressure on these guys and reform starts getting turned around until federal sentencing starts getting strengthened.
Well we've already had some success by this method so it looks pretty good right now.
How is FreedomWorks doing anyway?
I don't know, but I'm growing a pair of those sideburns starting today.
V+1 spit take at the title. Well played, you two.
I'm imagining it's heel marks all the way with holder.
I could be wrong.
Hey guys,
I missed out on the liberals are fascist Eugenia's post. Can we continue that discussion here? It sounds like fun and just a little cray-cray. My position is that every attempt to use Darwinism outside of an attempt to describe things like the shape of finch beaks has been an abject failure. I'm sure that position is a controversial one here at reason.com. Discuss, please.
Emergent order explains a lot more than the shape of finch beaks.
Nah, I'd rather discuss why the Soviet Union has been unfairly maligned throughout history.
Che - misunderstood mass murderer?
Nobody ever praises the NKVD's community outreach programs!
Poor Che. It's long past due time his bust is added to Mt Rushmore.
Pol Pot - he did it for the children.
From your post I guess I'm being invited to spit on the legacies of Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, and Reagan. Hey, I'm a libertarian so that's no problem for me.
Do you think that more people died from the decisions made by Leonid Brezhnev or the collective leadership of the United States while he was in power?
LOL if you think I'm a fan of any of those guys. The thing is, unlike you, I actually am a libertarian. I'm not willing to excuse atrocities like the Holodomor because said government put a woman in space and provided some token shitty schools (and allowed no alternatives).
The Great Leap Forward: An unmitigated success!
A tough, unbiased analysis of Chairman Mao's proudest legacy, by amsoc.
Or how Cuba is actually an advanced, progressive paradise we should all enjoy before the Yanks come in and ruin it.
Don't lock eyes with 'em, don't do it!
Is there any notable libertarian who self-described as a Social Darwinist?
There are many natural scientists, and especially physicists, who continue to reject the notion that the disciplines concerned with social and cultural criticism can have anything to contribute, except perhaps peripherally, to their research. Still less are they receptive to the idea that the very foundations of their worldview must be revised or rebuilt in the light of such criticism. Rather, they cling to the dogma imposed by the long post-Enlightenment hegemony over the Western intellectual outlook, which can be summarized briefly as follows: that there exists an external world, whose properties are independent of any individual human being and indeed of humanity as a whole; that these properties are encoded in ``eternal'' physical laws; and that human beings can obtain reliable, albeit imperfect and tentative, knowledge of these laws by hewing to the ``objective'' procedures and epistemological strictures prescribed by the (so-called) scientific method.
So....JUST Rand Paul and Eric Holder? Are your arms tired from carrying all this water?
Also, it is laughable that Eric Holder is going to make the country more just, the guy who couldn't beg for executive privilege enough to get out of Fast and Furious questioning.
They never "get tough" on their own crime.
" It's part of a wide-ranging push to reduce America's prison population and address the militarization of police and other issues."
Um, explain to me the part where mandatory sentence reduction and judicial discretion will have any reducing effect on police militarization.....cause I'm not seeing it. That's a one way street that this initiative has not way to change.
The key problem with the left on criminal justice reform isn't so much the policies they advocate (although there's a lot of class-A deep on gun control), but rather the way they frame the problem. Instead of criticizing police abuse or mandatory minima as abrogations of universal moral principles, leftists only focus on them to the extent they offer proof of "systemic racism" (whatever the fuck that means). That whites do not face police abuse, leftists (falsely) claim, proves the existence of "white privilege."
From here, the danger of such racialist narratives becomes apparent. If having your rights not systemically fucked by cops constitutes a privilege, and if the state exists to eliminate privilege, the logical policy outcome is to redirect police violence against formerly privileged groups.
If you don't think the SJWs' deranged sense of reciprocation would ever go this far, I have two words: affirmative action. These people literally justify academic discrimination against whites as a way to compensate for past discrimination against blacks. And, of course, they have proven quite eager to use state violence to accomplish their ends.
The WaPo has taken a decidedly libertarianish turn in its editorship of late, but the readership is still your typical DC metro leftist prog, when it isn't your hardened race warrior. In the comments section on a piece about police brutality, more than a few local commenters opined that the real issue wasn't police brutality, it was that white police were shooting black men, and that the optimum outcome was for black police to start shooting white people.
Yep. Can't make that shit up. Anybody who says the South is the most racist place in the US has either never lived in the DC metro or hasn't been to the South.
As a lifelong resident of Mordor on the Potomac, I can definitely attest to that. By far the worst were the Millionaire Mercedes Marylanders with whom I went to prep school. The amount of self hatred needed to assuage their potpourri of guilt-ridden neuroses was absolutely staggering.
Even during the dark days of the Rolling Stone debacle, my liberal classmates at UVA didn't even come close.
To the degree that that's true (I don't really see it), maybe it's due to its purchase by Bezos?
Nora . I can see what your saying... Valerie `s rep0rt is good, on saturday I got a great Ford Mustang since I been bringin in $5602 thiss month and-even more than, ten grand this past month . it's actualy the easiest job Ive ever done . I started this four months/ago and right away started to bring home more than $73.. per-hour .
you can try this out ....... http://www.MoneyKin.Com
I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing,
------------- http://www.work-cash.com
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.netjob80.com