Anal Probes Run Amok: Drug-Sniffing Dogs Must Be Stopped.
The case of Timothy Young made national headlines in 2012 when New Mexico police anally probed him in search of drugs (no contraband was found). His ordeal was the result of a false positive alert by a drug-sniffing police dog. Incredibly, the same dog was involved in a case involving another New Mexico resident that resulted in forced rectal exams that uncovered no drugs. That case ended with authorities paying a $1.6 million settlement (Young's case is still pending).
Although presented as impartial and infallible, it turns out that such dogs are not only often poorly trained, they are frequently wrong.
Cops, explains Andy Falco, a former K-9 handler and officer for the Anaheim Police Department in California, "will often motivate their dog or cue their dog to alert when there's absolutely nothing there." A 2011 analysis by the Chicago Tribune of police departments in the greater Chicago area found that vehicle searches initiated after dogs alerted failed to turn up drugs or drug paraphernalia 56 percent of the time. Other studies find false positives as high as 74 percent and 80 percent.
Yet in 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that as long as police say the dog is trained or accurate, "a court can presume that the dog's alert provides probable cause to search" people, vehicles, and property.
"If [police] have a dog that will alert on cue," says Reason Senior Editor Jacob Sullum, who has written extensively on the issue, "that's a very useful tool to have to search people you have other grounds to think are suspicious." Sullum stresses that there are no uniform or reliable certification standards for training drug-sniffing dogs.
While convinced of dogs' potential usefulness, Falco agrees that police dogs are generally poorly trained and handled.
Indeed, in the wake of such appalling cases such as Young's in New Mexico, Falco worries that drug-sniffing dogs will be completely discredited. "I've seen cases where people have trained their own dogs in their backyards and then taken it to work as a drug dog. I've seen that happen," he says. "We're going to lose them because we're not using them the way we're supposed to."
About 4 minutes. Produced by Will Neff. Additional camera by Paul Detrick.
Scroll below for downloadable versions. Subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel to receive automatic notifications when new videos go live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yeah, dogs are awesome.
You'd think they might retire fido after he cost thme $1.6 million.
Who is thme? The cops didn't pay a dime or miss a paycheck.
The dog didn't cost them any money.
It's the human handler that is the one who is costing them money; he's the one who is very eager about ordering rectal exams.
He didn't cost them anything, he cost the taxpayers of NM $1.6 million.
What a complainer! I walk around with barely traceable amounts of drug residue in my as just so I can get forcibly probed.
ass
So the dog's an ass-play voyeur. No big.
my buddy's aunt makes $66 /hr on the computer . She has been laid off for ten months but last month her pay was $21677 just working on the computer for a few hours. see this site ....
???????? http://www.netjob70.com
I'm sorry but none of this crap ever "cost the authorities" anything at all. It typically does, however, cost the taxpayers a lot.
I'm always amazed that the authorities go to the extreme of anal probing a drug suspect in the first place. How much could they find if anything was even there? At best you could make a change of personal use possession which is probably going to be a misdemeanor in many cases. It's not like they are taking pounds of heroin off the street. This seems to be more a matter of imposing brute force on someone for the sake of humiliation and control. Sick.
Possession of anything other than marijuana is a felony in most states, regardless of amount.
In Michigan, for example (where I'm familiar with the law) one ecstasy tablet is a 10-year felony.
So if they find something, they can usually get the person to plea it down to use (a 1-year misdemeanor) and thereby get some money from fines, and keep a probation officer and drug counselor employed.
Or they can have the taxpayer shell out $1.6M in settlements. Whatever.
In Michigan, for example (where I'm familiar with the law) one ecstasy tablet is a 10-year felony.
Wow, just wow.
Yeah. The same maximum penalty as Assault with Intent to Commit Great Bodily Harm Less than Murder. Nice, eh?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....n-use.html
Any bets on whether procedures were followed? Funny that the witnesses and their video are different than what the cops say happened.
...and it's possible that if "vehicle searches initiated after dogs alerted failed to turn up drugs or drug paraphernalia 56 percent of the time", the 44% "success" rate is no greater than the random chance of finding drugs in the type of vehicles whom the police profile, so the dogs are actually statistically useless and, as the article suggests, little more than a ploy to provide bogus probable cause.
Maybe if the dog fails to give a hit, they can justify it as "The dog is usually wrong, so we figured there were drugs there."
HELP-HELP-HELP, won't someone please give me some good advice?!!? I have a most EXCELLENT tax-money-saving idea that I'd like to put in to the Departments of Our Heroic Protectors in Government Almighty all across the land, and I just don't know WHERE to submit my brilliant money-saving idea; PLEASE help. Idea summary: REAL drug-sniffing dogs are expensive to train, feed, house, and transport. EFFIGY dogs (think sock-puppet-doggie on officer's hand) would be FAR less expensive! Officer waves sock-puppet-effigy-dog slowly over car, says wuff-wuff-wuff quietly and softly, then reaches trunk of car, goes WOOF-WOOF-WOOF loudly and urgently, now the car can be searched! Problem solved, cost-effectively! Woo-Hoo!!! ? Now? HOW do we spread this most excellent idea? Please advise? This excellent idea brought to you by the Church of Scienfoology, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/ ?
I remember the good old days, when the only involuntary anal probing was at the hands of little green men in flying saucers.
The answer to all of this is very simple: End the war on drugs and all illegal substances. All drugs should be over the counter. I suppose the Congress could pass a law banning drug sniffing dogs. I'd be for that. What type of mental, paradigm shift would that take?
"I violated this man's 4t Amendment right to be free from warrantless searches, and anally raped him, because my dog gave me permission to do so."
Just goes to show how frustratingly bloody STUPID the Gestapo really are. . .