3 Ways to Make Obamacare Less Awful Right NOW!
Obamacare is a truly epic mistake, but it's also one that's not going away anytime soon.
With that in mind, here are three ways to immediately make the president's signature legislative achievement better, cheaper, and more cost-effective.
1. Let anyone buy "catastrophic plan."
As it stands, only people under 30 years of age and a few other folks can buy cheap "catastrophic plans" that cover few regular procedures but protect you against very costly medical emergencies. Catastrophic plans are much cheaper than the cheapest comprehensive bronze plans at Healthcare.gov.
One of the selling points of Obamacare was that it would let people choose plans that fit their needs. If a catastrophic plan is what you want, why not be allowed to buy one despite your age?
2. Force insurers to compete across state lines.
Health insurance companies, in cahoots with state insurance commissions, have carved up their territories like old-school mob families.
A true national market that would force insurers to compete across state lines for customers on the basis of price and service. A national market would expand consumer options and eventually lead to new ways of doing business. It works in auto and home insurance and would work with health insurance, too.
3. Grow the supply of medical care already.
Obamacare increases the demand for medical care but does virtually nothing to grow its supply.
That's a recipe for shortages and long wait times.
The quickest way to grow the supply of health care is to ditch all sorts of barriers ranging from super-slow FDA approval processes for new drugs and devices to protectionist professional licensing to tightly restricted medical school admissions. Almost three dozen states give existing hospitals an indirect say in whether new, competing hospitals can be built!
Scrapping all of these rules and more would make health care easier and cheaper to get.
Obamacare is not just a dumb law but a deeply offensive one. In a perfect world, it would be repealed and we'd actually move toward a true free market in health care (even before Obamacare, local, state, and federal governments were spending nearly 50 cents of each buck spent on health care).
But in the world we actually live in, Obamacare isn't going away any time soon. The least we can do in the meantime is make it less horrible.
About 2.30 minutes. Written by Nick Gillespie and produced by Joshua Swain.
Scroll below for downloadable versions. Subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel to receive automatic notifications when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Three ways to make Obamacare less awful short of abolishing it? Ok, I'll play.
1. Shoot the head of HHS in the head
2. Shoot the replacement head of HHS in the head.
3. Threaten to shoot any following replacement in the head.
Unfortunately the organism Bureaucratis Americanis has become highly evolved over the last century and is quite capable of surviving and feeding without a head. There is no known way to actually permanently kill one of these creatures, as they are also highly adaptable in seeking out new areas to sate their never-ending hunger, as well as in finding new hosts that can be lured into providing for them. The best result one can hope for is to contain it and keep it as starved as possible, but that's only a temporary strategy until a real solution can be found.
I've been experimenting, but the only methods that appear that they might be successful require far more pitchforks and torches than I can carry. It's a work in progress.
So they're like cockroaches? Well,then I feel this way about them:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=givqd63RgcM
So much for nuking the site from orbit, then...
See my post below about NBC warfare.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_o3yGJcbaY
Ha. I made the same argument about Khamenei in a class that received a presentation on late 19th/early 20th century anarchism poorly (mostly because the professor primed them against it).
The professor was annoyed that he'd managed to stir up some solid disgust and I'd quieted it down to "Well, you can't really argue with that. They'd be much better off if they started assassinating their leaders."
His only good retort was that during the time period the anarchists did a great job of softening up the old order, then the communists would swoop in arrest the wealthy and anarchists alike and shit on the rest of society for a few generations.
I hate to say it, but sometimes that's the only recourse oppressed people have. And while my post above is obviously hyperbole, the situation you outlined is a perfect example where assassinations are in order.
See: Christmas Day in Romania, 1989.
The species of anarchist in question only rhetorically opposed statism. For them, a state by any other name would smell as sweet.
These species of anarchists also were not keen on private property, free markets or any of the private institutions required to actually govern society without a Westphalian nation-state. With the exception of anarcho-capitalists and related schools like agorism, their preferred system of justice and economics necessarily requires a substantial amount of centralized state power.
CUT OFF THE HEAD
AND TWO TAKE ITS PLACE
I agree. But don't stop there. The whole administration should be executed for treason. And then this country needs a massive Red Scare to clean out the subversive Marxist progtards.
With that trash dealt with, we can get on with the task of cutting government back to a reasonable level and reduce intrusion into the lives of loyal Americans.
1. Repeal it
2. Repeal it
3. Repeal it
Yeah, it was implied to me LAST time this article ran, that my suggestion that Nick has this all wrong, and that repeal is the only choice, that incrementalism was better than nothing.
To which I replied, "That is unacceptable in this case."
So - I'm with you, Sevo. Hang the rest.
Sometimes man you jsut have to roll with it.
http://www.AnonToolz.tk
No, Anon-bot, just no.
Fuck this evil law.
No. The democrats wanted this shit, let them have it as is. People need to stop cleaning up after the progressives.
Yep. Tax collectors for the welfare state.
Nuke all 7,000 pages from orbit... Even then I wouldn't be sure.
That's why you have to nuke it three ways!
Finally,may use for our biological and chemical weapons.
NBC attack FTW!
Is this, truly, why we have three branches of government?
"...we have three branches of government"
I agree.
-sloopy 1990
Citation required
-sloopy 2014
...But do we need MIRVs, then, or a Tsar Bomba?
We must safeguard our precious bodily fluids.
Let me put it this way, Nick.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_akwHYMdbsM
1) Impeach Obama for ostentatious stupidity and fraud.
2) Arrest any and all administrative appointees pending trials for malfeasance.
3) Require all government employees, specifically including Congress, to obtain all their healthcare through whatever is allowed to remain of Obamacare ?.. and sit back and watch it get repealed, in each and every detail, in record time.
Wait a second....
.... is this a Re-Run?!
I have an idea.
1. repeal it.
2. take it outside the capitol building
3. thermite
Obamacare wasn't a "mistake" for me...and hundreds of thousands of other people who have insurance now who coudln't get it before. The system is better now. So it costs more for some people and less for others, that is fine.
It fixed only about 5% of what is a very evil and corrupt system but that's better than nothing. You may personally prefer the way things were before, but that doesn't mean they were inherently "better" or even for most people.
So as long as it benefits you personally it should be left as is, huh Steven ?
Regardless if it has negative effect on the country as a whole, huh Steven ?
Personally I'm fine with it as it is if they would repeal all the mandates, both individual and corporate.
I mean, if it;s good policy it will swim on it;s own right ?
Let it stand on it's own, cost neutral, and let those who chose to buy, or sell, something else have that liberty to do so.
Got any problems with that Steven ? If it costs more without mandates would you be willing to pay your fair share ?
See, it's not fair to force others to pay for you. That's not their fair share, it's your unfair share.
"Obamacare wasn't a "mistake" for me...and hundreds of thousands of other people who have insurance now who coudln't get it before. "
in other words:
"Gibsmedat!!"
You mean without making pig someone else foot the bill with a gun to their head.
What a Marxist load of shit. It's compulsory. Obama should be executed for treason for even ATTEMPTING to pass this shit. It's a major step to a Marxist state, and therefore treasonous.
My annual costs are up 133%. My plan was cancelled as 'non ACA compliant'. I have been with the same HMO for 15 years. My wait time for an appointment with my same doctor, in the same network is up 50% in the last 6 months.
Replacing what you consider evil with what I consider evil and forcing me to pay for it and then telling me "The system is better now." Is some prime, Grade A arrogance.
Sometimes man you jsut have to rol lwith it.
http://www.AnonToolz.tk
Repeal the personal mandate. Anything less is totally unacceptable.
The initial premise is flawed. The point of ACA isn't to ensure that every American has access to high-quality, affordable health care. If the top men who run our country really wanted that, they could probably make it happen.
The point of ACA is to destroy the health sector of the American economy so the government can institute single payer social medicine. And for this job, there is very little about the ACA that can be improved. It is essentially perfect.
Taco, I think that instead of ACA, a single-payer would be a lot more efficient.
That said, I am still against ANY govt. meddling in healthcare. Where I live, free-enterprise private doctors charge as little as $2/visit. My cardiologist charges about $40 for full enceph-and tests. Colonoscopy cost me $90. All lab-tests and most medicines need NO prescription.
I pay $29/month for govt. health insurance which has NO deductible (I bought it only for serious or long-term problems).
Competition, as always, works the best.
I live in Mexico.
Why is it "fine" for other people to pay more? Who are you to decide that?
1. Ask nicely.
2. Write him a harshly worded email.
3. Post a hardly noticeable satire post poking fun at Nick in the commentariat.
2. Force insurers to compete across state lines. -- ??!!
I can't believe you said that!