Philly Artist Fights City Hall Over Eminent Domain Abuse
Philadelphia's James Dupree is an accomplished artist whose work has appeared in museum all over the world, including his hometown's Philadelphia Museum of Art and African American Museum.
In 2005, Dupree bought a dilapidated warehouse in the City of Brotherly Love's Mantua neighborhood and worked to turn it into a studio that hosts his personal workshop, art classes, and even visitors through Airbnb.
That's all being threatened by the Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority (PRA), a local government agency that is supposed to revitalize distressed neighborhoods.
PRA made plans with Aquinas Realty Partners to convert the block that Dupree's studio is on into a multi-use area with retail shops and a high-end grocery store. PRA designated the studio as blighted and moved to take it via eminent domain, the government's right to seize property for public use. It planned to give the property to the private developer Aquinas. Part of the eminent domain process is that dispossessed property owners must be offered fair and just compensation. PRA offered Dupree $640,000 for his property even though the estimated market value is $2.2 million.
Taking private property and then giving it to a developer constitutes abuse of eminent domain, says Institute for Justice senior attorney Scott Bullock. "A grocery store is like any other private business," he explains. "It is about as far away from a public use as one could imagine." Historically, eminent domain was used to build things such as roads, public schools, and hospitals. Increasingly, though, it's being used by governments to give favored developers sweetheart deals.
Bullock was the lead counsel in the 2005 Supreme Court case Kelo v. New London, which involved a municipal government in Connecticut seizing property and giving it to a private developer to build a hotel complex. The high court ruled that it was constitutional as long as the government said they were trying to increase tax revenues. The Kelo decision was highly controversial and led many states and municipalities to pass tighter restrictions on the use of eminent domain.
Ironically, the inefficiency of municipal bureaucracy may give Dupree his best chance of winning his case. When PRA classified Dupree's property as blighted, it ended up condemning only two of the three addresses his property sits on.
Dupree has begun an online petition and has taken PRA to court. A decision is expected later this year.
About 5 minutes.
Produced by Joshua Swain. Narrated by Nick Gillespie.
Scroll down for downloadable versions of this video and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel to receive automatic updates when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Glad Virginians came out of their stupid-hole for two seconds and voted for a Constitutional Amendment prohibiting private development via eminent domain. The Democrats opposed it, for course. Said the law was "fine" as-is.
If I didn't know for a fact that Team Blue was on the side of working and middle-class property owners (against whom eminent domain is almost always invoked), I would almost be tempted to think that all they wanted was higher tax revenues and more government power.
Of course the biggest eminent domain project going is currently being championed by the GOP (Keystone Pipeline).
Are you competing for the crown of 'New Shreek'?
I didn't think you saw him as a teller of truths...The Keystone project is riddled with eminent domain and the GOP seem to have no problem with that.
Of course the biggest eminent domain project going is currently being championed by the GOP
I see him for what he is, that is if he was real and not a sock puppet.
So why are you trying to make this a partisan issue when it's not? Team Purple is equally guilty.
Er, why didn't you jump in with that for the two posts preceding mine?
KK: We fixed that in Virginia, even though those stupid Democrats fought against it.
HA: If I didn't know better, I'd think Team Blue were up to supporting eminent domain to get tax revenues and cronys.
Me: Well, the GOP is supporting a huge eminent domain project currently.
You: Hey! What are you doing bringing partisanship into this!
What does Obama think?
I'm not defending Obama, just pointing out the GOP is terrible on the issue. I assume Obama is equally bad if not worse, as he is in most things.
ust pointing out the GOP is terrible on the issue
How good is Team Blue on the issue? I don't think it's a team thing, it's a government thing.
" the GOP is supporting a huge eminent domain project currently"
technically, the issue of ED re: the pipeline is not so much a "GOP writ large", national issue, where the party is aggressively supporting use of eminent domain...
...so much as it is with a few selected republican governors (the most notable being in SD, Nebraska, Iowa, Texas, last i checked) and their threat to utilize it if necessary.
(though obviously the party as a whole supports the project 'approval' which is separate from the details of how the project is actually implemented on a state-by-state basis)
the point here would be =
Bo, do you have some kind of specific gripe about *actual cases* of ED committed to further the KXL pipeline? or are you just comparing the 'hypothetical' use of it...
...to the much more-common cases of eminent domain abuse by urban democrats, which are so frequent as to be cliche?
Most of the reports about ED related to Keystone i've seen are merely legal battles over whether any state *will* use it further to scare the shit out of a small # of intransigent people.
Actual cases where its been used so far seem comparatively rare (the # in Nebraska, where the state granted the power to seize land, was 2% of the overall acreage)
"to the much more-common cases of eminent domain abuse by urban democrats, which are so frequent as to be cliche?"
Citation? Given the longstanding use of eminent domain for pipelines, railroads, power companies, cable companies, etc., I'd be surprised if it's used more in the cities than in rural areas (where those kind of projects tend to be).
Google: Urban Blight
and you've ignored the actual point made = the "GOP" writ large has no actual posture re: eminent domain so much as it has played 'some role' in a project that is widely supported by 80%+ of the US public
That it has been employed in some states in varying degrees does not make it as a whole "the largest eminent domain case ever", or "huge", or however you've spun it.
"Google: Urban Blight"
That google search came up with a band's website. You don't have any actual data to support your claim? Again, I'd find it very doubtful since eminent domain is used for virtually every pipeline, cable laying, etc. that goes on, and most of that goes on in rural areas.
And talking about ignoring the point, who cares if 80% of the public support the same eminent domain riddled project as the GOP is currently championing?
TruCanada itself has said that they think in the best case that 5-6% of the landowners in NE they will cross they will have to use eminent domain against.
"Bo Cara Esq.|1.4.15 @ 9:53PM|#
"Google: Urban Blight"
That google search came up with a band's website. You don't have any actual data to support your claim? "
Bo, you claim to care about the issue = make the slightest fucking effort
If you want to conflate otherwise harmless utility cable-laying with the more-common urban-blight declarations that have predominated since the 70s, go ahead, but it makes you look like even more of an asshole, if that were possible
because using state power to 'dig a path' across open land is not exactly the same as seizing whole city blocks. Beyond that i'm not in the mood to play stupid-dispute games with you.
Just say you don't have comparative data and be done with it Gilmore. Lots of people are poorly informed on an issue yet still have opinions.
I'm sure you read the entire history of how slum clearance/urban renewal has been used throughout the 20th century before returning to your smug confidence that rural land grabs by utilities etc. are far more significant a 'problem'. Makes total sense. Empty land. Really the same as say, Robert Moses declaring whole neighborhoods in the bronx no longer fit for human habitation, or the billions of $ in property routinely seized over the years for public/private 'development corporations'.
Your ignorance is your convenience.
I thought in Nebraska there's still legal wrangling over the issue?
In Texas it seems to be 12% of the properties crossed involved actual ED filings.
http://keystone.steamingmules......omain-map/
It was Hugh and KK that seemed to be painting it as a Team Blue issue, I only wanted to point out it's more Purple (to use your phrase), not to refute the Dems are terrible.
You'll note that I didn't actually say anything about Team Red in my post. A criticism of one does not imply an endorsement of the other.
Of course, it seems to be Hyperion, not I, who comes to such a conclusion from such a premise.
Besmirching Team Red is not allowed here. You merely followed the rules.
What does/did that Virginian law really look like? Did it have an 'compelling government interest' exception?
Property rights? We don't need no stinkin' property rights!
If you have ever been to Philadelphia it can be pretty difficult to separate the blighted from the unblighted. Still, if you're going to abuse bureaucratic power to favor your friends you should at least make sure you've dotted your i's and crossed your t's.
Finding blight in any city is easy:
There's a public school, there's a police station, there's a multistory condominium block in a TIF district, there's an alderman's house...
*golf clap*
So you use the same definition as the bureaucrats? Whatever strikes your fancy?
Don't forget the housing projects!
my friend's mom makes $62 hourly on the laptop . She has been laid off for nine months but last month her paycheck was $18955 just working on the laptop for a few hours. learn the facts here now...........
http://www.Works23.us
a high-end grocery store
Another food desert in the making.
Funny, I work in City Hall, and heard that that was one of the reasons why the government decided to buy off this block. Never mind the fact that a quick Google map search reveals more restaurants and food stores than I can count.
Yes. But they need to come up with something to justify another (in a long line) corrupt money grab.
Whenever I run into somebody blathering about food deserts the first thing that comes to my mind is wondering whether they're useful idiots or actively intellectually dishonest.
I am from Philly. I love that city. But politically and economically, it represents a libertarian's worst nightmare. On the other hand, it is heaven on earth for big government progressives and crony capitalists. It's ironic that it is home to the Liberty Bell.
Of course, there's a giant crack in it. /symbolismFTW
The most ironic part of this whole thing is that the original property in Kelo v. New London is still sitting, undeveloped, after all this time. The deal to do the construction on that property fell through, and the property is sitting vacant.
The Kelo decision needs to be reversed. It's unconstitutional, wrong-headed, and ultimately wasteful.
Cite: http://www.foxnews.com/politic.....main-case/
It is horrifying. The "reasoning" (drink) of the supreme court allows "increased tax revenues" to be sufficient grounds for the government to forcefully take the property.
I am very surprised that there isn't a wave of eminent domain seizures going on following that decision. It is a crony's wet dream.
Well, that is The Nature of The State...
Not remedying this situation is the greatest failing of our constitution.
OT: Stuart Scott dies, social signalers hardest hit.
He is survived by his two daughters, both his parents, both his sisters and his only brother, and his wife Kimberly for whom they have been married since 1993.[1] President Obama said:
I will miss Stuart Scott. Twenty years ago, Stu helped usher in a new way to talk about our favorite teams and the day's best plays. For much of those twenty years, public service and campaigns have kept me from my family ?- but wherever I went, I could flip on the TV and Stu and his colleagues on SportsCenter were there. Over the years, he entertained us, and in the end, he inspired us ? with courage and love. Michelle and I offer our thoughts and prayers to his family, friends, and colleagues.
No *he* is cooler than the other side of the pillow.
"When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion ? when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing ? when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors ? when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you ? when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice ? you may know that your society is doomed. "
How long before Philly is in the same condition as Detroit? Just like Detroit, when it gets there the Dems will proclaim it the fault of Republican policies.
Yes, Ayn hit it out of the park on several occasions.
Well, let's toss out some OT guaranteed to give Luddites the willies! How about a way to make your own life form?
"Controversial DNA startup wants to let customers create creatures"
[...]
"In Austen Heinz's vision of the future, customers tinker with the genetic codes of plants and animals and even design new creatures on a computer. Then his startup, Cambrian Genomics, prints that DNA quickly, accurately and cheaply.
"Anyone in the world that has a few dollars can make a creature, and that changes the game," Heinz said. "And that creates a whole new world.""
http://www.sfgate.com/business.....992426.php
If GMOs make you nervous, this'll give you nightmares!
Ha.
Terraforming Mars may not be as difficult as we thought.
It made an early investment in Glowing Plant, which raised more than $480,000 on Kickstarter to create genetically modified glow-in-the-dark plants. In response, the crowdfunding platform banned projects involving genetically engineered organisms.
Wimps.
"Wimps."
If only!
Would they have denied funding to Borlaug?
Why do they prefer starvation?
Yes, the future will be interesting....
Sevo I like this so much. =)
Uh oh, it's looking more and more like Loser Tony Romo is making his typical playoff appearance...
Can't really blame Romo for the O line's abysmal performance.
20-14. You could well be wrong again.
Still smarting from the sorry Redskins of all teams knocking your beloved Eagles out?
Barry Wilcox to DeMarcus Lawrence: "FALL DOWN, BITCH!"
...and then DeMarcus Lawrence strips Matthew Stafford, recovers and falls on it one minute later.
Suh looks like he's ready to get a hot shower and a cold drink and then stomp a sackful of kitties to death.
Why was he playing? Wasn't he suspended for stepping on Rodgers?
They rescinded the suspension and fined him 70K.
What a joke. There was an economist on ESPN one day who studied the issue and found that fines were significantly inferior to suspensions in combating that kind of behavior.
Swami Mike M whiffs again. You are wrong as often as John is.
Swami Mike M whiffs again. You are wrong as often as John is.
Go do some work on your crappy book, scumbag. It should have been finished by now, and your publishers are getting annoyed.
Part of the eminent domain process is that dispossessed property owners must be offered fair and just compensation. PRA offered Dupree $640,000 for his property even though the estimated market value is $2.2 million.
What would the market value be if the property weren't "blighted"?
How much would the (presumably) Whole Foods be worth?
Three Molotov Cocktails.
Dupree is lucky Philly didn't use a C-4 bomb on him like they did with MOVE. 61 buildings burnt down isn't too many broken eggs for an omelet, is it?
For the youngsters.
Hey, it looks like the Lions might not Romo, and let Romo Romo instead. A little over a quarter to go - there's still time for them to Romo.
We'll see.
I'll be damned, he actually pulled it off. Unbelievable!
With a lot of help from the officials.
That pass interference un-call was certainly significant.
I agree. At the same time, if you need that call to win, you probably don't deserve to win.
This ^
When you're griping about a call, it means you didn't have what it takes to win.
One group of bureaucrats has saved themselves a trip to the internet rage wall.
Makes me think of those school lunch programs that give kids what the bureaucrats think they should eat. Mostly all they do is fill garbage cans with fresh food.
I'm thinking that this fresh food purveyor would have to operate on some sort of a subsidy, so it could afford to throw the bureaucrat approved merchandise in the dumpster.
The only reason any business don't operate somewhere is because there aren't enough people buying the stuff to make it worth the trouble.
As many people have said, politics is the art of finding trouble where it doesn't exist, and then applying the wrong remedy. With other peoples' money of course.
"the inability to acquire Mr. Dupree's property puts the prospect of bringing fresh food to this community at serious risk,"
Yep, there is NO OTHER LOCATION where 'fresh food' could be sold than Dupree's property. None!
I kinda giggled at the mental image of this very strange neighborhood where the inhabitants existed solely off canned food, dried beans and beef jerky, because they had no way to obtain "fresh" food.
BuSab Agent|1.4.15 @ 11:41PM|#
"I kinda giggled at the mental image of this very strange neighborhood where the inhabitants existed solely off canned food, dried beans and beef jerky, because they had no way to obtain "fresh" food."
I see a Monty Python or South Park episode based on that.
Imagine them smashing the cans open with rocks, while folks 3 blocks down the street enjoy a wonderful Cesare salad!
All because Dupree won't turn over the property...
OT: What leading feminists want to accomplish this year
"Central" and "control"... what a telling choice of words.
Is it me or is that sample really loaded with 'diversity' choices?
And what's a 'caregiving' job?
what's a 'caregiving' job?
It's a job that enables people to take care of others. You know -- like "civil engineer" or "drone manufacturer".
also "prison guard" and "psychiatric orderly"
By not handing over his property, PRA claims Dupree is putting lives in danger.
Please contribute to the SBF (Starving Bureaucrat Fund). Libertarians are dead set on bureaucrat genocide, please help us save the bureaucrats before it's too late.
By not handing over his property, PRA claims Dupree is putting lives in danger.
Bullshit. By not handing over his property, Dupree is preventing people from choking on that high-end food.
"Historically, eminent domain was used to build things such as roads, public schools, and hospitals."
Well, sort of. For a long time (well over a century) the courts have allowed governments to grant eminent domain powers to and for private companies that will be engaged in the public interest, such as railroad companies, oil and gas companies making pipelines, power companies under the argument that these industries are regulated for and therefore operate for the 'public interest.'
For me, once you start doing that and allowing for condemnation for blight I don't see how to draw a coherent line at economic development projects which are directed by government. There should be no taking power at all (maybe allowed only for imminent emergencies).
We already have about all the highways that we need.
So, in the case of a pipeline or something like that, if it needs to go directly through a house, the government (taxpayers) should have to put up a vote and if the public wants it, they should have to compensate the land owners, not for a fair market value, but for a lot more, like as if a development company wants to buy a farm to build a new apartment complex.
Eminent domain should be allowed, but only for a very important public good, never for cronyism, and the public should accept that that anyone displaced by the project will be overly compensated for their loss.
Rights should not be up for a vote.
So, you are saying that imminent domain should never be allowed? I'm open to that, but I'm not sure how that works. For sure, like I said, we don't really need any new highways.
I don't see how it can be reconciled with individual rights. If people can vote that's it's 'necessary' to violate their property rights then why can't they do the same for any other right?
Like the right to vote?
Er, yes, majority votes can't justify denying others the right to vote imo.
What's magic about the right to vote? It seems majority votes deny others other rights.
"What's magic about the right to vote?"
Read the Declaration of Independence.
OK, Bo. We're just not on the same wavelength tonight.
So how can we build any roads? As I said, there's already enough of those now, but should we have stayed a nation of horse and carriage? And what if you rode across someone else property trying to get from NYC to Cali? A toll every other minute or a beat down? Are you being serious? Obviously no, if you cannot explain how a modern society cannot have any highways.
The government or private party who wants the land more can pay people for the land. That happens all the time. It's the idea behind Coase's Theorem, for example.
We got a new grocery store around here a little over a year ago. No eminent domain was used. The land negotiations took more time than it did to build the place, but they got it done without government force. Rumor has it that the resistance came from property owners tied to the family that owns the ho-hum grocery and several other ho-hum local businesses. Latest thing in the news is that that family is suing the corporate chain over their liquor license. The state only allows so many per given area/population, and the corporation got the last one. Since then the family built another convenience store/take-out place, and they want the license.
This family only survives in business because they use the government to hamper the competition. All of their stores are ho-hum and their staff treats the customers like they own them. I won't shop at any of their stores now.
I choose the evil corporations.
We have a small, 'employee-owned' (don't know the details) grocery a couple of blocks away. Pretty good products but it used to be 'health food', open 10-5 and no meats.
Whole Foods moved in a mile away a couple of years ago, now the small place has a pretty good selection of fresh meats, open 7-10, better prices...
Amazing what competition does for customers.
ED is never acceptable.
Cialis.
It's easy to distinguish the case for roads, pipelines, etc.: The space needed is long & thin. All of our liberty suffers if we're confined by boxy spaces that we have no right of access to or thru, without long & narrow ones that allow passage.
"linear corridors"
From the PRA release:
And then later...
Residents were already bringing fresh food to their community.
Horseshit. Every inner city neighborhood that I visit is loaded with fruit and vegetable stands, at least in NYC. Supermarkets are rarer but when one opens it is mobbed from day one - no subsidy needed.
This. It's a non-problem, a pretext.
Not just that, but in my experience you can almost always get better prices by shopping at a few small stores than at a single big one for groceries. The big stores are selling convenience and a few from-time-to-time loss leaders.
But they had to drive! OUT OF THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD.
"But they had to drive!"
Carbon BUTTPRINT!
OT
Christian radio host solves mystery of the strong nuclear force. It turns out the answer is "Jesus".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRcPXtqdKjE
In other news, Islamic boy bands exist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z88iwN78eKU
Just replace the word "baby" with "allah" and presto! Islamic pop song.
My reaction to the above:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKm5xQyD2vE
Islam is sooooo gay.
"Allah, I just want to get down on my knees and please you!"
Hey, no flutes and no singing worthy of the name - it's halal!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzxd9d41Hhc
The Prodigy said it with fewer words and fewer learned citations.
Everyone's gonna starve! We need a Philadelphia airlift!
Who could possibly believe such a ridiculous statement? Why, then, do they bother making such a statement? Why couldn't they just say, "We think they're making a mistake" or "You'll regret it"? You know, something sincere & credible. Sometimes I wonder whether someone just does it because it's a job, and they're making fun of their boss.
"In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is...in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to."
? Theodore Dalrymple
As a resident of San Francisco, I have witnessed otherwise intelligent people speak obvious nonsense; obvious to them also, but acceptable to the current company.
When called on the nonsense, the person and the company respond with obvious defensive embarrassment; they (all of them) were caught with their hands in the till, so to speak, and they are not pleased that someone in the immediate surroundings is not in agreement that skimming sort of OK.
When pointing out that the Emperor has no clothes, it's usually a good idea to compliment him on his penis size at the same time.
For you single guys looking for the right gal
That is FUNNY!
It is funny, but I still think that when guys say "crazy" they mean stupid. It's hard to admit when you're attracted to a stupid person, because of what it might imply about you. Whereas crazy sounds sexy and exotic.
Nah. "Crazy" is a combination of moody, emotionally needy, controlling and deceptive. Basically Jackie from that RS story.
I would normally agree with your definition, but I've heard guys refer to merely stupid, clumsy, and erratic women as "crazy" too. We may say they're wrong, but if it becomes common enough they're not wrong anymore.
lap83|1.5.15 @ 12:21AM|#
"It is funny, but I still think that when guys say "crazy" they mean stupid."
I didn't read it that way. I read it as CRAZY-CRAZY!
I for one welcome Gilbert Gottfried's return to media relevance.
Also in light of current events you probably don't want a check from Bill Cosby going to your charity.
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for 74 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail
------------- http://www.paygazette.com
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for 74 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail......
------------http://tinyurl.com/o8fj6ty
What Michelle said I cant believe that anybody able to get paid $4819 in four weeks on the internet .
You could try here ~~~~~~~~ http://www.jobsfish.com
Can't they just raise 2.2 million by auctioning off seized property from drug raids? I feel like they're not even trying.
my buddy's mother makes $72 /hr on the internet . She has been without work for 5 months but last month her payment was $12076 just working on the internet for a few hours. read more............
????? http://www.netjob70.com
...another example of SCUMBAG Democrats stealing peoples property.
TULPA FIGHT!
But, which one is the real tulpa?
SHOOT US BOTH, SPOCK!
Top one is tuipa, bottom one is tulpa. Capital i and lowercase l are identical looking in the font for handles.
Also the rational one is fake.
Yes, it's the only way to save us.